Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (646 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The ability to detect scents or odors, such as the function of olfactory receptor neurons.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Olfaction; Sense of Smell; Smell Sense.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Sensation
- See also
- Olfaction Disorders
Related concepts
- Olfactory Receptor Neurons
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 20,075 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Smell” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 4,369 of them (21.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 5,657 records.
Reviews account for 2,232 records (11.1%) and meta-analyses for 100. Randomized controlled trials number 360 (1.8%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 5,657 |
| 2000-2009 | 4,631 |
| 2010-2019 | 5,418 |
| 2020 onward | 4,369 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 2,232 | 11.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 100 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 360 | 1.8% |
Method: PubMed query "Smell"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in neuroscience
Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nature and human well-being: The olfactory pathway | 2024 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 41 | cc by PMID 38748806 · DOI · PMC11809653 |
| What Does the Human Olfactory System Do, and How Does It Do It? | 2024 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 33 | cc by PMID 37788573 · DOI · PMC12931680 |
| High-speed odor sensing using miniaturized electronic nose | 2024 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 31 | cc by PMID 39504378 · DOI · PMC11540037 |
| Control of innate olfactory valence by segregated cortical amygdala circuits | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 8 | cc by PMID 41870253 · DOI · PMC13008359 |
Nature and human well-being: The olfactory pathway [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The world is undergoing massive atmospheric and ecological change, driving unprecedented challenges to human well-being.
- Closing excerpt
- We then discuss how this framework can contribute to better accounting of the impacts of policy and land-use decision-making on natural olfactory environments and, in turn, on planetary health.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (159 words)
The world is undergoing massive atmospheric and ecological change, driving unprecedented challenges to human well-being. Olfaction is a key sensory system through which these impacts occur. The sense of smell influences quality of and satisfaction with life, emotion, emotion regulation, cognitive function, social interactions, dietary choices, stress, and depressive symptoms. Exposures via the olfactory pathway can also lead to (anti-)inflammatory outcomes. Increased understanding is needed regarding the ways in which odorants generated by nature (i.e., natural olfactory environments) affect human well-being. With perspectives from a range of health, social, and natural sciences, we provide an overview of this unique sensory system, four consensus statements regarding olfaction and the environment, and a conceptual framework that integrates the olfactory pathway into an understanding of the effects of natural environments on human well-being. We then discuss how this framework can contribute to better accounting of the impacts of policy and land-use decision-making on natural olfactory environments and, in turn, on planetary health.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38748806 · DOI · PMC11809653
What Does the Human Olfactory System Do, and How Does It Do It? [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Historically, the human sense of smell has been regarded as the odd stepchild of the senses, especially compared to the sensory bravado of seeing, touching, and hearing.
- Closing excerpt
- We conclude by offering some guideposts for harnessing the next decade of olfactory research in all its shapes and forms.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (146 words)
Historically, the human sense of smell has been regarded as the odd stepchild of the senses, especially compared to the sensory bravado of seeing, touching, and hearing. The idea that the human olfaction has little to contribute to our experience of the world is commonplace, though with the emergence of COVID-19 there has rather been a sea change in this understanding. An ever increasing body of work has convincingly highlighted the keen capabilities of the human nose and the sophistication of the human olfactory system. Here, we provide a concise overview of the neuroscience of human olfaction spanning the last 10-15 years, with focus on the peripheral and central mechanisms that underlie how odor information is processed, packaged, parceled, predicted, and perturbed to serve odor-guided behaviors. We conclude by offering some guideposts for harnessing the next decade of olfactory research in all its shapes and forms.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37788573 · DOI · PMC12931680
High-speed odor sensing using miniaturized electronic nose [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Animals have evolved to rapidly detect and recognize brief and intermittent encounters with odor packages, exhibiting recognition capabilities within milliseconds.
- Closing excerpt
- This will allow for addressing challenges in environmental and industrial monitoring, security, neuroscience, and beyond.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (142 words)
Animals have evolved to rapidly detect and recognize brief and intermittent encounters with odor packages, exhibiting recognition capabilities within milliseconds. Artificial olfaction has faced challenges in achieving comparable results-existing solutions are either slow; or bulky, expensive, and power-intensive-limiting applicability in real-world scenarios for mobile robotics. Here, we introduce a miniaturized high-speed electronic nose, characterized by high-bandwidth sensor readouts, tightly controlled sensing parameters, and powerful algorithms. The system is evaluated on a high-fidelity odor delivery benchmark. We showcase successful classification of tens-of-millisecond odor pulses and demonstrate temporal pattern encoding of stimuli switching with up to 60 hertz. Those timescales are unprecedented in miniaturized low-power settings and demonstrably exceed the performance observed in mice. It is now possible to match the temporal resolution of animal olfaction in robotic systems. This will allow for addressing challenges in environmental and industrial monitoring, security, neuroscience, and beyond.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39504378 · DOI · PMC11540037
Control of innate olfactory valence by segregated cortical amygdala circuits [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Animals exhibit innate behaviors that are stereotyped responses to specific evolutionarily relevant stimuli in the absence of prior learning or experience.
- Closing excerpt
- Together, these data support a model whereby distinct, topographically distributed plCoA populations direct innate olfactory responses by signaling to divergent valence-specific targets, linking upstream olfactory identity to downstream valence behaviors, through a population code.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
Animals exhibit innate behaviors that are stereotyped responses to specific evolutionarily relevant stimuli in the absence of prior learning or experience. The posterolateral cortical amygdala (plCoA) mediates innate attraction and aversion to odor. Here, we sought to define the circuit features of plCoA that give rise to innate attraction and aversion to odor in mice. First, we examined odor-evoked responses in these areas and found sparse encoding of odor identity, but not valence. We next considered a topographic organization and found that optogenetic stimulation of the anterior and posterior domains of plCoA elicits avoidance and attraction, respectively, suggesting a functional axis for valence. Using single-cell and spatial RNA sequencing, we identified the molecular cell types in plCoA, revealing an anteroposterior gradient in glutamatergic neurons that are sufficient and partially necessary for behavior. Finally, we identified topographically organized projections, whereby anterior neurons preferentially project to medial amygdala, and posterior neurons preferentially project to nucleus accumbens, which are respectively sufficient and necessary for innate attraction and aversion. Together, these data support a model whereby distinct, topographically distributed plCoA populations direct innate olfactory responses by signaling to divergent valence-specific targets, linking upstream olfactory identity to downstream valence behaviors, through a population code.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41870253 · DOI · PMC13008359
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Evolution of insect olfaction [5]
- Research article Cortical processing of odor objects [6]
- Research article Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth [7]
- Research article The Drosophila Mushroom Body: From Architecture to Algorithm in a Learning Circuit [8]
- Research article Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications [9]
- Research article Aversion and attraction through olfaction [10]
References
- Bratman GN, Bembibre C, Daily GC, Doty RL, Hummel T, Jacobs LF, et al.. Nature and human well-being: The olfactory pathway. . 2024. PMID 38748806 · DOI · PMC11809653
- Dikeçligil GN, Gottfried JA. What Does the Human Olfactory System Do, and How Does It Do It?. . 2024. PMID 37788573 · DOI · PMC12931680
- Dennler N, Drix D, Warner TPA, Rastogi S, Casa CD, Ackels T, et al.. High-speed odor sensing using miniaturized electronic nose. . 2024. PMID 39504378 · DOI · PMC11540037
- Howe JR, Chan CL, Lee D, Blanquart M, Lee JH, Decoster L, et al.. Control of innate olfactory valence by segregated cortical amygdala circuits. . 2026. PMID 41870253 · DOI · PMC13008359
- Hansson BS, Stensmyr MC. Evolution of insect olfaction. Neuron. 2011. PMID 22153368 · DOI
- Wilson DA, Sullivan RM. Cortical processing of odor objects. Neuron. 2011. PMID 22099455 · DOI · PMC3223720
- McGann JP. Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth. Science. 2017. PMID 28495701 · DOI · PMC5512720
- Modi MN, Shuai Y, Turner GC. The Drosophila Mushroom Body: From Architecture to Algorithm in a Learning Circuit. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2020. PMID 32283995 · DOI
- Wilson AD, Baietto M. Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications. Sensors (Basel). 2011. PMID 22346620 · DOI · PMC3274093
- Li Q, Liberles SD. Aversion and attraction through olfaction. Curr Biol. 2015. PMID 25649823 · DOI · PMC4317791
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.