Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,835Open textbooks209Open-access articles1,406Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology182Genetics and Genomics170Neuroscience185Cardiovascular Medicine180Immunology142Pharmacology173Molecular Biology161Infectious Diseases150Rare and Inherited Diseases181Clinical Research173Anatomy and Physiology613Drugs and Chemicals621Psychiatry and Psychology185Public Health and Nutrition178Diagnostics and Medical Technology125Respiratory Medicine113Digestive System and Liver91Metabolism and Endocrine Disease177Bones, Joints, Muscles and Skin213Kidney, Urology and Women's Health173Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat55
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Psychiatry and Psychology›Hostility

Continue where you left off ()

Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Hostility

Psychiatry and Psychology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-11-04 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Tendency to feel anger toward and to seek to inflict harm upon a person or group.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (896 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Tendency to feel anger toward and to seek to inflict harm upon a person or group.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Hostilities.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Emotions

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,819 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Hostility” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 621 of them (10.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,880 records.

Reviews account for 301 records (5.2%) and meta-analyses for 45. Randomized controlled trials number 229 (3.9%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,880 records; 2000-2009: 1,166 records; 2010-2019: 1,152 records; 2020 onward: 621 records2,880through 19991,1662000-20091,1522010-20196212020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,880
2000-20091,166
2010-20191,152
2020 onward621
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.8 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.9 percentReviews5.2% (301)Meta-analyses0.8% (45)Randomized controlled trials3.9% (229)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,819 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3015.2%
Meta-analyses450.8%
Randomized controlled trials2293.9%

Method: PubMed query "Hostility"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in psychiatry and psychology

Research on mental health and behaviour relies on questionnaires, interviews and rating scales rather than physical measurements, so how a condition was defined and measured shapes every result. Many studies are observational or small, placebo responses can be large, and findings in one group or culture may not carry over to another. Nothing on this page is advice about diagnosis or treatment; anyone worried about their mental health should talk to a qualified clinician. Check how outcomes were measured, who took part and how long they were followed.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Hostility and cellular aging in men from the Whitehall II cohort
Brydon L, Lin J, Butcher L, Hamer M, Erusalimsky JD, Blackburn EH, et al.
2012Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
43cc by
PMID 21974787 · DOI · PMC3657139
Threat, hostility and violence in childhood and later psychotic disorder: population-based case-control study
Morgan C, Gayer-Anderson C, Beards S, Hubbard K, Mondelli V, Di Forti M, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
40cc by
PMID 32778182 · DOI · PMC7525109
Polymorphism in the serotonin receptor 2a (HTR2A) gene as possible predisposal factor for aggressive traits
Banlaki Z, Elek Z, Nanasi T, Szekely A, Nemoda Z, Sasvari-Szekely M, et al.
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
29cc by
PMID 25658328 · DOI · PMC4319849
Beyond hostility: exploring facial emotion recognition biases in youths with conduct disorder
Bacher J, von Planta B, Bernhard A, Fairchild G, Jansen L, De Brito SA, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 40864282 · DOI · PMC12917026

Hostility and cellular aging in men from the Whitehall II cohort [1]

Research article Brydon L, Lin J, Butcher L, Hamer M, Erusalimsky JD, Blackburn EH, et al. · · 2012 · cited 43 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundHostility is associated with a significantly increased risk of age-related disease and mortality, yet the pathophysiological mechanisms involved remain unclear.
Closing excerpt
Our findings suggest that telomere attrition might represent a novel mechanism mediating the detrimental effects of hostility on men's health.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (171 words)

BackgroundHostility is associated with a significantly increased risk of age-related disease and mortality, yet the pathophysiological mechanisms involved remain unclear. Here we investigated the hypothesis that hostility might impact health by promoting cellular aging.MethodsWe tested the relationship between cynical hostility and two known markers of cellular aging, leukocyte telomere length (TL) and leukocyte telomerase activity (TA), in 434 men and women from the Whitehall II cohort.ResultsHigh-hostile men had significantly shorter leukocyte TL than their low-hostile counterparts. They also had elevated leukocyte TA, with a significantly increased likelihood of having both short TL and high TA, compared with low-hostile individuals.ConclusionsBecause telomerase is known to counteract telomere shortening by synthesizing telomeric DNA repeats, particularly in the context of shortened telomeres, heightened TA might represent a compensatory response in high-hostile individuals. The relationship between hostility and disease is stronger in men than in women, and men generally have a shorter life expectancy than women. Our findings suggest that telomere attrition might represent a novel mechanism mediating the detrimental effects of hostility on men's health.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 21974787 · DOI · PMC3657139

Threat, hostility and violence in childhood and later psychotic disorder: population-based case-control study [2]

Research article Morgan C, Gayer-Anderson C, Beards S, Hubbard K, Mondelli V, Di Forti M, et al. · · 2020 · cited 40 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundA growing body of research suggests that childhood adversities are associated with later psychosis, broadly defined.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsOur findings extend previous research on childhood adversity and suggest a degree of specificity for severe adversities involving threat, hostility and violence.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (241 words)

BackgroundA growing body of research suggests that childhood adversities are associated with later psychosis, broadly defined. However, there remain several gaps and unanswered questions. Most studies are of low-level psychotic experiences and findings cannot necessarily be extrapolated to psychotic disorders. Further, few studies have examined the effects of more fine-grained dimensions of adversity such as type, timing and severity.AimsUsing detailed data from the Childhood Adversity and Psychosis (CAPsy) study, we sought to address these gaps and examine in detail associations between a range of childhood adversities and psychotic disorder.MethodCAPsy is population-based first-episode psychosis case-control study in the UK. In a sample of 374 cases and 301 controls, we collected extensive data on childhood adversities, in particular household discord, various forms of abuse and bullying, and putative confounders, including family history of psychotic disorder, using validated, semi-structured instruments.ResultsWe found strong evidence that all forms of childhood adversity were associated with around a two- to fourfold increased odds of psychotic disorder and that exposure to multiple adversities was associated with a linear increase in odds. We further found that severe forms of adversity, i.e. involving threat, hostility and violence, were most strongly associated with increased odds of disorder. More tentatively, we found that some adversities (e.g. bullying, sexual abuse) were more strongly associated with psychotic disorder if first occurrence was in adolescence.ConclusionsOur findings extend previous research on childhood adversity and suggest a degree of specificity for severe adversities involving threat, hostility and violence.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32778182 · DOI · PMC7525109

Polymorphism in the serotonin receptor 2a (HTR2A) gene as possible predisposal factor for aggressive traits [3]

Research article Banlaki Z, Elek Z, Nanasi T, Szekely A, Nemoda Z, Sasvari-Szekely M, et al. · · 2015 · cited 29 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Aggressive manifestations and their consequences are a major issue of mankind, highlighting the need for understanding the contributory factors.
Closing excerpt
In conclusion, this is the first study to our knowledge analyzing SNPs in a wide variety of genes in terms of aggression in a large sample-size non-clinical adult population, also describing a novel candidate polymorphism as predisposal to aggressive traits.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (242 words)

Aggressive manifestations and their consequences are a major issue of mankind, highlighting the need for understanding the contributory factors. Still, aggression-related genetic analyses have so far mainly been conducted on small population subsets such as individuals suffering from a certain psychiatric disorder or a narrow-range age cohort, but no data on the general population is yet available. In the present study, our aim was to identify polymorphisms in genes affecting neurobiological processes that might explain some of the inter-individual variation between aggression levels in the non-clinical Caucasian adult population. 55 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were simultaneously determined in 887 subjects who also filled out the self-report Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). Single marker association analyses between genotypes and aggression scores indicated a significant role of rs7322347 located in the HTR2A gene encoding serotonin receptor 2a following Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (p = 0.0007) both for males and females. Taking the four BPAQ subscales individually, scores for Hostility, Anger and Physical Aggression showed significant association with rs7322347 T allele in themselves, while no association was found with Verbal Aggression. Of the subscales, relationship with rs7322347 was strongest in the case of Hostility, where statistical significance virtually equaled that observed with the whole BPAQ. In conclusion, this is the first study to our knowledge analyzing SNPs in a wide variety of genes in terms of aggression in a large sample-size non-clinical adult population, also describing a novel candidate polymorphism as predisposal to aggressive traits.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25658328 · DOI · PMC4319849

Beyond hostility: exploring facial emotion recognition biases in youths with conduct disorder [4]

Research article Bacher J, von Planta B, Bernhard A, Fairchild G, Jansen L, De Brito SA, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Facial emotion recognition (FER) biases refer to systematic tendencies to recognize specific emotions when processing facial expressions.
Closing excerpt
Our findings indicate that youths with CD not only show a hostile attribution bias but rather misclassify emotions as predominant when they are present at low intensity, regardless of type of emotion.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (242 words)

Facial emotion recognition (FER) biases refer to systematic tendencies to recognize specific emotions when processing facial expressions. In youths with conduct disorder (CD), who are characterized by highly impairing antisocial behavior, research on FER biases has focused on hostile attribution biases. This work has shown that youths with CD perceive ambiguous social cues as angry. However, youths with CD may not only show biases towards anger, which is why we investigated FER biases in youths with CD towards the six basic emotions. Within the European FemNAT-CD study, we analyzed data from 610 youths with CD (60% female) and 818 typically developing controls (TDCs; 68% female), aged 9 to 18 years (M = 14.1, SD = 2.41 years). FER biases were assessed using the Emotion Hexagon Task by showing morphed emotional expressions and asking participants to choose the predominant emotion. Biases were calculated as tendency towards an emotion shown at 0%, 10%, 30%, or 50% intensity. Our findings from hierarchical linear modelling indicate that youths with CD exhibited stronger FER biases than TDCs across all emotions, meaning that they misclassified each emotion more often. However, this difference varied by intensity, with youths with CD displaying weaker biases at higher intensity levels and a smaller increase in bias with increasing intensity level. Our findings indicate that youths with CD not only show a hostile attribution bias but rather misclassify emotions as predominant when they are present at low intensity, regardless of type of emotion.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40864282 · DOI · PMC12917026

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health [5]
    Miller TQ, Smith TW, Turner CW, Guijarro ML, Hallet AJ · Psychol Bull · 1996 · cited 427 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The association of anger and hostility with future coronary heart disease: a meta-analytic review of prospective evidence [6]
    Chida Y, Steptoe A · J Am Coll Cardiol · 2009 · cited 399 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Translational science in action: hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems [7]
    Dodge KA · Dev Psychopathol · 2006 · cited 276 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Anger, hostility, and posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults: a meta-analysis [8]
    Orth U, Wieland E · J Consult Clin Psychol · 2006 · cited 239 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: an interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health [9]
    Smith TW, Glazer K, Ruiz JM, Gallo LC · J Pers · 2004 · cited 232 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Posttraumatic stress disorder, cardiovascular, and metabolic disease: a review of the evidence [10]
    Dedert EA, Calhoun PS, Watkins LL, Sherwood A, Beckham JC · Ann Behav Med · 2010 · cited 192 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Brydon L, Lin J, Butcher L, Hamer M, Erusalimsky JD, Blackburn EH, et al.. Hostility and cellular aging in men from the Whitehall II cohort. . 2012. PMID 21974787 · DOI · PMC3657139
  2. Morgan C, Gayer-Anderson C, Beards S, Hubbard K, Mondelli V, Di Forti M, et al.. Threat, hostility and violence in childhood and later psychotic disorder: population-based case-control study. . 2020. PMID 32778182 · DOI · PMC7525109
  3. Banlaki Z, Elek Z, Nanasi T, Szekely A, Nemoda Z, Sasvari-Szekely M, et al.. Polymorphism in the serotonin receptor 2a (HTR2A) gene as possible predisposal factor for aggressive traits. . 2015. PMID 25658328 · DOI · PMC4319849
  4. Bacher J, von Planta B, Bernhard A, Fairchild G, Jansen L, De Brito SA, et al.. Beyond hostility: exploring facial emotion recognition biases in youths with conduct disorder. . 2026. PMID 40864282 · DOI · PMC12917026
  5. Miller TQ, Smith TW, Turner CW, Guijarro ML, Hallet AJ. A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychol Bull. 1996. PMID 8851276 · DOI
  6. Chida Y, Steptoe A. The association of anger and hostility with future coronary heart disease: a meta-analytic review of prospective evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID 19281923 · DOI
  7. Dodge KA. Translational science in action: hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems. Dev Psychopathol. 2006. PMID 17152401 · DOI · PMC2745254
  8. Orth U, Wieland E. Anger, hostility, and posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006. PMID 16881777 · DOI
  9. Smith TW, Glazer K, Ruiz JM, Gallo LC. Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: an interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. J Pers. 2004. PMID 15509282 · DOI
  10. Dedert EA, Calhoun PS, Watkins LL, Sherwood A, Beckham JC. Posttraumatic stress disorder, cardiovascular, and metabolic disease: a review of the evidence. Ann Behav Med. 2010. PMID 20174903 · DOI · PMC3219414

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-11-04.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • AchievementPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AffectPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AggressionPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AlcoholismPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Anorexia NervosaPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AnxietyPsychiatry and Psychology

All 110 articles in Psychiatry and Psychology →

At a glance

5,819
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
301
review articles
229
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • AchievementPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AffectPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AggressionPsychiatry and Psychology
  • AlcoholismPsychiatry and Psychology
  • Anorexia NervosaPsychiatry and Psychology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Rights and removal requests · Legal · Support