Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,029 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The symptom of PAIN in the cranial region. It may be an isolated benign occurrence or manifestation of a wide variety of headache disorders.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Headaches; Cephalalgia; Cephalalgias; Cephalgia; Cephalgias; Cephalodynia; Cephalodynias; Cranial Pain.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Pain
- Narrower topics
- Slit Ventricle Syndrome
- See also
- Headache Disorders
Related concepts
- Headache Disorders
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 33,568 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Headache” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 5,888 of them (17.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 13,098 records.
Reviews account for 4,666 records (13.9%) and meta-analyses for 330. Randomized controlled trials number 1,741 (5.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 13,098 |
| 2000-2009 | 6,737 |
| 2010-2019 | 7,845 |
| 2020 onward | 5,888 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 4,666 | 13.9% |
| Meta-analyses | 330 | 1.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 1,741 | 5.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Headache"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in neuroscience
Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Performance of an Open-Source Large Language Model in Extracting Information from Free-Text Radiology Reports [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Purpose To assess the performance of a local open-source large language model (LLM) in various information extraction tasks from real-life emergency brain MRI reports.
- Closing excerpt
- See also the commentary by Akinci D'Antonoli and Bluethgen in this issue.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (313 words)
Purpose To assess the performance of a local open-source large language model (LLM) in various information extraction tasks from real-life emergency brain MRI reports. Materials and Methods All consecutive emergency brain MRI reports written in 2022 from a French quaternary center were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists identified MRI scans that were performed in the emergency department for headaches. Four radiologists scored the reports' conclusions as either normal or abnormal. Abnormalities were labeled as either headache-causing or incidental. Vicuna (LMSYS Org), an open-source LLM, performed the same tasks. Vicuna's performance metrics were evaluated using the radiologists' consensus as the reference standard. Results Among the 2398 reports during the study period, radiologists identified 595 that included headaches in the indication (median age of patients, 35 years [IQR, 26-51 years]; 68% [403 of 595] women). A positive finding was reported in 227 of 595 (38%) cases, 136 of which could explain the headache. The LLM had a sensitivity of 98.0% (95% CI: 96.5, 99.0) and specificity of 99.3% (95% CI: 98.8, 99.7) for detecting the presence of headache in the clinical context, a sensitivity of 99.4% (95% CI: 98.3, 99.9) and specificity of 98.6% (95% CI: 92.2, 100.0) for the use of contrast medium injection, a sensitivity of 96.0% (95% CI: 92.5, 98.2) and specificity of 98.9% (95% CI: 97.2, 99.7) for study categorization as either normal or abnormal, and a sensitivity of 88.2% (95% CI: 81.6, 93.1) and specificity of 73% (95% CI: 62, 81) for causal inference between MRI findings and headache. Conclusion An open-source LLM was able to extract information from free-text radiology reports with excellent accuracy without requiring further training. Keywords: Large Language Model (LLM), Generative Pretrained Transformers (GPT), Open Source, Information Extraction, Report, Brain, MRI Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. See also the commentary by Akinci D'Antonoli and Bluethgen in this issue.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38717292 · DOI · PMC11294959
Headache and immunological/autoimmune disorders: a comprehensive review of available epidemiological evidence with insights on potential underlying mechanisms [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Several lines of evidence support a role of the immune system in headache pathogenesis, with particular regard to migraine.
- Closing excerpt
- The present review summarizes findings to date regarding the plausible relationship between headache and immunological/autoimmune disorders, starting from a description of immunological alteration of primary headaches, and moving onward to the evidence supporting a potential link between headache and each specific autoimmune/immunological disease.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (174 words)
Several lines of evidence support a role of the immune system in headache pathogenesis, with particular regard to migraine. Firstly, alterations in cytokine profile and in lymphocyte subsets have been reported in headache patients. Secondly, several genetic and environmental pathogenic factors seem to be frequently shared by headache and immunological/autoimmune diseases. Accordingly, immunological alterations in primary headaches, in particular in migraine, have been suggested to predispose some patients to the development of immunological and autoimmune diseases. On the other hand, pathogenic mechanisms underlying autoimmune disorders, in some cases, seem to favour the onset of headache. Therefore, an association between headache and immunological/autoimmune disorders has been thoroughly investigated in the last years. The knowledge of this possible association may have relevant implications in the clinical practice when deciding diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The present review summarizes findings to date regarding the plausible relationship between headache and immunological/autoimmune disorders, starting from a description of immunological alteration of primary headaches, and moving onward to the evidence supporting a potential link between headache and each specific autoimmune/immunological disease.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34749743 · DOI · PMC8573865
Frequency and phenotype of headache in covid-19: a study of 2194 patients [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- To estimate the frequency of headache in patients with confirmed COVID-19 and characterize the phenotype of headache attributed to COVID-19, comparing patients depending on the need of hospitalization and sex, an observational study was done.
- Closing excerpt
- 74011 and Regional Health Administration, Gerencia Regional de Salud, Castilla y Leon (GRS: 2289/A/2020).
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (233 words)
To estimate the frequency of headache in patients with confirmed COVID-19 and characterize the phenotype of headache attributed to COVID-19, comparing patients depending on the need of hospitalization and sex, an observational study was done. We systematically screened all eligible patients from a reference population of 261,431 between March 8 (first case) and April 11, 2020. A physician administered a survey assessing demographic and clinical data and the phenotype of the headache. During the study period, 2194 patients out of the population at risk were diagnosed with COVID-19. Headache was described by 514/2194 patients (23.4%, 95% CI 21.7-25.3%), including 383/1614 (23.7%) outpatients and 131/580 (22.6%) inpatients. The headache phenotype was studied in detail in 458 patients (mean age, 51 years; 72% female; prior history of headache, 49%). Headache was the most frequent first symptom of COVID-19. Median headache onset was within 24 h, median duration was 7 days and persisted after 1 month in 13% of patients. Pain was bilateral (80%), predominantly frontal (71%), with pressing quality (75%), of severe intensity. Systemic symptoms were present in 98% of patients. Headache frequency and phenotype was similar in patients with and without need for hospitalization and when comparing male and female patients, being more intense in females.Trial registration: This study was supported by the Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), code 07.04.467804.74011 and Regional Health Administration, Gerencia Regional de Salud, Castilla y Leon (GRS: 2289/A/2020).
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34282206 · DOI · PMC8290038
Calcitonin gene-related peptide induces headache attacks in people with idiopathic intracranial hypertension [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a key mediator in migraine pathophysiology.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings provide mechanistic support for CGRP involvement in headache attributed to IIH and justify prospective evaluation of CGRP pathway blockade in this population.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (309 words)
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a key mediator in migraine pathophysiology. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) headache phenotype is now understood to be typically migraine-like, but it is unclear whether CGRP directly provokes IIH headaches or alters intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover trial to address this. Twenty women with IIH and no prior migraine were randomly assigned to receive a 20-min continuous intravenous infusion of CGRP (1.5 μg/min) or placebo (isotonic saline). The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of participants who developed a provoked headache attack between CGRP and placebo during the 12 h observation after infusion. Secondary outcomes included the area under the curve (AUC) for headache intensity from -10 min to 12 h, the timing and duration of headache features, and baseline-adjusted changes for vital signs, cerebrovascular haemodynamics and ICP. Seventeen participants with mean age (standard deviation) 26.7 (6.4) years completed both visits. Twelve (71%) participants developed a typical IIH headache attack with migraine-like features after CGRP compared with three (18%) after placebo (risk difference 53%; 95% confidence interval, 26-79; P = 0.004). The AUC-10min-12h for headache intensity was higher after CGRP than after placebo (P = 0.016). The mean ICP remained unchanged, whereas ICP amplitude increased significantly after CGRP (P = 0.005). Vital signs and cerebrovascular haemodynamics AUC-10min-90min were significantly altered after CGRP [increased: heart rate (P < 0.001), tissue oxygenation index (P = 0.041), and oxygenated haemoglobin (P < 0.001); decreased: mean arterial pressure (P = 0.010) and middle cerebral artery blood velocity (P = 0.006)]. CGRP reliably provoked typical IIH headache attacks (which have migraine-like features) and increased ICP pulse amplitude, as a measure of intracranial compliance, without altering mean pressure. These findings provide mechanistic support for CGRP involvement in headache attributed to IIH and justify prospective evaluation of CGRP pathway blockade in this population.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41989095 · DOI · PMC13431804
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Red and orange flags for secondary headaches in clinical practice: SNNOOP10 list [5]
- Research article Neurological Manifestations in COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [6]
- Research article Hypothalamic regulation of headache and migraine [7]
- Research article Association of diet and headache [8]
- Research article Multiple Neuroinvasive Pathways in COVID-19 [9]
- Research article A meta-analysis for headache in systemic lupus erythematosus: the evidence and the myth [10]
References
- Le Guellec B, Lefèvre A, Geay C, Shorten L, Bruge C, Hacein-Bey L, et al.. Performance of an Open-Source Large Language Model in Extracting Information from Free-Text Radiology Reports. . 2024. PMID 38717292 · DOI · PMC11294959
- Biscetti L, De Vanna G, Cresta E, Corbelli I, Gaetani L, Cupini L, et al.. Headache and immunological/autoimmune disorders: a comprehensive review of available epidemiological evidence with insights on potential underlying mechanisms. . 2021. PMID 34749743 · DOI · PMC8573865
- García-Azorín D, Sierra Á, Trigo J, Alberdi A, Blanco M, Calcerrada I, et al.. Frequency and phenotype of headache in covid-19: a study of 2194 patients. . 2021. PMID 34282206 · DOI · PMC8290038
- Yiangou A, Do TP, Mollan SP, Thaller M, Mitchell JL, Mugo CW, et al.. Calcitonin gene-related peptide induces headache attacks in people with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. . 2026. PMID 41989095 · DOI · PMC13431804
- Do TP, Remmers A, Schytz HW, Schankin C, Nelson SE, Obermann M, et al.. Red and orange flags for secondary headaches in clinical practice: SNNOOP10 list. Neurology. 2019. PMID 30587518 · DOI · PMC6340385
- Collantes MEV, Espiritu AI, Sy MCC, Anlacan VMM, Jamora RDG. Neurological Manifestations in COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Can J Neurol Sci. 2021. PMID 32665054 · DOI · PMC7492583
- May A, Burstein R. Hypothalamic regulation of headache and migraine. Cephalalgia. 2019. PMID 31466456 · DOI · PMC7164212
- Razeghi Jahromi S, Ghorbani Z, Martelletti P, Lampl C, Togha M, School of Advanced Studies of the European Headache Federation (EHF-SAS). Association of diet and headache. J Headache Pain. 2019. PMID 31726975 · DOI · PMC6854770
- Bougakov D, Podell K, Goldberg E. Multiple Neuroinvasive Pathways in COVID-19. Mol Neurobiol. 2021. PMID 32990925 · DOI · PMC7523266
- Mitsikostas DD, Sfikakis PP, Goadsby PJ. A meta-analysis for headache in systemic lupus erythematosus: the evidence and the myth. Brain. 2004. PMID 15047589 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.