Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Infectious Diseases›Q Fever
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Q Fever

Infectious Diseases · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

An acute infectious disease caused by coxiella burnetii.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,212 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

An acute infectious disease caused by coxiella burnetii. It is characterized by a sudden onset of fever; headache; malaise; and weakness. In humans, it is commonly contracted by inhalation of infected dusts derived from infected domestic animals (animals, domestic).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Fever, Q; Fevers, Q; Q Fevers; Query Fever; Fever, Query; Fevers, Query; Query Fevers; Coxiella burnetii Fever.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Related concepts

  • Coxiella Burnetii
  • Fever
  • Headache
  • Animals
  • Domestic

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,549 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Q Fever” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 709 of them (12.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,696 records.

Reviews account for 471 records (8.5%) and meta-analyses for 18. Randomized controlled trials number 15 (0.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,696 records; 2000-2009: 771 records; 2010-2019: 1,373 records; 2020 onward: 709 records2,696through 19997712000-20091,3732010-20197092020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,696
2000-2009771
2010-20191,373
2020 onward709
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.3 percentReviews8.5% (471)Meta-analyses0.3% (18)Randomized controlled trials0.3% (15)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,549 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4718.5%
Meta-analyses180.3%
Randomized controlled trials150.3%

Method: PubMed query "Q Fever"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in infectious diseases

Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Sero-prevalence of brucellosis, Q-fever and Rift Valley fever in humans and livestock in Somali Region, Ethiopia
Ibrahim M, Schelling E, Zinsstag J, Hattendorf J, Andargie E, Tschopp R
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
58cc by
PMID 33493173 · DOI · PMC7861547
The sero-epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) across livestock species and herding contexts in Laikipia County, Kenya
Larson PS, Espira L, Grabow C, Wang CA, Muloi D, Browne AS, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
38cc by
PMID 30788910 · DOI · PMC6563451
The epidemic of Q fever in 2018 to 2019 in Zhuhai city of China determined by metagenomic next-generation sequencing
Huang M, Ma J, Jiao J, Li C, Chen L, Zhu Z, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
34cc by
PMID 34264939 · DOI · PMC8282036
Seroprevalence and risk factors for Brucella species and Coxiella burnetii exposure in a cross-sectional serosurvey of occupationally exposed groups in peri-urban Lomé, Togo
Kerr CL, Patassi A, Pato PS, Guitian J, Diop SA, Musallam I, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41557721 · DOI · PMC12858067

Sero-prevalence of brucellosis, Q-fever and Rift Valley fever in humans and livestock in Somali Region, Ethiopia [1]

Research article Ibrahim M, Schelling E, Zinsstag J, Hattendorf J, Andargie E, Tschopp R · · 2021 · cited 58 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Information on zoonotic diseases in humans and livestock are limited in pastoral/agro-pastoral communities in Ethiopia.
Closing excerpt
Collaboration between public and animal health sectors for further investigation on these zoonoses using the One Health concept is indispensable.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (336 words)

Information on zoonotic diseases in humans and livestock are limited in pastoral/agro-pastoral communities in Ethiopia. A multi-stage cross sectional cluster design study was implemented with the aim to establish the seroprevalence of zoonotic diseases including brucellosis, Q-fever and Rift Valley fever (RVF) in humans and livestock in Adadle Woreda of the Somali Region, Ethiopia. Blood samples were collected from humans and livestock and tested by relevant serological tests. For brucellosis, Rose Bengal test (RBT) and indirect ELISA was used for screening and confirmatory diagnosis respectively. Indirect and competitive ELISA were also used for Q-fever and RVF respectively. The individual seropositivity of Q-fever in livestock was 9.6% (95% CI 5.9-15.1) in cattle, 55.7% (95% CI 46.0-65.0) in camels, 48.8% (95% CI 42.5-55.0) in goats, and 28.9% (95% CI 25.0-33.2) in sheep. In humans, seropositivity of Q-fever was 27.0% (95% CI 20.4-34.0), with prevalence in males of 28.9% vs 24.2% in females (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 0.6-2.5). Camel seropositivity of Q-fever was significantly associated with age (OR = 8.1; 95% CI 2.8-23.7). The individual apparent seroprevalence of RVF was 13.2% (95% CI 8.7-18.8) in humans, 17.9% (95% CI 11.0-27.8) in cattle, 42.6% (95% CI 34.8-50.7) in camels, 6.3% (95% CI 3.3-11.6) in goats and 7.4% (95% CI 4.7-11.5) in sheep. Camels had the highest seropositivity of both Q-fever and RVF. Only a weak correlation was observed between human and livestock seropositivity for both Q-fever and RVF. Only cattle and camels were seropositive for brucellosis by iELISA. The individual seroprevalence of brucellosis was 2.8(0.9-6.4) in humans, 1.5% (95% CI 0.2-5.2) in cattle and 0.6% (95% CI 0.0-3.2) in camels. This study showed the importance of zoonoses in Somali Region and is the first published study to describe RVF exposure in humans and livestock in the country. Even though human exposure to RVF virus was reported, public health sector of Somali Region has not given attention to such zoonoses. Collaboration between public and animal health sectors for further investigation on these zoonoses using the One Health concept is indispensable.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33493173 · DOI · PMC7861547

The sero-epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) across livestock species and herding contexts in Laikipia County, Kenya [2]

Research article Larson PS, Espira L, Grabow C, Wang CA, Muloi D, Browne AS, et al. · · 2019 · cited 38 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Query fever (Q fever), is among the most highly infectious zoonotic pathogens transmitted among livestock, with chronic effects challenging to veterinary and medical detection and care systems.
Closing excerpt
Further longitudinal studies are needed to disentangle the mechanisms underlying these patterns, and further explore transmission patterns between wildlife, domestic animal, and human populations.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (293 words)

Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Query fever (Q fever), is among the most highly infectious zoonotic pathogens transmitted among livestock, with chronic effects challenging to veterinary and medical detection and care systems. Transmission among domestic livestock species can vary regionally due to herd management practices that determine which livestock species are raised, whether or not livestock are in contact with wildlife, and the susceptibility of these livestock to infection. To explore how different livestock management practices are associated with the risk of infection in multispecies environments, we carried out a comparative study of three types of herd management systems in the central Kenyan county of Laikipia: agro-commercial, mixed conservancy/commercial, and smallholder ranches. We tested C. burnetii antibody seroprevalence in four common livestock species. Across all management types, the highest seroprevalence was in camels (20%), followed by goats (18%), sheep (13%), and cattle (6%). We observed a lower odds of testing seropositive for young compared to adult animals (adjusted OR = 0.44 [95% CI 0.24, 0.76]), and for males compared to females (adjusted OR = 0.52 [95% CI 0.33, 0.80]). Animals from mixed conservancy/commercial and smallholder operations had a higher odds of testing seropositive compared to animals from agro-commercial ranches (adjusted OR = 5.17 [95% CI 2.71, 10.44] and adjusted OR = 2.21 [95% CI 1.17, 4.43] respectively). These data suggest that herd management practices might affect the transmission dynamics of C. burnetiiin arid African ecosystems like those seen in Kenya where several transmission modes are possible, risk of drought has promoted new livestock species such as camels, and multiple wildlife species may co-occur with livestock on the landscape. Further longitudinal studies are needed to disentangle the mechanisms underlying these patterns, and further explore transmission patterns between wildlife, domestic animal, and human populations.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30788910 · DOI · PMC6563451

The epidemic of Q fever in 2018 to 2019 in Zhuhai city of China determined by metagenomic next-generation sequencing [3]

Research article Huang M, Ma J, Jiao J, Li C, Chen L, Zhu Z, et al. · · 2021 · cited 34 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii (Cb).
Closing excerpt
Our study demonstrates Q fever was epidemic in 2018-2019 in Zhuhai city, and this is the first confirmed epidemic of Q fever in a contemporary city in China.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (228 words)

Q fever is a worldwide zoonosis caused by Coxiella burnetii (Cb). From January 2018 to November 2019, plasma samples from 2,382 patients with acute fever of unknown cause at a hospital in Zhuhai city of China were tested using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Of those tested, 138 patients (5.8%) were diagnosed with Q fever based on the presence of Cb genomic DNA detected by mNGS. Among these, 78 cases (56.5%) presented from Nov 2018 to Mar 2019, suggesting an outbreak of Q fever. 55 cases with detailed clinical information that occurred during the outbreak period were used for further analysis. The vast majority of plasma samples from those Cb-mNGS-positive patients were positive in a Cb-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (n = 38) and/or indirect immunofluorescence assay (n = 26). Mobile phone tracing data was used to define the area of infection during the outbreak. This suggested the probable infection source was Cb-infected goats and cattle at the only official authorized slaughterhouse in Zhuhai city. Phylogenic analysis based on genomic sequences indicated Cb strains identified in the patients, goat and cattle were formed a single branch, most closely related to the genomic group of Cb dominated by strains isolated from goats. Our study demonstrates Q fever was epidemic in 2018-2019 in Zhuhai city, and this is the first confirmed epidemic of Q fever in a contemporary city in China.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34264939 · DOI · PMC8282036

Seroprevalence and risk factors for Brucella species and Coxiella burnetii exposure in a cross-sectional serosurvey of occupationally exposed groups in peri-urban Lomé, Togo [4]

Research article Kerr CL, Patassi A, Pato PS, Guitian J, Diop SA, Musallam I, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundBrucella species and Coxiella burnetii have been detected in livestock populations in Togo.
Closing excerpt
A One Health prioritization of zoonotic disease would help to bring together the relevant sectors to adequately resource prevention and control of zoonoses of public health concern in Togo, which may particularly impact workers in close contact with animals.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (355 words)

BackgroundBrucella species and Coxiella burnetii have been detected in livestock populations in Togo. Populations exposed to livestock ruminants through their occupation may be at increased risk of infection.Methods/principal findingsA cross-sectional serosurvey was conducted in 108 abattoir and 81 dairy farm workers (from 52 dairy farms) in peri-urban Lomé, Togo in 2019-2020. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data on participant livestock contact and dairy product consumption. Sera were tested using the Rose Bengal plate agglutination test (RBT) and the indirect Brucella IgG Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for Brucella, and the IgG ELISA for Coxiella burnetii in Phase 1 and in Phase 2. Fresh bulk milk samples from farms were tested using an indirect milk ELISA for Brucella IgG. The association between seropositivity and exposure variables was examined using logistic regression with robust standard errors to account for site-level clustering. Eighteen workers (9.5%, 95% CI 5.5-16.0) were Brucella seropositive. Twenty-eight percent (95% CI 22.5-34.3) of workers were seropositive for C. burnetii. Twenty of fifty-one farms which gave milk samples tested positive for Brucella antibodies (39.2%, 95% CI 26.6 - 53.4%). Farmworkers had nearly twice the crude odds of being Brucella seropositive compared to abattoir workers (OR 1.93, 95% CI: 0.94-3.93, p = 0.07). After adjusting for age, working on farms with animal ill health, a positive milk test, participating in small ruminant husbandry and assisting with cattle abortion were all associated with increased odds of seropositivity. Farm and abattoir workers who consumed raw milk at least every month were more likely to be seropositive for Brucella species (OR 3.79, 95% CI: 2.34-6.13, p ConclusionsLivestock workers in peri-urban Lomé have been exposed to both Brucella and Coxiella burnetii bacteria. The widespread consumption of raw dairy products and lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) use is of concern as both dairy consumption and participation in animal husbandry activities have been seen to increase odds of seropositivity for both pathogens. A One Health prioritization of zoonotic disease would help to bring together the relevant sectors to adequately resource prevention and control of zoonoses of public health concern in Togo, which may particularly impact workers in close contact with animals.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41557721 · DOI · PMC12858067

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Q fever [5]
    Maurin M, Raoult D · Clin Microbiol Rev · 1999 · cited 1,457 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article From Q Fever to Coxiella burnetii Infection: a Paradigm Change [6]
    Eldin C, Mélenotte C, Mediannikov O, Ghigo E, Million M, Edouard S, et al. · Clin Microbiol Rev · 2017 · cited 710 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Natural history and pathophysiology of Q fever [7]
    Raoult D, Marrie T, Mege J · Lancet Infect Dis · 2005 · cited 511 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Q Fever [8]
    Angelakis E, Raoult D · Vet Microbiol · 2010 · cited 498 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diagnosis of Q fever [9]
    Fournier PE, Marrie TJ, Raoult D · J Clin Microbiol · 1998 · cited 389 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diagnosis and management of Q fever--United States, 2013: recommendations from CDC and the Q Fever Working Group [10]
    Anderson A, Bijlmer H, Fournier PE, Graves S, Hartzell J, Kersh GJ, et al. · MMWR Recomm Rep · 2013 · cited 329 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Ibrahim M, Schelling E, Zinsstag J, Hattendorf J, Andargie E, Tschopp R. Sero-prevalence of brucellosis, Q-fever and Rift Valley fever in humans and livestock in Somali Region, Ethiopia. . 2021. PMID 33493173 · DOI · PMC7861547
  2. Larson PS, Espira L, Grabow C, Wang CA, Muloi D, Browne AS, et al.. The sero-epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) across livestock species and herding contexts in Laikipia County, Kenya. . 2019. PMID 30788910 · DOI · PMC6563451
  3. Huang M, Ma J, Jiao J, Li C, Chen L, Zhu Z, et al.. The epidemic of Q fever in 2018 to 2019 in Zhuhai city of China determined by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. . 2021. PMID 34264939 · DOI · PMC8282036
  4. Kerr CL, Patassi A, Pato PS, Guitian J, Diop SA, Musallam I, et al.. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Brucella species and Coxiella burnetii exposure in a cross-sectional serosurvey of occupationally exposed groups in peri-urban Lomé, Togo. . 2026. PMID 41557721 · DOI · PMC12858067
  5. Maurin M, Raoult D. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999. PMID 10515901 · DOI · PMC88923
  6. Eldin C, Mélenotte C, Mediannikov O, Ghigo E, Million M, Edouard S, et al.. From Q Fever to Coxiella burnetii Infection: a Paradigm Change. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017. PMID 27856520 · DOI · PMC5217791
  7. Raoult D, Marrie T, Mege J. Natural history and pathophysiology of Q fever. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005. PMID 15792739 · DOI
  8. Angelakis E, Raoult D. Q Fever. Vet Microbiol. 2010. PMID 19875249 · DOI
  9. Fournier PE, Marrie TJ, Raoult D. Diagnosis of Q fever. J Clin Microbiol. 1998. PMID 9650920 · DOI · PMC104936
  10. Anderson A, Bijlmer H, Fournier PE, Graves S, Hartzell J, Kersh GJ, et al.. Diagnosis and management of Q fever--United States, 2013: recommendations from CDC and the Q Fever Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013. PMID 23535757

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Scarlet FeverInfectious Diseases
  • Rheumatic FeverInfectious Diseases
  • Scrub TyphusInfectious Diseases
  • Relapsing FeverInfectious Diseases
  • EhrlichiosisInfectious Diseases
  • Legionnaires' DiseaseInfectious Diseases

All 102 articles in Infectious Diseases →

At a glance

5,549
PubMed records on this heading
13%
published since 2020
471
review articles
15
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Scarlet FeverInfectious Diseases
  • Rheumatic FeverInfectious Diseases
  • Scrub TyphusInfectious Diseases
  • Relapsing FeverInfectious Diseases
  • EhrlichiosisInfectious Diseases

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support