Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (991 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A glycoprotein that is secreted into the luminal surface of the epithelia in the gastrointestinal tract. It is found in the feces and pancreaticobiliary secretions and is used to monitor the response to colon cancer treatment.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Antigen, Carcinoembryonic; Antigen, CD66e; CD66e Antigen; Antigens, CD66e; CD66e Antigens.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Cell Adhesion Molecules; Antigens, Neoplasm; Biomarkers, Tumor
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 17,486 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Carcinoembryonic Antigen” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 2,027 of them (11.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 9,133 records.
Reviews account for 1,243 records (7.1%) and meta-analyses for 65. Randomized controlled trials number 145 (0.8%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 9,133 |
| 2000-2009 | 3,043 |
| 2010-2019 | 3,283 |
| 2020 onward | 2,027 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,243 | 7.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 65 | 0.4% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 145 | 0.8% |
Method: PubMed query "Carcinoembryonic Antigen"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
The clinical efficacy of first-generation carcinoembryonic antigen (CEACAM5)-specific CAR T cells is limited by poor persistence and transient pre-conditioning-dependent respiratory toxicity [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The primary aim of this clinical trial was to determine the feasibility of delivering first-generation CAR T cell therapy to patients with advanced, CEACAM5+ malignancy.
- Closing excerpt
- Whilst improved CAR designs and T cell production methods could improve the systemic persistence and activity, methods to control CAR T 'on-target, off-tissue' toxicity are required to enable a clinical impact of this approach in solid malignancies.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (245 words)
The primary aim of this clinical trial was to determine the feasibility of delivering first-generation CAR T cell therapy to patients with advanced, CEACAM5+ malignancy. Secondary aims were to assess clinical efficacy, immune effector function and optimal dose of CAR T cells. Three cohorts of patients received increasing doses of CEACAM5+-specific CAR T cells after fludarabine pre-conditioning plus systemic IL2 support post T cell infusion. Patients in cohort 4 received increased intensity pre-conditioning (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine), systemic IL2 support and CAR T cells. No objective clinical responses were observed. CAR T cell engraftment in patients within cohort 4 was significantly higher. However, engraftment was short-lived with a rapid decline of systemic CAR T cells within 14 days. Patients in cohort 4 had transient, acute respiratory toxicity which, in combination with lack of prolonged CAR T cell persistence, resulted in the premature closure of the trial. Elevated levels of systemic IFNγ and IL-6 implied that the CEACAM5-specific T cells had undergone immune activation in vivo but only in patients receiving high-intensity pre-conditioning. Expression of CEACAM5 on lung epithelium may have resulted in this transient toxicity. Raised levels of serum cytokines including IL-6 in these patients implicate cytokine release as one of several potential factors exacerbating the observed respiratory toxicity. Whilst improved CAR designs and T cell production methods could improve the systemic persistence and activity, methods to control CAR T 'on-target, off-tissue' toxicity are required to enable a clinical impact of this approach in solid malignancies.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28660319 · DOI · PMC5645435
Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19-9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe diagnostic and prognostic significance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate associated antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) in early gastric cancer have not been investigated yet.
- Closing excerpt
- Elevation of CEA level was an independent risk factor for the poor prognosis of early gastric cancer.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (258 words)
BackgroundThe diagnostic and prognostic significance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate associated antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) in early gastric cancer have not been investigated yet. Thus, the present study aimed to explore the diagnostic and prognostic significance of the four tumor markers for early gastric cancer.MethodsFrom September 2008 to March 2015, 587 early gastric cancer patients were given radical gastrectomy in our center. The clinicopathological characteristics were recorded. The association between levels of CEA and CA19-9 and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients were analyzed.ResultsThere were 444 men (75.6%) and 143 women (24.4%). The median age was 57 years (ranged 21-85). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rate was 99.1%, 96.8% and 93.1%, respectively. The positive rate of CEA, CA19-9, AFP and CA125 was 4.3%, 4.8%, 1.5% and 1.9%, respectively. The positive rate of all markers combined was 10.4%. The associations between the clinicopathological features and levels of CEA and CA19-9 were analyzed. No significant association was found between CEA level and clinicopathological features. However, elevated CA19-9 level was correlated with female gender and presence of lymph node metastasis. Age > 60 years old, presence of lymph node metastasis and elevation of CEA level were independent risk factors for poor prognosis of early gastric cancer.ConclusionsThe positive rates of CEA, CA19-9, APF and CA125 were relatively low for early gastric cancer. Elevation of CA19-9 level was associated with female gender and presence of lymph node metastasis. Elevation of CEA level was an independent risk factor for the poor prognosis of early gastric cancer.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29121872 · DOI · PMC5679342
Recombination of a dual-CAR-modified T lymphocyte to accurately eliminate pancreatic malignancy [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe therapeutic application of T cells endowing with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) is faced with "on-target, off-tumor" toxicity against solid tumors, particularly in the treatment of the pancreatic cancer.
- Closing excerpt
- Dual-targeted CAR-T cells can be precisely localized at the tumor site and can exert high cytotoxicity against tumor cells, alleviating "on-target, off-tumor" toxicity and enabling accurate application of CAR-T cell therapy.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (294 words)
BackgroundThe therapeutic application of T cells endowing with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) is faced with "on-target, off-tumor" toxicity against solid tumors, particularly in the treatment of the pancreatic cancer. To our best knowledge, the pancreatic cancer cell line AsPC-1 often highly expressed some distinct tumor-associated antigens, such as carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) and mesothelin (MSLN). Therefore, in this research, we have characterized dual-receptor CAR-modified T cells (dCAR-T) that exert effective and safe cytotoxicity against AsPC-1 cells.MethodsBased on the dual signaling pathway of wild T cells, we designed a novel dCAR diagram specific for CEA and MSLN, which achieved comparable activity relative to that of conventional CAR-T cells (CEA-CAR T or MSLN-CAR T). In this dCAR, a tandem construct containing two physically separate structures, CEA-CD3ζ and MSLN-4/1BB signaling domains were effectively controlled with tumor antigens CEA and MSLN, respectively. Finally, the activity of dCAR-T cells has been verified via in vitro and in vivo experiments.ResultsIn the presence of cognate tumor cells (AsPC-1) expressing both CEA and MSLN, dCAR-T cells exerted high anti-tumor activity relative to that of other single-receptor CAR-T cells bearing only one signaling pathway (e.g., Cζ-CAR and MBB-CAR). In a xenograft model, dCAR-T cells significantly inhibited the growth of AsPC-1 cells yet no effect on the growth of non-cognate tumor cells. Furthermore, the released cytokines and T cell persistence in mice were comparable with that of conventional CAR-T cells, obtaining specific and controllable cytotoxicity.ConclusionsA novel type of CAR-T cells, termed dCAR-T, was designed with specific activities, that is, significant cytotoxicity for two antigen-positive tumor cells yet no cytotoxicity for single antigen-positive tumor cells. Dual-targeted CAR-T cells can be precisely localized at the tumor site and can exert high cytotoxicity against tumor cells, alleviating "on-target, off-tumor" toxicity and enabling accurate application of CAR-T cell therapy.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30103775 · DOI · PMC6090669
Enhanced Fluorescence of Near-Infrared Anti-CEA Antibodies for Visualizing Colorectal Cancers Using Modified Heptamethine Cyanines [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe clinical success of fluorescence-guided surgery is dependent on tumor-specific probes that can achieve high tumor-to-background contrast.
- Closing excerpt
- By achieving superior performance through intrinsic fluorophore design rather than complex bioconjugation strategies, the approach provides a clinically translatable advancement for tumor-specific FGS.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)
BackgroundThe clinical success of fluorescence-guided surgery is dependent on tumor-specific probes that can achieve high tumor-to-background contrast. Conventional near-infrared (NIR) fluorophores often alter the pharmacokinetic properties of the parental molecule that result in aggregation, altered biodistribution, and impaired tumor targeting.MethodsThis present study evaluates two charge-balanced heptamethine cyanine dyes, FNIR-Tag-766 and FNIR-Tag-804, conjugated to a humanized anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody (M5A). Their performance was compared to the standard M5A-IR800CW conjugate in both subcutaneous and orthotopic colorectal cancer xenograft models in mice. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), and ex vivo biodistribution were compared.ResultsThe M5A-FNIR-766 conjugate produced a greater MFI in tumors at all timepoints compared to M5A-IR800CW, resulting in a significantly improved TBR. Ex vivo analysis at 96 h confirmed higher tumor accumulation for M5A-FNIR-766 and revealed a reduction in hepatic signal for both M5A-FNIR-Tag conjugates. The observations were concordant in the clinically relevant orthotopic model.ConclusionAntibody-fluorophore conjugates linked to the charge-modified FNIR-Tag dyes provide improved tumor-specific signals and a more favorable biodistribution profile than the same antibody conjugated to a conventional dye. By achieving superior performance through intrinsic fluorophore design rather than complex bioconjugation strategies, the approach provides a clinically translatable advancement for tumor-specific FGS.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41667902 · DOI · PMC13161264
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family: structures, suggested functions and expression in normal and malignant tissues [5]
- Research article Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer [6]
- Research article Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? [7]
- Research article Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs) in cancer progression and metastasis [8]
- Research article Carcinoembryonic antigen gene family: molecular biology and clinical perspectives [9]
- Research article Carcinoembryonic antigen [10]
References
- Thistlethwaite FC, Gilham DE, Guest RD, Rothwell DG, Pillai M, Burt DJ, et al.. The clinical efficacy of first-generation carcinoembryonic antigen (CEACAM5)-specific CAR T cells is limited by poor persistence and transient pre-conditioning-dependent respiratory toxicity. . 2017. PMID 28660319 · DOI · PMC5645435
- Feng F, Tian Y, Xu G, Liu Z, Liu S, Zheng G, et al.. Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19-9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer. . 2017. PMID 29121872 · DOI · PMC5679342
- Zhang E, Yang P, Gu J, Wu H, Chi X, Liu C, et al.. Recombination of a dual-CAR-modified T lymphocyte to accurately eliminate pancreatic malignancy. . 2018. PMID 30103775 · DOI · PMC6090669
- Cox K, Jitender J, Mehta S, Li DH, Amirfakhri S, Hoffman RM, et al.. Enhanced Fluorescence of Near-Infrared Anti-CEA Antibodies for Visualizing Colorectal Cancers Using Modified Heptamethine Cyanines. . 2026. PMID 41667902 · DOI · PMC13161264
- Hammarström S. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family: structures, suggested functions and expression in normal and malignant tissues. Semin Cancer Biol. 1999. PMID 10202129 · DOI
- Grunnet M, Sorensen JB. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2012. PMID 22153832 · DOI
- Duffy MJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful?. Clin Chem. 2001. PMID 11274010 · DOI
- Beauchemin N, Arabzadeh A. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs) in cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013. PMID 23903773 · DOI
- Thompson JA, Grunert F, Zimmermann W. Carcinoembryonic antigen gene family: molecular biology and clinical perspectives. J Clin Lab Anal. 1991. PMID 1941355 · DOI
- Fletcher RH. Carcinoembryonic antigen. Ann Intern Med. 1986. PMID 3510056 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.