Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (868 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The first phase of cell nucleus division, in which the chromosomes become visible, the cell nucleus starts to lose its identity, the spindle apparatus appears, and the centrioles migrate toward opposite poles.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Prophases.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
Related concepts
- Chromosomes
- Cell Nucleus
- Spindle Apparatus
- Centrioles
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 3,587 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Prophase” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 492 of them (13.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 1,103 records.
Reviews account for 317 records (8.8%) and meta-analyses for 0. Randomized controlled trials number 1 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 940 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,103 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,052 |
| 2020 onward | 492 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 317 | 8.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 0 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 1 | 0.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Prophase"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in molecular biology
Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meioc maintains an extended meiotic prophase I in mice | 2017 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 132 | cc by PMID 28380054 · DOI · PMC5397071 |
| Networks of neuronal genes affected by common and rare variants in autism spectrum disorders | 2012 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 121 | cc by PMID 22412387 · DOI · PMC3297570 |
| Interplay between synaptonemal complex, homologous recombination, and centromeres during mammalian meiosis | 2012 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 118 | cc by PMID 22761591 · DOI · PMC3386176 |
| Cleavage of mRNAs by a minority of pachytene piRNAs improves sperm fitness | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 9 | cc by PMID 41639461 · DOI · PMC13061629 |
Meioc maintains an extended meiotic prophase I in mice [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The meiosis-specific chromosomal events of homolog pairing, synapsis, and recombination occur over an extended meiotic prophase I that is many times longer than prophase of mitosis.
- Closing excerpt
- Specifically, MEIOC, together with YTHDC2, promotes a meiotic (as opposed to mitotic) cell cycle program via post-transcriptional control of their target transcripts.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)
The meiosis-specific chromosomal events of homolog pairing, synapsis, and recombination occur over an extended meiotic prophase I that is many times longer than prophase of mitosis. Here we show that, in mice, maintenance of an extended meiotic prophase I requires the gene Meioc, a germ-cell specific factor conserved in most metazoans. In mice, Meioc is expressed in male and female germ cells upon initiation of and throughout meiotic prophase I. Mouse germ cells lacking Meioc initiate meiosis: they undergo pre-meiotic DNA replication, they express proteins involved in synapsis and recombination, and a subset of cells progress as far as the zygotene stage of prophase I. However, cells in early meiotic prophase-as early as the preleptotene stage-proceed to condense their chromosomes and assemble a spindle, as if having progressed to metaphase. Meioc-deficient spermatocytes that have initiated synapsis mis-express CYCLIN A2, which is normally expressed in mitotic spermatogonia, suggesting a failure to properly transition to a meiotic cell cycle program. MEIOC interacts with YTHDC2, and the two proteins pull-down an overlapping set of mitosis-associated transcripts. We conclude that when the meiotic chromosomal program is initiated, Meioc is simultaneously induced so as to extend meiotic prophase. Specifically, MEIOC, together with YTHDC2, promotes a meiotic (as opposed to mitotic) cell cycle program via post-transcriptional control of their target transcripts.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28380054 · DOI · PMC5397071
Networks of neuronal genes affected by common and rare variants in autism spectrum disorders [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are neurodevelopmental disorders with phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity.
- Closing excerpt
- The results of this study point toward contribution of minor and major perturbations in the two sub-networks of neuronal genes to ASD risk.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (191 words)
Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are neurodevelopmental disorders with phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. Recent studies have reported rare and de novo mutations in ASD, but the allelic architecture of ASD remains unclear. To assess the role of common and rare variations in ASD, we constructed a gene co-expression network based on a widespread survey of gene expression in the human brain. We identified modules associated with specific cell types and processes. By integrating known rare mutations and the results of an ASD genome-wide association study (GWAS), we identified two neuronal modules that are perturbed by both rare and common variations. These modules contain highly connected genes that are involved in synaptic and neuronal plasticity and that are expressed in areas associated with learning and memory and sensory perception. The enrichment of common risk variants was replicated in two additional samples which include both simplex and multiplex families. An analysis of the combined contribution of common variants in the neuronal modules revealed a polygenic component to the risk of ASD. The results of this study point toward contribution of minor and major perturbations in the two sub-networks of neuronal genes to ASD risk.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22412387 · DOI · PMC3297570
Interplay between synaptonemal complex, homologous recombination, and centromeres during mammalian meiosis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The intimate synapsis of homologous chromosome pairs (homologs) by synaptonemal complexes (SCs) is an essential feature of meiosis.
- Closing excerpt
- We propose that SC fragments retained during diplonema stabilize nascent bivalents and help orchestrate local chromosome reorganization that promotes centromere and chiasma function.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (272 words)
The intimate synapsis of homologous chromosome pairs (homologs) by synaptonemal complexes (SCs) is an essential feature of meiosis. In many organisms, synapsis and homologous recombination are interdependent: recombination promotes SC formation and SCs are required for crossing-over. Moreover, several studies indicate that initiation of SC assembly occurs at sites where crossovers will subsequently form. However, recent analyses in budding yeast and fruit fly imply a special role for centromeres in the initiation of SC formation. In addition, in budding yeast, persistent SC-dependent centromere-association facilitates the disjunction of chromosomes that have failed to become connected by crossovers. Here, we examine the interplay between SCs, recombination, and centromeres in a mammal. In mouse spermatocytes, centromeres do not serve as SC initiation sites and are invariably the last regions to synapse. However, centromeres are refractory to de-synapsis during diplonema and remain associated by short SC fragments. Since SC-dependent centromere association is lost before diakinesis, a direct role in homolog segregation seems unlikely. However, post-SC disassembly, we find evidence of inter-centromeric connections that could play a more direct role in promoting homolog biorientation and disjunction. A second class of persistent SC fragments is shown to be crossover-dependent. Super-resolution structured-illumination microscopy (SIM) reveals that these structures initially connect separate homolog axes and progressively diminish as chiasmata form. Thus, DNA crossing-over (which occurs during pachynema) and axis remodeling appear to be temporally distinct aspects of chiasma formation. SIM analysis of the synapsis and crossover-defective mutant Sycp1⁻/⁻ implies that SCs prevent unregulated fusion of homolog axes. We propose that SC fragments retained during diplonema stabilize nascent bivalents and help orchestrate local chromosome reorganization that promotes centromere and chiasma function.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22761591 · DOI · PMC3386176
Cleavage of mRNAs by a minority of pachytene piRNAs improves sperm fitness [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Animals use 18-33-nucleotide PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) to silence transposons in germ cells1-3.
- Closing excerpt
- Together, our findings explain the lack of conservation of most pachytene piRNA sequences and suggest that these 'selfish' small RNAs persist in mammalian evolution because target cleavage by a tiny minority of piRNAs supports male fertility.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (190 words)
Animals use 18-33-nucleotide PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) to silence transposons in germ cells1-3. In addition to transposon-silencing piRNAs, placental mammals make pachytene piRNAs4,5, an abundant class of testis-specific small RNAs derived from long noncoding RNA precursors. Although the sites of pachytene piRNA precursor transcription are often conserved among placental mammals, the sequences of the piRNAs themselves are rapidly diverging, even in the human population6. Consequently, the biological function and mechanism of action of pachytene piRNAs remain debated. Here we report that most mouse pachytene piRNAs have no biological function but instead 'selfishly' promote their own production. Our data suggest that pachytene piRNAs direct endonucleolytic cleavage of partially complementary targets and neither activate nor repress mRNA translation. Although many pachytene piRNAs guide cleavage of specific mRNAs, few alter the steady-state abundance of their targets. The minority of pachytene piRNAs that reduce target mRNA abundance enhance sperm fitness, thereby ensuring production of the entire pachytene piRNA repertoire. Together, our findings explain the lack of conservation of most pachytene piRNA sequences and suggest that these 'selfish' small RNAs persist in mammalian evolution because target cleavage by a tiny minority of piRNAs supports male fertility.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41639461 · DOI · PMC13061629
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis [5]
- Research article The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex [6]
- Research article A bouquet makes ends meet [7]
- Research article The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis [8]
- Research article Early decision; meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis [9]
- Research article Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex [10]
References
- Soh YQS, Mikedis MM, Kojima M, Godfrey AK, de Rooij DG, Page DC. Meioc maintains an extended meiotic prophase I in mice. . 2017. PMID 28380054 · DOI · PMC5397071
- Ben-David E, Shifman S. Networks of neuronal genes affected by common and rare variants in autism spectrum disorders. . 2012. PMID 22412387 · DOI · PMC3297570
- Qiao H, Chen JK, Reynolds A, Höög C, Paddy M, Hunter N. Interplay between synaptonemal complex, homologous recombination, and centromeres during mammalian meiosis. . 2012. PMID 22761591 · DOI · PMC3386176
- Cecchini K, Zamani M, Ajaykumar N, Vega-Badillo J, Bagci A, Bailey S, et al.. Cleavage of mRNAs by a minority of pachytene piRNAs improves sperm fitness. . 2026. PMID 41639461 · DOI · PMC13061629
- Zickler D, Kleckner N. Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015. PMID 25986558 · DOI · PMC4448610
- Page SL, Hawley RS. The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004. PMID 15473851 · DOI
- Scherthan H. A bouquet makes ends meet. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001. PMID 11483995 · DOI
- Burgoyne PS, Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM. The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis. Nat Rev Genet. 2009. PMID 19188923 · DOI
- Bishop DK, Zickler D. Early decision; meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis. Cell. 2004. PMID 15066278 · DOI
- Kleckner N. Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex. Chromosoma. 2006. PMID 16555016 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.