Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,018 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The mucous membrane lining of the uterine cavity that is hormonally responsive during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. The endometrium undergoes cyclic changes that characterize menstruation. After successful fertilization, it serves to sustain the developing embryo.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Endometria.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 39,078 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Endometrium” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 6,898 of them (17.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 16,427 records.
Reviews account for 4,025 records (10.3%) and meta-analyses for 183. Randomized controlled trials number 990 (2.5%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 16,427 |
| 2000-2009 | 7,403 |
| 2010-2019 | 8,350 |
| 2020 onward | 6,898 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 4,025 | 10.3% |
| Meta-analyses | 183 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 990 | 2.5% |
Method: PubMed query "Endometrium"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives | 2025 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 17 | cc by PMID 41226831 · DOI · PMC12609489 |
| Molecular Impact of Metabolic and Endocrine Disturbance on Endometrial Function in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | 2025 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 17 | cc by PMID 41155220 · DOI · PMC12563804 |
| Balancing Decidualization, Autophagy, and Cellular Senescence for Reproductive Success in Endometriosis Biology | 2025 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 11 | cc by PMID 41009686 · DOI · PMC12471044 |
| Integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration: From biomaterials and stem cells to organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies | 2026 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 9 | cc by PMID 41346706 · DOI · PMC12674934 |
Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The human endometrium, previously considered a sterile environment, is now recognized as a low-biomass but biologically active microbial niche critical to reproductive health.
- Closing excerpt
- This review gives a new insight into current knowledge on the uterine microbiome and its impact on implantation success, analyzed through the lenses of microbiology, immunology, and oxidative stress.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (306 words)
The human endometrium, previously considered a sterile environment, is now recognized as a low-biomass but biologically active microbial niche critical to reproductive health. Advances in sequencing technologies, particularly shotgun metagenomics, have provided unprecedented insights into the taxonomic and functional complexity of the endometrial microbiome. While 16S rRNA sequencing has delineated the distinction between Lactobacillus-dominant and non-dominant microbial communities, shotgun metagenomics has revealed additional diversity at the species and strain level, uncovering microbial signatures that remain undetected by amplicon-based approaches. Current evidence supports the association of Lactobacillus dominance with endometrial homeostasis and favorable reproductive outcomes. Dysbiosis, characterized by increased microbial diversity and enrichment of anaerobic taxa such as Gardnerella, Atopobium, Prevotella, and Streptococcus, is linked to chronic endometritis, implantation failure, and adverse IVF results. Beyond compositional differences, the endometrial microbiome interacts with the host through immunological, metabolic, and epigenetic mechanisms. These interactions modulate cytokine signaling, epithelial barrier integrity, and receptivity-associated gene expression, ultimately influencing embryo implantation. However, discrepancies between published studies reflect the lack of standardized protocols for sampling, DNA extraction, and bioinformatic analysis, as well as the inherent challenges of studying low-biomass environments. Factors such as geography, ethnicity, hormonal status, and antibiotic exposure further contribute to interindividual variability. Culturomics approaches complement sequencing by enabling the isolation of viable bacterial strains, offering perspectives for microbiome-based biotherapeutics. Emerging 3D endometrial models provide additional tools to dissect microbiome-host interactions under controlled conditions. Taken together, the growing body of data highlights the potential of endometrial microbiome profiling as a biomarker for reproductive success and as a target for personalized interventions. Future research should focus on integrating multi-omics approaches and functional analyses to establish causal relationships and translate findings into clinical practice. This review gives a new insight into current knowledge on the uterine microbiome and its impact on implantation success, analyzed through the lenses of microbiology, immunology, and oxidative stress.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41226831 · DOI · PMC12609489
Molecular Impact of Metabolic and Endocrine Disturbance on Endometrial Function in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a systemic metabolic and endocrine disorder that significantly disrupts reproductive physiology and endometrial function.
- Closing excerpt
- Overall, our review provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms linking systemic metabolic and endocrine dysfunction with endometrial pathology in PCOS and has broader implications that apply to all women.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a systemic metabolic and endocrine disorder that significantly disrupts reproductive physiology and endometrial function. In this narrative review, we examine the molecular impact of metabolic and hormonal imbalances on the endometrium of women with PCOS. We investigate the specific mechanisms that delineate how hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, chronic low-grade inflammation, and estrogen/progesterone/androgen imbalance contribute to altered epigenetic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, and signaling profiles in a wide array of different cell types within endometrial tissues. The synergistic interplay between upregulated inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1,2,6,8,17,18, and TNF-α), along with key changes in critical molecular pathways associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance (e.g., PI3K/AKT/MAPK, and Wnt/β-catenin), in addition to aberrant sex steroid hormone signaling (e.g., CYP19A1, COX-2, PGE2, HOXA10, 11βHSD2), promotes deleterious changes within the endometrial microenvironment. These anomalies underpin a spectrum of clinical manifestations observed in women with PCOS at each stage of the life course, including abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-age women, impaired decidualization in pregnancy, and altered postmenopausal endometrial physiology. Clinically, these alterations are associated with abnormal uterine bleeding, subfertility, implantation failure, miscarriage, pregnancy complications, and postmenopausal endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. Overall, our review provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms linking systemic metabolic and endocrine dysfunction with endometrial pathology in PCOS and has broader implications that apply to all women.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41155220 · DOI · PMC12563804
Balancing Decidualization, Autophagy, and Cellular Senescence for Reproductive Success in Endometriosis Biology [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Endometriosis is a chronic disease characterized by the ectopic presence of endometrial cells that evade apoptosis and survive and proliferate under harsh environmental conditions.
- Closing excerpt
- Future development of therapeutic strategies targeting these processes is expected to help overcome infertility associated with endometriosis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (220 words)
Endometriosis is a chronic disease characterized by the ectopic presence of endometrial cells that evade apoptosis and survive and proliferate under harsh environmental conditions. It is closely associated with infertility and pregnancy-related complications. This review focuses on the molecular pathophysiology of endometriosis, particularly the disruption of the p53-AMPK-mTOR signaling axis, and highlights the dysregulation of decidualization and cellular senescence, incorporating recent findings in reproductive physiology. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar without temporal restrictions. Endometriotic cells adapt to the hostile peritoneal environment through resistance to apoptosis and alterations in autophagy. In the early stages, autophagy activation may promote cell survival; however, as the disease progresses, autophagic activity tends to decline. Aberrant activation of mTOR signaling is implicated in this process, contributing to the suppression of autophagy, impaired decidualization, and promotion of cellular senescence, ultimately facilitating lesion progression and infertility. Indeed, in the eutopic endometrium of patients with endometriosis, progesterone resistance, elevated inflammatory cytokines, and epigenetic abnormalities are known to reduce endometrial receptivity. Moreover, suppression of autophagy leads to excessive cellular senescence and secretion of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), thereby interfering with proper decidualization. Maintaining an appropriate balance between decidualization and cellular senescence is essential for reproductive function. Future development of therapeutic strategies targeting these processes is expected to help overcome infertility associated with endometriosis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41009686 · DOI · PMC12471044
Integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration: From biomaterials and stem cells to organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Endometrial regeneration remains a significant clinical challenge for women with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), thin endometrium, or uterine factor infertility, conditions that severely impair fertility and reproductive outcomes.
- Closing excerpt
- Collectively, these approaches offer a next-generation therapeutic paradigm for restoring endometrial function and fertility.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (277 words)
Endometrial regeneration remains a significant clinical challenge for women with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), thin endometrium, or uterine factor infertility, conditions that severely impair fertility and reproductive outcomes. Traditional hormonal and surgical interventions often fail to restore the structural and functional integrity of damaged endometrial tissue. This review comprehensively examines integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration, focusing on the synergistic applications of biomaterials, stem cells, organoids, and organ-on-a-chip technologies. Natural polymers such as collagen, gelatin, alginate, hyaluronic acid, and synthetic polymers including PCL, PLA, PGA, and PLGA have been comprehensively evaluated for their ability to mimic extracellular matrix, support cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and modulate immune responses. The incorporation of mesenchymal stem cells, extracellular vesicles, and growth factors into bioengineered scaffolds, such as hydrogels and nanofiber membranes, enhances regenerative efficacy. Furthermore, emerging platforms, such as endometrial organoids, 3D bioprinting, and organ-on-a-chip systems, offer physiologically relevant models for precision regenerative medicine. Innovations such as AI-assisted monitoring, 4D printing, and advanced drug delivery systems represent transformative approaches to overcome current therapeutic limitations. This review highlights the convergence of materials science, stem cell biology, and microengineering as a foundation for next-generation, personalized therapies aimed at restoring endometrial function and fertility. In addition, the review highlights biomaterial-based strategies as the foundation of endometrial regeneration, by detailing how natural polymers (e.g., collagen, gelatin, alginate, hyaluronic acid) and synthetic polymers (e.g., PCL, PLA, PLGA) support tissue repair structurally and by mediating biological functions. The integration of advanced technologies, such as 4D printing, AI-assisted monitoring, and stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle delivery has emerged as a transformative direction for overcoming current clinical challenges. Collectively, these approaches offer a next-generation therapeutic paradigm for restoring endometrial function and fertility.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41346706 · DOI · PMC12674934
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
- Research article The endometrial immune environment of women with endometriosis [6]
- Research article Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
- Research article Physiology of the Endometrium and Regulation of Menstruation [8]
- Research article Dynamic Function and Composition Changes of Immune Cells During Normal and Pathological Pregnancy at the Maternal-Fetal Interface [9]
- Research article Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Genetics (Review of Literature) [10]
References
- Stoyancheva G, Mihaylova N, Gerginova M, Krumova E. Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives. . 2025. PMID 41226831 · DOI · PMC12609489
- Parker J, O'Brien C, Uppal T, Tremellen K. Molecular Impact of Metabolic and Endocrine Disturbance on Endometrial Function in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. . 2025. PMID 41155220 · DOI · PMC12563804
- Shigetomi H, Nishio M, Umetani M, Imanaka S, Hashimoto H, Kobayashi H. Balancing Decidualization, Autophagy, and Cellular Senescence for Reproductive Success in Endometriosis Biology. . 2025. PMID 41009686 · DOI · PMC12471044
- Kim SR, Lee HY. Integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration: From biomaterials and stem cells to organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies. . 2026. PMID 41346706 · DOI · PMC12674934
- Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, Eijkemans MJ, Mol BW, Opmeer BC, et al.. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014. PMID 24664156 · DOI
- Vallvé-Juanico J, Houshdaran S, Giudice LC. The endometrial immune environment of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019. PMID 31424502 · DOI · PMC6737540
- Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, et al.. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019. PMID 30624659 · DOI
- Critchley HOD, Maybin JA, Armstrong GM, Williams ARW. Physiology of the Endometrium and Regulation of Menstruation. Physiol Rev. 2020. PMID 32031903 · DOI
- Yang F, Zheng Q, Jin L. Dynamic Function and Composition Changes of Immune Cells During Normal and Pathological Pregnancy at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. Front Immunol. 2019. PMID 31681264 · DOI · PMC6813251
- Smolarz B, Szyłło K, Romanowicz H. Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Genetics (Review of Literature). Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID 34638893 · DOI · PMC8508982
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.