Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (888 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The duct that is connected to the gallbladder and allows the emptying of bile into the common bile duct.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Cystic Ducts; Duct, Cystic; Ducts, Cystic.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,968 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Cystic Duct” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 192 of them (9.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,198 records.
Reviews account for 120 records (6.1%) and meta-analyses for 9. Randomized controlled trials number 17 (0.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,198 |
| 2000-2009 | 291 |
| 2010-2019 | 287 |
| 2020 onward | 192 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 120 | 6.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 9 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 17 | 0.9% |
Method: PubMed query "Cystic Duct"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reoperation after cholecystectomy. The role of the cystic duct stump | 1991 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 35 | cc by PMID 1931779 · DOI · PMC2443006 |
| Meta-analysis of laparoscopic transcystic versus transcholedochal common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis | 2019 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 22 | cc by PMID 31183439 · DOI · PMC6551404 |
| Classification of the cystic duct patterns and endoscopic transpapillary cannulation of the gallbladder to prevent post-ERCP cholecystitis | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 15 | cc by PMID 31382888 · DOI · PMC6683449 |
| Intraoperative Variations of Cystic Artery and Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis | 2026 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 3 | cc by PMID 41913469 · DOI · PMC13536192 |
Reoperation after cholecystectomy. The role of the cystic duct stump [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The so-called "Postcholecystectomy Syndrome" may be due to various pathological biliary causes.
- Closing excerpt
- Total excision of the cystic duct does not eliminate the existence of postcholecystectomy symptoms.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (250 words)
The so-called "Postcholecystectomy Syndrome" may be due to various pathological biliary causes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of the cystic duct stump syndrome and if so, how often a long (greater than 1.5 cm) cystic duct stump was an indication for reoperation on the bile ducts after cholecystectomy in our patients. Three hundred and twenty two patients underwent a second operation on the bile ducts after cholecystectomy in the last ten years. In 35 patients (10.8%) a striking findings was a long cystic duct stump (greater than 1.5 cm). In 24 of these patients, a pathological finding, in addition to the long cystic duct stump, was found on exploration. Out of these 24 patients there were 14 with common bile duct stones; 6 with stenosis of the sphincter of Oddi; 3 with chronic pancreatitis and in one patient hepatitis was the cause of the symptoms. From the remaining 11 patients 8 had a stone in a partial gall bladder or cystic duct stump. One patient had a fistula between the cystic duct stump and duodenum and one a suture granuloma. There was only one patient where a 1.5 cm long cystic duct stump remnant was the only pathological finding. Four years after reoperation this patient is still suffering from the same intermittent gastrointestinal symptoms. We conclude that the cystic duct stump is hardly ever a cause for recurrent symptoms in itself. Total excision of the cystic duct does not eliminate the existence of postcholecystectomy symptoms.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 1931779 · DOI · PMC2443006
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic transcystic versus transcholedochal common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundIt is not clear whether laparoscopic transcystic exploration (LTCE) laparoscopic choledochotomy (LCD) is superior in the management of choledocholithiasis.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionLCD has a higher rate of successful duct clearance, but is associated with a longer duration of surgery and hospital stay, and a higher bile leak rate.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (223 words)
BackgroundIt is not clear whether laparoscopic transcystic exploration (LTCE) laparoscopic choledochotomy (LCD) is superior in the management of choledocholithiasis. In this meta-analysis, the success of LTCE versus LCD was evaluated.MethodsCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Trip, PubMed, Ovid and Embase databases were searched systematically for relevant literature up to May 2017. Studies that compared the success rate of LTCE and LCD in patients with choledocholithiasis were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Multiple independent reviewers contributed on a cloud-based platform. Random-effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (MDs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals. An a priori hypothesis was generated based on clinical experience that LTCE is as successful as LCD.ResultsOf 3533 screened articles, 25 studies comprising 4224 patients were included. LTCE achieved a lower duct clearance rate than LCD (OR 0.38, 95 per cent c.i. 0·24 to 0·59). It was associated with a shorter duration of surgery (MD -0·86, 95 per cent c.i. -0·97 to -0·77), lower bile leak (OR 0·46, 0·23 to 0·93) and shorter hospital stay (MD -0·78, -1·14 to -0·42) than LCD. There was no statistically significant difference in conversion, stricture formation or reintervention rate.ConclusionLCD has a higher rate of successful duct clearance, but is associated with a longer duration of surgery and hospital stay, and a higher bile leak rate.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31183439 · DOI · PMC6551404
Classification of the cystic duct patterns and endoscopic transpapillary cannulation of the gallbladder to prevent post-ERCP cholecystitis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundEndoscopic transpapillary cannulation of the gallbladder is useful but challenging.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionClassification of cystic duct patterns was helpful in guiding endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder cannulation.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (208 words)
BackgroundEndoscopic transpapillary cannulation of the gallbladder is useful but challenging. This study aimed to investigate cystic duct anatomy patterns, which may guide cystic duct cannulation.MethodsA total of 226 patients who underwent endoscopic transpapillary cannulation of the gallbladder were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsAccording to the cystic duct take-off, 226 cystic duct patterns were divided into 3 patterns: Type I (193, 85.4%), located on the right and angled up; Type II (7, 3.1%), located on the right and angled down; and Type III (26, 11.5%), located on the left and angled up. Type I was further divided into three subtypes: Line type, S type (S1, not surrounding the common bile duct; S2, surrounding the common bile duct), and α type (α1, forward α; α2, reverse α). Types I and III cystic ducts were easier to be cannulated with a higher success rate (85.1 and 86.4%, respectively) compared with Type II cystic duct (75%) despite no statistically significant difference. The reasons for the failure of gallbladder cannulation included invisible cyst duct take-off, severe cyst duct stenosis, impacted stones in cyst duct or neck of the gallbladder, sharply angled cyst duct, and markedly dilated cyst duct with the tortuous valves of Heister.ConclusionClassification of cystic duct patterns was helpful in guiding endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder cannulation.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31382888 · DOI · PMC6683449
Intraoperative Variations of Cystic Artery and Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold-standard treatment for benign gallbladder disease but carries a higher risk of bile duct injury than the open approach, largely due to misidentification of critical hepatobiliary structures.
- Closing excerpt
- Integrating these findings into the cognitive framework of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) highlights the importance of anticipating "third elements" and heterotopic courses when dissecting.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (207 words)
BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold-standard treatment for benign gallbladder disease but carries a higher risk of bile duct injury than the open approach, largely due to misidentification of critical hepatobiliary structures. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes intraoperative evidence on the prevalence and surgical relevance of anatomical variations and evaluates their implications for safe LC.MethodsFollowing Evidence-based Anatomy and PRISMA 2020 guidelines, four databases were investigated. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled prevalences and small-study effects were assessed.ResultsTwenty-seven studies (n = 9618) were included. Conventional cystic artery and duct (CA and CD) anatomy was observed in 86.15% and 89.02% of cases, respectively. Among arterial variants, duplicate CA (7.18%) and caterpillar hump of the right hepatic artery (6.26%) were the most common "third elements" entering the hepatocystic triangle. CA positional deviations included courses posterior (14.95%), anterior (10.75%), and inferior (6.23%) to the CD. Aberrant right hepatic duct entering the hepatocystic triangle was recorded in 1.03%.ConclusionsMost CA and CD variations relevant to LC occur within the hepatocystic triangle, where they can interfere with identification of the vascular-biliary pedicle and increase the risk of vasculo-biliary injury. Integrating these findings into the cognitive framework of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) highlights the importance of anticipating "third elements" and heterotopic courses when dissecting.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41913469 · DOI · PMC13536192
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article The cystic duct: normal anatomy and disease processes [5]
- Research article The clinical anatomy of cystic artery variations: a review of over 9800 cases [6]
- Research article Biliary dyskinesia: role of the sphincter of Oddi, gallbladder and cholecystokinin [7]
- Research article Calot's triangle [8]
- Research article Cystic duct patency in malignant obstructive jaundice. An ERCP-based study relevant to the role of laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy [9]
- Research article A systematic review of the anatomical findings of multiple gallbladders [10]
References
- Rogy MA, Függer R, Herbst F, Schulz F. Reoperation after cholecystectomy. The role of the cystic duct stump. . 1991. PMID 1931779 · DOI · PMC2443006
- Bekheit M, Smith R, Ramsay G, Soggiu F, Ghazanfar M, Ahmed I. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic transcystic versus transcholedochal common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. . 2019. PMID 31183439 · DOI · PMC6551404
- Cao J, Ding X, Wu H, Shen Y, Zheng R, Peng C, et al.. Classification of the cystic duct patterns and endoscopic transpapillary cannulation of the gallbladder to prevent post-ERCP cholecystitis. . 2019. PMID 31382888 · DOI · PMC6683449
- Triantafyllou G, Gondorf D, Manatakis DK, Lyros O, Lykoudis PM, Christodoulou S, et al.. Intraoperative Variations of Cystic Artery and Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. . 2026. PMID 41913469 · DOI · PMC13536192
- Turner MA, Fulcher AS. The cystic duct: normal anatomy and disease processes. Radiographics. 2001. PMID 11158640 · DOI
- Andall RG, Matusz P, du Plessis M, Ward R, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. The clinical anatomy of cystic artery variations: a review of over 9800 cases. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016. PMID 26698600 · DOI
- Krishnamurthy S, Krishnamurthy GT. Biliary dyskinesia: role of the sphincter of Oddi, gallbladder and cholecystokinin. J Nucl Med. 1997. PMID 9374365
- Abdalla S, Pierre S, Ellis H. Calot's triangle. Clin Anat. 2013. PMID 23519829 · DOI
- Tarnasky PR, England RE, Lail LM, Pappas TN, Cotton PB. Cystic duct patency in malignant obstructive jaundice. An ERCP-based study relevant to the role of laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy. Ann Surg. 1995. PMID 7536405 · DOI
- Darnis B, Mohkam K, Cauchy F, Cazauran JB, Bancel B, Rode A, et al.. A systematic review of the anatomical findings of multiple gallbladders. HPB (Oxford). 2018. PMID 29887260 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.