Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,114 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Rare neoplasms of mesenchymal origin, usually benign, and most commonly involving the pleura (see solitary fibrous tumor, pleural). They also are found in extrapleural sites.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Fibrous Tumor, Solitary; Fibrous Tumors, Solitary; Solitary Fibrous Tumor; Tumor, Solitary Fibrous; Tumors, Solitary Fibrous.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Neoplasms, Fibrous Tissue
- Narrower topics
- Solitary Fibrous Tumor, Pleural
Related concepts
- Pleura
- Solitary Fibrous Tumor
- Pleural
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,918 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Solitary Fibrous Tumors” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 676 of them (35.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,050 records.
Reviews account for 344 records (17.9%) and meta-analyses for 8. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 213 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,050 |
| 2020 onward | 676 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 344 | 17.9% |
| Meta-analyses | 8 | 0.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 2 | 0.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Solitary Fibrous Tumors"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology
Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The many faces of solitary fibrous tumor; diversity of histological features, differential diagnosis and role of molecular studies and surrogate markers in avoiding misdiagnosis and predicting the behavior | 2021 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 150 | cc by PMID 33879215 · DOI · PMC8059036 |
| Solitary fibrous tumor - clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of 28 cases | 2014 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 74 | cc by PMID 25432794 · DOI · PMC4264260 |
| Molecular changes in solitary fibrous tumor progression | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 71 | cc by PMID 31321477 · DOI · PMC6746689 |
| Survival and prognostic factors of anaplastic hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor grade III | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 41896408 · DOI · PMC13033020 |
The many faces of solitary fibrous tumor; diversity of histological features, differential diagnosis and role of molecular studies and surrogate markers in avoiding misdiagnosis and predicting the behavior [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundSolitary Fibrous Tumor (SFT) is a distinct soft tissue neoplasm associated with NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionThis review will focus on describing the diversity of histological features of SFT, differential diagnoses and discussing the features helpful in distinguishing SFT from its histological mimics.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (242 words)
BackgroundSolitary Fibrous Tumor (SFT) is a distinct soft tissue neoplasm associated with NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion. It can involve a number of anatomic sites and exhibits a wide spectrum of histological features.Main bodyApart from diversity in morphological features seen even in conventional SFT, two histologic variants (fat-forming and giant cell-rich) are also recognized. In addition, a malignant form and dedifferentiation are well recognized. Owing to diverse histological features and involvement of diverse anatomic locations, SFT can mimic other soft tissue neoplasms of different lineages including schwannoma, spindle cell lipoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, liposarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and synovial sarcoma. SFT is classified as an intermediate (rarely metastasizing) tumor according to World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Soft tissue and Bone, 5th edition. The management and prognosis of SFT differs from its malignant mimics and correct diagnosis is therefore important. Although SFT expresses a distinct immunohistochemical (IHC) profile, the classic histomorphological and IHC profile is not seen in all cases and diagnosis can be challenging. NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion has recently emerged as a sensitive and specific molecular marker and its IHC surrogate marker signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) has also shown significant sensitivity and specificity. However, few recent studies have reported STAT6 expression in other soft tissue neoplasms.ConclusionThis review will focus on describing the diversity of histological features of SFT, differential diagnoses and discussing the features helpful in distinguishing SFT from its histological mimics.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33879215 · DOI · PMC8059036
Solitary fibrous tumor - clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of 28 cases [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundSolitary fibrous tumor is a mesenchymal tumor of fibroblastic type, which can affect any region of the body.
- Closing excerpt
- eu/vs/13000_2014_224.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (323 words)
BackgroundSolitary fibrous tumor is a mesenchymal tumor of fibroblastic type, which can affect any region of the body. Recently, a recurrent gene fusion NAB2-STAT6 has been identified as molecular hallmark. The NAB2-STAT6 fusion leads to EGR1 activation and transcriptional deregulation of EGR1-dependent target genes and is a driving event in initiation of SFT. In this study, we report the clinicopathologic and RT-PCR findings and evaluated expression of STAT6 and EGR1 protein in a cohort of 28 SFTs.Methods28 patients with a median age of 54 years were included with SFTs originating at different sites, most occurring in the lung and pleura (9, 32%), 5 in soft tissues of the lower extremities (18%) and 5 in the head and neck (18%). For detection of the NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene, RT-PCR was performed using RNA extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. Immunohistochemistry was performed on all cases with antibodies against STAT6 and EGR1.ResultsAll patients were treated by surgery, 3 with adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy. Follow-up data of 18 patients could be obtained of which 2 patients died of metastatic disease 13 months and 52 years after first diagnosis. Sixteen patients have no evidence of disease with a median follow up of 29.5 months (range 7 - 120 months). NAB2-STAT6 fusion transcripts were found in 19/28 cases (68%). The most common fusion was between NAB2 exon 4 and STAT6 exon 3 (11/19, 58%), mainly occurring in pleuropulmonary lesions. All cases showed strong nuclear expression of STAT6 (28/28, 100%) while EGR1 showed low-level variable nuclear expression in all samples, comparable with the EGR1 expression results of the control group.ConclusionsThe identification of the NAB2-STAT6 fusion in SFTs can provide important diagnostic information, especially in cases with aberrant morphology or when biopsy material is limited. STAT6 immunohistochemistry is another useful tool in diagnosing SFT. EGR1 immunohistochemistry indicates low-level protein expression in accordance with EGR1 activation due to distorted NAB2 activity.Virtual slidesThe virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/13000_2014_224.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25432794 · DOI · PMC4264260
Molecular changes in solitary fibrous tumor progression [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are NAB2-STAT6 fusion-associated neoplasms.
- Closing excerpt
- Our study suggests that dysfunction of TP53 and APAF1 leads to impaired apoptotic function, and eventually contributes toward malignant SFT transformation.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (298 words)
Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are NAB2-STAT6 fusion-associated neoplasms. There are several subtypes of NAB2-STAT6 fusions, but their clinical significances are still unclear. Moreover, the mechanisms of malignant progression are also poorly understood. In this study, using 91 SFT cases, we examined whether fusion variants are associated with clinicopathological parameters and also investigated the molecular mechanism of malignant transformation using whole-exome sequencing. We detected variant 1b (NAB2ex4-STAT6ex2) in 51/91 (56%) cases and variants 2a/2b (NAB2ex6-STAT6ex16/17) in 17/91 (19%) cases. The NAB2-STAT6 fusion variant types were significantly associated with their primary site (P < 0.001). In addition, a TERT promoter mutation was detected in 7/73 (10%) cases, and it showed a significant association with malignant SFTs (P = 0.003). To identify molecular changes during malignant progression, we selected an index patient to obtain parallel tissue samples from the primary and metastatic tumors. In the metastatic tissue, 10 unique molecular alterations, including those in TP53 and APAF1, were detected. In vitro functional experiments showed that APAF1 depletion increased the tumor potency of cells expressing NAB2-STAT6 fusion protein under treatment with staurosporine. We found that TP53 immunopositivity (P = 0.006) and loss of APAF1 immunoreactivity (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with malignant SFTs. Our study suggests that dysfunction of TP53 and APAF1 leads to impaired apoptotic function, and eventually contributes toward malignant SFT transformation. KEY MESSAGES: We firstly found that the TERT promoter mutation was strongly associated with malignant SFTs (P = 0.003) and the representative 1b (NAB2ex4-STAT6ex2) or 2a (NAB2ex6-STAT6ex16) fusion variants similarly contribute to tumorigenicity. We also found that TP53 immunopositivity (P = 0.006) and loss of APAF1 immunoreactivity (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with malignant SFTs. Our study suggests that dysfunction of TP53 and APAF1 leads to impaired apoptotic function, and eventually contributes toward malignant SFT transformation.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31321477 · DOI · PMC6746689
Survival and prognostic factors of anaplastic hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor grade III [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundAnaplastic Hemangiopericytoma (AHPC), now known as Solitary Fibrous Tumor (SFT) Grade III, is a rare biologically aggressive neoplasm with a high rate of recurrence.
- Closing excerpt
- Continued advances in therapeutic strategies are needed to further improve survival in this rare and clinically devastating disease.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (251 words)
BackgroundAnaplastic Hemangiopericytoma (AHPC), now known as Solitary Fibrous Tumor (SFT) Grade III, is a rare biologically aggressive neoplasm with a high rate of recurrence. Owing to its rarity, the existing literature is limited regarding its clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, management, and treatment strategies. In this study, we evaluate the association between patient demographics, clinical variables, and treatment modalities with overall survival in patients with intracranial AHPC/SFT Grade III.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for the clinical and care parameters of patients ≥ 18-years-old diagnosed with AHPC between 2004 and 2017. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was implemented to determine factors associated with overall survival.Results427 patients were identified with a mean age of 52.6 ± 0.7 years. Most patients were between 40-70 years old (67.0%) with patients ≤ 40-years-old making up 21.3% and those ≥ 70-years-old making up only 11.7%. Overall median survival was 10.8 years. When stratified based on age, those ≤ 40-years-old had increased mean survival compared to those ≥ 70-years-old (10.8 vs. 6.6 years; p ConclusionIn this NCDB cohort of intracranial grade III SFT/HPC, improved overall survival was associated with younger age, private insurance status, and treatment with surgery alone or surgery combined with radiation therapy. Chemotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit. Interpretation of treatment effects should be cautious, given the potential for selection bias in chemotherapy utilization and the risk of immortal time bias analyses of radiotherapy. Continued advances in therapeutic strategies are needed to further improve survival in this rare and clinically devastating disease.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41896408 · DOI · PMC13033020
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Diagnostic imaging of solitary tumors of the spine: what to do and say [5]
- Research article Imaging features of solitary fibrous tumors [6]
- Research article The Current Status of Solitary Fibrous Tumor: Diagnostic Features, Variants, and Genetics [7]
- Research article Inhibiting the VEGF-VEGFR pathway in angiosarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor [8]
- Research article Extrapleural solitary fibrous tumor: A distinct entity from pleural solitary fibrous tumor. An update on clinical, molecular and diagnostic features [9]
- Research article New insights into the hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor spectrum of tumors [10]
References
- Tariq MU, Din NU, Abdul-Ghafar J, Park YK. The many faces of solitary fibrous tumor; diversity of histological features, differential diagnosis and role of molecular studies and surrogate markers in avoiding misdiagnosis and predicting the behavior. . 2021. PMID 33879215 · DOI · PMC8059036
- Vogels RJ, Vlenterie M, Versleijen-Jonkers YM, Ruijter E, Bekers EM, Verdijk MA, et al.. Solitary fibrous tumor - clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of 28 cases. . 2014. PMID 25432794 · DOI · PMC4264260
- Park HK, Yu DB, Sung M, Oh E, Kim M, Song JY, et al.. Molecular changes in solitary fibrous tumor progression. . 2019. PMID 31321477 · DOI · PMC6746689
- Pando A, Patel AM, Valdivia DJ, Daut CT, Levin-Carrion Y, Shah V, et al.. Survival and prognostic factors of anaplastic hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor grade III. . 2026. PMID 41896408 · DOI · PMC13033020
- Rodallec MH, Feydy A, Larousserie F, Anract P, Campagna R, Babinet A, et al.. Diagnostic imaging of solitary tumors of the spine: what to do and say. Radiographics. 2008. PMID 18635627 · DOI
- Ginat DT, Bokhari A, Bhatt S, Dogra V. Imaging features of solitary fibrous tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. PMID 21343490 · DOI
- Thway K, Ng W, Noujaim J, Jones RL, Fisher C. The Current Status of Solitary Fibrous Tumor: Diagnostic Features, Variants, and Genetics. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016. PMID 26811389 · DOI
- Park MS, Ravi V, Araujo DM. Inhibiting the VEGF-VEGFR pathway in angiosarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor. Curr Opin Oncol. 2010. PMID 20485168 · DOI
- Ronchi A, Cozzolino I, Zito Marino F, Accardo M, Montella M, Panarese I, et al.. Extrapleural solitary fibrous tumor: A distinct entity from pleural solitary fibrous tumor. An update on clinical, molecular and diagnostic features. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2018. PMID 29660566 · DOI
- Park MS, Araujo DM. New insights into the hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor spectrum of tumors. Curr Opin Oncol. 2009. PMID 19444101 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.