Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Genetics and Genomics›Replicon
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Replicon

Genetics and Genomics · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Any DNA sequence capable of independent replication or a molecule that possesses a replication origin and which is therefore potentially capable of being replicated in a suitable cell.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (666 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Any DNA sequence capable of independent replication or a molecule that possesses a replication origin and which is therefore potentially capable of being replicated in a suitable cell. (Singleton and Sainsbury, Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, 2d ed)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Replicons; Replication Unit; Replication Units; Unit, Replication; Units, Replication.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Genome Components
Narrower topics
Replication Origin

Related concepts

  • Replication Origin

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 7,314 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Replicon” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 689 of them (9.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 2,566 records.

Reviews account for 706 records (9.7%) and meta-analyses for 1. Randomized controlled trials number 8 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,175 records; 2000-2009: 2,566 records; 2010-2019: 1,884 records; 2020 onward: 689 records2,175through 19992,5662000-20091,8842010-20196892020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,175
2000-20092,566
2010-20191,884
2020 onward689
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.1 percentReviews9.7% (706)Meta-analyses0.0% (1)Randomized controlled trials0.1% (8)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 7,314 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews7069.7%
Meta-analyses10.0%
Randomized controlled trials80.1%

Method: PubMed query "Replicon"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics

Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies
Robertson J, Nash JHE
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
907cc by
PMID 30052170 · DOI · PMC6159552
Replication landscape of the human genome
Petryk N, Kahli M, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Jaszczyszyn Y, Shen Y, Silvain M, et al.
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
295cc by
PMID 26751768 · DOI · PMC4729899
Involvement of G-quadruplex regions in mammalian replication origin activity
Prorok P, Artufel M, Aze A, Coulombe P, Peiffer I, Lacroix L, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
179cc by
PMID 31332171 · DOI · PMC6646384
License to Replicate: Mechanisms of Licensing Eukaryotic Origins for DNA Replication
Frisbie V, Bleichert F
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 41423967 · DOI · PMC12719912

MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies [1]

Research article Robertson J, Nash JHE · · 2018 · cited 907 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Large-scale bacterial population genetics studies are now routine due to cost-effective Illumina short-read sequencing.
Closing excerpt
com/phac-nml/mob-suite.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (238 words)

Large-scale bacterial population genetics studies are now routine due to cost-effective Illumina short-read sequencing. However, analysing plasmid content remains difficult due to incomplete assembly of plasmids. Bacterial isolates can contain any number of plasmids and assembly remains complicated due to the presence of repetitive elements. Numerous tools have been developed to analyse plasmids but the performance and functionality of the tools are variable. The MOB-suite was developed as a set of modular tools for reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assembly data to facilitate characterization of plasmids. Using a set of closed genomes with publicly available Illumina data, the MOB-suite identified contigs of plasmid origin with both high sensitivity and specificity (95 and 88 %, respectively). In comparison, plasmidfinder demonstrated high specificity (99 %) but limited sensitivity (50 %). Using the same dataset of 377 known plasmids, MOB-recon accurately reconstructed 207 plasmids so that they were assigned to a single grouping without other plasmid or chromosomal sequences, whereas plasmidSPAdes was only able to accurately reconstruct 102 plasmids. In general, plasmidSPAdes has a tendency to merge different plasmids together, with 208 plasmids undergoing merge events. The MOB-suite reduces the number of errors but produces more hybrid plasmids, with 84 plasmids undergoing both splits and merges. The MOB-suite also provides replicon typing similar to plasmidfinder but with the inclusion of relaxase typing and prediction of conjugation potential. The MOB-suite is written in Python 3 and is available from https://github.com/phac-nml/mob-suite.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30052170 · DOI · PMC6159552

Replication landscape of the human genome [2]

Research article Petryk N, Kahli M, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Jaszczyszyn Y, Shen Y, Silvain M, et al. · · 2016 · cited 295 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Despite intense investigation, human replication origins and termini remain elusive.
Closing excerpt
This novel panorama of replication reveals how chromatin and transcription modulate the initiation process to create cell-type-specific replication programs.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (151 words)

Despite intense investigation, human replication origins and termini remain elusive. Existing data have shown strong discrepancies. Here we sequenced highly purified Okazaki fragments from two cell types and, for the first time, quantitated replication fork directionality and delineated initiation and termination zones genome-wide. Replication initiates stochastically, primarily within non-transcribed, broad (up to 150 kb) zones that often abut transcribed genes, and terminates dispersively between them. Replication fork progression is significantly co-oriented with the transcription. Initiation and termination zones are frequently contiguous, sometimes separated by regions of unidirectional replication. Initiation zones are enriched in open chromatin and enhancer marks, even when not flanked by genes, and often border 'topologically associating domains' (TADs). Initiation zones are enriched in origin recognition complex (ORC)-binding sites and better align to origins previously mapped using bubble-trap than λ-exonuclease. This novel panorama of replication reveals how chromatin and transcription modulate the initiation process to create cell-type-specific replication programs.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26751768 · DOI · PMC4729899

Involvement of G-quadruplex regions in mammalian replication origin activity [3]

Research article Prorok P, Artufel M, Aze A, Coulombe P, Peiffer I, Lacroix L, et al. · · 2019 · cited 179 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Genome-wide studies of DNA replication origins revealed that origins preferentially associate with an Origin G-rich Repeated Element (OGRE), potentially forming G-quadruplexes (G4).
Closing excerpt
Altogether, these results converge to the functional importance of OGRE/G4 elements in DNA replication initiation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (152 words)

Genome-wide studies of DNA replication origins revealed that origins preferentially associate with an Origin G-rich Repeated Element (OGRE), potentially forming G-quadruplexes (G4). Here, we functionally address their requirements for DNA replication initiation in a series of independent approaches. Deletion of the OGRE/G4 sequence strongly decreased the corresponding origin activity. Conversely, the insertion of an OGRE/G4 element created a new replication origin. This element also promoted replication of episomal EBV vectors lacking the viral origin, but not if the OGRE/G4 sequence was deleted. A potent G4 ligand, PhenDC3, stabilized G4s but did not alter the global origin activity. However, a set of new, G4-associated origins was created, whereas suppressed origins were largely G4-free. In vitro Xenopus laevis replication systems showed that OGRE/G4 sequences are involved in the activation of DNA replication, but not in the pre-replication complex formation. Altogether, these results converge to the functional importance of OGRE/G4 elements in DNA replication initiation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31332171 · DOI · PMC6646384

License to Replicate: Mechanisms of Licensing Eukaryotic Origins for DNA Replication [4]

Review article Frisbie V, Bleichert F · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Accurate and timely genome replication is a universal feature of living organisms and a prerequisite for cell proliferation.
Closing excerpt
In this review, we highlight similarities and differences in licensing mechanisms between yeast and metazoa.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (125 words)

Accurate and timely genome replication is a universal feature of living organisms and a prerequisite for cell proliferation. In eukaryotes, genomic DNA replication initiates in two steps, origin licensing and origin firing, reflecting the loading and activation of the MCM replicative helicase motor on origin DNA. Biochemical reconstitution of these steps in the budding yeast model system signified a major advance towards understanding the molecular and structural details of eukaryotic replication initiation events. With recent successes in reconstituting origin licensing with purified human proteins, a mechanistic picture is beginning to emerge on how DNA replication initiates in higher eukaryotes and how it deviates from the paradigms established in budding yeast. In this review, we highlight similarities and differences in licensing mechanisms between yeast and metazoa.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41423967 · DOI · PMC12719912

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex [5]
    Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, Goldberg JB · Nat Rev Microbiol · 2005 · cited 674 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork [6]
    Branzei D, Foiani M · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2010 · cited 662 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article DNA replication origin activation in space and time [7]
    Fragkos M, Ganier O, Coulombe P, Méchali M · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2015 · cited 434 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Replication fork stalling at natural impediments [8]
    Mirkin EV, Mirkin SM · Microbiol Mol Biol Rev · 2007 · cited 430 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The plasticity of DNA replication forks in response to clinically relevant genotoxic stress [9]
    Berti M, Cortez D, Lopes M · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2020 · cited 336 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers [10]
    Méchali M · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2010 · cited 326 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Robertson J, Nash JHE. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. . 2018. PMID 30052170 · DOI · PMC6159552
  2. Petryk N, Kahli M, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Jaszczyszyn Y, Shen Y, Silvain M, et al.. Replication landscape of the human genome. . 2016. PMID 26751768 · DOI · PMC4729899
  3. Prorok P, Artufel M, Aze A, Coulombe P, Peiffer I, Lacroix L, et al.. Involvement of G-quadruplex regions in mammalian replication origin activity. . 2019. PMID 31332171 · DOI · PMC6646384
  4. Frisbie V, Bleichert F. License to Replicate: Mechanisms of Licensing Eukaryotic Origins for DNA Replication. . 2026. PMID 41423967 · DOI · PMC12719912
  5. Mahenthiralingam E, Urban TA, Goldberg JB. The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005. PMID 15643431 · DOI
  6. Branzei D, Foiani M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010. PMID 20177396 · DOI
  7. Fragkos M, Ganier O, Coulombe P, Méchali M. DNA replication origin activation in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015. PMID 25999062 · DOI
  8. Mirkin EV, Mirkin SM. Replication fork stalling at natural impediments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007. PMID 17347517 · DOI · PMC1847372
  9. Berti M, Cortez D, Lopes M. The plasticity of DNA replication forks in response to clinically relevant genotoxic stress. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020. PMID 32612242 · DOI
  10. Méchali M. Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010. PMID 20861881 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • 3' Untranslated RegionsGenetics and Genomics
  • AllelesGenetics and Genomics
  • CodonGenetics and Genomics
  • EpigenomeGenetics and Genomics
  • ExomeGenetics and Genomics
  • ExonsGenetics and Genomics

All 95 articles in Genetics and Genomics →

At a glance

7,314
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
706
review articles
8
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • 3' Untranslated RegionsGenetics and Genomics
  • AllelesGenetics and Genomics
  • CodonGenetics and Genomics
  • EpigenomeGenetics and Genomics
  • ExomeGenetics and Genomics

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support