Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (739 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A plague-like disease of rodents, transmissible to man. It is caused by francisella tularensis and is characterized by fever, chills, headache, backache, and weakness.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Tularemias; Francisella tularensis Infection; Francisella tularensis Infections; Infection, Francisella tularensis.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Tick-Borne Diseases
Related concepts
- Francisella Tularensis
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 3,754 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Tularemia” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 348 of them (9.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,794 records.
Reviews account for 352 records (9.4%) and meta-analyses for 1. Randomized controlled trials number 5 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,794 |
| 2000-2009 | 693 |
| 2010-2019 | 919 |
| 2020 onward | 348 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 352 | 9.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 1 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 5 | 0.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Tularemia"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in infectious diseases
Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisella tularensis, Tularemia and Serological Diagnosis | 2020 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 81 | cc by PMID 33194778 · DOI · PMC7649319 |
| Tularemia as a waterborne disease: a review | 2019 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 80 | cc by PMID 31287787 · DOI · PMC6691783 |
| Francisella requires dynamic type VI secretion system and ClpB to deliver effectors for phagosomal escape | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 77 | cc by PMID 28621333 · DOI · PMC5481754 |
| Immunosensors and Immunoassays to Detect Francisella tularensis and Diagnose Tularemia | 2026 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 41892051 · DOI · PMC13024696 |
Francisella tularensis, Tularemia and Serological Diagnosis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Tularemia is a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Francisella tularensis.
- Closing excerpt
- It is necessary to improve further speed and accuracy of tularemia diagnosis, as well as the standardization of diagnostic procedures.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (230 words)
Tularemia is a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Francisella tularensis. The predominant sources, routes of infection, and clinical manifestations of human infections greatly vary according to the geographic area considered. Moreover, clinical suspicion of tularemia is often tricky because of the lack of specificity of the clinical manifestations. Because F. tularensis isolation is tedious and detection of its DNA usually requires removal of infected tissues, serological techniques are most often used for diagnostic confirmation. However, these techniques are varied and poorly standardized. The microagglutination test (MAT), the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and ELISA tests are currently the most frequently used techniques. These home-made and commercial tests are mainly used for tularemia diagnosis but also seroprevalence studies. ELISA tests detect specific antibodies within two weeks of disease evaluation, compared to 2-3 weeks for MAT and IFA. However, more false-positive results are usually reported with ELISA. The long-term persistence of anti-F. tularensis antibodies in patients with past tularemia infection hampers the diagnostic specificity of all these tests. Also, cross-reacting antibodies have been described (especially with Brucella and Yersinia species), although usually at a low level. The immunoblotting technique can highlight these serological cross-reactions. Tularemia remains an underdiagnosed disease in most endemic areas, and the clinical presentations of this disease are evolving. It is necessary to improve further speed and accuracy of tularemia diagnosis, as well as the standardization of diagnostic procedures.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33194778 · DOI · PMC7649319
Tularemia as a waterborne disease: a review [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Francisella tularensis is a Gram-negative, intracellular bacterium causing the zoonosis tularemia.
- Closing excerpt
- tularensis likely shares with these species an ability of long-term survival in the aquatic environment, which has to be considered in terms of tularemia surveillance and control.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (198 words)
Francisella tularensis is a Gram-negative, intracellular bacterium causing the zoonosis tularemia. This highly infectious microorganism is considered a potential biological threat agent. Humans are usually infected through direct contact with the animal reservoir and tick bites. However, tularemia cases also occur after contact with a contaminated hydro-telluric environment. Water-borne tularemia outbreaks and sporadic cases have occurred worldwide in the last decades, with specific clinical and epidemiological traits. These infections represent a major public health and military challenge. Human contaminations have occurred through consumption or use of F. tularensis-contaminated water, and various aquatic activities such as swimming, canyoning and fishing. In addition, in Sweden and Finland, mosquitoes are primary vectors of tularemia due to infection of mosquito larvae in contaminated aquatic environments. The mechanisms of F. tularensis survival in water may include the formation of biofilms, interactions with free-living amoebae, and the transition to a 'viable but nonculturable' state, but the relative contribution of these possible mechanisms remains unknown. Many new aquatic species of Francisella have been characterized in recent years. F. tularensis likely shares with these species an ability of long-term survival in the aquatic environment, which has to be considered in terms of tularemia surveillance and control.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31287787 · DOI · PMC6691783
Francisella requires dynamic type VI secretion system and ClpB to deliver effectors for phagosomal escape [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Francisella tularensis is an intracellular pathogen that causes the fatal zoonotic disease tularaemia.
- Closing excerpt
- This suggests that PdpC and PdpD are T6SS effectors involved in phagosome rupture.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (143 words)
Francisella tularensis is an intracellular pathogen that causes the fatal zoonotic disease tularaemia. Critical for its pathogenesis is the ability of the phagocytosed bacteria to escape into the cell cytosol. For this, the bacteria use a non-canonical type VI secretion system (T6SS) encoded on the Francisella pathogenicity island (FPI). Here we show that in F. novicida T6SS assembly initiates at the bacterial poles both in vitro and within infected macrophages. T6SS dynamics and function depends on the general purpose ClpB unfoldase, which specifically colocalizes with contracted sheaths and is required for their disassembly. T6SS assembly depends on iglF, iglG, iglI and iglJ, whereas pdpC, pdpD, pdpE and anmK are dispensable. Importantly, strains lacking pdpC and pdpD are unable to escape from phagosome, activate AIM2 inflammasome or cause disease in mice. This suggests that PdpC and PdpD are T6SS effectors involved in phagosome rupture.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28621333 · DOI · PMC5481754
Immunosensors and Immunoassays to Detect Francisella tularensis and Diagnose Tularemia [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia, is a highly infectious Category A biothreat agent characterized by an exceptionally low infectious dose and diverse transmission routes.
- Closing excerpt
- tularensis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (168 words)
Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia, is a highly infectious Category A biothreat agent characterized by an exceptionally low infectious dose and diverse transmission routes. Due to the pathogen's fastidious growth requirements and the high risk of laboratory-acquired infections, traditional cultivation methods are often protracted and hazardous. Consequently, the development of rapid and sensitive diagnostic tools is paramount. This manuscript provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of immunoassays, with a specific focus on the evolution from standard laboratory techniques to advanced biosensors. We detail the critical phases of antigen preparation, including high-pressure homogenization and sonication, and the generation of high-affinity polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Furthermore, we evaluate the implementation of novel biosensor-like devices, such as electrochemiluminescence and Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering platforms, designed for point-of-care and field-ready scenarios. By synthesizing recent advancements in nanomaterial-enhanced recognition and microfluidic integration, this review emphasizes the pivotal role of these technologies in achieving early detection and mitigating the impact of both natural outbreaks and potential deliberate misuse of F. tularensis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41892051 · DOI · PMC13024696
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management [5]
- Research article Tularemia [6]
- Research article Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations [7]
- Research article Tularaemia: bioterrorism defence renews interest in Francisella tularensis [8]
- Research article Molecular epidemiology, evolution, and ecology of Francisella [9]
- Research article The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? [10]
References
- Maurin M. Francisella tularensis, Tularemia and Serological Diagnosis. . 2020. PMID 33194778 · DOI · PMC7649319
- Hennebique A, Boisset S, Maurin M. Tularemia as a waterborne disease: a review. . 2019. PMID 31287787 · DOI · PMC6691783
- Brodmann M, Dreier RF, Broz P, Basler M. Francisella requires dynamic type VI secretion system and ClpB to deliver effectors for phagosomal escape. . 2017. PMID 28621333 · DOI · PMC5481754
- Pohanka M. Immunosensors and Immunoassays to Detect Francisella tularensis and Diagnose Tularemia. . 2026. PMID 41892051 · DOI · PMC13024696
- Dennis DT, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS, Eitzen E, et al.. Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. 2001. PMID 11386933 · DOI
- Ellis J, Oyston PC, Green M, Titball RW. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002. PMID 12364373 · DOI · PMC126859
- Sjöstedt A. Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007. PMID 17395726 · DOI
- Oyston PC, Sjostedt A, Titball RW. Tularaemia: bioterrorism defence renews interest in Francisella tularensis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004. PMID 15550942 · DOI
- Keim P, Johansson A, Wagner DM. Molecular epidemiology, evolution, and ecology of Francisella. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007. PMID 17435120 · DOI
- Kaufmann AF, Meltzer MI, Schmid GP. The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable?. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997. PMID 9204289 · DOI · PMC2627615
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.