Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (765 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Suppurative inflammation of the tissues of the internal structures of the eye frequently associated with an infection.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Endophthalmitides; Ophthalmia; Ophthalmias; Infectious Endophthalmitis; Endophthalmitides, Infectious; Endophthalmitis, Infectious; Infectious Endophthalmitides.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Eye Infections
- Narrower topics
- Uveitis, Suppurative
- See also
- Panophthalmitis
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 8,285 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Endophthalmitis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,509 of them (18.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,926 records.
Reviews account for 843 records (10.2%) and meta-analyses for 53. Randomized controlled trials number 186 (2.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,926 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,768 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,082 |
| 2020 onward | 1,509 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 843 | 10.2% |
| Meta-analyses | 53 | 0.6% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 186 | 2.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Endophthalmitis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in infectious diseases
Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microbiological diagnosis of endophthalmitis using nanopore targeted sequencing | 2021 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 36 | cc by PMID 34463015 · DOI · PMC9292959 |
| Vision Defense: Efficient Antibacterial AIEgens Induced Early Immune Response for Bacterial Endophthalmitis | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 31 | cc by PMID 35794437 · DOI · PMC9443450 |
| Incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF agent with or without topical antibiotics | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 30 | cc by PMID 33335269 · DOI · PMC7747565 |
| Dropless after cataract surgery (DACS): concepts, evidence and clinical potential | 2026 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 42362989 · DOI · PMC13415846 |
Microbiological diagnosis of endophthalmitis using nanopore targeted sequencing [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundMicroorganism identification is critical for the early diagnosis and management of infectious endophthalmitis, but traditional culture can yield false-negative results.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionsNTS appears to be a promising diagnostic platform for diagnosing infectious endophthalmitis, even for culture-negative cases.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (201 words)
BackgroundMicroorganism identification is critical for the early diagnosis and management of infectious endophthalmitis, but traditional culture can yield false-negative results. Nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) is a third-generation sequencing technique with multiple advantages. This study aimed to test aqueous humour or vitreous fluid samples from presumed cases of infectious endophthalmitis using NTS to evaluate the feasibility of NTS in diagnosing endophthalmitis, especially for culture-negative cases.MethodsThis prospective study enrolled patients who presented to the Department of Ophthalmology of Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) between June 2018 and December 2020. The samples were sent immediately for routine microbiology culture processing and NTS assay.ResultsNTS identified microorganisms in 17 of 18 cases (94.4%) (eight culture-positive cases, nine culture-negative cases, and one case unavailable for culture). There was a high-quality match between culture and NTS for culture-positive cases. In the eight culture-negative cases and the case unavailable for culture, NTS detected either bacteria, fungi, or a mixture of bacteria and fungi in the intraocular fluids. The average waiting times for the results of bacterial and fungal cultures were 48 and 72 h, respectively. The average time for the NTS results was 12 h.ConclusionsNTS appears to be a promising diagnostic platform for diagnosing infectious endophthalmitis, even for culture-negative cases.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34463015 · DOI · PMC9292959
Vision Defense: Efficient Antibacterial AIEgens Induced Early Immune Response for Bacterial Endophthalmitis [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Bacterial endophthalmitis (BE) is an acute eye infection and potentially irreversible blinding ocular disease.
- Closing excerpt
- This study exhibits an efficient photodynamic antibacterial treatment to BE, which induces an early intraocular immune response and saves useful vision, endowing TTPy a promising potential for clinical application of ocular infections.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (183 words)
Bacterial endophthalmitis (BE) is an acute eye infection and potentially irreversible blinding ocular disease. The empirical intravitreous injection of antibiotic is the primary treatment once diagnosed as BE. However, the overuse of antibiotic contributes to the drug resistance of pathogens and the retinal toxicity of antibiotic limits its application in clinic. Herein, a cationic aggregation-induced emission luminogens named with triphenylamine thiophen pyridinium (TTPy) is reported for photodynamic treatment of BE. TTPy can selectively discriminate and kill bacteria efficiently over normal ocular cells. More importantly, TTPy shows excellent antibacterial ability in BE rat models infected by Staphylococcus aureus. Meanwhile, the bacterial killing behavior triggered by TTPy induces innate immune response at an early stage of infection, limiting subsequent robust inflammation and protecting retina from bacterial toxins and inflammation-induced bystander damage. In addition, TTPy performs better antibacterial ability than commercially used Rose Bengal, suggesting its excellent capability of vision salvage in acute BE. This study exhibits an efficient photodynamic antibacterial treatment to BE, which induces an early intraocular immune response and saves useful vision, endowing TTPy a promising potential for clinical application of ocular infections.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35794437 · DOI · PMC9443450
Incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF agent with or without topical antibiotics [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the standard treatment modality in various types of retinal diseases.
- Closing excerpt
- Data from this large population, treated with or without antibiotics, suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis does not reduce the rate of endophthalmitis after IVI.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (188 words)
Intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the standard treatment modality in various types of retinal diseases. However, endophthalmitis remains the most serious complication. Despite the lack of evidence that antibiotics prevent endophthalmitis, topical antibiotics are still used routinely in Japan. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study by analyzing records from patients who underwent IVI of anti-VEGF agents with or without antibiotic treatment. In the analysis of a total of 147,440 eyes, the incidence of endophthalmitis was 0.007%: 0.005% with no use of antibiotics, 0.009% with antibiotic pretreatment, 0.012% with posttreatment, and 0.005% with pre- and posttreatment. There was no statistically significant difference among the four groups (chi-square test, p = 0.57). Most facilities used masks, sterilized gloves, and drapes. Nine of the 10 eyes that developed endophthalmitis received topical antibiotics, and all infected eyes underwent IVI with aflibercept, not the prefilled syringe delivery system. In four patients who received multiple IVI, the detection of causative bacteria revealed resistance to used antibiotics. Data from this large population, treated with or without antibiotics, suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis does not reduce the rate of endophthalmitis after IVI.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33335269 · DOI · PMC7747565
Dropless after cataract surgery (DACS): concepts, evidence and clinical potential [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Cataract surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide, and is traditionally followed by a postoperative regimen of eyedrops to reduce the risk of infection and inflammation.
- Closing excerpt
- As the global burden of cataract surgery continues to grow, embracing dropless techniques may represent a forward-looking step in modernising postoperative management to optimise patient-centred care.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (193 words)
Cataract surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide, and is traditionally followed by a postoperative regimen of eyedrops to reduce the risk of infection and inflammation. However, variable adherence to treatment and the burden of administering drops pose significant challenges. "Dropless after cataract surgery" (DACS) has emerged as an approach where intraoperative delivery may eliminate the need for postoperative drops. DACS offers a simplified alternative to eyedrop therapy, with the potential to improve patient-related quality of life, lower healthcare costs, and promote sustainable practices by reducing medical waste. Multiple studies over the past few decades have demonstrated the effectiveness of intraoperative intracameral antibiotics alone in reducing endophthalmitis rates, thus eliminating the need for topical antibiotic drops. Sustained-release steroid formulations have demonstrated reliable control of postoperative inflammation, similar to those achieved with standard topical regimens, but their adoption remains limited. Realising the full benefits of DACS will require systemic barriers to be addressed, and dropless regimens should be considered within a holistic value-based healthcare approach. As the global burden of cataract surgery continues to grow, embracing dropless techniques may represent a forward-looking step in modernising postoperative management to optimise patient-centred care.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42362989 · DOI · PMC13415846
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Bacterial and Fungal Endophthalmitis [5]
- Research article Endophthalmitis [6]
- Research article Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery: an evidence-based update [7]
- Research article Meta-analysis of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents: causative organisms and possible prevention strategies [8]
- Research article Toxic anterior segment syndrome [9]
- Research article Intraocular foreign bodies: A review [10]
References
- Huang Q, Fu A, Wang Y, Zhang J, Zhao W, Cheng Y. Microbiological diagnosis of endophthalmitis using nanopore targeted sequencing. . 2021. PMID 34463015 · DOI · PMC9292959
- Li T, Wu Y, Cai W, Wang D, Ren C, Shen T, et al.. Vision Defense: Efficient Antibacterial AIEgens Induced Early Immune Response for Bacterial Endophthalmitis. . 2022. PMID 35794437 · DOI · PMC9443450
- Morioka M, Takamura Y, Nagai K, Yoshida S, Mori J, Takeuchi M, et al.. Incidence of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF agent with or without topical antibiotics. . 2020. PMID 33335269 · DOI · PMC7747565
- Birtel J, Ong AY, Deichl K, Mole G, Aslam SA, Charbel Issa P. Dropless after cataract surgery (DACS): concepts, evidence and clinical potential. . 2026. PMID 42362989 · DOI · PMC13415846
- Durand ML. Bacterial and Fungal Endophthalmitis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017. PMID 28356323 · DOI · PMC5475221
- Durand ML. Endophthalmitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013. PMID 23438028 · DOI · PMC3638360
- Ciulla TA, Starr MB, Masket S. Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2002. PMID 11772573 · DOI
- McCannel CA. Meta-analysis of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents: causative organisms and possible prevention strategies. Retina. 2011. PMID 21330939 · DOI
- Mamalis N, Edelhauser HF, Dawson DG, Chew J, LeBoyer RM, Werner L. Toxic anterior segment syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006. PMID 16565012 · DOI
- Loporchio D, Mukkamala L, Gorukanti K, Zarbin M, Langer P, Bhagat N. Intraocular foreign bodies: A review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID 26994871 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.