Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Neuroscience›Taste
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Taste

Neuroscience · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The ability to detect chemicals through gustatory receptors in the mouth, including those on the tongue; the palate; the pharynx; and the epiglottis.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (760 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The ability to detect chemicals through gustatory receptors in the mouth, including those on the tongue; the palate; the pharynx; and the epiglottis.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Tastes; Gustation; Gustations; Taste Sense; Senses, Taste; Sense, Taste; Taste Senses.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Sensation
Narrower topics
Taste Threshold

Related concepts

  • Tongue
  • Palate
  • Pharynx
  • Epiglottis

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 31,486 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Taste” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 8,554 of them (27.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 8,698 records.

Reviews account for 2,753 records (8.7%) and meta-analyses for 66. Randomized controlled trials number 896 (2.8%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 8,659 records; 2000-2009: 5,575 records; 2010-2019: 8,698 records; 2020 onward: 8,554 records8,659through 19995,5752000-20098,6982010-20198,5542020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19998,659
2000-20095,575
2010-20198,698
2020 onward8,554
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.8 percentReviews8.7% (2,753)Meta-analyses0.2% (66)Randomized controlled trials2.8% (896)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 31,486 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,7538.7%
Meta-analyses660.2%
Randomized controlled trials8962.8%

Method: PubMed query "Taste"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in neuroscience

Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
A neural mechanism for learning from delayed postingestive feedback
Zimmerman CA, Bolkan SS, Pan-Vazquez A, Wu B, Keppler EF, Meares-Garcia JB, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
34cc by
PMID 40175547 · DOI · PMC12176619
Mechanisms and novel therapeutic roles of bitter taste receptors in diseases
Tong A, Yang H, Yu X, Wang D, Guan J, Zhao M, et al.
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
16cc by
PMID 40213652 · DOI · PMC11980658
Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Key Sensory Compounds
Wolinska-Kennard K, Schönberger C, Fenton A, Sahin AW
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
14cc by
PMID 40625310 · DOI · PMC12235588
Steroid Hormones Are Potent and Putatively Endogenous Activators of Human Bitter Taste Receptors
Lang T, Ferri F, Ziegler F, Pizio AD, Behrens M
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 41482740 · DOI · PMC12915477

A neural mechanism for learning from delayed postingestive feedback [1]

Research article Zimmerman CA, Bolkan SS, Pan-Vazquez A, Wu B, Keppler EF, Meares-Garcia JB, et al. · · 2025 · cited 34 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Animals learn the value of foods on the basis of their postingestive effects and thereby develop aversions to foods that are toxic1-10 and preferences to those that are nutritious11-13.
Closing excerpt
Thus, we demonstrate that postingestive reactivation and plasticity of neural flavour representations may support learning from delayed feedback.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (238 words)

Animals learn the value of foods on the basis of their postingestive effects and thereby develop aversions to foods that are toxic1-10 and preferences to those that are nutritious11-13. However, it remains unclear how the brain is able to assign credit to flavours experienced during a meal with postingestive feedback signals that can arise after a substantial delay. Here we reveal an unexpected role for the postingestive reactivation of neural flavour representations in this temporal credit-assignment process. To begin, we leverage the fact that mice learn to associate novel14,15, but not familiar, flavours with delayed gastrointestinal malaise signals to investigate how the brain represents flavours that support aversive postingestive learning. Analyses of brain-wide activation patterns reveal that a network of amygdala regions is unique in being preferentially activated by novel flavours across every stage of learning (consumption, delayed malaise and memory retrieval). By combining high-density recordings in the amygdala with optogenetic stimulation of malaise-coding hindbrain neurons, we show that delayed malaise signals selectively reactivate flavour representations in the amygdala from a recent meal. The degree of malaise-driven reactivation of individual neurons predicts the strengthening of flavour responses upon memory retrieval, which in turn leads to stabilization of the population-level representation of the recently consumed flavour. By contrast, flavour representations in the amygdala degrade in the absence of unexpected postingestive consequences. Thus, we demonstrate that postingestive reactivation and plasticity of neural flavour representations may support learning from delayed feedback.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40175547 · DOI · PMC12176619

Mechanisms and novel therapeutic roles of bitter taste receptors in diseases [2]

Review article Tong A, Yang H, Yu X, Wang D, Guan J, Zhao M, et al. · · 2025 · cited 16 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Bitter taste receptors (TAS2R) are expressed in the oral cavity, intestine, airways, and vascular smooth muscle, where they regulate physiological processes, including immune responses.
Closing excerpt
This review examines the expression of TAS2R across diverse tissues, their complex physiological roles, and potential therapeutic applications, including disease management and targeted drug delivery.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (100 words)

Bitter taste receptors (TAS2R) are expressed in the oral cavity, intestine, airways, and vascular smooth muscle, where they regulate physiological processes, including immune responses. However, the activation of TAS2R triggers signaling pathways that influence inflammation, metabolism, and cell proliferation, suggesting their potential as therapeutic targets for diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, asthma, and cancer. Bitter compounds capable of activating TAS2R have shown potential in modulating these pathways, presenting novel opportunities for drug development. This review examines the expression of TAS2R across diverse tissues, their complex physiological roles, and potential therapeutic applications, including disease management and targeted drug delivery.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40213652 · DOI · PMC11980658

Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Key Sensory Compounds [3]

Review article Wolinska-Kennard K, Schönberger C, Fenton A, Sahin AW · · 2025 · cited 14 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Mouthfeel is a complex and multidimensional sensory experience that plays an important role in how people perceive flavor and accept food and beverages.
Closing excerpt
By combining insights from sensory science, food chemistry, and neuroscience, this review highlights the need for better tools and clearer frameworks to study and improve mouthfeel in modern food and beverage products.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (257 words)

Mouthfeel is a complex and multidimensional sensory experience that plays an important role in how people perceive flavor and accept food and beverages. Although it is a key part of the eating and drinking experience, mouthfeel is still not clearly defined and is difficult to measure. This review explores mouthfeel from a flavor perspective by examining the physiological processes, chemical interactions, and main sensory qualities involved, such as viscosity, crunchiness, astringency, and thermal sensations like cooling and warming. During consumption, food and beverages release a variety of chemical components in the mouth. These are broadly classified as volatile and non-volatile compounds. Volatile compounds, which act as odorants and some irritants, stimulate the olfactory system and contribute to aroma perception. In contrast, non-volatile compounds include tastants, irritants, and texture-related molecules that activate the gustatory and trigeminal systems. The integration of these chemical and physical signals from multiple sensory pathways is essential to flavor perception and underpins the experience of mouthfeel. The roles of oral processing, saliva, and the sensory systems, particularly the trigeminal system, are discussed to better understand how mouthfeel is created and perceived. The review also looks at current sensory and instrumental methods used to evaluate mouthfeel, outlining their uses and limitations. Beer, especially non- and low-alcoholic beers, is used as a case study to show how mouthfeel affects product development and consumer acceptance. By combining insights from sensory science, food chemistry, and neuroscience, this review highlights the need for better tools and clearer frameworks to study and improve mouthfeel in modern food and beverage products.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40625310 · DOI · PMC12235588

Steroid Hormones Are Potent and Putatively Endogenous Activators of Human Bitter Taste Receptors [4]

Research article Lang T, Ferri F, Ziegler F, Pizio AD, Behrens M · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Human bitter taste plays an important role in the quality assessment of food.
Closing excerpt
Comparison with a human metabolite database revealed that several steroid hormone levels reach activating concentrations for TAS2Rs, suggesting that TAS2Rs indeed could act as sensors for circulating steroid hormones.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (165 words)

Human bitter taste plays an important role in the quality assessment of food. The presence of the corresponding receptors, the taste receptor 2 family (TAS2Rs), in nongustatory tissues without direct contact to the environment suggested that, apart from food compounds, putative endogenous agonists may also exist. Recent studies on bitter taste receptors of vertebrates, including humans, identified occasional steroid hormones as agonists for these receptors; therefore, steroid hormones represent relevant, potentially endogenous agonists for TAS2Rs. In this study, a comprehensive analysis of 19 steroid hormones, cholesterol, and two plant-derived hormones was performed using functional assays to assess the activation of TAS2Rs. Two TAS2Rs, TAS2R14 and TAS2R46, were found to be differentially activated by the test compounds, with TAS2R46 being in almost all cases the more sensitive receptor. Some steroid hormones activated TAS2R46 with extraordinarily high potencies. Comparison with a human metabolite database revealed that several steroid hormone levels reach activating concentrations for TAS2Rs, suggesting that TAS2Rs indeed could act as sensors for circulating steroid hormones.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41482740 · DOI · PMC12915477

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Gustatory Processing in Drosophila melanogaster [5]
    Scott K · Annu Rev Entomol · 2018 · cited 149 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Ruminant meat flavor influenced by different factors with special reference to fatty acids [6]
    Arshad MS, Sohaib M, Ahmad RS, Nadeem MT, Imran A, Arshad MU, et al. · Lipids Health Dis · 2018 · cited 135 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Annexins-a family of proteins with distinctive tastes for cell signaling and membrane dynamics [7]
    Gerke V, Gavins FNE, Geisow M, Grewal T, Jaiswal JK, Nylandsted J, et al. · Nat Commun · 2024 · cited 132 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Taste and Flavor Perceptions of Glucosinolates, Isothiocyanates, and Related Compounds [8]
    Bell L, Oloyede OO, Lignou S, Wagstaff C, Methven L · Mol Nutr Food Res · 2018 · cited 113 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article An update on extra-oral bitter taste receptors [9]
    Tuzim K, Korolczuk A · J Transl Med · 2021 · cited 96 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Taste transduction and channel synapses in taste buds [10]
    Taruno A, Nomura K, Kusakizako T, Ma Z, Nureki O, Foskett JK · Pflugers Arch · 2021 · cited 95 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Zimmerman CA, Bolkan SS, Pan-Vazquez A, Wu B, Keppler EF, Meares-Garcia JB, et al.. A neural mechanism for learning from delayed postingestive feedback. . 2025. PMID 40175547 · DOI · PMC12176619
  2. Tong A, Yang H, Yu X, Wang D, Guan J, Zhao M, et al.. Mechanisms and novel therapeutic roles of bitter taste receptors in diseases. . 2025. PMID 40213652 · DOI · PMC11980658
  3. Wolinska-Kennard K, Schönberger C, Fenton A, Sahin AW. Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Key Sensory Compounds. . 2025. PMID 40625310 · DOI · PMC12235588
  4. Lang T, Ferri F, Ziegler F, Pizio AD, Behrens M. Steroid Hormones Are Potent and Putatively Endogenous Activators of Human Bitter Taste Receptors. . 2026. PMID 41482740 · DOI · PMC12915477
  5. Scott K. Gustatory Processing in Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Entomol. 2018. PMID 29324046 · DOI
  6. Arshad MS, Sohaib M, Ahmad RS, Nadeem MT, Imran A, Arshad MU, et al.. Ruminant meat flavor influenced by different factors with special reference to fatty acids. Lipids Health Dis. 2018. PMID 30249252 · DOI · PMC6154429
  7. Gerke V, Gavins FNE, Geisow M, Grewal T, Jaiswal JK, Nylandsted J, et al.. Annexins-a family of proteins with distinctive tastes for cell signaling and membrane dynamics. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID 38383560 · DOI · PMC10882027
  8. Bell L, Oloyede OO, Lignou S, Wagstaff C, Methven L. Taste and Flavor Perceptions of Glucosinolates, Isothiocyanates, and Related Compounds. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2018. PMID 29578640 · DOI
  9. Tuzim K, Korolczuk A. An update on extra-oral bitter taste receptors. J Transl Med. 2021. PMID 34674725 · DOI · PMC8529754
  10. Taruno A, Nomura K, Kusakizako T, Ma Z, Nureki O, Foskett JK. Taste transduction and channel synapses in taste buds. Pflugers Arch. 2021. PMID 32936320 · DOI · PMC9386877

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • TouchNeuroscience
  • SmellNeuroscience
  • Acute PainNeuroscience
  • Back PainNeuroscience
  • Cancer PainNeuroscience
  • Chronic PainNeuroscience

All 110 articles in Neuroscience →

At a glance

31,486
PubMed records on this heading
27%
published since 2020
2,753
review articles
896
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • TouchNeuroscience
  • SmellNeuroscience
  • Acute PainNeuroscience
  • Back PainNeuroscience
  • Cancer PainNeuroscience

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support