Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Sphenoid Sinus
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Sphenoid Sinus

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

One of the paired air spaces located in the body of the sphenoid bone behind the ethmoid bone in the middle of the skull.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (948 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

One of the paired air spaces located in the body of the sphenoid bone behind the ethmoid bone in the middle of the skull. Sphenoid sinus communicates with the posterosuperior part of nasal cavity on the same side.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Sinus, Sphenoid.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Paranasal Sinuses

Related concepts

  • Sphenoid Bone
  • Ethmoid Bone
  • Nasal Cavity

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 3,894 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sphenoid Sinus” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 446 of them (11.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,541 records.

Reviews account for 322 records (8.3%) and meta-analyses for 9. Randomized controlled trials number 7 (0.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,541 records; 2000-2009: 881 records; 2010-2019: 1,026 records; 2020 onward: 446 records1,541through 19998812000-20091,0262010-20194462020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,541
2000-2009881
2010-20191,026
2020 onward446
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.2 percentReviews8.3% (322)Meta-analyses0.2% (9)Randomized controlled trials0.2% (7)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 3,894 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3228.3%
Meta-analyses90.2%
Randomized controlled trials70.2%

Method: PubMed query "Sphenoid Sinus"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis
Gao Y, Zhong C, Wang Y, Xu S, Guo Y, Dai C, et al.
2014Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
121cc by
PMID 24721812 · DOI · PMC3991865
Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery of 1,166 pituitary adenomas
Wang F, Zhou T, Wei S, Meng X, Zhang J, Hou Y, et al.
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
89cc by
PMID 25270611 · DOI · PMC4422857
The sphenoid sinus, foramen rotundum and vidian canal: a radiological study of anatomical relationships
Mohebbi A, Rajaeih S, Safdarian M, Omidian P
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
29cc by
PMID 27283380 · DOI · PMC9442688
Isolated sphenoid sinus foreign body following slingshot injury: a case report
Luu B, Mooney C, Dhepnorrarat RC, Gounder P
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42265716 · DOI · PMC13471584

Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis [1]

Meta-analysis Gao Y, Zhong C, Wang Y, Xu S, Guo Y, Dai C, et al. · · 2014 · cited 121 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundEndoscopic transsphenoidal surgery has gradually come to be regarded as a preferred option in the treatment of pituitary adenomas because of its advantages of improved visualization and its minimal invasiveness.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsThe present study indicates that the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach is safer and more effective than microscopic surgery in the treatment of pituitary adenomas.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (223 words)

BackgroundEndoscopic transsphenoidal surgery has gradually come to be regarded as a preferred option in the treatment of pituitary adenomas because of its advantages of improved visualization and its minimal invasiveness. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the outcomes and complications of endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in the treatment of pituitary adenomas.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Web of Science between January 1992 and May 2013. Studies with consecutive patients that explicitly and fully compared endoscopic and microscopic approaches in the treatment of pituitary adenomas were included.ResultsA total of 15 studies (n = 1,014 patients) met the inclusion criteria among 487 studies that involved endoscopic surgery and 527 studies that dealt with microscopic surgery. The rate of gross tumor removal was higher in the endoscopic group than in the microscopic group. The post-operative rates of septal perforation were less frequent in patients who underwent endoscopic surgery. There was no significant difference between the two techniques in the incidence rates of meningitis, diabetes insipidus, cerebrospinal fluid leak, epistaxis or hypopituitarism. The post-operative hospital stay was significantly shorter for the endoscopic surgery group compared with the microscopic surgery group (P 0.05).ConclusionsThe present study indicates that the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach is safer and more effective than microscopic surgery in the treatment of pituitary adenomas.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24721812 · DOI · PMC3991865

Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery of 1,166 pituitary adenomas [2]

Research article Wang F, Zhou T, Wei S, Meng X, Zhang J, Hou Y, et al. · · 2015 · cited 89 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
AimTo report the results of a series of patients undergoing pure endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure.
Closing excerpt
For patients with functional adenomas, while hormonal remission is unlikely to be achieved by surgery, the use of adjuvant therapy is advocated to obtain long-term hormonal control.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (252 words)

AimTo report the results of a series of patients undergoing pure endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure.Materials and methodsThe data of 1,166 patients that underwent endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal adenoma removal between December 2006 and June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and postoperative hormonal status (3 months after surgery) were analyzed and compared with the clinical parameters originally presented by the patients. The incidences of tumor removal, hormonal control, and tumor removal complications were retrospectively analyzed.ResultOut of 577 nonfunctioning adenomas, 180 were growth hormone (GH) secreting, 308 prolactin (PRL) secreting, 26 mixed GH/PRL adenomas, 68 adrenocorticotropin secreting, and 7 thyroid-stimulating hormone-secreting adenomas. The gross total removal of pituitary adenomas was achieved in 98 % of microadenomas, 92 % of macroadenomas, and 76 % of giant adenomas. Hormonal control was achieved in 47 (69 %) cases of ACTH adenomas, 119 (66 %) GH adenomas, 262 (85 %) PRL adenomas, and 6 (86 %) TSH adenomas. Postoperative complications were observed in 168 (14.4 %) patients. The most frequent complications were diabetes insipidus (7 %), epistaxis (1.7 %), hyposmia (1.5 %), anterior lobe insufficiency (1.3 %) ,and CSF leaks (0.6 %).ConclusionThe pure endoscopic approach is a safe, efficacious, and minimally invasive technique for the removal of pituitary adenomas. A higher gross total resection rate is vital for non-functional and functional adenomas. For patients with functional adenomas, while hormonal remission is unlikely to be achieved by surgery, the use of adjuvant therapy is advocated to obtain long-term hormonal control.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25270611 · DOI · PMC4422857

The sphenoid sinus, foramen rotundum and vidian canal: a radiological study of anatomical relationships [3]

Research article Mohebbi A, Rajaeih S, Safdarian M, Omidian P · · 2017 · cited 29 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionThe sphenoid sinus is an important structure in ventral skull base surgeries that is surrounded by several vital anatomical structures including the internal carotid arteries, optic nerve and cranial nerves inside the cavernous sinus.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionThe results of this study can be used to provide a better anatomical understanding of the area, which is necessary for endoscopic skull base surgeons.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (285 words)

IntroductionThe sphenoid sinus is an important structure in ventral skull base surgeries that is surrounded by several vital anatomical structures including the internal carotid arteries, optic nerve and cranial nerves inside the cavernous sinus. In addition, the foramen rotundum is a small canal deeply situated in the base of the skull, which represents the way for exit of the maxillary nerve. Understanding of the sphenoid bone anatomical relationships is central to the expanded endonasal approaches to the skull base.ObjectiveTo record and analyze the measurement indexes of the sphenoid sinus and foramen rotundum in the coronal plane of normal computer tomography scans.MethodsPatients underwent paranasal sinuses computer tomography scan from June 2014 to November 2015 were retrospectively entered this cross-sectional study. We obtained several morphometric measurements from both the right and left sides using computer software. We also classified foramen rotundum and vidian canal types and determined position of the foramen rotundum regarding to base of lateral pterygoid plate.ResultsOne-hundred patients with the mean age of 38.56±18.51 years entered this study. Mean bilateral FR distances were 38.48±3.87mm. Average right and left FRs distances to midline were 19.00±2.07 and 19.34±2.17mm, respectively (p=0.03). Twenty-eight cases (28%) had type I vidian canal, 48% and 24% had type II and III vidian canals, respectively. Four patients (4%) had type I rotundum foramen, 28% and 44% had type IIa and IIb, respectively and 24% had type III rotundum foramen. The position of foramen rotundums regarding to the base of lateral pterygoid plate was online in 50% of cases, medially placed in 47% and laterally placed in 3% of cases.ConclusionThe results of this study can be used to provide a better anatomical understanding of the area, which is necessary for endoscopic skull base surgeons.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27283380 · DOI · PMC9442688

Isolated sphenoid sinus foreign body following slingshot injury: a case report [4]

Research article Luu B, Mooney C, Dhepnorrarat RC, Gounder P · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundImpaction of foreign bodies within the paranasal sinuses secondary to slingshot projectiles is uncommon, with only three documented case reports within the literature.
Closing excerpt
It underscores the ophthalmic rationale and benefits of primary repair of a globe perforation in the setting of NPL vision, as well as the novel endoscopic techniques employed to achieve minimally invasive foreign body retrieval.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (188 words)

BackgroundImpaction of foreign bodies within the paranasal sinuses secondary to slingshot projectiles is uncommon, with only three documented case reports within the literature. There are no clear guidelines for the management of these injuries, and given the heterogeneity of their presentations, various methods of foreign body extraction have been employed, ranging from enucleation of the affected eye to transnasal endoscopic approaches.Case presentationThis case report describes the presentation and successful management of a 36-year-old male with a ruptured left globe and no perception of light (NPL) visual acuity secondary to a slingshot projectile. CT imaging of the head and orbits revealed a 17 mm-diameter metallic foreign body impacted solely within the sphenoid sinus. A review of the literature confirmed this to be the first reported case of an isolated sphenoid sinus foreign body secondary to a slingshot projectile mechanism.ConclusionsThis report highlights the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in managing complex sino-orbital foreign body injuries. It underscores the ophthalmic rationale and benefits of primary repair of a globe perforation in the setting of NPL vision, as well as the novel endoscopic techniques employed to achieve minimally invasive foreign body retrieval.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42265716 · DOI · PMC13471584

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica [5]
    Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL · Neurosurg Focus · 2005 · cited 282 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery [6]
    Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, De Divitiis O, Messina A, De Divitiis E · Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg · 2008 · cited 260 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Risk factors for postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis after expanded endoscopic endonasal surgery [7]
    Ivan ME, Iorgulescu JB, El-Sayed I, McDermott MW, Parsa AT, Pletcher SD, et al. · J Clin Neurosci · 2015 · cited 121 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Long-term study of endonasal duraplasty and review of the literature [8]
    Schick B, Ibing R, Brors D, Draf W · Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol · 2001 · cited 74 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Contemporary surgical treatment of epistaxis. What is the evidence for sphenopalatine artery ligation? [9]
    Kumar S, Shetty A, Rockey J, Nilssen E · Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci · 2003 · cited 67 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The role of the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach in pediatric neurosurgery [10]
    de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Gangemi M, Cavallo LM · Childs Nerv Syst · 2000 · cited 65 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Gao Y, Zhong C, Wang Y, Xu S, Guo Y, Dai C, et al.. Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis. . 2014. PMID 24721812 · DOI · PMC3991865
  2. Wang F, Zhou T, Wei S, Meng X, Zhang J, Hou Y, et al.. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery of 1,166 pituitary adenomas. . 2015. PMID 25270611 · DOI · PMC4422857
  3. Mohebbi A, Rajaeih S, Safdarian M, Omidian P. The sphenoid sinus, foramen rotundum and vidian canal: a radiological study of anatomical relationships. . 2017. PMID 27283380 · DOI · PMC9442688
  4. Luu B, Mooney C, Dhepnorrarat RC, Gounder P. Isolated sphenoid sinus foreign body following slingshot injury: a case report. . 2026. PMID 42265716 · DOI · PMC13471584
  5. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus. 2005. PMID 16078817 · DOI
  6. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, De Divitiis O, Messina A, De Divitiis E. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2008. PMID 18383814 · DOI
  7. Ivan ME, Iorgulescu JB, El-Sayed I, McDermott MW, Parsa AT, Pletcher SD, et al.. Risk factors for postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis after expanded endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2015. PMID 25439754 · DOI
  8. Schick B, Ibing R, Brors D, Draf W. Long-term study of endonasal duraplasty and review of the literature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001. PMID 11219521 · DOI
  9. Kumar S, Shetty A, Rockey J, Nilssen E. Contemporary surgical treatment of epistaxis. What is the evidence for sphenopalatine artery ligation?. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003. PMID 12871253 · DOI
  10. de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Gangemi M, Cavallo LM. The role of the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach in pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 2000. PMID 11151718 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Maxillary SinusAnatomy and Physiology
  • Paranasal SinusesAnatomy and Physiology
  • Frontal SinusAnatomy and Physiology
  • Nasal SeptumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Frontal BoneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Nasal CavityAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

3,894
PubMed records on this heading
11%
published since 2020
322
review articles
7
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Maxillary SinusAnatomy and Physiology
  • Paranasal SinusesAnatomy and Physiology
  • Frontal SinusAnatomy and Physiology
  • Nasal SeptumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Frontal BoneAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support