Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (813 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Occurrence or induction of release of more ova than are normally released at the same time in a given species. The term applies to both animals and humans.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Superovulations.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Ovulation Induction; Ovulation
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 2,141 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Superovulation” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 183 of them (8.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,042 records.
Reviews account for 139 records (6.5%) and meta-analyses for 2. Randomized controlled trials number 86 (4.0%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,042 |
| 2000-2009 | 500 |
| 2010-2019 | 416 |
| 2020 onward | 183 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 139 | 6.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 2 | 0.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 86 | 4.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Superovulation"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ovulation and ovarian wound healing are impaired with advanced reproductive age | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 103 | cc by PMID 32407290 · DOI · PMC7288922 |
| AMH: Could It Be Used as A Biomarker for Fertility and Superovulation in Domestic Animals? | 2019 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 44 | cc by PMID 31817280 · DOI · PMC6947652 |
| The role of GPR1 signaling in mice corpus luteum | 2016 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 41 | cc by PMID 27149986 · DOI · PMC5064765 |
| Granulosa cell transcription is similarly impacted by superovulation and aging and predicts early embryonic trajectories | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 11 | cc by PMID 40246835 · DOI · PMC12006393 |
Ovulation and ovarian wound healing are impaired with advanced reproductive age [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Aging is associated with reduced tissue remodeling efficiency and increased fibrosis, characterized by excess collagen accumulation and altered matrix degradation.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings demonstrate that ovulatory dysfunction is an additional mechanism underlying the age-related loss of fertility beyond the reduction of egg quantity and quality.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)
Aging is associated with reduced tissue remodeling efficiency and increased fibrosis, characterized by excess collagen accumulation and altered matrix degradation. Ovulation, the process by which an egg is released from the ovary, is one of the most dynamic cycles of tissue wounding and repair. Because the ovary is one of the first organs to age, ovulation and ovarian wound healing is impaired with advanced reproductive age. To test this hypothesis, we induced superovulation in reproductively young and old mice and determined the numbers of eggs ovulated and corpora lutea (CLs), the progesterone producing glands formed post-ovulation. Reproductively old mice ovulated fewer eggs and had fewer CLs relative to young controls. Moreover, reproductively old mice exhibited a greater number of oocytes trapped within CLs and expanded cumulus oocyte complexes within unruptured antral follicles, indicative of failed ovulation. In addition, post-ovulatory tissue remodeling was compromised with age as evidenced by reduced CL vasculature, increased collagen, decreased hyaluronan, decreased cell proliferation and apoptosis, impaired wound healing capacity, and aberrant morphology of the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE). These findings demonstrate that ovulatory dysfunction is an additional mechanism underlying the age-related loss of fertility beyond the reduction of egg quantity and quality.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32407290 · DOI · PMC7288922
AMH: Could It Be Used as A Biomarker for Fertility and Superovulation in Domestic Animals? [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a reliable and easily detectable reproductive marker for the fertility competence of many farm animal species.
- Closing excerpt
- However, due to the limited research in domestic animals, this potential of AMH remains underutilized.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (204 words)
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a reliable and easily detectable reproductive marker for the fertility competence of many farm animal species. AMH is also a good predictor of superovulation in cattle, sheep, and mares. In this review, we have summarized the recent findings related to AMH and its predictive reliability related to fertility and superovulation in domestic animals, especially in cattle. We focused on: (1) the dynamics of AMH level from infancy to prepubescence as well as during puberty and adulthood; (2) AMH as a predictor of fertility; (3) the association between antral follicle count (AFC) and plasma AMH level; (4) AMH as a predictor of superovulation; and (5) factors affecting AMH levels in domestic animals, especially cattle. Many factors affect the circulatory levels of AMH when considering the plasma, like nutrition, activity of granulosa cells, disease state and endocrine disruptions during fetal life. Briefly, we concluded that AMH concentrations are static within individuals, and collection of a single dose of blood has become more popular in the field of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). It may act as a potential predictor of fertility, superovulation, and ovarian disorders in domestic animals. However, due to the limited research in domestic animals, this potential of AMH remains underutilized.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31817280 · DOI · PMC6947652
The role of GPR1 signaling in mice corpus luteum [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Chemerin, a chemokine, plays important roles in immune responses, inflammation, adipogenesis, and carbohydrate metabolism.
- Closing excerpt
- This study indicates that chemerin/GPR1 signaling directly or indirectly regulates progesterone synthesis and secretion during the processes of follicular development, corpus luteum formation, and PGF2α-induced luteolysis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (253 words)
Chemerin, a chemokine, plays important roles in immune responses, inflammation, adipogenesis, and carbohydrate metabolism. Our recent research has shown that chemerin has an inhibitory effect on hormone secretion from the testis and ovary. However, whether G protein-coupled receptor 1 (GPR1), the active receptor for chemerin, regulates steroidogenesis and luteolysis in the corpus luteum is still unknown. In this study, we established a pregnant mare serum gonadotropin-human chorionic gonadotropin (PMSG-hCG) superovulation model, a prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) luteolysis model, and follicle and corpus luteum culture models to analyze the role of chemerin signaling through GPR1 in the synthesis and secretion of gonadal hormones during follicular/luteal development and luteolysis. Our results, for the first time, show that chemerin and GPR1 are both differentially expressed in the ovary over the course of the estrous cycle, with highest levels in estrus and metestrus. GPR1 has been localized to granulosa cells, cumulus cells, and the corpus luteum by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In vitro, we found that chemerin suppresses hCG-induced progesterone production in cultured follicle and corpus luteum and that this effect is attenuated significantly by anti-GPR1 MAB treatment. Furthermore, when the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway was blocked, the attenuating effect of GPR1 MAB was abrogated. Interestingly, PGF2α induces luteolysis through activation of caspase-3, leading to a reduction in progesterone secretion. Treatment with GPR1 MAB blocked the PGF2α effect on caspase-3 expression and progesterone secretion. This study indicates that chemerin/GPR1 signaling directly or indirectly regulates progesterone synthesis and secretion during the processes of follicular development, corpus luteum formation, and PGF2α-induced luteolysis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27149986 · DOI · PMC5064765
Granulosa cell transcription is similarly impacted by superovulation and aging and predicts early embryonic trajectories [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- In vitro fertilization efficiency is limited in part because a fraction of retrieved oocytes fails to fertilize.
- Closing excerpt
- By comparing mice and human transcriptional responses of granulosa cells, we find that age-related dysregulation of hormonal responses and cell cycle pathways are shared, though substantial divergence exists in other pathways.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (159 words)
In vitro fertilization efficiency is limited in part because a fraction of retrieved oocytes fails to fertilize. Accurately evaluating their quality could significantly improve in vitro fertilization efficiency, which would require better understanding how their maturation may be disrupted. Here, we quantitatively investigate the interplay between superovulation and aging in mouse oocytes and their paired granulosa cells using a newly adapted experimental methodology. We test the hypothesis that superovulation disrupts oocyte maturation, revealing the key intercellular communication pathways dysregulated at the transcriptional level by forced hormonal stimulation. We further demonstrate that granulosa cell transcriptional markers can prospectively predict an associated oocyte's early developmental potential. By using naturally ovulated old mice as a non-stimulated reference, we show that aging and superovulation dysregulate similar genes and interact with each other. By comparing mice and human transcriptional responses of granulosa cells, we find that age-related dysregulation of hormonal responses and cell cycle pathways are shared, though substantial divergence exists in other pathways.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40246835 · DOI · PMC12006393
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility [5]
- Research article Recent advances in the superovulation in cattle [6]
- Research article Factors affecting fertilisation and early embryo quality in single- and superovulated dairy cattle [7]
- Research article Multiple factors affecting the efficiency of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in sheep and goats [8]
- Research article Factors associated with variation in the superovulatory response of cattle [9]
- Research article Impact of ovarian hyperstimulation on the luteal phase [10]
References
- Mara JN, Zhou LT, Larmore M, Johnson B, Ayiku R, Amargant F, et al.. Ovulation and ovarian wound healing are impaired with advanced reproductive age. . 2020. PMID 32407290 · DOI · PMC7288922
- Umer S, Zhao SJ, Sammad A, Weldegebriall Sahlu B, Yunwei P, Zhu H. AMH: Could It Be Used as A Biomarker for Fertility and Superovulation in Domestic Animals?. . 2019. PMID 31817280 · DOI · PMC6947652
- Yang YL, Ren LR, Sun LF, Huang C, Xiao TX, Wang BB, et al.. The role of GPR1 signaling in mice corpus luteum. . 2016. PMID 27149986 · DOI · PMC5064765
- Daugelaite K, Lacour P, Winkler I, Koch ML, Schneider A, Schneider N, et al.. Granulosa cell transcription is similarly impacted by superovulation and aging and predicts early embryonic trajectories. . 2025. PMID 40246835 · DOI · PMC12006393
- Dodson WC, Haney AF. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril. 1991. PMID 2001748 · DOI
- Mapletoft RJ, Steward KB, Adams GP. Recent advances in the superovulation in cattle. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2002. PMID 12625424 · DOI
- Sartori R, Bastos MR, Wiltbank MC. Factors affecting fertilisation and early embryo quality in single- and superovulated dairy cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2010. PMID 20003858 · DOI
- Gonźalez-Bulnes A, Baird DT, Campbell BK, Cocero MJ, García-García RM, Inskeep EK, et al.. Multiple factors affecting the efficiency of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in sheep and goats. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2004. PMID 15315741 · DOI
- Kafi M, McGowan MR. Factors associated with variation in the superovulatory response of cattle. Anim Reprod Sci. 1997. PMID 9452869 · DOI
- Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Impact of ovarian hyperstimulation on the luteal phase. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 2000. PMID 10889839
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.