Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Thoracic Duct
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Thoracic Duct

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The largest lymphatic vessel that passes through the chest and drains into the subclavian vein.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (779 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The largest lymphatic vessel that passes through the chest and drains into the subclavian vein.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Ducts, Thoracic; Duct, Thoracic; Thoracic Ducts; Cisterna Chyli; Chyli, Cisterna; Chylus, Cisterna; Cisterna Chylus.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Lymphatic Vessels

Related concepts

  • Subclavian Vein

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,474 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Thoracic Duct” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 354 of them (7.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 3,243 records.

Reviews account for 301 records (6.7%) and meta-analyses for 9. Randomized controlled trials number 13 (0.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 3,243 records; 2000-2009: 367 records; 2010-2019: 510 records; 2020 onward: 354 records3,243through 19993672000-20095102010-20193542020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19993,243
2000-2009367
2010-2019510
2020 onward354
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.3 percentReviews6.7% (301)Meta-analyses0.2% (9)Randomized controlled trials0.3% (13)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,474 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3016.7%
Meta-analyses90.2%
Randomized controlled trials130.3%

Method: PubMed query "Thoracic Duct"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Anatomy and function of the vertebral column lymphatic network in mice
Jacob L, Boisserand LSB, Geraldo LHM, de Brito Neto J, Mathivet T, Antila S, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
126cc by
PMID 31597914 · DOI · PMC6785564
Near infra-red fluorescence identification of the thoracic duct to prevent chyle leaks during oesophagectomy
Barnes TG, MacGregor T, Sgromo B, Maynard ND, Gillies RS
2022Clinical trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
20cc by
PMID 34905086 · DOI · PMC9160097
Management of chyle leakage after general thoracic surgery: Impact of thoracic duct embolization
Jeon YJ, Cho JH, Hyun D, Shin S, Kim HK, Choi YS, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
18cc by
PMID 33783956 · DOI · PMC8088932
Lymphatic flow dynamics under exercise load assessed with thoracic duct ultrasonography
Shinaoka A, Kimata Y
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 40275043 · DOI · PMC12022353

Anatomy and function of the vertebral column lymphatic network in mice [1]

Research article Jacob L, Boisserand LSB, Geraldo LHM, de Brito Neto J, Mathivet T, Antila S, et al. · · 2019 · cited 126 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Cranial lymphatic vessels (LVs) are involved in the transport of fluids, macromolecules and central nervous system (CNS) immune responses.
Closing excerpt
Therefore, vertebral LVs add to skull meningeal LVs as gatekeepers of CNS immunity and may be potential targets to improve the maintenance and repair of spinal tissues.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (151 words)

Cranial lymphatic vessels (LVs) are involved in the transport of fluids, macromolecules and central nervous system (CNS) immune responses. Little information about spinal LVs is available, because these delicate structures are embedded within vertebral tissues and difficult to visualize using traditional histology. Here we show an extended vertebral column LV network using three-dimensional imaging of decalcified iDISCO+-clarified spine segments. Vertebral LVs connect to peripheral sensory and sympathetic ganglia and form metameric vertebral circuits connecting to lymph nodes and the thoracic duct. They drain the epidural space and the dura mater around the spinal cord and associate with leukocytes. Vertebral LVs remodel extensively after spinal cord injury and VEGF-C-induced vertebral lymphangiogenesis exacerbates the inflammatory responses, T cell infiltration and demyelination following focal spinal cord lesion. Therefore, vertebral LVs add to skull meningeal LVs as gatekeepers of CNS immunity and may be potential targets to improve the maintenance and repair of spinal tissues.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31597914 · DOI · PMC6785564

Near infra-red fluorescence identification of the thoracic duct to prevent chyle leaks during oesophagectomy [2]

Clinical trial Barnes TG, MacGregor T, Sgromo B, Maynard ND, Gillies RS · · 2022 · cited 20 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundChyle leaks following oesophagectomy are a frustrating complication of surgery with considerable morbidity.
Closing excerpt
gov (NCT03292757).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (243 words)

BackgroundChyle leaks following oesophagectomy are a frustrating complication of surgery with considerable morbidity. The use of near infra-red (NIR) fluorescence in surgery is an emerging technology and the use of fluorescence to identify the thoracic duct has been demonstrated in animal work and early human case reports. This study evaluated the use mesenteric and enteral administration of indocyanine green (ICG) in humans to identify the thoracic duct during oesophagectomy.MethodsPatients undergoing oesophagectomy were recruited to the study. Administration of ICG via an enteral route or mesenteric injection was evaluated. Fluorescence was assessed using a NIR fluorescence enabled laparoscope system with a visual scoring system and signal to background ratios. Visualisation of the thoracic duct under white light and NIR fluorescence was compared as well as any identification of active chyle leak. Patients were followed up post-operatively for adverse events and chyle leak.Results20 patients received ICG and were included in the study. The enteral route failed to fluoresce the thoracic duct. Mesenteric injection (17 patients) identified the thoracic duct under fluorescence prior to white light in 70% of patients with a mean signal to background ratio of 5.35. In 6 participants, a possible active chyle leak was identified under fluorescence with 4 showing active chyle leak from what was identified as the thoracic duct.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that ICG administration via mesenteric injection can highlight the thoracic duct during oesophagectomy and may be a potential technology to reduce chyle leak following surgery.Clinical trial registrationClinical trials.gov (NCT03292757).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34905086 · DOI · PMC9160097

Management of chyle leakage after general thoracic surgery: Impact of thoracic duct embolization [3]

Research article Jeon YJ, Cho JH, Hyun D, Shin S, Kim HK, Choi YS, et al. · · 2021 · cited 18 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of thoracic duct embolization (TDE) on the management of postoperative chyle leakage.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsTDE is an effective method for the management of chyle leakage and might help to avoid invasive surgery.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (224 words)

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of thoracic duct embolization (TDE) on the management of postoperative chyle leakage.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical record database of 4171 patients who underwent curative resection for lung or esophageal cancer between January 2015 and June 2017. We classified the period before the introduction of TDE as the first period and the period after the introduction of TDE as the second period.ResultsA total of 105 patients who developed chyle leakage after surgery were included. In the first period, 49 patients who underwent lung surgery developed chylothorax. Of those, two patients (4.1%) underwent surgical ligation of the thoracic duct (TD). Of eight patients with chyle leakage after esophagectomy, four patients (50%) underwent TD ligation. In the second period, 30 patients developed postoperative chyle leakage after pulmonary resection. Only one (3.3%) of them required surgical ligation. Of eight patients with chyle leakage after esophagectomy, only two (11.1%) patients underwent TD ligation. Five patients (16.7%) received TDE after lung surgery and five patients (27.7%) after esophageal surgery. Also, in the second period, the hospital stay of patients who underwent lung cancer surgery was shorter than the first period (12.6 ± 4.6 days vs. 16.3 ± 9.7 days; p = 0.026).ConclusionsTDE is an effective method for the management of chyle leakage and might help to avoid invasive surgery.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33783956 · DOI · PMC8088932

Lymphatic flow dynamics under exercise load assessed with thoracic duct ultrasonography [4]

Research article Shinaoka A, Kimata Y · · 2025 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The thoracic duct (TD) is the largest lymphatic vessel proximal to the venous system.
Closing excerpt
While various methods exist for observing the TD, our approach-dynamically monitoring the TD diameter using sonography in real time and correlating it with lymphatic flow dynamics-offers a novel contribution.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (161 words)

The thoracic duct (TD) is the largest lymphatic vessel proximal to the venous system. It undergoes morphological changes in response to lymph flow from the periphery, with automatic contraction controlling the dynamics to propel lymph toward the venous system. Recent advancements in ultrasonography have facilitated non-invasive observations of the TD's terminal, including its valve and wall motions. Observations of TD movements allow predictions of lymphatic flow dynamics. However, no studies have yet documented the changes in the TD under exercise-induced lymph flow enhancement in humans. Here, using 18-MHz high-frequency ultrasonography, we demonstrate for the first time that the TD diameter significantly expands under exercise load. This study analyzed 20 participants; the maximum TD diameters at rest and post-exercise were 2.69 ± 1.06 mm and 3.41 ± 1.32 mm, respectively (p = 0.00000056). While various methods exist for observing the TD, our approach-dynamically monitoring the TD diameter using sonography in real time and correlating it with lymphatic flow dynamics-offers a novel contribution.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40275043 · DOI · PMC12022353

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Chylothorax [5]
    Bessone LN, Ferguson TB, Burford TH · Ann Thorac Surg · 1971 · cited 116 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Review of thoracic duct anatomical variations and clinical implications [6]
    Phang K, Bowman M, Phillips A, Windsor J · Clin Anat · 2014 · cited 108 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The thoracic duct: clinical importance, anatomic variation, imaging, and embolization [7]
    Johnson OW, Chick JF, Chauhan NR, Fairchild AH, Fan CM, Stecker MS, et al. · Eur Radiol · 2016 · cited 106 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Plastic Bronchitis [8]
    Rubin BK · Clin Chest Med · 2016 · cited 78 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Clinical approach and review of causes of a chylothorax [9]
    Riley LE, Ataya A · Respir Med · 2019 · cited 74 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Management of thoracic duct injuries after oesophagectomy [10]
    Wemyss-Holden SA, Launois B, Maddern GJ · Br J Surg · 2001 · cited 71 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Jacob L, Boisserand LSB, Geraldo LHM, de Brito Neto J, Mathivet T, Antila S, et al.. Anatomy and function of the vertebral column lymphatic network in mice. . 2019. PMID 31597914 · DOI · PMC6785564
  2. Barnes TG, MacGregor T, Sgromo B, Maynard ND, Gillies RS. Near infra-red fluorescence identification of the thoracic duct to prevent chyle leaks during oesophagectomy. . 2022. PMID 34905086 · DOI · PMC9160097
  3. Jeon YJ, Cho JH, Hyun D, Shin S, Kim HK, Choi YS, et al.. Management of chyle leakage after general thoracic surgery: Impact of thoracic duct embolization. . 2021. PMID 33783956 · DOI · PMC8088932
  4. Shinaoka A, Kimata Y. Lymphatic flow dynamics under exercise load assessed with thoracic duct ultrasonography. . 2025. PMID 40275043 · DOI · PMC12022353
  5. Bessone LN, Ferguson TB, Burford TH. Chylothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 1971. PMID 4942619 · DOI
  6. Phang K, Bowman M, Phillips A, Windsor J. Review of thoracic duct anatomical variations and clinical implications. Clin Anat. 2014. PMID 24302465 · DOI
  7. Johnson OW, Chick JF, Chauhan NR, Fairchild AH, Fan CM, Stecker MS, et al.. The thoracic duct: clinical importance, anatomic variation, imaging, and embolization. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID 26628065 · DOI
  8. Rubin BK. Plastic Bronchitis. Clin Chest Med. 2016. PMID 27514587 · DOI
  9. Riley LE, Ataya A. Clinical approach and review of causes of a chylothorax. Respir Med. 2019. PMID 31454675 · DOI
  10. Wemyss-Holden SA, Launois B, Maddern GJ. Management of thoracic duct injuries after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 2001. PMID 11683738 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Bursa of FabriciusAnatomy and Physiology
  • Germinal CenterAnatomy and Physiology
  • Lymph NodesAnatomy and Physiology
  • Sentinel Lymph NodeAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cystic DuctAnatomy and Physiology
  • Common Bile DuctAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

4,474
PubMed records on this heading
8%
published since 2020
301
review articles
13
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Bursa of FabriciusAnatomy and Physiology
  • Germinal CenterAnatomy and Physiology
  • Lymph NodesAnatomy and Physiology
  • Sentinel Lymph NodeAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cystic DuctAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support