Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (961 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The major progestational steroid that is secreted primarily by the corpus luteum and the placenta. Progesterone acts on the uterus, the mammary glands and the brain. It is required in embryo implantation; pregnancy maintenance, and the development of mammary tissue for MILK production. Progesterone, converted from pregnenolone, also serves as an intermediate in the biosynthesis of gonadal steroid hormones and adrenal corticosteroids.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Pregnenedione; Progesterone, (17 alpha)-Isomer; Progesterone, (9 beta,10 alpha)-Isomer; Progesterone, (13 alpha,17 alpha)-(+-)-Isomer.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Pregnenediones; Corpus Luteum Hormones; Progesterone Congeners
- Narrower topics
- 20-alpha-Dihydroprogesterone; Algestone; Hydroxyprogesterones; 5-alpha-Dihydroprogesterone; Pregnanediol
- See also
- Receptors, Progesterone
Related concepts
- Corpus Luteum
- Placenta
- Uterus
- Mammary Glands
- Brain
- Embryo Implantation
- Pregnancy
- Pregnenolone
- Gonadal Steroid Hormones
- Corticosteroids
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 76,076 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Progesterone” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 5,947 of them (7.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 46,881 records.
Reviews account for 4,980 records (6.5%) and meta-analyses for 284. Randomized controlled trials number 2,869 (3.8%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 46,881 |
| 2000-2009 | 12,470 |
| 2010-2019 | 10,778 |
| 2020 onward | 5,947 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 4,980 | 6.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 284 | 0.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 2,869 | 3.8% |
Method: PubMed query "Progesterone"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Unraveling the Dynamics of Estrogen and Progesterone Signaling in the Endometrium: An Overview [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The endometrium is crucial for the perpetuation of human species.
- Closing excerpt
- In this narrative review, we delve into the physiology of the endometrium, encompassing the complex signaling pathways of estrogen and progesterone.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (160 words)
The endometrium is crucial for the perpetuation of human species. It is a complex and dynamic tissue lining the inner wall of the uterus, regulated throughout a woman's life based on estrogen and progesterone fluctuations. During each menstrual cycle, this multicellular tissue undergoes cyclical changes, including regeneration, differentiation in order to allow egg implantation and embryo development, or shedding of the functional layer in the absence of pregnancy. The biology of the endometrium relies on paracrine interactions between epithelial and stromal cells involving complex signaling pathways that are modulated by the variations of estrogen and progesterone levels across the menstrual cycle. Understanding the complexity of estrogen and progesterone receptor signaling will help elucidate the mechanisms underlying normal reproductive physiology and provide fundamental knowledge contributing to a better understanding of the consequences of hormonal imbalances on gynecological conditions and tumorigenesis. In this narrative review, we delve into the physiology of the endometrium, encompassing the complex signaling pathways of estrogen and progesterone.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39120268 · DOI · PMC11312103
Long acting progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pill for preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain: the PRE-EMPT pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of long acting progestogens compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain.
- Closing excerpt
- Trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN97865475.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (337 words)
ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of long acting progestogens compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain.DesignThe PRE-EMPT (preventing recurrence of endometriosis) pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.Setting34 UK hospitals.Participants405 women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis.InterventionsParticipants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio using a secure internet facility to a long acting progestogen (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system) or the combined oral contraceptive pill.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was pain measured three years after randomisation using the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes (evaluated at six months, one, two, and three years) included the four core and six modular domains of the EHP-30, and treatment failure (further therapeutic surgery or second line medical treatment).Results405 women were randomised to receive a long acting progestogen (n=205) or combined oral contraceptive pill (n=200). At three years, there was no difference in pain scores between the groups (adjusted mean difference -0.8, 95% confidence interval -5.7 to 4.2, P=0.76), which had improved by around 40% in both groups compared with preoperative values (an average of 24 and 23 points for long acting progestogen and combined oral contraceptive pill groups, respectively). Most of the other domains of the EHP-30 also showed improvement at all time points compared with preoperative scores, without evidence of any differences between groups. Women randomised to a long acting progestogen underwent fewer surgical procedures or second line treatments compared with those randomised to the combined oral contraceptive pill group (73 v 97; hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.00).ConclusionsPostoperative prescription of a long acting progestogen or the combined oral contraceptive pill results in similar levels of improvement in endometriosis related pain at three years, with both groups showing around a 40% improvement compared with preoperative levels. While women can be reassured that both options are effective, the reduced risk of repeat surgery for endometriosis and hysterectomy might make long acting reversible progestogens preferable for some.Trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN97865475.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38749550 · DOI · PMC11094611
Construction organoid model of ovarian endometriosis and the function of estrogen and progesterone in the model [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Endometriosis is a refractory estrogen-dependent gynecological disease in which ovarian endometriosis(OE) is the most common, and the main cell components are endometrial epithelial cells and stromal cells.
- Closing excerpt
- The successful construction of ectopic endometrial organoids provides a new in vitro model for drug intervention and mechanism study of ovarian endometriosis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (172 words)
Endometriosis is a refractory estrogen-dependent gynecological disease in which ovarian endometriosis(OE) is the most common, and the main cell components are endometrial epithelial cells and stromal cells. However, constructing ectopic endometrial epithelial cell models in basic studies is still challenging. In this study, we explored the feasibility and influencing factors of constructing and validating eutopic and ectopic endometrial organoid models of OE as in-vitro models. Eutopic and ectopic endometrial tissues of OE patients were selected to establish organoids. Morphologically, the organoids showed a three-dimensional glandular structure with vacuoles or cystic irregularities, and the histological features of the epithelial organoids in endometriosis were well preserved. Immunofluorescence showed positive expression of epithelial markers and estrogen/progesterone receptors. Genetic identification revealed a 100% match between endometriosis epithelial organoids and endometrial tissue, indicating a common origin. The effects of estrogen and progesterone on the proliferation and secretion of organoids differed with the change in concentration. The successful construction of ectopic endometrial organoids provides a new in vitro model for drug intervention and mechanism study of ovarian endometriosis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39994247 · DOI · PMC11850836
Elevation of corticosterone and 17OH progesterone in extremely preterm infants and clinical implications [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundA greater understanding of gestational age-adjusted steroid profiles in preterm neonates is needed to inform diagnosis, optimal timing, dosage, and duration of postnatal steroid therapy for preterm infants with adrenal insufficiency.
- Closing excerpt
- By utilizing techniques traditionally used to diagnose congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), we provide actionable guidance for interpreting steroid data in preterm infants, offering a practical framework for improved clinical decision-making.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (292 words)
BackgroundA greater understanding of gestational age-adjusted steroid profiles in preterm neonates is needed to inform diagnosis, optimal timing, dosage, and duration of postnatal steroid therapy for preterm infants with adrenal insufficiency. Therefore, we evaluated changes in steroid profiles using newborn screening dried blood spots (DBS) to determine the impact of prematurity on fetal adrenal function.MethodsCortisol and its biosynthetic precursors were quantified in 813 anonymized DBS from newborns between 23 to 42 weeks of gestation, collected within 72 hours of birth and again approximately two weeks later. Steroid quantification was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), with analyses stratified by gestational and postnatal ages.ResultsExtremely preterm infants often had elevated cortisol levels, with a general decline as gestational age increased. Levels of 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP4) and corticosterone were significantly higher in most preterm newborns, with 17OHP4 showing the strongest inverse correlation with gestational age. In contrast, aldosterone levels remained unaffected by gestational age.ConclusionsElevations in 17OHP4 and corticosterone, rather than cortisol alone, reflect prematurity's effect on adrenal sufficiency. Preterm infants with high cortisol and elevated corticosterone and 17OHP4 levels may struggle to meet their physiological cortisol needs through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, increasing the risk of adrenal crises. These findings provide important insights to guide the management of adrenal insufficiency in preterm neonates.ImpactThe increasing survival of preterm infants born at earlier gestational ages presents clinicians with the complex challenge of distinguishing normal from abnormal adrenal function, a determination which may be critical for survival. Our study advances the understanding of adrenal dysfunction in this population by employing analytical methods rooted in the steroid biosynthesis pathway's maturation. By utilizing techniques traditionally used to diagnose congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), we provide actionable guidance for interpreting steroid data in preterm infants, offering a practical framework for improved clinical decision-making.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40775060 · DOI · PMC13021513
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence [5]
- Research article Progesterone and Estrogen Signaling in the Endometrium: What Goes Wrong in Endometriosis? [6]
- Research article Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data [7]
- Research article Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles [8]
- Research article Ovarian hormones and obesity [9]
- Research article Progesterone resistance in endometriosis: origins, consequences and interventions [10]
References
- Dias Da Silva I, Wuidar V, Zielonka M, Pequeux C. Unraveling the Dynamics of Estrogen and Progesterone Signaling in the Endometrium: An Overview. . 2024. PMID 39120268 · DOI · PMC11312103
- Cooper KG, Bhattacharya S, Daniels JP, Horne AW, Clark TJ, Saridogan E, et al.. Long acting progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pill for preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain: the PRE-EMPT pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial. . 2024. PMID 38749550 · DOI · PMC11094611
- Zhang R, Yang Y, Li R, Ma Y, Ma S, Chen X, et al.. Construction organoid model of ovarian endometriosis and the function of estrogen and progesterone in the model. . 2025. PMID 39994247 · DOI · PMC11850836
- Kessel JM, Held PK, Bialk ER, McAdams RM, Bird IM. Elevation of corticosterone and 17OH progesterone in extremely preterm infants and clinical implications. . 2026. PMID 40775060 · DOI · PMC13021513
- Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence. Lancet. 2019. PMID 31474332 · DOI · PMC6891893
- Marquardt RM, Kim TH, Shin JH, Jeong JW. Progesterone and Estrogen Signaling in the Endometrium: What Goes Wrong in Endometriosis?. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID 31387263 · DOI · PMC6695957
- Romero R, Conde-Agudelo A, Da Fonseca E, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, Creasy GW, et al.. Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID 29157866 · DOI · PMC5987201
- Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2013. PMID 23827986 · DOI
- Leeners B, Geary N, Tobler PN, Asarian L. Ovarian hormones and obesity. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. PMID 28333235 · DOI · PMC5850121
- Patel BG, Rudnicki M, Yu J, Shu Y, Taylor RN. Progesterone resistance in endometriosis: origins, consequences and interventions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017. PMID 28423456 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.