Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (883 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A long, narrow, and flat bone commonly known as breastbone occurring in the midsection of the anterior thoracic segment or chest region, which stabilizes the rib cage and serves as the point of origin for several muscles that move the arms, head, and neck.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Rib Cage
- Narrower topics
- Manubrium; Xiphoid Bone
Related concepts
- Breastbone
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 10,173 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sternum” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 945 of them (9.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,822 records.
Reviews account for 594 records (5.8%) and meta-analyses for 39. Randomized controlled trials number 178 (1.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 4,822 |
| 2000-2009 | 2,502 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,904 |
| 2020 onward | 945 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 594 | 5.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 39 | 0.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 178 | 1.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Sternum"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinitis | 2017 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 65 | cc by PMID 29096673 · DOI · PMC5667468 |
| Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures-a systematic review | 2019 | Systematic review Design not recorded in structured metadata | 50 | cc by PMID 29700586 · DOI · PMC6525114 |
| Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors | 2021 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 41 | cc by PMID 34388183 · DOI · PMC8362975 |
| Sternal Re-Closure for Refractory Dehiscence Using Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Tape | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42114135 · DOI · PMC13195629 |
Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinitis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundDeep sternal wound complications are uncommon after cardiac surgery.
- Closing excerpt
- Negative pressure wound therapy and appropriately timed and staged muscle or omental flap reconstruction have transformed the outcomes once these complications occur.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (156 words)
BackgroundDeep sternal wound complications are uncommon after cardiac surgery. They comprise sternal dehiscence, deep sternal wound infections and mediastinitis, which will be treated as varying expressions of a singular pathology for reasons explained in the text.Methodology and reviewThis article reviews the definition, prevalence, risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, microbiology and management of deep sternal wound infections and mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. The role of negative pressure wound therapy and initial and delayed surgical management is discussed with special emphasis on plastic techniques with muscle and omental flaps. Recent advances in reconstructive surgery are presented.ConclusionsDeep sternal wound complications no longer spell debilitating morbidity and high mortality. Better understanding of risk factors that predispose to deep sternal wound complications and general improvement in theatre protocols for asepsis have dramatically reduced the incidence of deep sternal wound complications. Negative pressure wound therapy and appropriately timed and staged muscle or omental flap reconstruction have transformed the outcomes once these complications occur.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29096673 · DOI · PMC5667468
Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures-a systematic review [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PurposeTraumatic sternal fractures are rare injuries.
- Closing excerpt
- Although all patients in this review displayed sternal healing, results should be interpreted with caution since most included studies were of poor quality.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (189 words)
PurposeTraumatic sternal fractures are rare injuries. The most common mechanism of injury is direct blunt trauma to the anterior chest wall. Most (> 95%) sternal fractures are treated conservatively. Surgical fixation is indicated in case of fracture instability, displacement or non-union. However, limited research has been performed on treatment outcomes. This study aimed to provide an overview of the current treatment practices and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures and dislocations.MethodsA systematic review of literature published from 1990 to June 2017 was conducted. Original studies on traumatic sternal fractures, reporting sternal healing or sternal stability were included. Studies on non-traumatic sternal fractures or not reporting sternal healing outcomes, as well as case reports (n = 1), were excluded.ResultsSixteen studies were included in this review, which reported treatment outcomes for 191 patients. Most included studies were case series of poor quality. All patients showed sternal healing and 98% reported pain relief. Treatment complications occurred in 2% of patients.ConclusionsTreatment of traumatic sternal fractures and dislocations is an underexposed topic. Although all patients in this review displayed sternal healing, results should be interpreted with caution since most included studies were of poor quality.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29700586 · DOI · PMC6525114
Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Keel bone fractures (KBF) in commercial poultry production systems are a major welfare problem with possible economic consequences for the poultry industry.
- Closing excerpt
- Further research regarding this is warranted to strengthen the longevity and enhance the welfare of laying hens.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (441 words)
Keel bone fractures (KBF) in commercial poultry production systems are a major welfare problem with possible economic consequences for the poultry industry. Recent investigations suggest that the overall situation may be worsening. Depending on the housing system, fracture prevalences exceeding 80% have been reported from different countries. No specific causes have yet been identified and this has consequently hampered risk factor identification. The objective of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of KBF in Danish layer hens and to identify risk factors in relation to KBF in all major productions systems, including parent stock production. For risk factor identification, production data from the included flocks was used. In total, 4794 birds from 40 flocks were investigated at end-of-lay. All birds were euthanized on farm and underwent inspection and palpation followed by necropsy. All observations were recorded and subsequently analysed using the SAS statistical software package. In flocks from non-caged systems, fracture prevalence in the range 53%-100%, was observed whereas the prevalence in flocks from enriched cages ranged between 50-98%. Furthermore, often multiple fractures (≥4) were observed in individual birds (range 5-81% of the birds with fractures) depending on the flock. The localization of the fractures at the distal end of the keel bone is highly consistent in all flocks (>96%). Macroscopically the fractures varied morphologically from an appearance with an almost total absence of callus, most frequently observed in caged birds, to large callus formations in and around the fracture lines, which was a typical finding in non-caged birds. Despite being housed under cage-free conditions, parent birds had significantly fewer fractures (all flocks were 60 weeks old) per bird, than other birds from cage-free systems. The body weight at end-of-lay had an effect on the risk of having fractures, heavy hens have significantly fewer fractures at end-of-lay. The older the hens were at onset of lay, the lower was the flock prevalence at end-of-lay. Additionally, the daily egg size at onset of lay was of importance for the risk of developing fractures, the production of heavier eggs initially, resulted in higher fracture prevalence at depopulation. The odds ratio of body weight, (+100 g) was 0.97, age at onset of lay (+1 week) was 0.87 and daily egg weight at onset (+1 gram) was 1.03. In conclusion, the study demonstrated a very high prevalence of KBF in hens from all production systems and identified hen size, age at onset of lay and daily egg weight at onset of lay to be major risk factors for development of KBF in the modern laying hen. Further research regarding this is warranted to strengthen the longevity and enhance the welfare of laying hens.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34388183 · DOI · PMC8362975
Sternal Re-Closure for Refractory Dehiscence Using Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Tape [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape has been introduced as an alternative to stainless-steel wires for primary sternal closure, yet its efficacy in secondary reconstruction has not been reported.
- Closing excerpt
- This case highlights the potential utility of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape as a durable and secure option for secondary sternal closure in patients with refractory sternal dehiscence.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (97 words)
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape has been introduced as an alternative to stainless-steel wires for primary sternal closure, yet its efficacy in secondary reconstruction has not been reported. We present a 67-year-old male with refractory sternal dehiscence following coronary artery bypass grafting. Despite 2 failed reconstruction attempts using conventional wires and the Robicsek technique, stable fixation was finally achieved by combining ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape with mesh plates. This case highlights the potential utility of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape as a durable and secure option for secondary sternal closure in patients with refractory sternal dehiscence.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42114135 · DOI · PMC13195629
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
- Research article Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities [6]
- Research article Prevention and management of sternal wound infections [7]
- Research article Skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation [8]
- Research article Pectus excavatum: history, hypotheses and treatment options [9]
- Research article Disruption and infection of median sternotomy: a comprehensive review [10]
References
- Kaul P. Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinitis. . 2017. PMID 29096673 · DOI · PMC5667468
- Klei DS, de Jong MB, Öner FC, Leenen LPH, van Wessem KJP. Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures-a systematic review. . 2019. PMID 29700586 · DOI · PMC6525114
- Thøfner ICN, Dahl J, Christensen JP. Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors. . 2021. PMID 34388183 · DOI · PMC8362975
- Niki T, Nakahara Y, Iwakura T, Marui A. Sternal Re-Closure for Refractory Dehiscence Using Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Tape. . 2026. PMID 42114135 · DOI · PMC13195629
- Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009. PMID 19258087 · DOI
- Fokin AA, Steuerwald NM, Ahrens WA, Allen KE. Anatomical, histologic, and genetic characteristics of congenital chest wall deformities. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009. PMID 19632563 · DOI
- Lazar HL, Salm TV, Engelman R, Orgill D, Gordon S. Prevention and management of sternal wound infections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. PMID 27555340 · DOI
- Hoke RS, Chamberlain D. Skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2004. PMID 15582769 · DOI
- Brochhausen C, Turial S, Müller FK, Schmitt VH, Coerdt W, Wihlm JM, et al.. Pectus excavatum: history, hypotheses and treatment options. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID 22394989 · DOI · PMC3352718
- Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Disruption and infection of median sternotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002. PMID 12062271 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.