Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (836 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The outer shorter of the two bones of the forearm, lying parallel to the ULNA and partially revolving around it.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Radial Tuberosity; Radial Tuberosities; Tuberosities, Radial; Tuberosity, Radial.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Arm Bones
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 11,076 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Radius” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,693 of them (15.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,934 records.
Reviews account for 634 records (5.7%) and meta-analyses for 43. Randomized controlled trials number 186 (1.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 4,934 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,908 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,541 |
| 2020 onward | 1,693 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 634 | 5.7% |
| Meta-analyses | 43 | 0.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 186 | 1.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Radius"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Biomechanical considerations on a CT-based treatment-oriented classification in radius fractures [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- A wide range of different classifications exist for distal radius fractures (DRF).
- Closing excerpt
- By applying the following principles, the surgeon may be assisted in choosing the ideal form of treatment approach and implant selection.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (176 words)
A wide range of different classifications exist for distal radius fractures (DRF). Most of them are based on plane X-rays and do not give us any information on how to treat these fractures. A biomechanical understanding of the mechanical forces underlying each fracture type is important to treat each injury specifically and ensure the optimal choice for stabilization. The main cause of DRFs are forces acting on the carpus and the radius as well as the position of the wrist in relation to the radius. Reconstructing the mechanism of the injury gives insight into which structures are involved, such as ruptured ligaments, bone fragments as well as the dislocated osteoligamentous units. This article attempts to define certain key fragments, which seem crucial to reduce and stabilize each type of DRF. Once the definition is established, an ideal implant can be selected to sufficiently maintain reduction of these key fragments. Additionally, the perfect approach is selected. By applying the following principles, the surgeon may be assisted in choosing the ideal form of treatment approach and implant selection.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32193681 · DOI · PMC7181558
Microstructural parameters of bone evaluated using HR-pQCT correlate with the DXA-derived cortical index and the trabecular bone score in a cohort of randomly selected premenopausal women [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundAreal bone mineral density is predictive for fracture risk.
- Closing excerpt
- Whether these indexes are suitable for better predictions of the fracture risk deserves further investigation.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (291 words)
BackgroundAreal bone mineral density is predictive for fracture risk. Microstructural bone parameters evaluated at the appendicular skeleton by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) display differences between healthy patients and fracture patients. With the simple geometry of the cortex at the distal tibial diaphysis, a cortical index of the tibia combining material and mechanical properties correlated highly with bone strength ex vivo. The trabecular bone score derived from the scan of the lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) correlated ex vivo with the micro architectural parameters. It is unknown if these microstructural correlations could be made in healthy premenopausal women.MethodsRandomly selected women between 20-40 years of age were examined by DXA and HR-pQCT at the standard regions of interest and at customized sub regions to focus on cortical and trabecular parameters of strength separately. For cortical strength, at the distal tibia the volumetric cortical index was calculated directly from HR-pQCT and the areal cortical index was derived from the DXA scan using a Canny threshold-based tool. For trabecular strength, the trabecular bone score was calculated based on the DXA scan of the lumbar spine and was compared with the corresponding parameters derived from the HR-pQCT measurements at radius and tibia.ResultsSeventy-two healthy women were included (average age 33.8 years, average BMI 23.2 kg/m(2)). The areal cortical index correlated highly with the volumetric cortical index at the distal tibia (R = 0.798). The trabecular bone score correlated moderately with the microstructural parameters of the trabecular bone.ConclusionThis study in randomly selected premenopausal women demonstrated that microstructural parameters of the bone evaluated by HR-pQCT correlated with the DXA derived parameters of skeletal regions containing predominantly cortical or cancellous bone. Whether these indexes are suitable for better predictions of the fracture risk deserves further investigation.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24551194 · DOI · PMC3923873
Biomechanical study of isolated radial head dislocation [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundIsolated radial head dislocation is a rare injury with an unclear pathomechanism, and the treatment is controversial.
- Closing excerpt
- Anatomical annular ligament reconstruction provided multidirectional radial head stability.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (175 words)
BackgroundIsolated radial head dislocation is a rare injury with an unclear pathomechanism, and the treatment is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the biomechanical contributions of the annular ligament, quadrate ligament, interosseous membrane, and annular ligament reconstructions to proximal radioulnar joint stability.MethodsFive fresh frozen cadaveric upper extremities were amputated above the elbow and solidly fixed on a customized jig. Radial head dislocation was reproduced by sequential sectioning of ligamentous structures and passive mobility testing. Radial head displacement during mobility testing was measured with an electromagnetic tracking device in three forearm rotation positions. The data were compared among different sectioning stages and between two types of simulated ligamentous reconstruction.ResultsLateral displacement of the radial head significantly increased in the neutral forearm rotation after annular ligament sectioning (46 ± 10%, p ConclusionThe direction of radial head instability varied depending on the degree of soft tissue sectioning and specific forearm rotation. Anterior radial head dislocation may involve more severe ligament damage than other types of dislocation. Anatomical annular ligament reconstruction provided multidirectional radial head stability.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29157249 · DOI · PMC5697087
Preclinical paired noninferiority study comparing in-house and commercially available 3D planning for corrective osteotomy of the distal radius [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- 3D surgical planning and patient-specific guide design are becoming an established approach in complex skeletal surgery.
- Closing excerpt
- The results demonstrated that in-house surgical planning and guide design for distal radius corrective osteotomies can achieve comparable accuracy to external commercial companies.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)
3D surgical planning and patient-specific guide design are becoming an established approach in complex skeletal surgery. Traditionally, this is outsourced to commercial companies, but an alternative is to establish an in-house hospital team for the process. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of in-house design with a commercial company. Sixteen patients with extra-articular distal radius malunions requiring surgery were included. A hospital-based team and a surgeon working with an external company independently planned surgery and designed guides for each patient. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing simulated corrections with the planned corrections using 3D-printed bone models. The null hypothesis was that the in-house guides were inferior to the externally purchased ones. Noninferiority margins of 5° for volar tilt and 2 mm for ulnar variance were set. The mean volar tilt error difference between the two guides was 2.3°, and the mean ulnar variance error difference was 0.38 mm, both within the noninferiority limits. The dimensional accuracy of the printed guides before and after sterilization showed minimal variation (less than 0.3 mm). The results demonstrated that in-house surgical planning and guide design for distal radius corrective osteotomies can achieve comparable accuracy to external commercial companies.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40221557 · DOI · PMC11993771
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Thrombocytopenia with absent radius (TAR) [5]
- Research article Failure of fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone [6]
- Research article The distal interosseous membrane: current concepts in wrist anatomy and biomechanics [7]
- Research article Wrist pain, distal radial physeal injury, and ulnar variance in the young gymnast [8]
- Research article Fractures of the radial head [9]
- Research article Complex Distal Radius Fractures: An Anatomic Algorithm for Surgical Management [10]
References
- Hintringer W, Rosenauer R, Pezzei C, Quadlbauer S, Jurkowitsch J, Keuchel T, et al.. Biomechanical considerations on a CT-based treatment-oriented classification in radius fractures. . 2020. PMID 32193681 · DOI · PMC7181558
- Popp AW, Buffat H, Eberli U, Lippuner K, Ernst M, Richards RG, et al.. Microstructural parameters of bone evaluated using HR-pQCT correlate with the DXA-derived cortical index and the trabecular bone score in a cohort of randomly selected premenopausal women. . 2014. PMID 24551194 · DOI · PMC3923873
- Hayami N, Omokawa S, Iida A, Kraisarin J, Moritomo H, Mahakkanukrauh P, et al.. Biomechanical study of isolated radial head dislocation. . 2017. PMID 29157249 · DOI · PMC5697087
- Stor Swinkels C, Libberecht K, Gryska E, Axelsson P, Fredrikson P, Björkman A. Preclinical paired noninferiority study comparing in-house and commercially available 3D planning for corrective osteotomy of the distal radius. . 2025. PMID 40221557 · DOI · PMC11993771
- Hall JG, Levin J, Kuhn JP, Ottenheimer EJ, van Berkum KA, McKusick VA. Thrombocytopenia with absent radius (TAR). Medicine (Baltimore). 1969. PMID 4951233 · DOI
- von Rüden C, Augat P. Failure of fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone. Injury. 2016. PMID 27338224 · DOI
- Moritomo H. The distal interosseous membrane: current concepts in wrist anatomy and biomechanics. J Hand Surg Am. 2012. PMID 22721462 · DOI
- DiFiori JP, Caine DJ, Malina RM. Wrist pain, distal radial physeal injury, and ulnar variance in the young gymnast. Am J Sports Med. 2006. PMID 16493174 · DOI
- Duckworth AD, McQueen MM, Ring D. Fractures of the radial head. Bone Joint J. 2013. PMID 23365021 · DOI
- Rhee PC, Medoff RJ, Shin AY. Complex Distal Radius Fractures: An Anatomic Algorithm for Surgical Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017. PMID 28033150 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.