Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Rare and Inherited Diseases›Hypospadias
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Hypospadias

Rare and Inherited Diseases · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A birth defect due to malformation of the urethra in which the urethral opening is below its normal location.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (998 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A birth defect due to malformation of the urethra in which the urethral opening is below its normal location. In the male, the malformed urethra generally opens on the ventral surface of the penis or on the perineum. In the female, the malformed urethral opening is in the vagina.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Hypospadia.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Urogenital Abnormalities; Penile Diseases

Related concepts

  • Urethra
  • Penis
  • Perineum
  • Vagina

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,106 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Hypospadias” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,116 of them (18.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,316 records.

Reviews account for 507 records (8.3%) and meta-analyses for 67. Randomized controlled trials number 144 (2.4%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,316 records; 2000-2009: 1,170 records; 2010-2019: 1,504 records; 2020 onward: 1,116 records2,316through 19991,1702000-20091,5042010-20191,1162020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,316
2000-20091,170
2010-20191,504
2020 onward1,116
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.4 percentReviews8.3% (507)Meta-analyses1.1% (67)Randomized controlled trials2.4% (144)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,106 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5078.3%
Meta-analyses671.1%
Randomized controlled trials1442.4%

Method: PubMed query "Hypospadias"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in rare and inherited diseases

Rare conditions are difficult to study: few patients means small studies, case reports and registries are common, and randomized trials are the exception. Small samples limit precision and can exaggerate effects, and cases reported in the literature may be the most severe or unusual. Evidence from many small studies is best read together. Check how patients were identified, how many were included and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Hypospadias, all there is to know
van der Horst HJ, de Wall LL
2017Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
180cc by
PMID 28190103 · DOI · PMC5352742
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Reproductive Health in Boys and Men
Rodprasert W, Toppari J, Virtanen HE
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
70cc by
PMID 34690925 · DOI · PMC8530230
Molecular basis of the scalp-ear-nipple syndrome unraveled by the characterization of disease-causing KCTD1 mutants
Smaldone G, Balasco N, Pirone L, Caruso D, Di Gaetano S, Pedone EM, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
31cc by
PMID 31324836 · DOI · PMC6642198
Performance of 5 Large Language Models in Perioperative Consultation for Pediatric Hypospadias: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study
Kang T, Yuan C, Hu X, Huang W
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42525870 · DOI · PMC13419283

Hypospadias, all there is to know [1]

Review article van der Horst HJ, de Wall LL · · 2017 · cited 180 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital anomalies in men.
Closing excerpt
• New developments allow a more individualized approach, hopefully leading to less complications and more patient satisfaction.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (274 words)

Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital anomalies in men. The condition is typically characterized by proximal displacement of the urethral opening, penile curvature, and a ventrally deficient hooded foreskin. In about 70%, the urethral meatus is located distally on the penile shaft; this is considered a mild form that is not associated with other urogenital deformities. The remaining 30% are proximal and often more complex. In these cases, endocrinological evaluation is advised to exclude disorders of sexual differentiation, especially in case of concomitant unilateral or bilateral undescended testis. Although the etiology of hypospadias is largely unknown, many hypotheses exist about genetic predisposition and hormonal influences. The goal of hypospadias repair is to achieve cosmetic and functional normality, and currently, surgery is recommended between 6 and 18 months of age. Hypospadias can be corrected at any age with comparable complication risk, functional, and cosmetic outcome; however, the optimal age of repair remains conclusive. Although long-term overall outcome concerning cosmetic appearance and sexual function is fairly good, after correction, men may more often be inhibited in seeking sexual contact. Moreover, lower urinary tract symptoms occur twice as often in patients undergoing hypospadias repair and can still occur many years after the initial repair.ConclusionThis study explores the most recent insights into the management of hypospadias. What is Known: • Guidelines advise referral for treatment between 6 and 18 months of age. • Cosmetic outcome is considered satisfactory in over 70% of all patients. What is New: • Long-term complications include urinary tract symptoms and sexual and cosmetic issues. • New developments allow a more individualized approach, hopefully leading to less complications and more patient satisfaction.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28190103 · DOI · PMC5352742

Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Reproductive Health in Boys and Men [2]

Review article Rodprasert W, Toppari J, Virtanen HE · · 2021 · cited 70 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Male reproductive health has declined as indicated by increasing rates of cryptorchidism, i.
Closing excerpt
We review also studies on the association between early life and postnatal EDC exposure and semen quality, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis hormone levels and testicular cancer.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (170 words)

Male reproductive health has declined as indicated by increasing rates of cryptorchidism, i.e., undescended testis, poor semen quality, low serum testosterone level, and testicular cancer. Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has been proposed to have a role in this finding. In utero exposure to antiandrogenic EDCs, particularly at a sensitive period of fetal testicular development, the so-called 'masculinization programming window (MPW)', can disturb testicular development and function. Low androgen effect during the MPW can cause both short- and long-term reproductive disorders. A concurrent exposure to EDCs may also affect testicular function or damage testicular cells. Evidence from animal studies supports the role of endocrine disrupting chemicals in development of male reproductive disorders. However, evidence from epidemiological studies is relatively mixed. In this article, we review the current literature that evaluated relationship between prenatal EDC exposures and anogenital distance, cryptorchidism, and congenital penile abnormality called hypospadias. We review also studies on the association between early life and postnatal EDC exposure and semen quality, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis hormone levels and testicular cancer.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34690925 · DOI · PMC8530230

Molecular basis of the scalp-ear-nipple syndrome unraveled by the characterization of disease-causing KCTD1 mutants [3]

Research article Smaldone G, Balasco N, Pirone L, Caruso D, Di Gaetano S, Pedone EM, et al. · · 2019 · cited 31 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The scalp-ear-nipple (SEN) syndrome is an autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by cutis aplasia of the scalp and malformations of breast, external ears, digits, and nails.
Closing excerpt
Collectively, these findings provide an intriguing picture of the functional and structural alterations induced by KCTD1 mutations that ultimately lead to disease.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (240 words)

The scalp-ear-nipple (SEN) syndrome is an autosomal-dominant disorder characterized by cutis aplasia of the scalp and malformations of breast, external ears, digits, and nails. Genetic analyses have shown that the disease is caused by missense mutations of the KCTD1 protein, although the functional/structural basis of SEN insurgence is hitherto unknown. With the aim of unravelling the molecular basis of the SEN syndrome associated with KCTD1 mutations we here expressed and characterized several disease causing mutants. A preliminary dissection of the protein provides insights into the role that individual domains play in KCTD1 stability. The characterization of SEN-causing mutants indicates that, although the mutation sites are located in distant regions of the BTB domain or of the pre-BTB region, all of them are unable to interact with the transcription factor AP-2α, a well-known KCTD1 biological partner. Notably, all mutations, including the one located in the pre-BTB region, produce a significant destabilization of the protein. The structural role of the pre-BTB region in KCTD1 and other proteins of the family is corroborated by its sequence conservation in orthologs and paralogs. Interestingly, SEN-causing mutations also favor the tendency of KCTD1 to adopt structural states that are characterized by the ability to bind the β-amyloid fluorescent dye thioflavin T. The formation of aggregation-prone species may have important implications for the disease etiology. Collectively, these findings provide an intriguing picture of the functional and structural alterations induced by KCTD1 mutations that ultimately lead to disease.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31324836 · DOI · PMC6642198

Performance of 5 Large Language Models in Perioperative Consultation for Pediatric Hypospadias: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study [4]

Research article Kang T, Yuan C, Hu X, Huang W · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundHypospadias is a common congenital malformation requiring surgery.
Closing excerpt
For perioperative use, AI should follow a tiered human-machine collaboration model with mandatory clinician oversight in high-risk scenarios.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (314 words)

BackgroundHypospadias is a common congenital malformation requiring surgery. Caregivers face substantial perioperative information needs, and large language models (LLMs) offer a potential health education channel, but their performance in pediatric urology and the relation between citation accuracy and clinical content safety lack systematic evaluation.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate 5 LLMs (ChatGPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-Pro, OpenEvidence, Zhipu Qingyan, and DeepSeek) for pediatric hypospadias perioperative consultation, and to characterize the dimensions clinicians and caregivers prioritize.MethodsA noninterventional cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in April 2025. From a 40-item bank, 10 high-priority questions were selected by an independent caregiver screening cohort (N=34, cohort A) and classified into 3 risk levels. Twenty-three pediatric urology experts (6 dimensions) and 36 primary caregivers (cohort B; 4 dimensions) evaluated responses by double-blind forced-ranking (reverse-scored, 5=best). Friedman tests with Kendall W assessed overall differences; paired Wilcoxon tests with Bonferroni correction (adjusted α=.005) and rank-biserial r with Hodges-Lehmann 95% CIs were used post hoc. Reference authenticity was independently verified by 2 reviewers (XH and WH) using a 5-category scheme (V/PV/F/G/NR [V: Verifiable, PV: Partially Verifiable, F: Fabricated, G: Guideline-Based, Nonspecific, and NR: No References]), with consensus after canonical-source reverification (Cohen κ=0.702 preadjudication). An 8-reviewer clinical safety audit (7 senior specialists plus 1 European Association of Urology [EAU]-anchored intermediate-title clinician) applied a 4-level severity scheme (None/Mild/Moderate/Severe).ResultsModels differed significantly (caregiver: χ²4=77.5, W=0.538, PConclusionsHigh citation accuracy does not guarantee clinical safety. In the first dual-perspective evaluation, no model was uniformly best. Gemini-2.5-Pro was most comprehensive but relied on nonspecific guidelines. DeepSeek scored highest on caregiver-rated Empathy, yet it had the highest fabrication rate. OpenEvidence produced the most verifiable citations but carried the heaviest Severe-flag burden. These dimension-level priorities, the dissociation between citation quality and safety, and the portable evaluation framework can inform future pediatric medical-artificial intelligence (AI) development. For perioperative use, AI should follow a tiered human-machine collaboration model with mandatory clinician oversight in high-risk scenarios.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42525870 · DOI · PMC13419283

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique [5]
    Baskin LS, Ebbers MB · J Pediatr Surg · 2006 · cited 235 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Aetiology of hypospadias: a systematic review of genes and environment [6]
    van der Zanden LF, van Rooij IA, Feitz WF, Franke B, Knoers NV, Roeleveld N · Hum Reprod Update · 2012 · cited 196 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Worldwide prevalence of hypospadias [7]
    Springer A, van den Heijkant M, Baumann S · J Pediatr Urol · 2016 · cited 176 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Hypospadias and urethral development [8]
    Baskin LS · J Urol · 2000 · cited 168 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The Genetic and Environmental Factors Underlying Hypospadias [9]
    Bouty A, Ayers KL, Pask A, Heloury Y, Sinclair AH · Sex Dev · 2015 · cited 146 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Hypospadias surgery: when, what and by whom? [10]
    Manzoni G, Bracka A, Palminteri E, Marrocco G · BJU Int · 2004 · cited 129 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. van der Horst HJ, de Wall LL. Hypospadias, all there is to know. . 2017. PMID 28190103 · DOI · PMC5352742
  2. Rodprasert W, Toppari J, Virtanen HE. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Reproductive Health in Boys and Men. . 2021. PMID 34690925 · DOI · PMC8530230
  3. Smaldone G, Balasco N, Pirone L, Caruso D, Di Gaetano S, Pedone EM, et al.. Molecular basis of the scalp-ear-nipple syndrome unraveled by the characterization of disease-causing KCTD1 mutants. . 2019. PMID 31324836 · DOI · PMC6642198
  4. Kang T, Yuan C, Hu X, Huang W. Performance of 5 Large Language Models in Perioperative Consultation for Pediatric Hypospadias: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. . 2026. PMID 42525870 · DOI · PMC13419283
  5. Baskin LS, Ebbers MB. Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique. J Pediatr Surg. 2006. PMID 16516617 · DOI
  6. van der Zanden LF, van Rooij IA, Feitz WF, Franke B, Knoers NV, Roeleveld N. Aetiology of hypospadias: a systematic review of genes and environment. Hum Reprod Update. 2012. PMID 22371315 · DOI
  7. Springer A, van den Heijkant M, Baumann S. Worldwide prevalence of hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. PMID 26810252 · DOI
  8. Baskin LS. Hypospadias and urethral development. J Urol. 2000. PMID 10688029 · DOI
  9. Bouty A, Ayers KL, Pask A, Heloury Y, Sinclair AH. The Genetic and Environmental Factors Underlying Hypospadias. Sex Dev. 2015. PMID 26613581 · DOI · PMC5012964
  10. Manzoni G, Bracka A, Palminteri E, Marrocco G. Hypospadias surgery: when, what and by whom?. BJU Int. 2004. PMID 15613162 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • CryptorchidismRare and Inherited Diseases
  • Gonadal DysgenesisRare and Inherited Diseases
  • Klinefelter SyndromeRare and Inherited Diseases
  • Bladder ExstrophyRare and Inherited Diseases
  • HyperandrogenismRare and Inherited Diseases
  • Turner SyndromeRare and Inherited Diseases

All 106 articles in Rare and Inherited Diseases →

At a glance

6,106
PubMed records on this heading
18%
published since 2020
507
review articles
144
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • CryptorchidismRare and Inherited Diseases
  • Gonadal DysgenesisRare and Inherited Diseases
  • Klinefelter SyndromeRare and Inherited Diseases
  • Bladder ExstrophyRare and Inherited Diseases
  • HyperandrogenismRare and Inherited Diseases

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support