Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Infectious Diseases›Anaplasmosis
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Anaplasmosis

Infectious Diseases · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A disease usually in cattle caused by parasitization of the red blood cells by bacteria of the genus anaplasma.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (901 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A disease usually in cattle caused by parasitization of the red blood cells by bacteria of the genus anaplasma.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Anaplasmoses; Anaplasma Infection; Anaplasma Infections; Infection, Anaplasma; Infections, Anaplasma; Anaplasma phagocytophilum Infection; Anaplasma phagocytophilum Infections; Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Anaplasmataceae Infections; Tick-Borne Diseases; Animal Diseases

Related concepts

  • Anaplasma

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,355 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Anaplasmosis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 579 of them (24.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 736 records.

Reviews account for 166 records (7.0%) and meta-analyses for 10. Randomized controlled trials number 6 (0.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 736 records; 2000-2009: 354 records; 2010-2019: 686 records; 2020 onward: 579 records736through 19993542000-20096862010-20195792020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999736
2000-2009354
2010-2019686
2020 onward579
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.3 percentReviews7.0% (166)Meta-analyses0.4% (10)Randomized controlled trials0.3% (6)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,355 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1667.0%
Meta-analyses100.4%
Randomized controlled trials60.3%

Method: PubMed query "Anaplasmosis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in infectious diseases

Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Circulation of four Anaplasma phagocytophilum ecotypes in Europe
Jahfari S, Coipan EC, Fonville M, van Leeuwen AD, Hengeveld P, Heylen D, et al.
2014Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
222cc by
PMID 25127547 · DOI · PMC4153903
Guideline for veterinary practitioners on canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in Europe
Sainz Á, Roura X, Miró G, Estrada-Peña A, Kohn B, Harrus S, et al.
2015Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
208cc by
PMID 25649069 · DOI · PMC4324656
Systems biology of tissue-specific response to Anaplasma phagocytophilum reveals differentiated apoptosis in the tick vector Ixodes scapularis
Ayllón N, Villar M, Galindo RC, Kocan KM, Šíma R, López JA, et al.
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
107cc by
PMID 25815810 · DOI · PMC4376793
Machine Learning-Based Detection of Anaplasma spp. Using Dielectric Properties of Host Cells
Valishirin H, Yaram SDR, Doost NF, Srivastava SK, Broschat SL
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42515092 · DOI · PMC13416276

Circulation of four Anaplasma phagocytophilum ecotypes in Europe [1]

Research article Jahfari S, Coipan EC, Fonville M, van Leeuwen AD, Hengeveld P, Heylen D, et al. · · 2014 · cited 222 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundAnaplasma phagocytophilum is the etiological agent of granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans and animals.
Closing excerpt
phagocytophilum ecotype indicates a recent increase of the acarological risk of exposure of humans and animals.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (327 words)

BackgroundAnaplasma phagocytophilum is the etiological agent of granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans and animals. Wild animals and ticks play key roles in the enzootic cycles of the pathogen. Potential ecotypes of A. phagocytophilum have been characterized genetically, but their host range, zoonotic potential and transmission dynamics has only incompletely been resolved.MethodsThe presence of A. phagocytophilum DNA was determined in more than 6000 ixodid ticks collected from the vegetation and wildlife, in 289 tissue samples from wild and domestic animals, and 69 keds collected from deer, originating from various geographic locations in The Netherlands and Belgium. From the qPCR-positive lysates, a fragment of the groEL-gene was amplified and sequenced. Additional groEL sequences from ticks and animals from Europe were obtained from GenBank, and sequences from human cases were obtained through literature searches. Statistical analyses were performed to identify A. phagocytophilum ecotypes, to assess their host range and their zoonotic potential. The population dynamics of A. phagocytophilum ecotypes was investigated using population genetic analyses.ResultsDNA of A. phagocytophilum was present in all stages of questing and feeding Ixodes ricinus, feeding I. hexagonus, I. frontalis, I. trianguliceps, and deer keds, but was absent in questing I. arboricola and Dermacentor reticulatus. DNA of A. phagocytophilum was present in feeding ticks and tissues from many vertebrates, including roe deer, mouflon, red foxes, wild boar, sheep and hedgehogs but was rarely found in rodents and birds and was absent in badgers and lizards. Four geographically dispersed A. phagocytophilum ecotypes were identified, that had significantly different host ranges. All sequences from human cases belonged to only one of these ecotypes. Based on population genetic parameters, the potentially zoonotic ecotype showed significant expansion.ConclusionFour ecotypes of A. phagocytophilum with differential enzootic cycles were identified. So far, all human cases clustered in only one of these ecotypes. The zoonotic ecotype has the broadest range of wildlife hosts. The expansion of the zoonotic A. phagocytophilum ecotype indicates a recent increase of the acarological risk of exposure of humans and animals.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25127547 · DOI · PMC4153903

Guideline for veterinary practitioners on canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in Europe [2]

Review article Sainz Á, Roura X, Miró G, Estrada-Peña A, Kohn B, Harrus S, et al. · · 2015 · cited 208 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are important tick-borne diseases with a worldwide distribution.
Closing excerpt
This guideline is intended to answer the most common questions on these diseases from a practical point of view.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (92 words)

Canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are important tick-borne diseases with a worldwide distribution. Information has been continuously collected on these infections in Europe, and publications have increased in recent years. Prevalence rates are high for Ehrlichia and Anaplasma spp. infections in dogs from different European countries. The goal of this article was to provide a practical guideline for veterinary practitioners on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in dogs from Europe. This guideline is intended to answer the most common questions on these diseases from a practical point of view.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25649069 · DOI · PMC4324656

Systems biology of tissue-specific response to Anaplasma phagocytophilum reveals differentiated apoptosis in the tick vector Ixodes scapularis [3]

Research article Ayllón N, Villar M, Galindo RC, Kocan KM, Šíma R, López JA, et al. · · 2015 · cited 107 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Anaplasma phagocytophilum is an emerging pathogen that causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis.
Closing excerpt
scapularis tissue-specific transcriptome and proteome demonstrated the complexity of the tick response to infection and will contribute to characterize gene regulation in ticks.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (292 words)

Anaplasma phagocytophilum is an emerging pathogen that causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis. Infection with this zoonotic pathogen affects cell function in both vertebrate host and the tick vector, Ixodes scapularis. Global tissue-specific response and apoptosis signaling pathways were characterized in I. scapularis nymphs and adult female midguts and salivary glands infected with A. phagocytophilum using a systems biology approach combining transcriptomics and proteomics. Apoptosis was selected for pathway-focused analysis due to its role in bacterial infection of tick cells. The results showed tissue-specific differences in tick response to infection and revealed differentiated regulation of apoptosis pathways. The impact of bacterial infection was more pronounced in tick nymphs and midguts than in salivary glands, probably reflecting bacterial developmental cycle. All apoptosis pathways described in other organisms were identified in I. scapularis, except for the absence of the Perforin ortholog. Functional characterization using RNA interference showed that Porin knockdown significantly increases tick colonization by A. phagocytophilum. Infection with A. phagocytophilum produced complex tissue-specific alterations in transcript and protein levels. In tick nymphs, the results suggested a possible effect of bacterial infection on the inhibition of tick immune response. In tick midguts, the results suggested that A. phagocytophilum infection inhibited cell apoptosis to facilitate and establish infection through up-regulation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Bacterial infection inhibited the intrinsic apoptosis pathway in tick salivary glands by down-regulating Porin expression that resulted in the inhibition of Cytochrome c release as the anti-apoptotic mechanism to facilitate bacterial infection. However, tick salivary glands may promote apoptosis to limit bacterial infection through induction of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway. These dynamic changes in response to A. phagocytophilum in I. scapularis tissue-specific transcriptome and proteome demonstrated the complexity of the tick response to infection and will contribute to characterize gene regulation in ticks.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25815810 · DOI · PMC4376793

Machine Learning-Based Detection of Anaplasma spp. Using Dielectric Properties of Host Cells [4]

Research article Valishirin H, Yaram SDR, Doost NF, Srivastava SK, Broschat SL · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Tick-borne bacterial infections such as those caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum are difficult to diagnose, particularly at early stages, because they rely on specialized laboratory tests.
Closing excerpt
This study is intended as a pilot and supports further work with larger datasets, additional cell types, and broader experimental conditions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (190 words)

Tick-borne bacterial infections such as those caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum are difficult to diagnose, particularly at early stages, because they rely on specialized laboratory tests. Dielectric-based measurements provide a label-free way to probe cellular state and may offer useful information. In this study, we explored whether A. phagocytophilum-infected and uninfected HL-60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells can be distinguished using dielectric measurements collected under controlled in vitro conditions. Measurements were performed at two medium conductivities (100 and 300 µS/cm), and three dielectric properties were examined: cytoplasmic conductivity, specific membrane conductance, and specific membrane capacitance. We used exploratory analysis, statistical tests, and interpretable linear classifiers, with performance evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. Membrane-related properties, especially specific membrane conductance, showed the clearest separation between infection states and were consistently the most informative across models. Both classification performance and effect sizes were stronger at the higher medium conductivity condition. These results are encouraging, but because the sample size was small and consisted only of technical replicates, they should be interpreted as preliminary measurement-level evidence. This study is intended as a pilot and supports further work with larger datasets, additional cell types, and broader experimental conditions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42515092 · DOI · PMC13416276

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America [5]
    Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, Halperin JJ, Steere AC, Klempner MS, et al. · Clin Infect Dis · 2006 · cited 1,275 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The natural history of Anaplasma marginale [6]
    Kocan KM, de la Fuente J, Blouin EF, Coetzee JF, Ewing SA · Vet Parasitol · 2010 · cited 350 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A review of bovine anaplasmosis [7]
    Aubry P, Geale DW · Transbound Emerg Dis · 2011 · cited 276 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Antigens and alternatives for control of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle [8]
    Kocan KM, de la Fuente J, Guglielmone AA, Meléndez RD · Clin Microbiol Rev · 2003 · cited 255 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis [9]
    Ismail N, Bloch KC, McBride JW · Clin Lab Med · 2010 · cited 238 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Lyme Disease, Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, and Babesiosis: A Review [10]
    Sanchez E, Vannier E, Wormser GP, Hu LT · JAMA · 2016 · cited 226 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Jahfari S, Coipan EC, Fonville M, van Leeuwen AD, Hengeveld P, Heylen D, et al.. Circulation of four Anaplasma phagocytophilum ecotypes in Europe. . 2014. PMID 25127547 · DOI · PMC4153903
  2. Sainz Á, Roura X, Miró G, Estrada-Peña A, Kohn B, Harrus S, et al.. Guideline for veterinary practitioners on canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in Europe. . 2015. PMID 25649069 · DOI · PMC4324656
  3. Ayllón N, Villar M, Galindo RC, Kocan KM, Šíma R, López JA, et al.. Systems biology of tissue-specific response to Anaplasma phagocytophilum reveals differentiated apoptosis in the tick vector Ixodes scapularis. . 2015. PMID 25815810 · DOI · PMC4376793
  4. Valishirin H, Yaram SDR, Doost NF, Srivastava SK, Broschat SL. Machine Learning-Based Detection of Anaplasma spp. Using Dielectric Properties of Host Cells. . 2026. PMID 42515092 · DOI · PMC13416276
  5. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED, Halperin JJ, Steere AC, Klempner MS, et al.. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006. PMID 17029130 · DOI
  6. Kocan KM, de la Fuente J, Blouin EF, Coetzee JF, Ewing SA. The natural history of Anaplasma marginale. Vet Parasitol. 2010. PMID 19811876 · DOI
  7. Aubry P, Geale DW. A review of bovine anaplasmosis. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011. PMID 21040509 · DOI
  8. Kocan KM, de la Fuente J, Guglielmone AA, Meléndez RD. Antigens and alternatives for control of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003. PMID 14557295 · DOI · PMC207124
  9. Ismail N, Bloch KC, McBride JW. Human ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. Clin Lab Med. 2010. PMID 20513551 · DOI · PMC2882064
  10. Sanchez E, Vannier E, Wormser GP, Hu LT. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Lyme Disease, Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, and Babesiosis: A Review. JAMA. 2016. PMID 27115378 · DOI · PMC7758915

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • EhrlichiosisInfectious Diseases
  • TularemiaInfectious Diseases
  • Lyme DiseaseInfectious Diseases
  • Rocky Mountain Spotted FeverInfectious Diseases
  • Relapsing FeverInfectious Diseases
  • AnthraxInfectious Diseases

All 102 articles in Infectious Diseases →

At a glance

2,355
PubMed records on this heading
25%
published since 2020
166
review articles
6
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • EhrlichiosisInfectious Diseases
  • TularemiaInfectious Diseases
  • Lyme DiseaseInfectious Diseases
  • Rocky Mountain Spotted FeverInfectious Diseases
  • Relapsing FeverInfectious Diseases

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support