Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (760 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The ability to detect chemicals through gustatory receptors in the mouth, including those on the tongue; the palate; the pharynx; and the epiglottis.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Tastes; Gustation; Gustations; Taste Sense; Senses, Taste; Sense, Taste; Taste Senses.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Sensation
- Narrower topics
- Taste Threshold
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 31,486 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Taste” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 8,554 of them (27.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 8,698 records.
Reviews account for 2,753 records (8.7%) and meta-analyses for 66. Randomized controlled trials number 896 (2.8%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 8,659 |
| 2000-2009 | 5,575 |
| 2010-2019 | 8,698 |
| 2020 onward | 8,554 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 2,753 | 8.7% |
| Meta-analyses | 66 | 0.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 896 | 2.8% |
Method: PubMed query "Taste"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in neuroscience
Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A neural mechanism for learning from delayed postingestive feedback | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 34 | cc by PMID 40175547 · DOI · PMC12176619 |
| Mechanisms and novel therapeutic roles of bitter taste receptors in diseases | 2025 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 16 | cc by PMID 40213652 · DOI · PMC11980658 |
| Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Key Sensory Compounds | 2025 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 14 | cc by PMID 40625310 · DOI · PMC12235588 |
| Steroid Hormones Are Potent and Putatively Endogenous Activators of Human Bitter Taste Receptors | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 3 | cc by PMID 41482740 · DOI · PMC12915477 |
A neural mechanism for learning from delayed postingestive feedback [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Animals learn the value of foods on the basis of their postingestive effects and thereby develop aversions to foods that are toxic1-10 and preferences to those that are nutritious11-13.
- Closing excerpt
- Thus, we demonstrate that postingestive reactivation and plasticity of neural flavour representations may support learning from delayed feedback.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (238 words)
Animals learn the value of foods on the basis of their postingestive effects and thereby develop aversions to foods that are toxic1-10 and preferences to those that are nutritious11-13. However, it remains unclear how the brain is able to assign credit to flavours experienced during a meal with postingestive feedback signals that can arise after a substantial delay. Here we reveal an unexpected role for the postingestive reactivation of neural flavour representations in this temporal credit-assignment process. To begin, we leverage the fact that mice learn to associate novel14,15, but not familiar, flavours with delayed gastrointestinal malaise signals to investigate how the brain represents flavours that support aversive postingestive learning. Analyses of brain-wide activation patterns reveal that a network of amygdala regions is unique in being preferentially activated by novel flavours across every stage of learning (consumption, delayed malaise and memory retrieval). By combining high-density recordings in the amygdala with optogenetic stimulation of malaise-coding hindbrain neurons, we show that delayed malaise signals selectively reactivate flavour representations in the amygdala from a recent meal. The degree of malaise-driven reactivation of individual neurons predicts the strengthening of flavour responses upon memory retrieval, which in turn leads to stabilization of the population-level representation of the recently consumed flavour. By contrast, flavour representations in the amygdala degrade in the absence of unexpected postingestive consequences. Thus, we demonstrate that postingestive reactivation and plasticity of neural flavour representations may support learning from delayed feedback.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40175547 · DOI · PMC12176619
Mechanisms and novel therapeutic roles of bitter taste receptors in diseases [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Bitter taste receptors (TAS2R) are expressed in the oral cavity, intestine, airways, and vascular smooth muscle, where they regulate physiological processes, including immune responses.
- Closing excerpt
- This review examines the expression of TAS2R across diverse tissues, their complex physiological roles, and potential therapeutic applications, including disease management and targeted drug delivery.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (100 words)
Bitter taste receptors (TAS2R) are expressed in the oral cavity, intestine, airways, and vascular smooth muscle, where they regulate physiological processes, including immune responses. However, the activation of TAS2R triggers signaling pathways that influence inflammation, metabolism, and cell proliferation, suggesting their potential as therapeutic targets for diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, asthma, and cancer. Bitter compounds capable of activating TAS2R have shown potential in modulating these pathways, presenting novel opportunities for drug development. This review examines the expression of TAS2R across diverse tissues, their complex physiological roles, and potential therapeutic applications, including disease management and targeted drug delivery.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40213652 · DOI · PMC11980658
Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Key Sensory Compounds [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Mouthfeel is a complex and multidimensional sensory experience that plays an important role in how people perceive flavor and accept food and beverages.
- Closing excerpt
- By combining insights from sensory science, food chemistry, and neuroscience, this review highlights the need for better tools and clearer frameworks to study and improve mouthfeel in modern food and beverage products.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (257 words)
Mouthfeel is a complex and multidimensional sensory experience that plays an important role in how people perceive flavor and accept food and beverages. Although it is a key part of the eating and drinking experience, mouthfeel is still not clearly defined and is difficult to measure. This review explores mouthfeel from a flavor perspective by examining the physiological processes, chemical interactions, and main sensory qualities involved, such as viscosity, crunchiness, astringency, and thermal sensations like cooling and warming. During consumption, food and beverages release a variety of chemical components in the mouth. These are broadly classified as volatile and non-volatile compounds. Volatile compounds, which act as odorants and some irritants, stimulate the olfactory system and contribute to aroma perception. In contrast, non-volatile compounds include tastants, irritants, and texture-related molecules that activate the gustatory and trigeminal systems. The integration of these chemical and physical signals from multiple sensory pathways is essential to flavor perception and underpins the experience of mouthfeel. The roles of oral processing, saliva, and the sensory systems, particularly the trigeminal system, are discussed to better understand how mouthfeel is created and perceived. The review also looks at current sensory and instrumental methods used to evaluate mouthfeel, outlining their uses and limitations. Beer, especially non- and low-alcoholic beers, is used as a case study to show how mouthfeel affects product development and consumer acceptance. By combining insights from sensory science, food chemistry, and neuroscience, this review highlights the need for better tools and clearer frameworks to study and improve mouthfeel in modern food and beverage products.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40625310 · DOI · PMC12235588
Steroid Hormones Are Potent and Putatively Endogenous Activators of Human Bitter Taste Receptors [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Human bitter taste plays an important role in the quality assessment of food.
- Closing excerpt
- Comparison with a human metabolite database revealed that several steroid hormone levels reach activating concentrations for TAS2Rs, suggesting that TAS2Rs indeed could act as sensors for circulating steroid hormones.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (165 words)
Human bitter taste plays an important role in the quality assessment of food. The presence of the corresponding receptors, the taste receptor 2 family (TAS2Rs), in nongustatory tissues without direct contact to the environment suggested that, apart from food compounds, putative endogenous agonists may also exist. Recent studies on bitter taste receptors of vertebrates, including humans, identified occasional steroid hormones as agonists for these receptors; therefore, steroid hormones represent relevant, potentially endogenous agonists for TAS2Rs. In this study, a comprehensive analysis of 19 steroid hormones, cholesterol, and two plant-derived hormones was performed using functional assays to assess the activation of TAS2Rs. Two TAS2Rs, TAS2R14 and TAS2R46, were found to be differentially activated by the test compounds, with TAS2R46 being in almost all cases the more sensitive receptor. Some steroid hormones activated TAS2R46 with extraordinarily high potencies. Comparison with a human metabolite database revealed that several steroid hormone levels reach activating concentrations for TAS2Rs, suggesting that TAS2Rs indeed could act as sensors for circulating steroid hormones.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41482740 · DOI · PMC12915477
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Gustatory Processing in Drosophila melanogaster [5]
- Research article Ruminant meat flavor influenced by different factors with special reference to fatty acids [6]
- Research article Annexins-a family of proteins with distinctive tastes for cell signaling and membrane dynamics [7]
- Research article Taste and Flavor Perceptions of Glucosinolates, Isothiocyanates, and Related Compounds [8]
- Research article An update on extra-oral bitter taste receptors [9]
- Research article Taste transduction and channel synapses in taste buds [10]
References
- Zimmerman CA, Bolkan SS, Pan-Vazquez A, Wu B, Keppler EF, Meares-Garcia JB, et al.. A neural mechanism for learning from delayed postingestive feedback. . 2025. PMID 40175547 · DOI · PMC12176619
- Tong A, Yang H, Yu X, Wang D, Guan J, Zhao M, et al.. Mechanisms and novel therapeutic roles of bitter taste receptors in diseases. . 2025. PMID 40213652 · DOI · PMC11980658
- Wolinska-Kennard K, Schönberger C, Fenton A, Sahin AW. Mouthfeel of Food and Beverages: A Comprehensive Review of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Key Sensory Compounds. . 2025. PMID 40625310 · DOI · PMC12235588
- Lang T, Ferri F, Ziegler F, Pizio AD, Behrens M. Steroid Hormones Are Potent and Putatively Endogenous Activators of Human Bitter Taste Receptors. . 2026. PMID 41482740 · DOI · PMC12915477
- Scott K. Gustatory Processing in Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Entomol. 2018. PMID 29324046 · DOI
- Arshad MS, Sohaib M, Ahmad RS, Nadeem MT, Imran A, Arshad MU, et al.. Ruminant meat flavor influenced by different factors with special reference to fatty acids. Lipids Health Dis. 2018. PMID 30249252 · DOI · PMC6154429
- Gerke V, Gavins FNE, Geisow M, Grewal T, Jaiswal JK, Nylandsted J, et al.. Annexins-a family of proteins with distinctive tastes for cell signaling and membrane dynamics. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID 38383560 · DOI · PMC10882027
- Bell L, Oloyede OO, Lignou S, Wagstaff C, Methven L. Taste and Flavor Perceptions of Glucosinolates, Isothiocyanates, and Related Compounds. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2018. PMID 29578640 · DOI
- Tuzim K, Korolczuk A. An update on extra-oral bitter taste receptors. J Transl Med. 2021. PMID 34674725 · DOI · PMC8529754
- Taruno A, Nomura K, Kusakizako T, Ma Z, Nureki O, Foskett JK. Taste transduction and channel synapses in taste buds. Pflugers Arch. 2021. PMID 32936320 · DOI · PMC9386877
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.