Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Genetics and Genomics›Exome
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Exome

Genetics and Genomics · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

That part of the genome that corresponds to the complete complement of exons of an organism or cell.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (762 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

That part of the genome that corresponds to the complete complement of exons of an organism or cell.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Exomes.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Genome
See also
Exons; Transcriptome

Related concepts

  • Exons

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 7,711 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Exome” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,860 of them (24.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 5,925 records.

Reviews account for 560 records (7.3%) and meta-analyses for 72. Randomized controlled trials number 16 (0.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 0 records; 2010-2019: 5,925 records; 2020 onward: 1,860 records0through 199902000-20095,9252010-20191,8602020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20090
2010-20195,925
2020 onward1,860
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.9 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.2 percentReviews7.3% (560)Meta-analyses0.9% (72)Randomized controlled trials0.2% (16)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 7,711 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5607.3%
Meta-analyses720.9%
Randomized controlled trials160.2%

Method: PubMed query "Exome"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics

Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans
Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
9,101cc by
PMID 32461654 · DOI · PMC7334197
Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK Biobank participants
Backman JD, Li AH, Marcketta A, Sun D, Mbatchou J, Kessler MD, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
959cc by
PMID 34662886 · DOI · PMC8596853
Exome sequencing and characterization of 49,960 individuals in the UK Biobank
Van Hout CV, Tachmazidou I, Backman JD, Hoffman JD, Liu D, Pandey AK, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
525cc by
PMID 33087929 · DOI · PMC7759458
Large-scale exome analyses reveal new rare variant contributions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Hop PJ, Kooyman M, Kenna BJ, Zwamborn RAJ, van Eijk KR, Wang Y, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
15cc by
PMID 41917433 · DOI · PMC13083253

The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans [1]

Research article Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al. · · 2020 · cited 9,101 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Genetic variants that inactivate protein-coding genes are a powerful source of information about the phenotypic consequences of gene disruption: genes that are crucial for the function of an organism will be depleted of such variants in natural populations, whereas non-essential genes will tolerate their accumulation.
Closing excerpt
Using an improved model of human mutation rates, we classify human protein-coding genes along a spectrum that represents tolerance to inactivation, validate this classification using data from model organisms and engineered human cells, and show that it can be used to improve the power of gene discovery for both common and rare diseases.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (169 words)

Genetic variants that inactivate protein-coding genes are a powerful source of information about the phenotypic consequences of gene disruption: genes that are crucial for the function of an organism will be depleted of such variants in natural populations, whereas non-essential genes will tolerate their accumulation. However, predicted loss-of-function variants are enriched for annotation errors, and tend to be found at extremely low frequencies, so their analysis requires careful variant annotation and very large sample sizes1. Here we describe the aggregation of 125,748 exomes and 15,708 genomes from human sequencing studies into the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). We identify 443,769 high-confidence predicted loss-of-function variants in this cohort after filtering for artefacts caused by sequencing and annotation errors. Using an improved model of human mutation rates, we classify human protein-coding genes along a spectrum that represents tolerance to inactivation, validate this classification using data from model organisms and engineered human cells, and show that it can be used to improve the power of gene discovery for both common and rare diseases.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32461654 · DOI · PMC7334197

Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK Biobank participants [2]

Research article Backman JD, Li AH, Marcketta A, Sun D, Mbatchou J, Kessler MD, et al. · · 2021 · cited 959 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
A major goal in human genetics is to use natural variation to understand the phenotypic consequences of altering each protein-coding gene in the genome.
Closing excerpt
We illustrate the ability of exome sequencing to identify gene-trait associations, elucidate gene function and pinpoint effector genes that underlie GWAS signals at scale.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (206 words)

A major goal in human genetics is to use natural variation to understand the phenotypic consequences of altering each protein-coding gene in the genome. Here we used exome sequencing1 to explore protein-altering variants and their consequences in 454,787 participants in the UK Biobank study2. We identified 12 million coding variants, including around 1 million loss-of-function and around 1.8 million deleterious missense variants. When these were tested for association with 3,994 health-related traits, we found 564 genes with trait associations at P ≤ 2.18 × 10-11. Rare variant associations were enriched in loci from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), but most (91%) were independent of common variant signals. We discovered several risk-increasing associations with traits related to liver disease, eye disease and cancer, among others, as well as risk-lowering associations for hypertension (SLC9A3R2), diabetes (MAP3K15, FAM234A) and asthma (SLC27A3). Six genes were associated with brain imaging phenotypes, including two involved in neural development (GBE1, PLD1). Of the signals available and powered for replication in an independent cohort, 81% were confirmed; furthermore, association signals were generally consistent across individuals of European, Asian and African ancestry. We illustrate the ability of exome sequencing to identify gene-trait associations, elucidate gene function and pinpoint effector genes that underlie GWAS signals at scale.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34662886 · DOI · PMC8596853

Exome sequencing and characterization of 49,960 individuals in the UK Biobank [3]

Research article Van Hout CV, Tachmazidou I, Backman JD, Hoffman JD, Liu D, Pandey AK, et al. · · 2020 · cited 525 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The UK Biobank is a prospective study of 502,543 individuals, combining extensive phenotypic and genotypic data with streamlined access for researchers around the world1.
Closing excerpt
Exome sequences from the first 49,960 participants highlight the promise of genome sequencing in large population-based studies and are now accessible to the scientific community.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (229 words)

The UK Biobank is a prospective study of 502,543 individuals, combining extensive phenotypic and genotypic data with streamlined access for researchers around the world1. Here we describe the release of exome-sequence data for the first 49,960 study participants, revealing approximately 4 million coding variants (of which around 98.6% have a frequency of less than 1%). The data include 198,269 autosomal predicted loss-of-function (LOF) variants, a more than 14-fold increase compared to the imputed sequence. Nearly all genes (more than 97%) had at least one carrier with a LOF variant, and most genes (more than 69%) had at least ten carriers with a LOF variant. We illustrate the power of characterizing LOF variants in this population through association analyses across 1,730 phenotypes. In addition to replicating established associations, we found novel LOF variants with large effects on disease traits, including PIEZO1 on varicose veins, COL6A1 on corneal resistance, MEPE on bone density, and IQGAP2 and GMPR on blood cell traits. We further demonstrate the value of exome sequencing by surveying the prevalence of pathogenic variants of clinical importance, and show that 2% of this population has a medically actionable variant. Furthermore, we characterize the penetrance of cancer in carriers of pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Exome sequences from the first 49,960 participants highlight the promise of genome sequencing in large population-based studies and are now accessible to the scientific community.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33087929 · DOI · PMC7759458

Large-scale exome analyses reveal new rare variant contributions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [4]

Research article Hop PJ, Kooyman M, Kenna BJ, Zwamborn RAJ, van Eijk KR, Wang Y, et al. · · 2026 · cited 15 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a heritable disorder where rare variants with low-to-moderate penetrance are thought to dominate genetic risk.
Closing excerpt
These findings highlight new translational targets and show that rare variant analyses capture substantially more genetic risk than common variant genome-wide association studies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (158 words)

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a heritable disorder where rare variants with low-to-moderate penetrance are thought to dominate genetic risk. To identify such rare variants, we harmonized and analyzed exome data from 22 cohorts, totaling 17,919 individuals with ALS and 200,703 controls across discovery and replication phases. Rare variant analyses identified several new risk genes, with replication confirming association of YKT6 and supporting HTR3C, GBGT1 and KNTC1. We also provide strong, independent validation for genes with limited previous evidence: ARPP21, DNAJC7 and CFAP410. Notably, in ARPP21, we identified a new high-effect variant (p.P747L) and confirmed that p.P563L is an ALS-associated variant leading to an aggressive disease course. Beyond new discoveries, our analyses largely recapitulated the known genetic architecture of ALS, identifying risk variants in over 20% of cases and supporting a cumulative oligogenic risk model. These findings highlight new translational targets and show that rare variant analyses capture substantially more genetic risk than common variant genome-wide association studies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41917433 · DOI · PMC13083253

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery [5]
    Bamshad MJ, Ng SB, Bigham AW, Tabor HK, Emond MJ, Nickerson DA, et al. · Nat Rev Genet · 2011 · cited 1,222 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Tumor microenvironment: Challenges and opportunities in targeting metastasis of triple negative breast cancer [6]
    Deepak KGK, Vempati R, Nagaraju GP, Dasari VR, S N, Rao DN, et al. · Pharmacol Res · 2020 · cited 490 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article ACMG SF v3.2 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) [7]
    Miller DT, Lee K, Abul-Husn NS, Amendola LM, Brothers K, Chung WK, et al. · Genet Med · 2023 · cited 402 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing [8]
    Biesecker LG, Green RC · N Engl J Med · 2014 · cited 394 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The promise of whole-exome sequencing in medical genetics [9]
    Rabbani B, Tekin M, Mahdieh N · J Hum Genet · 2014 · cited 359 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Disease gene identification strategies for exome sequencing [10]
    Gilissen C, Hoischen A, Brunner HG, Veltman JA · Eur J Hum Genet · 2012 · cited 322 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al.. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. . 2020. PMID 32461654 · DOI · PMC7334197
  2. Backman JD, Li AH, Marcketta A, Sun D, Mbatchou J, Kessler MD, et al.. Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK Biobank participants. . 2021. PMID 34662886 · DOI · PMC8596853
  3. Van Hout CV, Tachmazidou I, Backman JD, Hoffman JD, Liu D, Pandey AK, et al.. Exome sequencing and characterization of 49,960 individuals in the UK Biobank. . 2020. PMID 33087929 · DOI · PMC7759458
  4. Hop PJ, Kooyman M, Kenna BJ, Zwamborn RAJ, van Eijk KR, Wang Y, et al.. Large-scale exome analyses reveal new rare variant contributions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. . 2026. PMID 41917433 · DOI · PMC13083253
  5. Bamshad MJ, Ng SB, Bigham AW, Tabor HK, Emond MJ, Nickerson DA, et al.. Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2011. PMID 21946919 · DOI
  6. Deepak KGK, Vempati R, Nagaraju GP, Dasari VR, S N, Rao DN, et al.. Tumor microenvironment: Challenges and opportunities in targeting metastasis of triple negative breast cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2020. PMID 32050092 · DOI
  7. Miller DT, Lee K, Abul-Husn NS, Amendola LM, Brothers K, Chung WK, et al.. ACMG SF v3.2 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2023. PMID 37347242 · DOI · PMC10524344
  8. Biesecker LG, Green RC. Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID 24941179 · DOI
  9. Rabbani B, Tekin M, Mahdieh N. The promise of whole-exome sequencing in medical genetics. J Hum Genet. 2014. PMID 24196381 · DOI
  10. Gilissen C, Hoischen A, Brunner HG, Veltman JA. Disease gene identification strategies for exome sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012. PMID 22258526 · DOI · PMC3330229

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ExonsGenetics and Genomics
  • IntronsGenetics and Genomics
  • 3' Untranslated RegionsGenetics and Genomics
  • AllelesGenetics and Genomics
  • CodonGenetics and Genomics
  • EpigenomeGenetics and Genomics

All 95 articles in Genetics and Genomics →

At a glance

7,711
PubMed records on this heading
24%
published since 2020
560
review articles
16
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ExonsGenetics and Genomics
  • IntronsGenetics and Genomics
  • 3' Untranslated RegionsGenetics and Genomics
  • AllelesGenetics and Genomics
  • CodonGenetics and Genomics

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support