Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 3 complete abstracts (851 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The clear, viscous fluid secreted by the salivary glands and mucous glands of the mouth. It contains mucins, water, organic salts, and ptylin.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Salivas.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Bodily Secretions
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 51,819 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Saliva” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 10,270 of them (19.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 18,228 records.
Reviews account for 3,086 records (6.0%) and meta-analyses for 261. Randomized controlled trials number 2,811 (5.4%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 18,228 |
| 2000-2009 | 8,631 |
| 2010-2019 | 14,690 |
| 2020 onward | 10,270 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 3,086 | 6.0% |
| Meta-analyses | 261 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 2,811 | 5.4% |
Method: PubMed query "Saliva"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salivary Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Peri-Implant Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | 2025 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 8 | cc by PMID 41373430 · DOI · PMC12692554 |
| Diagnostic accuracy of aMMP-8 levels in oral biofluids for monitoring periodontitis in patients with metabolic syndrome | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 6 | cc by PMID 41075005 · DOI · PMC12515219 |
| Salivary microbiota and clinical periodontal measures predicting cardiometabolic disease mortality: A nationwide survey | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 6 | cc by PMID 41071188 · DOI · PMC12934248 |
Salivary Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Peri-Implant Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Peri-implantitis, a common biological complication of dental implants, is characterized by soft-tissue inflammation and progressive bone loss.
- Closing excerpt
- Salivary MDA and TAC show consistent, large, standardized differences in peri-implant disease; however, observational designs, assay variability, and the absence of validated diagnostic thresholds warrant cautious interpretation and prospective validation before clinical adoption.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (221 words)
Peri-implantitis, a common biological complication of dental implants, is characterized by soft-tissue inflammation and progressive bone loss. Oxidative stress is increasingly implicated in its pathogenesis, yet the diagnostic potential of salivary redox biomarkers remains unclear. This study's objective was to assess the association between salivary malondialdehyde (MDA) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and peri-implant disease via a pre-registered, quantitative meta-analysis of previously published studies using predefined statistical criteria. Following a priori PROSPERO registration, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2004-September 2025), extracted data in duplicate, and pooled effects using random-effects models; certainty of evidence was appraised with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and risk of bias with ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions)/QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2). Twelve studies were included qualitatively: seven (n = 726) contributed to MDA and five (n = 485) to TAC meta-analyses. Peri-implant disease was associated with elevated MDA (SMD = 1.64, 95% CI 1.39-1.88) and reduced TAC (SMD = -1.88, 95% CI -2.17 to -1.58); statistical heterogeneity was not detected, and results were robust to sensitivity and exploratory assay-based subgroup analyses. Salivary MDA and TAC show consistent, large, standardized differences in peri-implant disease; however, observational designs, assay variability, and the absence of validated diagnostic thresholds warrant cautious interpretation and prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41373430 · DOI · PMC12692554
Diagnostic accuracy of aMMP-8 levels in oral biofluids for monitoring periodontitis in patients with metabolic syndrome [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectivesThe increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and periodontitis, both marked by chronic inflammation that disrupts immune function, underscores the need for tailored healthcare approaches that account for their systemic inflammatory impact.
- Closing excerpt
- aMMP-8 immunoassay chair-side kit offers a practical alternative to traditional methods for screening patients in non-dental settings.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (272 words)
ObjectivesThe increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and periodontitis, both marked by chronic inflammation that disrupts immune function, underscores the need for tailored healthcare approaches that account for their systemic inflammatory impact. The study aimed to estimate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of aMMP-8 expression in oral rinse, saliva, and GCF (gingival crevicular fluid) among patients with periodontitis and those with and without MetS.Materials and methodsA pilot sample of 77 participants was categorized into three groups based on the 2018 AAP/EFP periodontitis classification and the 2006 IDF metabolic syndrome criteria: MetS with periodontitis (MetS-PD; n = 34), systemically healthy with periodontitis (SH-PD; n = 21), and healthy controls (SH-PH; n = 22). Active metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) levels in oral biofluids were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. ANOVA and ROC curve analysis were done to assess diagnostic accuracy across groups.ResultsaMMP-8 levels varied by group but remained consistent across biofluids, with lower levels in SH-PH and higher levels in SH-PD and MetS-PD (p ConclusionOral rinse may be a preferable matrix for diagnosing periodontal disease, particularly in patients with systemic conditions, compared to saliva and GCF. Prospective longitudinal studies are required to evaluate its utility for monitoring over time.Clinical relevanceThis study highlights the potential of aMMP-8 as a reliable biomarker for assessing periodontal disease severity in patients with MetS, utilizing non-invasive oral fluids. With oral rinses demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy, they may be an effective and accessible tool for screening and case-finding in medical and dental settings in patients with MetS, facilitating early detection and tailored management strategies. aMMP-8 immunoassay chair-side kit offers a practical alternative to traditional methods for screening patients in non-dental settings.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41075005 · DOI · PMC12515219
Salivary microbiota and clinical periodontal measures predicting cardiometabolic disease mortality: A nationwide survey [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundAlthough periodontitis and oral microbiota are linked to cardiometabolic diseases (CMD), it is unclear if they similarly predict CMD mortality.
- Closing excerpt
- Future studies are needed to better understand the role of gum disease bacteria in the development of cardiometabolic diseases and the risk of death.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (358 words)
BackgroundAlthough periodontitis and oral microbiota are linked to cardiometabolic diseases (CMD), it is unclear if they similarly predict CMD mortality. We compared the predictive ability of salivary microbiota and periodontal disease measures for CMD mortality in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).MethodsWe included 5,037 adults aged ≥30 years (mean age [± standard deviation (SD)]: 48[± 14]; 50% male) from the 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 NHANES cycles. We used 16S rRNA sequencing data from saliva to operationalize microbial composition and diversity. We calculated the relative abundance log-ratio of Treponema (linked with periodontal disease) to Corynebacterium (linked with periodontal health) to compute the Microbial Indicator of Periodontitis (MIP). Interproximal periodontal probing depth and clinical attachment loss were measured from periodontal examinations. Mortality was ascertained through 2019. Survey-weighted Cox models regressed mortality rates on MIP, microbial diversity, and periodontal measures to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (HR [95% CI]).ResultsOver 8.8 median follow-up years, there were 81 CMD and 267 all-cause deaths. After multivariable adjustment, MIP was associated with increased CMD mortality risk (HR per 1-SD: 2.10 [1.30-3.38]). Neither microbial diversity nor periodontitis measures were associated with CMD mortality. MIP was associated with periodontitis in multivariable modeling (risk ratio per 1-SD: 1.29 [1.22-1.39]).ConclusionsIn a nationally representative cohort, greater baseline salivary Treponema to Corynebacterium ratio predicted increased CMD mortality risk, while microbial diversity metrics and periodontal parameters were not significantly associated with CMD mortality. Longitudinal studies that further contextualize the oral microbiota are warranted.Plain language summaryBacteria in the mouth that cause gum disease are linked to cardiometabolic diseases (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease). However, it is not well understood if bacteria of the mouth can predict the risk of death due to cardiometabolic diseases. We used data from a nationwide survey of US adults to explore whether bacteria from saliva, collected from a single time point, are associated with the future risk of cardiometabolic disease death. We found that people with higher levels of gum disease bacteria were more likely to die from cardiometabolic diseases. Future studies are needed to better understand the role of gum disease bacteria in the development of cardiometabolic diseases and the risk of death.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41071188 · DOI · PMC12934248
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Salivary secretion in health and disease [4]
- Research article Saliva diagnostics - Current views and directions [5]
- Research article Comparison of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Detection of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [6]
- Research article Measuring cortisol in serum, urine and saliva - are our assays good enough? [7]
- Research article Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [8]
- Research article Saliva: potential diagnostic value and transmission of 2019-nCoV [9]
References
- Popa PȘ, Popa GV, Earar K, Popa-Cazacu CE, Matei MN. Salivary Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Peri-Implant Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. . 2025. PMID 41373430 · DOI · PMC12692554
- Thomas JT, Joseph B, Räisänen IT, Anil S, Waltimo T, Sorsa T. Diagnostic accuracy of aMMP-8 levels in oral biofluids for monitoring periodontitis in patients with metabolic syndrome. . 2025. PMID 41075005 · DOI · PMC12515219
- Adam HS, Guan W, Johnson AJ, Sedaghat S, Goh C, Pankow JS, et al.. Salivary microbiota and clinical periodontal measures predicting cardiometabolic disease mortality: A nationwide survey. . 2026. PMID 41071188 · DOI · PMC12934248
- Pedersen AML, Sørensen CE, Proctor GB, Carpenter GH, Ekström J. Salivary secretion in health and disease. J Oral Rehabil. 2018. PMID 29878444 · DOI
- Kaczor-Urbanowicz KE, Martin Carreras-Presas C, Aro K, Tu M, Garcia-Godoy F, Wong DT. Saliva diagnostics - Current views and directions. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2017. PMID 27903834 · DOI · PMC5367650
- Butler-Laporte G, Lawandi A, Schiller I, Yao M, Dendukuri N, McDonald EG, et al.. Comparison of Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Swab Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Detection of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2021. PMID 33449069 · DOI · PMC7811189
- El-Farhan N, Rees DA, Evans C. Measuring cortisol in serum, urine and saliva - are our assays good enough?. Ann Clin Biochem. 2017. PMID 28068807 · DOI
- Lee RA, Herigon JC, Benedetti A, Pollock NR, Denkinger CM. Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID 33504593 · DOI · PMC8091856
- Xu R, Cui B, Duan X, Zhang P, Zhou X, Yuan Q. Saliva: potential diagnostic value and transmission of 2019-nCoV. Int J Oral Sci. 2020. PMID 32300101 · DOI · PMC7162686
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.