Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A transmembrane protein present in the myelin sheath of the central nervous system.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,054 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A transmembrane protein present in the myelin sheath of the central nervous system. It is one of the main autoantigens implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Glycoprotein, Myelin-Oligodendrocyte; Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein; MOG Glycoprotein.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Butyrophilins; Myelin Proteins; Autoantigens
See also
Multiple Sclerosis

Related concepts

  • Myelin Sheath
  • Central Nervous System
  • Multiple Sclerosis

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 3,930 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,599 of them (40.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 1,599 records.

Reviews account for 367 records (9.3%) and meta-analyses for 20. Randomized controlled trials number 9 (0.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 104 records; 2000-2009: 817 records; 2010-2019: 1,410 records; 2020 onward: 1,599 records104through 19998172000-20091,4102010-20191,5992020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999104
2000-2009817
2010-20191,410
2020 onward1,599
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.2 percentReviews9.3% (367)Meta-analyses0.5% (20)Randomized controlled trials0.2% (9)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 3,930 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3679.3%
Meta-analyses200.5%
Randomized controlled trials90.2%

Method: PubMed query "Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
The pathology of central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease accompanying myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein autoantibody
Höftberger R, Guo Y, Flanagan EP, Lopez-Chiriboga AS, Endmayr V, Hochmeister S, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
301cc by
PMID 32048003 · DOI · PMC7181560
Serial Anti-Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody Analyses and Outcomes in Children With Demyelinating Syndromes
Waters P, Fadda G, Woodhall M, O'Mahony J, Brown RA, Castro DA, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
267cc by
PMID 31545352 · DOI · PMC6763982
International multicenter examination of MOG antibody assays
Reindl M, Schanda K, Woodhall M, Tea F, Ramanathan S, Sagen J, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
230cc by
PMID 32024795 · DOI · PMC7051197
Biomarkers to predict relapse in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Andersen J, Trewin BP, Dale RC, Ramanathan S, Brilot F
2026Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
6cc by
PMID 41033784 · DOI · PMC12911599

The pathology of central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease accompanying myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein autoantibody [1]

Research article Höftberger R, Guo Y, Flanagan EP, Lopez-Chiriboga AS, Endmayr V, Hochmeister S, et al. · · 2020 · cited 301 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
We sought to define the pathological features of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody associated disorders (MOGAD) in an archival autopsy/biopsy cohort.
Closing excerpt
Parallels with MOG-EAE suggest MOG may be an amplification factor that augments CNS demyelination, possibly via complement mediated destruction of myelin or ADCC phagocytosis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (246 words)

We sought to define the pathological features of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody associated disorders (MOGAD) in an archival autopsy/biopsy cohort. We histopathologically analyzed 2 autopsies and 22 brain biopsies from patients with CNS inflammatory demyelinating diseases seropositive for MOG-antibody by live-cell-based-assay with full length MOG in its conformational form. MOGAD autopsies (ages 52 and 67) demonstrate the full spectrum of histopathological features observed within the 22 brain biopsies (median age, 10 years; range, 1-66; 56% female). Clinical, radiologic, and laboratory characteristics and course (78% relapsing) are consistent with MOGAD. MOGAD pathology is dominated by coexistence of both perivenous and confluent white matter demyelination, with an over-representation of intracortical demyelinated lesions compared to typical MS. Radially expanding confluent slowly expanding smoldering lesions in the white matter as seen in MS, are not present. A CD4+ T-cell dominated inflammatory reaction with granulocytic infiltration predominates. Complement deposition is present in all active white matter lesions, but a preferential loss of MOG is not observed. AQP4 is preserved, with absence of dystrophic astrocytes, and variable oligodendrocyte and axonal destruction. MOGAD is pathologically distinguished from AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD, but shares some overlapping features with both MS and ADEM, suggesting a transitional pathology. Complement deposition in the absence of selective MOG protein loss suggest humoral mechanisms are involved, however argue against endocytic internalization of the MOG antigen. Parallels with MOG-EAE suggest MOG may be an amplification factor that augments CNS demyelination, possibly via complement mediated destruction of myelin or ADCC phagocytosis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32048003 · DOI · PMC7181560

Serial Anti-Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody Analyses and Outcomes in Children With Demyelinating Syndromes [2]

Research article Waters P, Fadda G, Woodhall M, O'Mahony J, Brown RA, Castro DA, et al. · · 2020 · cited 267 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceIdentifying the course of demyelinating disease associated with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) autoantibodies is critical to guide appropriate treatment choices.
Closing excerpt
The presence of anti-MOG antibodies at the time of incident demyelination should not immediately prompt the initiation of long-term immunomodulatory therapy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (415 words)

ImportanceIdentifying the course of demyelinating disease associated with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) autoantibodies is critical to guide appropriate treatment choices.ObjectiveTo characterize serial anti-MOG antibody serologies and clinical and imaging features at presentation and during follow-up in an inception cohort of prospectively monitored children with acquired demyelination.Design, setting, and participantsIn this prospective cohort study, study participants were recruited from July 2004 to February 2017 through the multicenter Canadian Pediatric Demyelinating Disease Study. Inclusion criteria included (1) incident central nervous system demyelination, (2) at least 1 serum sample obtained within 45 days from onset, and (3) complete clinical information. Of 430 participants with acquired demyelinating syndrome recruited, 274 were included in analyses. Of 156 excluded participants, 154 were excluded owing to missing baseline samples and 2 owing to incomplete clinical information. Data were analyzed from May to October 2018.Main outcomes and measuresPresence of anti-MOG antibodies was blindly assessed in serial samples collected over a median of 4 years. Clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid features were characterized at presentation, and subsequent disease course was assessed by development of new brain magnetic resonance imaging lesions, total lesion volume at last evaluation, annualized relapse rates, Expanded Disability Status Scale score and visual functional score at 4 years, and any disease-modifying treatment exposure.ResultsOf the 274 included participants, 140 (51.1%) were female, and the median (interquartile range) age of all participants was 10.8 (6.2-13.9) years. One-third of children were positive for anti-MOG antibodies at the time of incident demyelination. Clinical presentations included a combination of optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis for 81 of 84 anti-MOG antibody-positive children (96%). Brain lesions were present in 51 of 76 anti-MOG antibody-positive participants (67%), but magnetic resonance imaging characteristics differed with age at presentation. Complete resolution of baseline lesions was observed in 26 of 49 anti-MOG antibody-positive participants (53%). On serial serum analysis, 38 of 67 participants (57%) who were seropositive at onset became seronegative (median time to conversion, 1 year). Among all participants who were positive for anti-MOG antibodies at presentation, clinical relapses occurred in 9 of 24 children (38%) who remained persistently seropositive and in 5 of 38 children (13%) who converted to seronegative status.Conclusions and relevanceMyelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies are common in children with acquired demyelinating syndrome and are transient in approximatively half of cases. Even when persistently positive, most anti-MOG antibody-positive children experience a monophasic disease. The presence of anti-MOG antibodies at the time of incident demyelination should not immediately prompt the initiation of long-term immunomodulatory therapy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31545352 · DOI · PMC6763982

International multicenter examination of MOG antibody assays [3]

Research article Reindl M, Schanda K, Woodhall M, Tea F, Ramanathan S, Sagen J, et al. · · 2020 · cited 230 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveTo compare the reproducibility of 11 antibody assays for immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG and MOG-IgM) from 5 international centers.
Closing excerpt
Further research is needed to improve international standardization for clinical care.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (251 words)

ObjectiveTo compare the reproducibility of 11 antibody assays for immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG and MOG-IgM) from 5 international centers.MethodsThe following samples were analyzed: MOG-IgG clearly positive sera (n = 39), MOG-IgG low positive sera (n = 39), borderline negative sera (n = 13), clearly negative sera (n = 40), and healthy blood donors (n = 30). As technical controls, 18 replicates (9 MOG-IgG positive and 9 negative) were included. All samples and controls were recoded, aliquoted, and distributed to the 5 testing centers, which performed the following antibody assays: 5 live and 1 fixed immunofluorescence cell-based assays (CBA-IF, 5 MOG-IgG, and 1 MOG-IgM), 3 live flow cytometry cell-based assays (CBA-FACS, all MOG-IgG), and 2 ELISAs (both MOG-IgG).ResultsWe found excellent agreement (96%) between the live CBAs for MOG-IgG for samples previously identified as clearly positive or negative from 4 different national testing centers. The agreement was lower with fixed CBA-IF (90%), and the ELISA showed no concordance with CBAs for detection of human MOG-IgG. All CBAs showed excellent interassay reproducibility. The agreement of MOG-IgG CBAs for borderline negative (77%) and particularly low positive (33%) samples was less good. Finally, most samples from healthy blood donors (97%) were negative for MOG-IgG in all CBAs.ConclusionsLive MOG-IgG CBAs showed excellent agreement for high positive and negative samples at 3 international testing centers. Low positive samples were more frequently discordant than in a similar comparison of aquaporin-4 antibody assays. Further research is needed to improve international standardization for clinical care.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32024795 · DOI · PMC7051197

Biomarkers to predict relapse in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis [4]

Meta-analysis Andersen J, Trewin BP, Dale RC, Ramanathan S, Brilot F · · 2026 · cited 6 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDetection of immunoglobulin G targeting myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) is the mainstay of laboratory diagnosis of MOG antibody-associated disease.
Closing excerpt
Prospero registration numberCRD42024554429.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (142 words)

BackgroundDetection of immunoglobulin G targeting myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) is the mainstay of laboratory diagnosis of MOG antibody-associated disease. Laboratory biomarkers have the potential to predict disease course and activity, thus informing prompt therapeutic decisions to minimise relapse-associated disability accrual.MethodsThis systematic review with meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024554429). MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases were searched. Random-effects or mixed-effects modelling was performed and OR or HR with 95% CIs reported.Results106 studies with ≥1710 individuals were included. A relapsing course was associated with persistent seropositivity on serial samples collected ≥3 months apart (OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.8 to 4.0), pConclusionsMOG-IgG serostatus and titre and CSF leucocytosis are biomarkers of disease course and activity. The findings provide rationale for serial serum MOG-IgG testing at an interval of 3-6 months in the first 12 months of disease to assist in relapse risk stratification.Prospero registration numberCRD42024554429.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41033784 · DOI · PMC12911599

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing [5]
    Jarius S, Paul F, Aktas O, Asgari N, Dale RC, de Seze J, et al. · J Neuroinflammation · 2018 · cited 566 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in neurological disease [6]
    Reindl M, Waters P · Nat Rev Neurol · 2019 · cited 470 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease [7]
    Marignier R, Hacohen Y, Cobo-Calvo A, Pröbstel AK, Aktas O, Alexopoulos H, et al. · Lancet Neurol · 2021 · cited 421 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The spectrum of MOG autoantibody-associated demyelinating diseases [8]
    Reindl M, Di Pauli F, Rostásy K, Berger T · Nat Rev Neurol · 2013 · cited 273 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Anti-MOG antibody: The history, clinical phenotype, and pathogenicity of a serum biomarker for demyelination [9]
    Ramanathan S, Dale RC, Brilot F · Autoimmun Rev · 2016 · cited 205 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Neurological update: MOG antibody disease [10]
    Wynford-Thomas R, Jacob A, Tomassini V · J Neurol · 2019 · cited 166 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Höftberger R, Guo Y, Flanagan EP, Lopez-Chiriboga AS, Endmayr V, Hochmeister S, et al.. The pathology of central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease accompanying myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein autoantibody. . 2020. PMID 32048003 · DOI · PMC7181560
  2. Waters P, Fadda G, Woodhall M, O'Mahony J, Brown RA, Castro DA, et al.. Serial Anti-Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody Analyses and Outcomes in Children With Demyelinating Syndromes. . 2020. PMID 31545352 · DOI · PMC6763982
  3. Reindl M, Schanda K, Woodhall M, Tea F, Ramanathan S, Sagen J, et al.. International multicenter examination of MOG antibody assays. . 2020. PMID 32024795 · DOI · PMC7051197
  4. Andersen J, Trewin BP, Dale RC, Ramanathan S, Brilot F. Biomarkers to predict relapse in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2026. PMID 41033784 · DOI · PMC12911599
  5. Jarius S, Paul F, Aktas O, Asgari N, Dale RC, de Seze J, et al.. MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing. J Neuroinflammation. 2018. PMID 29724224 · DOI · PMC5932838
  6. Reindl M, Waters P. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in neurological disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019. PMID 30559466 · DOI
  7. Marignier R, Hacohen Y, Cobo-Calvo A, Pröbstel AK, Aktas O, Alexopoulos H, et al.. Myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Lancet Neurol. 2021. PMID 34418402 · DOI
  8. Reindl M, Di Pauli F, Rostásy K, Berger T. The spectrum of MOG autoantibody-associated demyelinating diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013. PMID 23797245 · DOI
  9. Ramanathan S, Dale RC, Brilot F. Anti-MOG antibody: The history, clinical phenotype, and pathogenicity of a serum biomarker for demyelination. Autoimmun Rev. 2016. PMID 26708342 · DOI
  10. Wynford-Thomas R, Jacob A, Tomassini V. Neurological update: MOG antibody disease. J Neurol. 2019. PMID 30569382 · DOI · PMC6469662

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • LamininDrugs and Chemicals
  • beta 2-MicroglobulinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CadherinsDrugs and Chemicals
  • Carcinoembryonic AntigenDrugs and Chemicals
  • CD40 LigandDrugs and Chemicals
  • Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Drugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

3,930
PubMed records on this heading
41%
published since 2020
367
review articles
9
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • LamininDrugs and Chemicals
  • beta 2-MicroglobulinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CadherinsDrugs and Chemicals
  • Carcinoembryonic AntigenDrugs and Chemicals
  • CD40 LigandDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support