Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,002 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A disorder with chronic or recurrent colonic symptoms without a clearcut etiology. This condition is characterized by chronic or recurrent abdominal pain, bloating, mucus in feces, and an erratic disturbance of defecation.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Irritable Bowel Syndromes; Syndrome, Irritable Bowel; Syndromes, Irritable Bowel; Colitis, Mucous; Colitides, Mucous; Mucous Colitides; Mucous Colitis; Colon, Irritable.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Colonic Diseases, Functional
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 11,120 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Irritable Bowel Syndrome” (counts retrieved 2026-11-04). 3,825 of them (34.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 4,894 records.
Reviews account for 2,850 records (25.6%) and meta-analyses for 410. Randomized controlled trials number 988 (8.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 2,422 |
| 2010-2019 | 4,894 |
| 2020 onward | 3,825 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 2,850 | 25.6% |
| Meta-analyses | 410 | 3.7% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 988 | 8.9% |
Method: PubMed query "Irritable Bowel Syndrome"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-11-04.
Reading the evidence in digestive system and liver
Gut and liver research ranges from laboratory studies of the microbiome to large trials of drugs and surgery. Symptoms such as pain, reflux or bowel change are reported by patients and overlap between conditions, and diet and microbiome studies are mostly observational. Check whether the study measured symptoms, tissue findings or long-term outcomes, how the diagnosis was made and how long people were followed. Nothing here replaces advice from a qualified clinician.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Effect of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 on irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Irritable bowel syndrome is a chronic disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract, negatively impacting patients' quality of life.
- Closing excerpt
- These results indicate that RH 3201 was effective in ameliorating IBS-C, potentially by enriching beneficial microbes and associated metabolites in the gut environment.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (188 words)
Irritable bowel syndrome is a chronic disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract, negatively impacting patients' quality of life. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effects of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 (RH 3201) on irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, a total of 30 subjects with IBS-C were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 8 weeks of probiotics administration or placebo. Concerning bowel activities, both irritant bowel movements and discomfort caused by constipation showed significant improvement with RH 3201 at 8 weeks. Symptoms including severity of abdominal bloating, frequency of abdominal bloating, and satisfaction of bowel habits based on the irritable bowel syndrome-severity scoring system also ameliorated in the probiotic group. Analysis of the fecal microbiome revealed that the abundance of Bacteroides cellulosilyticus and Akkermansia muciniphila was higher during the period of RH 3201 administration compared to the placebo. Untargeted metabolome analysis further suggested a correlation between specific metabolites, such as N-acetylornithine, xanthine, and 3-phenylpropionic acid, and the improvement of clinical symptoms. These results indicate that RH 3201 was effective in ameliorating IBS-C, potentially by enriching beneficial microbes and associated metabolites in the gut environment.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39333245 · DOI · PMC11437119
Mechanosensory Piezo2 regulated by gut microbiota participates in the development of visceral hypersensitivity and intestinal dysmotility [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the manifestation of intestinal dysfunction associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
- Closing excerpt
- Piezo2 can be regulated by gut microbiota and involved in visceral hypersensitivity and colonic dysmotility, with Fusobacterium varium playing a crucial role.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (289 words)
The gut microbiota plays a crucial role in the manifestation of intestinal dysfunction associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The mechanosensory Piezo2 has been implicated in the regulation of intestinal function. However, it remains unclear whether Piezo2 is modulated by the gut microbiota, thus contributing to the development of visceral hypersensitivity and gut dysmotility. The study enrolled patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) alongside healthy controls (HC). Questionnaires, rectal barostat test, and colonoscopy with mucosal biopsy were conducted. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was performed using samples from HC or IBS-D patients, and interventions with Akkermansia muciniphila or Fusobacterium varium were carried out on colon- or dorsal root ganglion (DRG)- Piezo2 knockdown pseudo-germ-free mice. Visceral sensitivity and intestinal motility were assessed. Piezo2 levels were detected using western blot and immunofluorescence. Fecal 16S rRNA sequencing and cecum untargeted metabolomics analysis, followed by molecular docking predictions of Piezo2, were also performed. The ratio of Piezo2+/5-HT+ cells was lower in IBS-D patients, positively correlated with visceral sensation and intestinal dysbiosis. The mice that received FMT from IBS-D patients exhibited colonic dysmotility and visceral hypersensitivity, along with elevated Piezo2 protein levels in the colon and DRG. Knockdown of Piezo2 in the colon or DRG ameliorated the FMT-induced colonic dysmotility and visceral hypersensitivity. Fecal 16S rRNA sequencing revealed distinct microbiota composition. Notably, Fusobacterium varium, but not Akkermansia muciniphila, induced gut dysmotility and visceral hypersensitivity, effects that could be alleviated by colon or DRG Piezo2 knockdown. Additionally, Fusobacterium varium lead to increased Piezo2 protein levels, as well as elevated levels of indole-3-acetic acid and indole-3-acrylic acid, which were predicted to bind to Piezo2, causing disturbances. Piezo2 can be regulated by gut microbiota and involved in visceral hypersensitivity and colonic dysmotility, with Fusobacterium varium playing a crucial role.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40296251 · DOI · PMC12045567
Clinical Trial: A Mediterranean Low-FODMAP Diet Alleviates Symptoms of Non-Constipation IBS-Randomized Controlled Study and Volatomics Analysis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Background: Approximately 20% of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) link symptoms to food intake; a low-FODMAP diet is effective in managing these symptoms.
- Closing excerpt
- gov ID: NCT03997708.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)
Background: Approximately 20% of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) link symptoms to food intake; a low-FODMAP diet is effective in managing these symptoms. Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Mediterranean version of the low-FODMAP Diet (MED-LFD) compared to NICE guidelines for IBS and to assess changes in stool volatile compound levels. Methods: 108 patients with Rome IV IBS without constipation were randomized into the MED-LFD or NICE group. Primary endpoints included changes in symptom severity and responder rate (reduction of >50 IBS-SSS points) after intervention and at 6 months. Secondary endpoints assessed quality of life, symptom burden, adequate relief, anxiety/depression levels, and adherence. Volatile compound levels were measured using Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Results: At both time points, the MED-LFD group showed a significantly greater improvement in symptom severity (159 ± 80 vs. 253 ± 94 and 168 ± 117 vs. 245 ± 98), responder rates (84.6% vs. 60.8% and 79.1% vs. 52.3%), and adherence (75% vs. 41% and 45% vs. 7%). Similar results were observed for all secondary endpoints, with no serious adverse events reported. The MED-LFD intervention was the strongest independent predictor of being a responder at the first (OR = 6.66; 95%CI = 1.46, 30.4) and second follow-up (OR = 4.85; 95%CI = 1.31, 17.96). Short and branched-chain fatty acids were significantly reduced at both follow-ups. Conclusions: The MED-LFD is superior to NICE recommendations in managing non-constipated IBS symptoms and quality of life. It remains to be proven that reduced volatile compound levels might be an objective marker of response to dietary interventions. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03997708.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40362860 · DOI · PMC12073482
Psychological and Clinical Factors Mediate Post-COVID-19 Irritable Bowel Syndrome [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundExposure to COVID-19 has been shown previously to be associated with a higher risk for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).
- Closing excerpt
- The presence of specific GI symptoms at COVID-19 onset and their persistence should increase awareness of a potential new onset of IBS diagnosis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (265 words)
BackgroundExposure to COVID-19 has been shown previously to be associated with a higher risk for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This study aimed to better explain this relationship using mediation analysis.MethodsThis post hoc analysis of a multicenter cohort study includes 623 patients with and without COVID-19 infection. All participants completed the ROME IV criteria, gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) over 1 year. Mediation analysis utilized the PROCESS macro and Baron and Kenny's method for parametric and nonparametric mediating variables, respectively.Key resultsThe impact of COVID-19 on the development of post-COVID-19 IBS is completely mediated by dyspnea at baseline (adjusted OR = 3.561, p = 0.012), severity of acid regurgitation at 1 month [indirect effect, log-odds metric = 0.090, 95% CI (0.006-0.180)], hunger pains at 1 [indirect effect, log-odds metric = 0.094, 95% CI (0.024-0.178)], and 6 months [indirect effect, log-odds metric = 0.074, 95% CI (0.003-0.150)], depression at 6 [indirect effect, log-odds metric = 0.106, 95% CI (0.009-0.225)] and 12 months [indirect effect, log-odds metric = 0.146, 95% CI (0.016-0.311)] as well as borborygmus [indirect effect, log-odds metric = 0.095, 95% CI (0.009-0.203)], abdominal distention [indirect effect, log-odds metric = 0.162, 95% CI (0.047-0.303)], and increased flatus [indirect effect, log-odds metric = 0.110, 95% CI (0.005-0.234)] at 12 months.Conclusions and inferencesOur findings provide evidence for psychological and clinical mediators between COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 IBS, which may be promising targets for interventions tailored for treating or preventing depression. The presence of specific GI symptoms at COVID-19 onset and their persistence should increase awareness of a potential new onset of IBS diagnosis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40375581 · DOI · PMC13121868
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis [5]
- Research article Global prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome III or IV criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
- Research article Long-term dietary patterns are associated with pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory features of the gut microbiome [7]
- Research article Anxiety and depression comorbidities in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
- Research article Efficacy of antidepressants and psychological therapies in irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
- Research article Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome [10]
Full-text reviews on EvidenceLib
Open-access review articles about this topic, reproduced in full with authors, licence and references.
Effects of Low and High FODMAP Diets on Human Gastrointestinal Microbiota Composition in Adults with Intestinal Diseases: A Systematic Review
Doris Vandeputte, Marie Joossens · Microorganisms 2020 · CC BY 4.0
References
- Kwon H, Nam EH, Kim H, Jo H, Bang WY, Lee M, et al.. Effect of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus IDCC 3201 on irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial. . 2024. PMID 39333245 · DOI · PMC11437119
- Zheng H, Chen Y, Lu S, Liu Z, Ma Y, Zhang C, et al.. Mechanosensory Piezo2 regulated by gut microbiota participates in the development of visceral hypersensitivity and intestinal dysmotility. . 2025. PMID 40296251 · DOI · PMC12045567
- Kasti AN, Katsas K, Pavlidis DE, Stylianakis E, Petsis KI, Lambrinou S, et al.. Clinical Trial: A Mediterranean Low-FODMAP Diet Alleviates Symptoms of Non-Constipation IBS-Randomized Controlled Study and Volatomics Analysis. . 2025. PMID 40362860 · DOI · PMC12073482
- Hod K, Marasco G, Colecchia L, Cremon C, Barbaro MR, Cacciari G, et al.. Psychological and Clinical Factors Mediate Post-COVID-19 Irritable Bowel Syndrome. . 2026. PMID 40375581 · DOI · PMC13121868
- Lovell RM, Ford AC. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012. PMID 22426087 · DOI
- Oka P, Parr H, Barberio B, Black CJ, Savarino EV, Ford AC. Global prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome III or IV criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID 32702295 · DOI
- Bolte LA, Vich Vila A, Imhann F, Collij V, Gacesa R, Peters V, et al.. Long-term dietary patterns are associated with pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory features of the gut microbiome. Gut. 2021. PMID 33811041 · DOI · PMC8223641
- Fond G, Loundou A, Hamdani N, Boukouaci W, Dargel A, Oliveira J, et al.. Anxiety and depression comorbidities in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014. PMID 24705634 · DOI
- Ford AC, Talley NJ, Schoenfeld PS, Quigley EM, Moayyedi P. Efficacy of antidepressants and psychological therapies in irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2009. PMID 19001059 · DOI
- Ford AC, Harris LA, Lacy BE, Quigley EMM, Moayyedi P. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018. PMID 30294792 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.