Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (795 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Infection of the cornea by an ameboid protozoan which may cause corneal ulceration leading to blindness.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Keratitis, Acanthamoeba; Acanthamoeba Keratitides; Keratitides, Acanthamoeba.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Eye Infections, Parasitic; Amebiasis; Keratitis
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,377 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Acanthamoeba Keratitis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 305 of them (22.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 437 records.
Reviews account for 172 records (12.5%) and meta-analyses for 6. Randomized controlled trials number 7 (0.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 275 |
| 2000-2009 | 360 |
| 2010-2019 | 437 |
| 2020 onward | 305 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 172 | 12.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 6 | 0.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 7 | 0.5% |
Method: PubMed query "Acanthamoeba Keratitis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in infectious diseases
Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| An update on Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment | 2015 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 504 | cc by PMID 25687209 · DOI · PMC4330640 |
| Infectious keratitis: an update on epidemiology, causative microorganisms, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance | 2021 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 358 | cc by PMID 33414529 · DOI · PMC8102486 |
| Infectious keratitis: A review | 2022 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 251 | cc by PMID 35610943 · DOI · PMC9542356 |
| Oxidative Stress and Redox Imbalance in Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Host-Parasite Crosstalk and Therapeutic Perspectives | 2026 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42653299 · DOI · PMC13513219 |
An update on Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Free-living amoebae of the genus Acanthamoeba are causal agents of a severe sight-threatening infection of the cornea known as Acanthamoeba keratitis.
- Closing excerpt
- Altogether, this review may serve as the milestone for developing an effective solution for the prevention, control and treatment of Acanthamoeba infections.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (217 words)
Free-living amoebae of the genus Acanthamoeba are causal agents of a severe sight-threatening infection of the cornea known as Acanthamoeba keratitis. Moreover, the number of reported cases worldwide is increasing year after year, mostly in contact lens wearers, although cases have also been reported in non-contact lens wearers. Interestingly, Acanthamoeba keratitis has remained significant, despite our advances in antimicrobial chemotherapy and supportive care. In part, this is due to an incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of the disease, diagnostic delays and problems associated with chemotherapeutic interventions. In view of the devastating nature of this disease, here we present our current understanding of Acanthamoeba keratitis and molecular mechanisms associated with the disease, as well as virulence traits of Acanthamoeba that may be potential targets for improved diagnosis, therapeutic interventions and/or for the development of preventative measures. Novel molecular approaches such as proteomics, RNAi and a consensus in the diagnostic approaches for a suspected case of Acanthamoeba keratitis are proposed and reviewed based on data which have been compiled after years of working on this amoebic organism using many different techniques and listening to many experts in this field at conferences, workshops and international meetings. Altogether, this review may serve as the milestone for developing an effective solution for the prevention, control and treatment of Acanthamoeba infections.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25687209 · DOI · PMC4330640
Infectious keratitis: an update on epidemiology, causative microorganisms, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Corneal opacity is the 5th leading cause of blindness and visual impairment globally, affecting ~6 million of the world population.
- Closing excerpt
- In this review, we aim to provide an updated review on IK, encompassing the epidemiology, causative microorganisms, major risk factors and the impact of antimicrobial resistance.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (225 words)
Corneal opacity is the 5th leading cause of blindness and visual impairment globally, affecting ~6 million of the world population. In addition, it is responsible for 1.5-2.0 million new cases of monocular blindness per year, highlighting an ongoing uncurbed burden on human health. Among all aetiologies such as infection, trauma, inflammation, degeneration and nutritional deficiency, infectious keratitis (IK) represents the leading cause of corneal blindness in both developed and developing countries, with an estimated incidence ranging from 2.5 to 799 per 100,000 population-year. IK can be caused by a wide range of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, virus, parasites and polymicrobial infection. Subject to the geographical and temporal variations, bacteria and fungi have been shown to be the most common causative microorganisms for corneal infection. Although viral and Acanthamoeba keratitis are less common, they represent important causes for corneal blindness in the developed countries. Contact lens wear, trauma, ocular surface diseases, lid diseases, and post-ocular surgery have been shown to be the major risk factors for IK. Broad-spectrum topical antimicrobial treatment is the current mainstay of treatment for IK, though its effectiveness is being challenged by the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, including multidrug resistance, in some parts of the world. In this review, we aim to provide an updated review on IK, encompassing the epidemiology, causative microorganisms, major risk factors and the impact of antimicrobial resistance.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33414529 · DOI · PMC8102486
Infectious keratitis: A review [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Globally, infectious keratitis is the fifth leading cause of blindness.
- Closing excerpt
- Vision impairment, blindness and even loss of the eye can occur with a delay in diagnosis and inappropriate antimicrobial therapy.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (149 words)
Globally, infectious keratitis is the fifth leading cause of blindness. The main predisposing factors include contact lens wear, ocular injury and ocular surface disease. Staphylococcus species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Fusarium species, Candida species and Acanthamoeba species are the most common causal organisms. Culture of corneal scrapes is the preferred initial test to identify the culprit organism. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and in vivo confocal microscopy can complement the diagnosis. Empiric therapy is typically commenced with fluoroquinolones, or fortified antibiotics for bacterial keratitis; topical natamycin for fungal keratitis; and polyhexamethylene biguanide or chlorhexidine for acanthamoeba keratitis. Herpes simplex keratitis is mainly diagnosed clinically; however, PCR can also be used to confirm the initial diagnosis and in atypical cases. Antivirals and topical corticosteroids are indicated depending on the corneal layer infected. Vision impairment, blindness and even loss of the eye can occur with a delay in diagnosis and inappropriate antimicrobial therapy.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35610943 · DOI · PMC9542356
Oxidative Stress and Redox Imbalance in Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Host-Parasite Crosstalk and Therapeutic Perspectives [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Acanthamoeba keratitis is a severe, sight-threatening corneal infection caused by free-living amoebae widely distributed in soil, natural waters, and domestic or recreational water systems.
- Closing excerpt
- Progress will require causal validation of redox targets, separate assessment of trophozoites and mature cysts, long-term excystation and regrowth assays, evaluation across clinical isolates and genotypes, and parallel assessment of host-cell toxicity in clinically relevant corneal models.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (204 words)
Acanthamoeba keratitis is a severe, sight-threatening corneal infection caused by free-living amoebae widely distributed in soil, natural waters, and domestic or recreational water systems. Following entry into the corneal microenvironment, disease develops within a redox conflict in which host-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) may contribute to parasite control while simultaneously promoting inflammation and tissue injury. Acanthamoeba responds through an adaptable defense network involving superoxide dismutases, catalase, thioredoxin- and glutathione-dependent systems, peroxiredoxins, and mitochondrial mechanisms. However, most mechanistic evidence derives from in vitro trophozoite studies, whereas the contribution of individual redox pathways to mature cyst survival and persistence in the infected cornea remains poorly defined. This review critically integrates evidence on host oxidative and nitrosative responses, parasite antioxidant adaptation, bidirectional redox crosstalk, and redox-modulating therapeutic strategies. Current data support neither indiscriminate suppression nor uncontrolled amplification of reactive species. Instead, future interventions should achieve spatially, temporally, and stage-specifically controlled redox modulation that weakens parasite defenses while preserving corneal integrity and essential innate immune functions. Progress will require causal validation of redox targets, separate assessment of trophozoites and mature cysts, long-term excystation and regrowth assays, evaluation across clinical isolates and genotypes, and parallel assessment of host-cell toxicity in clinically relevant corneal models.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42653299 · DOI · PMC13513219
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis and treatment update 2009 [5]
- Research article Acanthamoeba keratitis: an emerging disease gathering importance worldwide? [6]
- Research article Acanthamoeba keratitis [7]
- Research article The pathophysiology of Acanthamoeba keratitis [8]
- Research article Naegleria and Acanthamoeba infections: review [9]
References
- Lorenzo-Morales J, Khan NA, Walochnik J. An update on Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. . 2015. PMID 25687209 · DOI · PMC4330640
- Ting DSJ, Ho CS, Deshmukh R, Said DG, Dua HS. Infectious keratitis: an update on epidemiology, causative microorganisms, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance. . 2021. PMID 33414529 · DOI · PMC8102486
- Cabrera-Aguas M, Khoo P, Watson SL. Infectious keratitis: A review. . 2022. PMID 35610943 · DOI · PMC9542356
- Wesołowski R, Sutkowy P, Lesiewska H, Kieszkowska A, Woźniak A. Oxidative Stress and Redox Imbalance in Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Host-Parasite Crosstalk and Therapeutic Perspectives. . 2026. PMID 42653299 · DOI · PMC13513219
- Dart JK, Saw VP, Kilvington S. Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis and treatment update 2009. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009. PMID 19660733 · DOI
- Lorenzo-Morales J, Martín-Navarro CM, López-Arencibia A, Arnalich-Montiel F, Piñero JE, Valladares B. Acanthamoeba keratitis: an emerging disease gathering importance worldwide?. Trends Parasitol. 2013. PMID 23433689 · DOI
- Illingworth CD, Cook SD. Acanthamoeba keratitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998. PMID 9635900 · DOI
- Clarke DW, Niederkorn JY. The pathophysiology of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Trends Parasitol. 2006. PMID 16500148 · DOI
- Ma P, Visvesvara GS, Martinez AJ, Theodore FH, Daggett PM, Sawyer TK. Naegleria and Acanthamoeba infections: review. Rev Infect Dis. 1990. PMID 2193354 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.