Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Sternum
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Sternum

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A long, narrow, and flat bone commonly known as breastbone occurring in the midsection of the anterior thoracic segment or chest region, which stabilizes the rib cage and serves as the point of origin for several muscles that move

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (883 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A long, narrow, and flat bone commonly known as breastbone occurring in the midsection of the anterior thoracic segment or chest region, which stabilizes the rib cage and serves as the point of origin for several muscles that move the arms, head, and neck.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Rib Cage
Narrower topics
Manubrium; Xiphoid Bone

Related concepts

  • Breastbone

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 10,173 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sternum” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 945 of them (9.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,822 records.

Reviews account for 594 records (5.8%) and meta-analyses for 39. Randomized controlled trials number 178 (1.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 4,822 records; 2000-2009: 2,502 records; 2010-2019: 1,904 records; 2020 onward: 945 records4,822through 19992,5022000-20091,9042010-20199452020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19994,822
2000-20092,502
2010-20191,904
2020 onward945
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.7 percentReviews5.8% (594)Meta-analyses0.4% (39)Randomized controlled trials1.7% (178)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 10,173 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5945.8%
Meta-analyses390.4%
Randomized controlled trials1781.7%

Method: PubMed query "Sternum"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinitis
Kaul P
2017Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
65cc by
PMID 29096673 · DOI · PMC5667468
Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures-a systematic review
Klei DS, de Jong MB, Öner FC, Leenen LPH, van Wessem KJP
2019Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
50cc by
PMID 29700586 · DOI · PMC6525114
Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors
Thøfner ICN, Dahl J, Christensen JP
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
41cc by
PMID 34388183 · DOI · PMC8362975
Sternal Re-Closure for Refractory Dehiscence Using Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Tape
Niki T, Nakahara Y, Iwakura T, Marui A
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42114135 · DOI · PMC13195629

Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinitis [1]

Review article Kaul P · · 2017 · cited 65 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDeep sternal wound complications are uncommon after cardiac surgery.
Closing excerpt
Negative pressure wound therapy and appropriately timed and staged muscle or omental flap reconstruction have transformed the outcomes once these complications occur.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (156 words)

BackgroundDeep sternal wound complications are uncommon after cardiac surgery. They comprise sternal dehiscence, deep sternal wound infections and mediastinitis, which will be treated as varying expressions of a singular pathology for reasons explained in the text.Methodology and reviewThis article reviews the definition, prevalence, risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, microbiology and management of deep sternal wound infections and mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. The role of negative pressure wound therapy and initial and delayed surgical management is discussed with special emphasis on plastic techniques with muscle and omental flaps. Recent advances in reconstructive surgery are presented.ConclusionsDeep sternal wound complications no longer spell debilitating morbidity and high mortality. Better understanding of risk factors that predispose to deep sternal wound complications and general improvement in theatre protocols for asepsis have dramatically reduced the incidence of deep sternal wound complications. Negative pressure wound therapy and appropriately timed and staged muscle or omental flap reconstruction have transformed the outcomes once these complications occur.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29096673 · DOI · PMC5667468

Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures-a systematic review [2]

Systematic review Klei DS, de Jong MB, Öner FC, Leenen LPH, van Wessem KJP · · 2019 · cited 50 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeTraumatic sternal fractures are rare injuries.
Closing excerpt
Although all patients in this review displayed sternal healing, results should be interpreted with caution since most included studies were of poor quality.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (189 words)

PurposeTraumatic sternal fractures are rare injuries. The most common mechanism of injury is direct blunt trauma to the anterior chest wall. Most (> 95%) sternal fractures are treated conservatively. Surgical fixation is indicated in case of fracture instability, displacement or non-union. However, limited research has been performed on treatment outcomes. This study aimed to provide an overview of the current treatment practices and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures and dislocations.MethodsA systematic review of literature published from 1990 to June 2017 was conducted. Original studies on traumatic sternal fractures, reporting sternal healing or sternal stability were included. Studies on non-traumatic sternal fractures or not reporting sternal healing outcomes, as well as case reports (n = 1), were excluded.ResultsSixteen studies were included in this review, which reported treatment outcomes for 191 patients. Most included studies were case series of poor quality. All patients showed sternal healing and 98% reported pain relief. Treatment complications occurred in 2% of patients.ConclusionsTreatment of traumatic sternal fractures and dislocations is an underexposed topic. Although all patients in this review displayed sternal healing, results should be interpreted with caution since most included studies were of poor quality.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29700586 · DOI · PMC6525114

Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors [3]

Research article Thøfner ICN, Dahl J, Christensen JP · · 2021 · cited 41 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Keel bone fractures (KBF) in commercial poultry production systems are a major welfare problem with possible economic consequences for the poultry industry.
Closing excerpt
Further research regarding this is warranted to strengthen the longevity and enhance the welfare of laying hens.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (441 words)

Keel bone fractures (KBF) in commercial poultry production systems are a major welfare problem with possible economic consequences for the poultry industry. Recent investigations suggest that the overall situation may be worsening. Depending on the housing system, fracture prevalences exceeding 80% have been reported from different countries. No specific causes have yet been identified and this has consequently hampered risk factor identification. The objective of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of KBF in Danish layer hens and to identify risk factors in relation to KBF in all major productions systems, including parent stock production. For risk factor identification, production data from the included flocks was used. In total, 4794 birds from 40 flocks were investigated at end-of-lay. All birds were euthanized on farm and underwent inspection and palpation followed by necropsy. All observations were recorded and subsequently analysed using the SAS statistical software package. In flocks from non-caged systems, fracture prevalence in the range 53%-100%, was observed whereas the prevalence in flocks from enriched cages ranged between 50-98%. Furthermore, often multiple fractures (≥4) were observed in individual birds (range 5-81% of the birds with fractures) depending on the flock. The localization of the fractures at the distal end of the keel bone is highly consistent in all flocks (>96%). Macroscopically the fractures varied morphologically from an appearance with an almost total absence of callus, most frequently observed in caged birds, to large callus formations in and around the fracture lines, which was a typical finding in non-caged birds. Despite being housed under cage-free conditions, parent birds had significantly fewer fractures (all flocks were 60 weeks old) per bird, than other birds from cage-free systems. The body weight at end-of-lay had an effect on the risk of having fractures, heavy hens have significantly fewer fractures at end-of-lay. The older the hens were at onset of lay, the lower was the flock prevalence at end-of-lay. Additionally, the daily egg size at onset of lay was of importance for the risk of developing fractures, the production of heavier eggs initially, resulted in higher fracture prevalence at depopulation. The odds ratio of body weight, (+100 g) was 0.97, age at onset of lay (+1 week) was 0.87 and daily egg weight at onset (+1 gram) was 1.03. In conclusion, the study demonstrated a very high prevalence of KBF in hens from all production systems and identified hen size, age at onset of lay and daily egg weight at onset of lay to be major risk factors for development of KBF in the modern laying hen. Further research regarding this is warranted to strengthen the longevity and enhance the welfare of laying hens.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34388183 · DOI · PMC8362975

Sternal Re-Closure for Refractory Dehiscence Using Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Tape [4]

Research article Niki T, Nakahara Y, Iwakura T, Marui A · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape has been introduced as an alternative to stainless-steel wires for primary sternal closure, yet its efficacy in secondary reconstruction has not been reported.
Closing excerpt
This case highlights the potential utility of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape as a durable and secure option for secondary sternal closure in patients with refractory sternal dehiscence.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (97 words)

Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape has been introduced as an alternative to stainless-steel wires for primary sternal closure, yet its efficacy in secondary reconstruction has not been reported. We present a 67-year-old male with refractory sternal dehiscence following coronary artery bypass grafting. Despite 2 failed reconstruction attempts using conventional wires and the Robicsek technique, stable fixation was finally achieved by combining ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape with mesh plates. This case highlights the potential utility of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape as a durable and secure option for secondary sternal closure in patients with refractory sternal dehiscence.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42114135 · DOI · PMC13195629

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
    Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV · J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg · 2009 · cited 254 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities [6]
    Fokin AA, Steuerwald NM, Ahrens WA, Allen KE · Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg · 2009 · cited 212 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Prevention and management of sternal wound infections [7]
    Lazar HL, Salm TV, Engelman R, Orgill D, Gordon S · J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg · 2016 · cited 166 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation [8]
    Hoke RS, Chamberlain D · Resuscitation · 2004 · cited 162 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Pectus excavatum: history, hypotheses and treatment options [9]
    Brochhausen C, Turial S, Müller FK, Schmitt VH, Coerdt W, Wihlm JM, et al. · Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg · 2012 · cited 142 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Disruption and infection of median sternotomy: a comprehensive review [10]
    Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW · Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · 2002 · cited 125 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Kaul P. Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinitis. . 2017. PMID 29096673 · DOI · PMC5667468
  2. Klei DS, de Jong MB, Öner FC, Leenen LPH, van Wessem KJP. Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures-a systematic review. . 2019. PMID 29700586 · DOI · PMC6525114
  3. Thøfner ICN, Dahl J, Christensen JP. Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors. . 2021. PMID 34388183 · DOI · PMC8362975
  4. Niki T, Nakahara Y, Iwakura T, Marui A. Sternal Re-Closure for Refractory Dehiscence Using Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Tape. . 2026. PMID 42114135 · DOI · PMC13195629
  5. Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009. PMID 19258087 · DOI
  6. Fokin AA, Steuerwald NM, Ahrens WA, Allen KE. Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009. PMID 19632563 · DOI
  7. Lazar HL, Salm TV, Engelman R, Orgill D, Gordon S. Prevention and management of sternal wound infections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. PMID 27555340 · DOI
  8. Hoke RS, Chamberlain D. Skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2004. PMID 15582769 · DOI
  9. Brochhausen C, Turial S, Müller FK, Schmitt VH, Coerdt W, Wihlm JM, et al.. Pectus excavatum: history, hypotheses and treatment options. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID 22394989 · DOI · PMC3352718
  10. Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Disruption and infection of median sternotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002. PMID 12062271 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Rib CageAnatomy and Physiology
  • AcetabulumAnatomy and Physiology
  • AcromionAnatomy and Physiology
  • CalcaneusAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cervical VertebraeAnatomy and Physiology
  • ChinAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

10,173
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
594
review articles
178
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Rib CageAnatomy and Physiology
  • AcetabulumAnatomy and Physiology
  • AcromionAnatomy and Physiology
  • CalcaneusAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cervical VertebraeAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support