Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Infectious Diseases›Infectious Mononucleosis
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Infectious Mononucleosis

Infectious Diseases · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

A common, acute infection usually caused by the Epstein-Barr virus (herpesvirus 4, human).

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,229 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A common, acute infection usually caused by the Epstein-Barr virus (herpesvirus 4, human). There is an increase in mononuclear white blood cells and other atypical lymphocytes, generalized lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and occasionally hepatomegaly with hepatitis.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Glandular Fever; Fever, Glandular; Mononucleosis, Infectious.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Leukocyte Disorders; Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Related concepts

  • Herpesvirus
  • Human

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 7,467 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Infectious Mononucleosis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 302 of them (4.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 5,936 records.

Reviews account for 631 records (8.5%) and meta-analyses for 10. Randomized controlled trials number 36 (0.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 5,936 records; 2000-2009: 683 records; 2010-2019: 546 records; 2020 onward: 302 records5,936through 19996832000-20095462010-20193022020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19995,936
2000-2009683
2010-2019546
2020 onward302
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.5 percentReviews8.5% (631)Meta-analyses0.1% (10)Randomized controlled trials0.5% (36)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 7,467 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews6318.5%
Meta-analyses100.1%
Randomized controlled trials360.5%

Method: PubMed query "Infectious Mononucleosis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in infectious diseases

Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Macrophage polarisation: an immunohistochemical approach for identifying M1 and M2 macrophages
Barros MH, Hauck F, Dreyer JH, Kempkes B, Niedobitek G
2013Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
475cc by
PMID 24260507 · DOI · PMC3829941
Epstein-Barr virus and its association with disease - a review of relevance to general practice
Fugl A, Andersen CL
2019Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
118cc by
PMID 31088382 · DOI · PMC6518816
Primary Epstein-Barr virus infection with and without infectious mononucleosis
Rostgaard K, Balfour HH, Jarrett R, Erikstrup C, Pedersen O, Ullum H, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
86cc by
PMID 31846480 · DOI · PMC6917282
Indicator condition-guided HIV testing in patients with mononucleosis-like illness and community-acquired pneumonia in an Emergency Department setting: A prospective study from Poland (2015-2018)
Pyziak-Kowalska K, Raben D, Sullivan A, Bielecki M, Horban A, Kowalska JD
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42525658 · DOI · PMC13419186

Macrophage polarisation: an immunohistochemical approach for identifying M1 and M2 macrophages [1]

Research article Barros MH, Hauck F, Dreyer JH, Kempkes B, Niedobitek G · · 2013 · cited 475 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Macrophage polarization is increasingly recognised as an important pathogenetic factor in inflammatory and neoplastic diseases.
Closing excerpt
Furthermore, CD163 cannot be considered a reliable M2 marker when used on its own.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (300 words)

Macrophage polarization is increasingly recognised as an important pathogenetic factor in inflammatory and neoplastic diseases. Proinflammatory M1 macrophages promote T helper (Th) 1 responses and show tumoricidal activity. M2 macrophages contribute to tissue repair and promote Th2 responses. CD68 and CD163 are used to identify macrophages in tissue sections. However, characterisation of polarised macrophages in situ has remained difficult. Macrophage polarisation is regulated by transcription factors, pSTAT1 and RBP-J for M1, and CMAF for M2. We reasoned that double-labelling immunohistochemistry for the detection of macrophage markers together with transcription factors may be suitable to characterise macrophage polarisation in situ. To test this hypothesis, we have studied conditions associated with Th1- and Th2-predominant immune responses: infectious mononucleosis and Crohn's disease for Th1 and allergic nasal polyps, oxyuriasis, wound healing and foreign body granulomas for predominant Th2 response. In all situations, CD163+ cells usually outnumbered CD68+ cells. Moreover, CD163+ cells, usually considered as M2 macrophages, co-expressing pSTAT1 and RBP-J were found in all conditions examined. The numbers of putative M1 macrophages were higher in Th1- than in Th2-associated diseases, while more M2 macrophages were seen in Th2- than in Th1 related disorders. In most Th1-related diseases, the balance of M1 over M2 cells was shifted towards M1 cells, while the reverse was observed for Th2-related conditions. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed two distinct clusters: cluster I included Th1 diseases together with cases with high numbers of CD163+pSTAT1+, CD68+pSTAT1+, CD163+RBP-J+ and CD68+RBP-J+ macrophages; cluster II comprised Th2 conditions together with cases displaying high numbers of CD163+CMAF+ and CD68+CMAF+ macrophages. These results suggest that the detection of pSTAT1, RBP-J, and CMAF in the context of CD68 or CD163 expression is a suitable tool for the characterisation of macrophage polarisation in situ. Furthermore, CD163 cannot be considered a reliable M2 marker when used on its own.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24260507 · DOI · PMC3829941

Epstein-Barr virus and its association with disease - a review of relevance to general practice [2]

Review article Fugl A, Andersen CL · · 2019 · cited 118 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundGeneral practitioners encounter the vast majority of patients with Epstein-Barr virus-related disease, i.
Closing excerpt
However, a general practitioner should be aware of this as a differential diagnosis in patients with persisting symptoms of infectious mononucleosis for more than 3 months.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (291 words)

BackgroundGeneral practitioners encounter the vast majority of patients with Epstein-Barr virus-related disease, i.e. infectious mononucleosis in children and adolescents. With the expanding knowledge regarding the multifaceted role of Epstein-Barr virus in both benign and malignant disease we chose to focus this review on Epstein-Barr virus-related conditions with relevance to the general practitioners. A PubMed and Google Scholar literature search was performed using PubMed's MeSH terms of relevance to Epstein-Barr virus/infectious mononucleosis in regard to complications and associated conditions.Main textIn the present review, these included three early complications; hepatitis, splenic rupture and airway compromise, as well as possible late conditions; lymphoproliferative cancers, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection. This review thus highlights recent advances in the understanding of Epstein-Barr virus pathogenesis, focusing on management, acute complications, referral indications and potentially associated conditions.ConclusionsHepatitis is a common and self-limiting early complication to infectious mononucleosis and should be monitored with liver tests in more symptomatic cases. Splenic rupture is rare. Most cases are seen within 3 weeks after diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis and may occur spontaneously. There is no consensus on the safe return to physical activities, and ultrasonic assessment of spleen size may provide the best estimate of risk. Airway compromise due to tonsil enlargement is encountered in a minority of patients and should be treated with systemic corticosteroids during hospitalization. Association between lymphoproliferative cancers, especially Hodgkin lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma, and infectious mononucleosis are well-established. Epstein-Barr virus infection/infectious mononucleosis as a risk factor for multiple sclerosis has been documented and may be linked to genetic susceptibility. Chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection is rare. However, a general practitioner should be aware of this as a differential diagnosis in patients with persisting symptoms of infectious mononucleosis for more than 3 months.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31088382 · DOI · PMC6518816

Primary Epstein-Barr virus infection with and without infectious mononucleosis [3]

Research article Rostgaard K, Balfour HH, Jarrett R, Erikstrup C, Pedersen O, Ullum H, et al. · · 2019 · cited 86 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundInfectious mononucleosis (IM) is a common adverse presentation of primary infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in adolescence and later, but is rarely recognized in early childhood where primary EBV infection commonly occurs.
Closing excerpt
Our methodology is applicable to the epidemiological study of any infectious agent that establishes a persistent infection in the host and the sequelae thereof.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (355 words)

BackgroundInfectious mononucleosis (IM) is a common adverse presentation of primary infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in adolescence and later, but is rarely recognized in early childhood where primary EBV infection commonly occurs. It is not known what triggers IM, and also not why IM risk upon primary EBV infection (IM attack rate) seemingly varies between children and adolescents. IM symptoms may be severe and persist for a long time. IM also markedly elevates the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple sclerosis for unknown reasons. The way IM occurrence depends on age and sex is incompletely described and hard to interpret etiologically, because it depends on three quantities that are not readily observable: the prevalence of EBV-naϊve persons, the hazard rate of seroconverting and the attack rate, i.e. the fraction of primary EBV infections that is accompanied by IM. We therefore aimed to provide these quantities indirectly, to obtain epidemiologically interpretable measures of the dynamics of IM occurrence to provide etiological clues.Methods and findingsWe used joint modeling of EBV prevalence and IM occurrence data to provide detailed sex- and age-specific EBV infection rates and IM attack rates and derivatives thereof for a target population of all Danes age 0-29 years in 2006-2011. We demonstrate for the first time that IM attack rates increase dramatically rather precisely in conjunction to typical ages of puberty onset. The shape of the seroconversion hazard rate for children and teenagers confirmed a priori expectations and underlined the importance of what happens at age 0-2 years. The cumulative risk of IM before age 30 years was 13.3% for males and 22.4% for females. IM is likely to become more common through delaying EBV infection in years to come.ConclusionsThe change in attack rate at typical ages of puberty onset suggests that the immunologic response to EBV drastically changes over a relatively short age-span. We speculate that these changes are an integrated part of normal sexual maturation. Our findings may inform further etiologic research into EBV-related diseases and vaccine design. Our methodology is applicable to the epidemiological study of any infectious agent that establishes a persistent infection in the host and the sequelae thereof.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31846480 · DOI · PMC6917282

Indicator condition-guided HIV testing in patients with mononucleosis-like illness and community-acquired pneumonia in an Emergency Department setting: A prospective study from Poland (2015-2018) [4]

Research article Pyziak-Kowalska K, Raben D, Sullivan A, Bielecki M, Horban A, Kowalska JD · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDespite advances in HIV care, late diagnosis remains a major public health challenge in Europe, with nearly half of HIV diagnoses in the EU/EEA occurring at a late stage.
Closing excerpt
These findings support routine indicator condition-guided HIV testing in Emergency Departments to improve early HIV diagnosis and timely linkage to care.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (283 words)

BackgroundDespite advances in HIV care, late diagnosis remains a major public health challenge in Europe, with nearly half of HIV diagnoses in the EU/EEA occurring at a late stage. In Poland, a substantial proportion of people living with HIV remain undiagnosed. Indicator condition-guided testing has been proposed as an effective strategy to reduce missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis.MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted at the Emergency Department of the Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw, Poland, between May 2015 and March 2018, as part of the European OptTEST project. HIV DUO testing was offered to patients aged 18-65 years presenting with mononucleosis-like illness (MONO) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We evaluated the prevalence of HIV infection and assessed linkage to HIV care among those testing positive. Confirmatory testing, CD4 cell counts at diagnosis, and linkage-to-care outcomes were collected.ResultsAmong 885 patients with indicator conditions (MONO: 794; CAP: 91), 636 (71.9%) accepted HIV testing. Twenty-two patients (3.5%) were confirmed HIV-positive. HIV prevalence was 2.6% among patients with MONO and 11.1% among those with CAP. Most HIV-positive patients were male (90.9%), with 59% identifying as men who have sex with men or bisexual. The median age was 32.5 years. The median CD4 cell count at diagnosis was 341 cells/µL overall and was lower in patients presenting with CAP than MONO (61 vs. 366.5 cells/µL). All patients diagnosed with HIV were linked to care, and 95.5% initiated antiretroviral therapy, with a median time to treatment of 8 days.ConclusionsHIV seroprevalence among patients presenting with MONO or CAP was higher than the national average, particularly among those with CAP. These findings support routine indicator condition-guided HIV testing in Emergency Departments to improve early HIV diagnosis and timely linkage to care.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42525658 · DOI · PMC13419186

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Cellular responses to viral infection in humans: lessons from Epstein-Barr virus [5]
    Hislop AD, Taylor GS, Sauce D, Rickinson AB · Annu Rev Immunol · 2007 · cited 578 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Infectious mononucleosis [6]
    Luzuriaga K, Sullivan JL · N Engl J Med · 2010 · cited 380 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Spectrum of Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases [7]
    Kutok JL, Wang F · Annu Rev Pathol · 2006 · cited 355 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Infectious mononucleosis and risk for multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis [8]
    Thacker EL, Mirzaei F, Ascherio A · Ann Neurol · 2006 · cited 353 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article An updated meta-analysis of risk of multiple sclerosis following infectious mononucleosis [9]
    Handel AE, Williamson AJ, Disanto G, Handunnetthi L, Giovannoni G, Ramagopalan SV · PLoS One · 2010 · cited 233 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Infectious Mononucleosis [10]
    Dunmire SK, Hogquist KA, Balfour HH · Curr Top Microbiol Immunol · 2015 · cited 214 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Barros MH, Hauck F, Dreyer JH, Kempkes B, Niedobitek G. Macrophage polarisation: an immunohistochemical approach for identifying M1 and M2 macrophages. . 2013. PMID 24260507 · DOI · PMC3829941
  2. Fugl A, Andersen CL. Epstein-Barr virus and its association with disease - a review of relevance to general practice. . 2019. PMID 31088382 · DOI · PMC6518816
  3. Rostgaard K, Balfour HH, Jarrett R, Erikstrup C, Pedersen O, Ullum H, et al.. Primary Epstein-Barr virus infection with and without infectious mononucleosis. . 2019. PMID 31846480 · DOI · PMC6917282
  4. Pyziak-Kowalska K, Raben D, Sullivan A, Bielecki M, Horban A, Kowalska JD. Indicator condition-guided HIV testing in patients with mononucleosis-like illness and community-acquired pneumonia in an Emergency Department setting: A prospective study from Poland (2015-2018). . 2026. PMID 42525658 · DOI · PMC13419186
  5. Hislop AD, Taylor GS, Sauce D, Rickinson AB. Cellular responses to viral infection in humans: lessons from Epstein-Barr virus. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007. PMID 17378764 · DOI
  6. Luzuriaga K, Sullivan JL. Infectious mononucleosis. N Engl J Med. 2010. PMID 20505178 · DOI
  7. Kutok JL, Wang F. Spectrum of Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases. Annu Rev Pathol. 2006. PMID 18039120 · DOI
  8. Thacker EL, Mirzaei F, Ascherio A. Infectious mononucleosis and risk for multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Ann Neurol. 2006. PMID 16502434 · DOI
  9. Handel AE, Williamson AJ, Disanto G, Handunnetthi L, Giovannoni G, Ramagopalan SV. An updated meta-analysis of risk of multiple sclerosis following infectious mononucleosis. PLoS One. 2010. PMID 20824132 · DOI · PMC2931696
  10. Dunmire SK, Hogquist KA, Balfour HH. Infectious Mononucleosis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2015. PMID 26424648 · DOI · PMC4670567

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Burkitt LymphomaCancer and Oncology
  • Castleman DiseaseImmunology
  • Hodgkin DiseaseCancer and Oncology
  • Immunoblastic LymphadenopathyImmunology
  • LymphangioleiomyomatosisCancer and Oncology
  • Mycosis FungoidesCancer and Oncology

All 102 articles in Infectious Diseases →

At a glance

7,467
PubMed records on this heading
4%
published since 2020
631
review articles
36
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Burkitt LymphomaCancer and Oncology
  • Castleman DiseaseImmunology
  • Hodgkin DiseaseCancer and Oncology
  • Immunoblastic LymphadenopathyImmunology
  • LymphangioleiomyomatosisCancer and Oncology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support