Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Perineum
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Perineum

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The body region lying between the genital area and the ANUS on the surface of the trunk, and to the shallow compartment lying deep to this area that is inferior to the pelvic diaphragm.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (976 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The body region lying between the genital area and the ANUS on the surface of the trunk, and to the shallow compartment lying deep to this area that is inferior to the pelvic diaphragm. The surface area is between the vulva and the anus in the female, and between the scrotum and the anus in the male.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Perineums.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Body Regions

Related concepts

  • Pelvic Floor
  • Vulva
  • Scrotum

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 11,377 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Perineum” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,792 of them (15.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,590 records.

Reviews account for 1,163 records (10.2%) and meta-analyses for 195. Randomized controlled trials number 390 (3.4%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 4,590 records; 2000-2009: 1,944 records; 2010-2019: 3,051 records; 2020 onward: 1,792 records4,590through 19991,9442000-20093,0512010-20191,7922020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19994,590
2000-20091,944
2010-20193,051
2020 onward1,792
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 10.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.4 percentReviews10.2% (1,163)Meta-analyses1.7% (195)Randomized controlled trials3.4% (390)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 11,377 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,16310.2%
Meta-analyses1951.7%
Randomized controlled trials3903.4%

Method: PubMed query "Perineum"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study
Simic M, Cnattingius S, Petersson G, Sandström A, Stephansson O
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
63cc by
PMID 28222704 · DOI · PMC5320686
Salvage Abdominoperineal Resection for Squamous Cell Anal Cancer: A 30-Year Single-Institution Experience
Hagemans JAW, Blinde SE, Nuyttens JJ, Morshuis WG, Mureau MAM, Rothbarth J, et al.
2018Clinical trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
45cc by
PMID 29691737 · DOI · PMC5976705
Pelvic floor and perineal muscles: a dynamic coordination between skeletal and smooth muscles on pelvic floor stabilization
Muro S, Akita K
2023Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
35cc by
PMID 36961619 · DOI · PMC10256674
Antibiotic prophylaxis for childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Armstrong H, Whitehurst J, Morris RK, Hodgetts Morton V, Man R, CHAPTER group
2025Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 40344566 · DOI · PMC12064200

Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study [1]

Research article Simic M, Cnattingius S, Petersson G, Sandström A, Stephansson O · · 2017 · cited 63 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundWe sought to investigate the impact of the duration of second stage of labor on risk of severe perineal lacerations (third and fourth degree).
Closing excerpt
Instrumental delivery is the most significant risk factor for severe lacerations, followed by duration of second stage of labor, fetal size and occiput posterior fetal position.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (255 words)

BackgroundWe sought to investigate the impact of the duration of second stage of labor on risk of severe perineal lacerations (third and fourth degree).MethodsThis population based cohort study was conducted in the Stockholm/Gotland region, Sweden, 2008-2014. Study population included 52 211 primiparous women undergoing vaginal delivery with cephalic presentation at term. Unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR), using 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main exposure was duration of second stage of labor, and main outcome was risks of severe perineal lacerations (third and fourth degree).ResultsRisk of severe perineal lacerations increased with duration of second stage of labor. Compared with a second stage of labor of 1 h or less, women with a second stage of more than 2 h had an increased risk (aOR 1.42; 95% CI 1.28-1.58). Compared with non-instrumental vaginal deliveries, the risk was elevated among instrumental vaginal deliveries (aOR 2.24; 95% CI 2.07-2.42). The risk of perineal laceration increased with duration of second stage of labor until less than 3 h in both instrumental and non-instrumental vaginal deliveries, but after 3 h, the ORs did not further increase. After adjustments for potential confounders, macrosomia (birth weight > 4 500 g) and occiput posterior fetal position were risk factors of severe perineal lacerations.ConclusionsThe risk of severe perineal laceration increases with duration until the third hour of second stage of labor. Instrumental delivery is the most significant risk factor for severe lacerations, followed by duration of second stage of labor, fetal size and occiput posterior fetal position.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28222704 · DOI · PMC5320686

Salvage Abdominoperineal Resection for Squamous Cell Anal Cancer: A 30-Year Single-Institution Experience [2]

Clinical trial Hagemans JAW, Blinde SE, Nuyttens JJ, Morshuis WG, Mureau MAM, Rothbarth J, et al. · · 2018 · cited 45 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundFailure of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) results in persistent or recurrent anal SCC.
Closing excerpt
Patients with recurrent anal SCC after salvage APR had poor prognosis, irrespective of performance of repeat salvage surgery, which never resulted in cure.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (189 words)

BackgroundFailure of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) results in persistent or recurrent anal SCC. Treatment with salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) can potentially achieve cure. The aims of this study are to analyze oncological and surgical outcomes of our 30-year experience with salvage APR for anal SCC after failed CRT and identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).MethodsAll consecutive patients who underwent salvage APR between 1990 and 2016 for histologically confirmed persistent or recurrent anal SCC after failed CRT were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsForty-seven patients underwent salvage APR for either persistent (n = 24) or recurrent SCC (n = 23). Median OS was 47 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.0-84.0 months] and 5-year survival was 41.6%, which did not differ significantly between persistent or recurrent disease (p = 0.551). Increased pathological tumor size (p ConclusionsSalvage APR for anal SCC after failed CRT resulted in adequate survival, with 5-year survival of 41.6%. Negative prognostic factors for survival were increased tumor size, lymph node involvement, and irradical resection. Patients with recurrent anal SCC after salvage APR had poor prognosis, irrespective of performance of repeat salvage surgery, which never resulted in cure.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29691737 · DOI · PMC5976705

Pelvic floor and perineal muscles: a dynamic coordination between skeletal and smooth muscles on pelvic floor stabilization [3]

Review article Muro S, Akita K · · 2023 · cited 35 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The purpose of this review is to present our researches on the pelvic outlet muscles, including the pelvic floor and perineal muscles, which are responsible for urinary function, defecation, sexual function, and core stability, and to discuss the insights into the mechanism of pelvic floor stabilization based on the findings.
Closing excerpt
These two types of muscles possibly coordinate the direction and force of muscle contraction with each other.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (241 words)

The purpose of this review is to present our researches on the pelvic outlet muscles, including the pelvic floor and perineal muscles, which are responsible for urinary function, defecation, sexual function, and core stability, and to discuss the insights into the mechanism of pelvic floor stabilization based on the findings. Our studies are conducted using a combination of macroscopic examination, immunohistological analysis, 3D reconstruction, and imaging. Unlike most previous reports, this article describes not only on skeletal muscle but also on smooth muscle structures in the pelvic floor and perineum to encourage new understanding. The skeletal muscles of the pelvic outlet are continuous, which means that they share muscle bundles. They form three muscle slings that pass anterior and posterior to the anal canal, thus serving as the foundation of pelvic floor support. The smooth muscle of the pelvic outlet, in addition to forming the walls of the viscera, also extends in three dimensions. This continuous smooth muscle occupies the central region of the pelvic floor and perineum, thus revising the conventional understanding of the perineal body. At the interface between the levator ani and pelvic viscera, smooth muscle forms characteristic structures that transfer the lifting power of the levator ani to the pelvic viscera. The findings suggest new concepts of pelvic floor stabilization mechanisms, such as dynamic coordination between skeletal and smooth muscles. These two types of muscles possibly coordinate the direction and force of muscle contraction with each other.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36961619 · DOI · PMC10256674

Antibiotic prophylaxis for childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis [4]

Meta-analysis Armstrong H, Whitehurst J, Morris RK, Hodgetts Morton V, Man R, CHAPTER group · · 2025 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionChildbirth-related perineal trauma affects the vast majority of women who give birth vaginally and subsequent complications such as wound infection occur frequently.
Closing excerpt
We recommend that an adequately powered, robust, randomised controlled trial is needed amongst women with first/second degree tears or episiotomies after spontaneous birth.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (291 words)

IntroductionChildbirth-related perineal trauma affects the vast majority of women who give birth vaginally and subsequent complications such as wound infection occur frequently. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not currently recommended following first or second degree tears, or episiotomies. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics for preventing complications from perineal trauma across all types of childbirth-related perineal trauma.Materials and methodsDatabases were searched from inception to February 2024. Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised interventional studies and observational studies were eligible for inclusion where women experienced childbirth-related perineal trauma and received antibiotic prophylaxis or placebo, including any type of tear or episiotomy. The primary outcome was perineal wound infection. Results were combined into meta-analysis using a random effects model.Results14 studies were eligible for inclusion (eight randomised controlled trials, six observational) involving 8,878 women. Ten studies were deemed to have a high overall risk of bias. Overall the GRADE certainty of findings were low. Twelve studies were included in the analysis for perineal wound infection, involving 8,438 women. There was a reduced rate of perineal wound infection when prophylactic antibiotics were received (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.67). The subgroup analysis by type of tear demonstrated association with reduced risk of infection when prophylactic antibiotics were received, in the non-obstetric anal sphincter injuries combined subgroup (relative risk 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.41-0.63) and the episiotomy only subgroup (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.91).ConclusionsProphylactic antibiotics are associated with a reduced risk of perineal wound infection. Despite these findings, there are not sufficient high-quality randomised controlled trials to adequately inform guideline change amongst women with first/second degree tears or episiotomies. We recommend that an adequately powered, robust, randomised controlled trial is needed amongst women with first/second degree tears or episiotomies after spontaneous birth.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40344566 · DOI · PMC12064200

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Diagnostic criteria for pudendal neuralgia by pudendal nerve entrapment (Nantes criteria) [5]
    Labat JJ, Riant T, Robert R, Amarenco G, Lefaucheur JP, Rigaud J · Neurourol Urodyn · 2008 · cited 215 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Outcome of Vaginoplasty in Male-to-Female Transgenders: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques [6]
    Horbach SE, Bouman MB, Smit JM, Özer M, Buncamper ME, Mullender MG · J Sex Med · 2015 · cited 201 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth [7]
    Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2017 · cited 192 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Primary versus Flap Closure of Perineal Defects following Oncologic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [8]
    Devulapalli C, Jia Wei AT, DiBiagio JR, Baez ML, Baltodano PA, Seal SM, et al. · Plast Reconstr Surg · 2016 · cited 144 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery [9]
    Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics · Obstet Gynecol · 2018 · cited 139 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [10]
    Musters GD, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ · Dis Colon Rectum · 2014 · cited 133 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Simic M, Cnattingius S, Petersson G, Sandström A, Stephansson O. Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study. . 2017. PMID 28222704 · DOI · PMC5320686
  2. Hagemans JAW, Blinde SE, Nuyttens JJ, Morshuis WG, Mureau MAM, Rothbarth J, et al.. Salvage Abdominoperineal Resection for Squamous Cell Anal Cancer: A 30-Year Single-Institution Experience. . 2018. PMID 29691737 · DOI · PMC5976705
  3. Muro S, Akita K. Pelvic floor and perineal muscles: a dynamic coordination between skeletal and smooth muscles on pelvic floor stabilization. . 2023. PMID 36961619 · DOI · PMC10256674
  4. Armstrong H, Whitehurst J, Morris RK, Hodgetts Morton V, Man R, CHAPTER group. Antibiotic prophylaxis for childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2025. PMID 40344566 · DOI · PMC12064200
  5. Labat JJ, Riant T, Robert R, Amarenco G, Lefaucheur JP, Rigaud J. Diagnostic criteria for pudendal neuralgia by pudendal nerve entrapment (Nantes criteria). Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID 17828787 · DOI
  6. Horbach SE, Bouman MB, Smit JM, Özer M, Buncamper ME, Mullender MG. Outcome of Vaginoplasty in Male-to-Female Transgenders: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID 25817066 · DOI
  7. Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID 28176333 · DOI · PMC5449575
  8. Devulapalli C, Jia Wei AT, DiBiagio JR, Baez ML, Baltodano PA, Seal SM, et al.. Primary versus Flap Closure of Perineal Defects following Oncologic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID 26796372 · DOI
  9. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID 30134424 · DOI
  10. Musters GD, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014. PMID 25101610 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Pelvic FloorAnatomy and Physiology
  • VulvaAnatomy and Physiology
  • VaginaAnatomy and Physiology
  • PelvisAnatomy and Physiology
  • DiaphragmAnatomy and Physiology
  • Retroperitoneal SpaceAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

11,377
PubMed records on this heading
16%
published since 2020
1,163
review articles
390
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Pelvic FloorAnatomy and Physiology
  • VulvaAnatomy and Physiology
  • VaginaAnatomy and Physiology
  • PelvisAnatomy and Physiology
  • DiaphragmAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support