Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Infectious Diseases›Tularemia
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Tularemia

Infectious Diseases · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A plague-like disease of rodents, transmissible to man.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (739 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A plague-like disease of rodents, transmissible to man. It is caused by francisella tularensis and is characterized by fever, chills, headache, backache, and weakness.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Tularemias; Francisella tularensis Infection; Francisella tularensis Infections; Infection, Francisella tularensis.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Tick-Borne Diseases

Related concepts

  • Francisella Tularensis

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 3,754 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Tularemia” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 348 of them (9.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,794 records.

Reviews account for 352 records (9.4%) and meta-analyses for 1. Randomized controlled trials number 5 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,794 records; 2000-2009: 693 records; 2010-2019: 919 records; 2020 onward: 348 records1,794through 19996932000-20099192010-20193482020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,794
2000-2009693
2010-2019919
2020 onward348
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.1 percentReviews9.4% (352)Meta-analyses0.0% (1)Randomized controlled trials0.1% (5)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 3,754 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3529.4%
Meta-analyses10.0%
Randomized controlled trials50.1%

Method: PubMed query "Tularemia"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in infectious diseases

Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Francisella tularensis, Tularemia and Serological Diagnosis
Maurin M
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
81cc by
PMID 33194778 · DOI · PMC7649319
Tularemia as a waterborne disease: a review
Hennebique A, Boisset S, Maurin M
2019Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
80cc by
PMID 31287787 · DOI · PMC6691783
Francisella requires dynamic type VI secretion system and ClpB to deliver effectors for phagosomal escape
Brodmann M, Dreier RF, Broz P, Basler M
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
77cc by
PMID 28621333 · DOI · PMC5481754
Immunosensors and Immunoassays to Detect Francisella tularensis and Diagnose Tularemia
Pohanka M
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41892051 · DOI · PMC13024696

Francisella tularensis, Tularemia and Serological Diagnosis [1]

Review article Maurin M · · 2020 · cited 81 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Tularemia is a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Francisella tularensis.
Closing excerpt
It is necessary to improve further speed and accuracy of tularemia diagnosis, as well as the standardization of diagnostic procedures.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (230 words)

Tularemia is a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Francisella tularensis. The predominant sources, routes of infection, and clinical manifestations of human infections greatly vary according to the geographic area considered. Moreover, clinical suspicion of tularemia is often tricky because of the lack of specificity of the clinical manifestations. Because F. tularensis isolation is tedious and detection of its DNA usually requires removal of infected tissues, serological techniques are most often used for diagnostic confirmation. However, these techniques are varied and poorly standardized. The microagglutination test (MAT), the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and ELISA tests are currently the most frequently used techniques. These home-made and commercial tests are mainly used for tularemia diagnosis but also seroprevalence studies. ELISA tests detect specific antibodies within two weeks of disease evaluation, compared to 2-3 weeks for MAT and IFA. However, more false-positive results are usually reported with ELISA. The long-term persistence of anti-F. tularensis antibodies in patients with past tularemia infection hampers the diagnostic specificity of all these tests. Also, cross-reacting antibodies have been described (especially with Brucella and Yersinia species), although usually at a low level. The immunoblotting technique can highlight these serological cross-reactions. Tularemia remains an underdiagnosed disease in most endemic areas, and the clinical presentations of this disease are evolving. It is necessary to improve further speed and accuracy of tularemia diagnosis, as well as the standardization of diagnostic procedures.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33194778 · DOI · PMC7649319

Tularemia as a waterborne disease: a review [2]

Review article Hennebique A, Boisset S, Maurin M · · 2019 · cited 80 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Francisella tularensis is a Gram-negative, intracellular bacterium causing the zoonosis tularemia.
Closing excerpt
tularensis likely shares with these species an ability of long-term survival in the aquatic environment, which has to be considered in terms of tularemia surveillance and control.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (198 words)

Francisella tularensis is a Gram-negative, intracellular bacterium causing the zoonosis tularemia. This highly infectious microorganism is considered a potential biological threat agent. Humans are usually infected through direct contact with the animal reservoir and tick bites. However, tularemia cases also occur after contact with a contaminated hydro-telluric environment. Water-borne tularemia outbreaks and sporadic cases have occurred worldwide in the last decades, with specific clinical and epidemiological traits. These infections represent a major public health and military challenge. Human contaminations have occurred through consumption or use of F. tularensis-contaminated water, and various aquatic activities such as swimming, canyoning and fishing. In addition, in Sweden and Finland, mosquitoes are primary vectors of tularemia due to infection of mosquito larvae in contaminated aquatic environments. The mechanisms of F. tularensis survival in water may include the formation of biofilms, interactions with free-living amoebae, and the transition to a 'viable but nonculturable' state, but the relative contribution of these possible mechanisms remains unknown. Many new aquatic species of Francisella have been characterized in recent years. F. tularensis likely shares with these species an ability of long-term survival in the aquatic environment, which has to be considered in terms of tularemia surveillance and control.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31287787 · DOI · PMC6691783

Francisella requires dynamic type VI secretion system and ClpB to deliver effectors for phagosomal escape [3]

Research article Brodmann M, Dreier RF, Broz P, Basler M · · 2017 · cited 77 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Francisella tularensis is an intracellular pathogen that causes the fatal zoonotic disease tularaemia.
Closing excerpt
This suggests that PdpC and PdpD are T6SS effectors involved in phagosome rupture.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (143 words)

Francisella tularensis is an intracellular pathogen that causes the fatal zoonotic disease tularaemia. Critical for its pathogenesis is the ability of the phagocytosed bacteria to escape into the cell cytosol. For this, the bacteria use a non-canonical type VI secretion system (T6SS) encoded on the Francisella pathogenicity island (FPI). Here we show that in F. novicida T6SS assembly initiates at the bacterial poles both in vitro and within infected macrophages. T6SS dynamics and function depends on the general purpose ClpB unfoldase, which specifically colocalizes with contracted sheaths and is required for their disassembly. T6SS assembly depends on iglF, iglG, iglI and iglJ, whereas pdpC, pdpD, pdpE and anmK are dispensable. Importantly, strains lacking pdpC and pdpD are unable to escape from phagosome, activate AIM2 inflammasome or cause disease in mice. This suggests that PdpC and PdpD are T6SS effectors involved in phagosome rupture.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28621333 · DOI · PMC5481754

Immunosensors and Immunoassays to Detect Francisella tularensis and Diagnose Tularemia [4]

Review article Pohanka M · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia, is a highly infectious Category A biothreat agent characterized by an exceptionally low infectious dose and diverse transmission routes.
Closing excerpt
tularensis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (168 words)

Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia, is a highly infectious Category A biothreat agent characterized by an exceptionally low infectious dose and diverse transmission routes. Due to the pathogen's fastidious growth requirements and the high risk of laboratory-acquired infections, traditional cultivation methods are often protracted and hazardous. Consequently, the development of rapid and sensitive diagnostic tools is paramount. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of immunoassays, with a specific focus on the evolution from standard laboratory techniques to advanced biosensors. We detail the critical phases of antigen preparation, including high-pressure homogenization and sonication, and the generation of high-affinity polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Furthermore, we evaluate the implementation of novel biosensor-like devices, such as electrochemiluminescence and Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering platforms, designed for point-of-care and field-ready scenarios. By synthesizing recent advancements in nanomaterial-enhanced recognition and microfluidic integration, this review emphasizes the pivotal role of these technologies in achieving early detection and mitigating the impact of both natural outbreaks and potential deliberate misuse of F. tularensis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41892051 · DOI · PMC13024696

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management [5]
    Dennis DT, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, et al. · JAMA · 2001 · cited 929 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Tularemia [6]
    Ellis J, Oyston PC, Green M, Titball RW · Clin Microbiol Rev · 2002 · cited 694 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations [7]
    Sjöstedt A · Ann N Y Acad Sci · 2007 · cited 425 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Tularaemia: bioterrorism defence renews interest in Francisella tularensis [8]
    Oyston PC, Sjostedt A, Titball RW · Nat Rev Microbiol · 2004 · cited 398 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Molecular epidemiology, evolution, and ecology of Francisella [9]
    Keim P, Johansson A, Wagner DM · Ann N Y Acad Sci · 2007 · cited 282 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? [10]
    Kaufmann AF, Meltzer MI, Schmid GP · Emerg Infect Dis · 1997 · cited 196 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Maurin M. Francisella tularensis, Tularemia and Serological Diagnosis. . 2020. PMID 33194778 · DOI · PMC7649319
  2. Hennebique A, Boisset S, Maurin M. Tularemia as a waterborne disease: a review. . 2019. PMID 31287787 · DOI · PMC6691783
  3. Brodmann M, Dreier RF, Broz P, Basler M. Francisella requires dynamic type VI secretion system and ClpB to deliver effectors for phagosomal escape. . 2017. PMID 28621333 · DOI · PMC5481754
  4. Pohanka M. Immunosensors and Immunoassays to Detect Francisella tularensis and Diagnose Tularemia. . 2026. PMID 41892051 · DOI · PMC13024696
  5. Dennis DT, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, et al.. Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. 2001. PMID 11386933 · DOI
  6. Ellis J, Oyston PC, Green M, Titball RW. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002. PMID 12364373 · DOI · PMC126859
  7. Sjöstedt A. Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007. PMID 17395726 · DOI
  8. Oyston PC, Sjostedt A, Titball RW. Tularaemia: bioterrorism defence renews interest in Francisella tularensis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004. PMID 15550942 · DOI
  9. Keim P, Johansson A, Wagner DM. Molecular epidemiology, evolution, and ecology of Francisella. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007. PMID 17435120 · DOI
  10. Kaufmann AF, Meltzer MI, Schmid GP. The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable?. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997. PMID 9204289 · DOI · PMC2627615

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • AnaplasmosisInfectious Diseases
  • Lyme DiseaseInfectious Diseases
  • Rocky Mountain Spotted FeverInfectious Diseases
  • Relapsing FeverInfectious Diseases
  • EhrlichiosisInfectious Diseases
  • AnthraxInfectious Diseases

All 102 articles in Infectious Diseases →

At a glance

3,754
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
352
review articles
5
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • AnaplasmosisInfectious Diseases
  • Lyme DiseaseInfectious Diseases
  • Rocky Mountain Spotted FeverInfectious Diseases
  • Relapsing FeverInfectious Diseases
  • EhrlichiosisInfectious Diseases

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support