Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,097 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Variation in health status arising from different causal factors to which each birth cohort in a population is exposed as environment and society change.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Cohort Effects; Effect, Cohort; Effects, Cohort; Generation Effect; Effect, Generation; Effects, Generation; Generation Effects.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 884 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Cohort Effect” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 148 of them (16.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 330 records.
Reviews account for 42 records (4.8%) and meta-analyses for 8. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 229 |
| 2000-2009 | 177 |
| 2010-2019 | 330 |
| 2020 onward | 148 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 42 | 4.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 8 | 0.9% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 2 | 0.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Cohort Effect"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in public health and nutrition
Population and nutrition studies mostly observe what people eat, breathe or are exposed to and then look for links with health, which shows association and not proof of cause. Self-reported diet is imprecise, people who eat or live differently also differ in other ways, and effects measured across a population may not apply to one person. Check the study design, how exposure was measured, what else was accounted for and the size of the effect, not only whether it was statistically significant.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Life-course body mass index trajectories and blood pressure in mid life in two British birth cohorts: stronger associations in the later-born generation [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundLittle is known about the impact of recent increases in obesity and more rapid gains in body mass index (BMI) on cardiovascular risk factors.
- Closing excerpt
- A stronger association between BMI trajectory and BP in the later-born cohort suggests that BMI-related effects may have been offset by improvements in other factors linked to BP, such as diet and smoking.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (296 words)
BackgroundLittle is known about the impact of recent increases in obesity and more rapid gains in body mass index (BMI) on cardiovascular risk factors. We investigated life-course BMI trajectories associations with adult blood pressure (BP) across two generations.MethodsWe used the the 1946 and 1958 British birth cohorts. Joint multivariate response models were fitted to longitudinal BMI measures [7, 11, 16, 20, 26, 36, 43 and 50 y (years): 1946 cohort, n = 4787; 7, 11, 16, 23, 33 and 45 y: 1958 cohort, n = 16,820] and mid-adult BP. We adopted linear spline models with random coefficients to characterize childhood and adult BMI slopes.ResultsMean systolic BP (SBP) decreased from the earlier- to later-born cohort by 2.8 mmHg in females, not males; mean diastolic BP (DBP) decreased by 3.2-3.3 mmHg (both sexes). Adult BMI was higher in the later- than the earlier-born cohort by 1.3-1.8 kg/m(2), slopes of BMI trajectory were steeper from early adulthood and associations with adult BP were stronger. Associations between adult BMI and SBP were stronger in the later-born cohort. For males, childhood BMI slope was associated with SBP only in the later-born cohort; the association for adult BMI slope was stronger in the later-born cohort: correlation coefficient r = 0.28 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25,0.33] versus 0.13 (0.06,0.20). For females, childhood slope was associated with SBP in both cohorts; adult slope was associated with SBP only in the 1958 cohort [r = 0.34 (0.31,0.37)]. Patterns of child-to-adult BMI associations were similar in relation to DBP.ConclusionsBP did not increase between two generations born 12 y apart despite higher BMI levels. A stronger association between BMI trajectory and BP in the later-born cohort suggests that BMI-related effects may have been offset by improvements in other factors linked to BP, such as diet and smoking.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26078389 · DOI · PMC4521132
The unrealized potential: cohort effects and age-period-cohort analysis [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- This study aims to provide a systematical introduction of age-period-cohort (APC) analysis to South Korean readers who are unfamiliar with this method (we provide an extended version of this study in Korean).
- Closing excerpt
- For designing effective health policies that improve Korean population's health and reduce health inequalities, it is essential to understand independent effects of the three temporal factors by using the innovative APC models.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (248 words)
This study aims to provide a systematical introduction of age-period-cohort (APC) analysis to South Korean readers who are unfamiliar with this method (we provide an extended version of this study in Korean). As health data in South Korea has substantially accumulated, population-level studies that explore long-term trends of health status and health inequalities and identify macrosocial determinants of the trends are needed. Analyzing long-term trends requires to discern independent effects of age, period, and cohort using APC analysis. Most existing health and aging literature have used cross-sectional or short-term available panel data to identify age or period effects ignoring cohort effects. This under-use of APC analysis may be attributed to the identification (ID) problem caused by the perfect linear dependency across age, period, and cohort. This study explores recently developed three APC models to address the ID problem and adequately estimate the effects of A-P-C: intrinsic estimator-APC models for tabular age by period data; hierarchical cross-classified random effects models for repeated cross-sectional data; and hierarchical APC-growth curve models for accelerated longitudinal panel data. An analytic exemplar for each model was provided. APC analysis may contribute to identifying biological, historical, and socioeconomic determinants in long-term trends of health status and health inequalities as well as examining Korean's aging trajectories and temporal trends of period and cohort effects. For designing effective health policies that improve Korean population's health and reduce health inequalities, it is essential to understand independent effects of the three temporal factors by using the innovative APC models.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29309721 · DOI · PMC5790985
The role of ageing in the wish to be dead: disentangling age, period and cohort effects in suicide ideation in European population [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- AimsTo investigate potential age, period and birth cohort effects in the prevalence of suicide ideation in European ageing population.
- Closing excerpt
- This scenario would imply a greater need for mental healthcare services for older people in the future.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (256 words)
AimsTo investigate potential age, period and birth cohort effects in the prevalence of suicide ideation in European ageing population.MethodsA total of 50 782 community-dwelling adults (aged + 50) from 20 different European countries were collected in the Survey Health Ageing and Retirement study. A multilevel logistic regression model of repeated measures was modelled to assess the effects of age and other variables, including the variability of observations over three levels: birth cohort groups, time period assessment and individual differences.ResultsThe larger effect of variability was attributed to individual-level factors (57.8%). Youngest-old people (65-79 years) showed lower suicide ideation than middle-aged people (50-64 years). No significative differences were found for suicide ideation between middle-aged people and oldest-old (80 + years). Only 0.85% and 0.13% of the total variability of suicide ideation accounted for birth cohort and period effects, respectively. Cohorts born between 1941 and 1944 possessed the lowest estimates of suicide ideation. Conversely, suicide ideation started to rise with post-War generations and reached a significant level for people born from 1953-1957 to 1961-1964. Regarding the time period, participants assessed in 2006-2007 showed a lower likelihood of suicide ideation. The rest of the cohorts and period groups did not show any significant effect on the prevalence of suicide ideation.ConclusionsOur results suggest that age and suicide ideation relationship is not linear in middle and older age. The European Baby boomers born from 50s to mid-60s might report higher suicide ideation than their ancestors. This scenario would imply a greater need for mental healthcare services for older people in the future.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33597061 · DOI · PMC8061246
Cohort Effects on Tobacco Consumption and Its Genetic and Environmental Variance Among Finnish Adults Born Between 1880 and 1957 [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionPopulation research indicates that smoking behaviors in Finland have varied over time by sex and birth cohort.
- Closing excerpt
- Our results highlight the intertwining effects of age, cohort, sex, and substance policies on substance use.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (297 words)
IntroductionPopulation research indicates that smoking behaviors in Finland have varied over time by sex and birth cohort. Smoking behaviors are influenced by genes and the environment; like the behaviors themselves, these underlying influences are not necessarily stable over time and may be modifiable by national drug policy.Aims and methodsWe utilized longitudinal mixed-effects models and causal-common-contingent twin models to evaluate sex and cohort effects on tobacco consumption and the underlying genetic and environmental variance components in a birth cohort sample of same-sex twins born in Finland between 1880 and 1957, assessed in 1975, 1981, 1990, and 2011.ResultsWe identified significant main effects of age, sex, and cohort on quantity of cigarette consumption, as well as significant age × cohort and sex × cohort interactions. We also identified sex and cohort effects on the liability to initiate regular smoking and the magnitude of variation underlying quantity of cigarette consumption. That said, heritability and environmental contributions to both traits were not different between the four sex × cohort groups.ConclusionsOur results indicate sex and cohort effects on the prevalence of smoking and its underlying variation. Our results on changing prevalence mirror existing population-level research in Finnish samples, but we did not identify differences in heritability found in other studies of cohort effects in tobacco use, potentially due to power issues. These results highlight the importance of considering age, cohort, and timing of policy changes when evaluating changes in substance consumption across time.ImplicationsThis study identifies sex and cohort effects influencing tobacco consumption in a sample of Finnish adult twins born between 1880 and 1957. Our results are in line with other population-level research in Finland and research on cohort effects influencing alcohol use in the same sample. Our results highlight the intertwining effects of age, cohort, sex, and substance policies on substance use.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38630445 · DOI · PMC11581999
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates [5]
- Research article Age period cohort analysis: a review of what we should and shouldn't do [6]
- Research article Intergenerational continuity of child physical abuse: how good is the evidence? [7]
- Research article Role of intergenerational effects on linear growth [8]
- Research article Does intergenerational transmission of trauma skip a generation? No meta-analytic evidence for tertiary traumatization with third generation of Holocaust survivors [9]
References
- Li L, Hardy R, Kuh D, Power C. Life-course body mass index trajectories and blood pressure in mid life in two British birth cohorts: stronger associations in the later-born generation. . 2015. PMID 26078389 · DOI · PMC4521132
- Heo J, Jeon SY, Oh CM, Hwang J, Hwang J, Oh J, et al.. The unrealized potential: cohort effects and age-period-cohort analysis. . 2017. PMID 29309721 · DOI · PMC5790985
- Cabello M, Rico-Uribe LA, Martinez-Ávila JC, Sánchez-Niubò A, Caballero FF, Borges G, et al.. The role of ageing in the wish to be dead: disentangling age, period and cohort effects in suicide ideation in European population. . 2021. PMID 33597061 · DOI · PMC8061246
- Zellers S, Maes HHM, Latvala A, Kaprio J. Cohort Effects on Tobacco Consumption and Its Genetic and Environmental Variance Among Finnish Adults Born Between 1880 and 1957. . 2024. PMID 38630445 · DOI · PMC11581999
- Holford TR. Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991. PMID 2049144 · DOI
- Bell A. Age period cohort analysis: a review of what we should and shouldn't do. Ann Hum Biol. 2020. PMID 32429768 · DOI
- Ertem IO, Leventhal JM, Dobbs S. Intergenerational continuity of child physical abuse: how good is the evidence?. Lancet. 2000. PMID 11022929 · DOI
- Ramakrishnan U, Martorell R, Schroeder DG, Flores R. Role of intergenerational effects on linear growth. J Nutr. 1999. PMID 10064328 · DOI
- Sagi-Schwartz A, van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Does intergenerational transmission of trauma skip a generation? No meta-analytic evidence for tertiary traumatization with third generation of Holocaust survivors. Attach Hum Dev. 2008. PMID 18773314 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-11-04; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-11-04.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.