Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Mastoid
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Mastoid

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The posterior part of the temporal bone.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (975 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The posterior part of the temporal bone. It is a projection of the petrous bone.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Mastoids; Mastoid Bone; Bone, Mastoid; Mastoid Bones; Mastoid Process; Mastoid Processes; Process, Mastoid; Mastoid Foramen.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Temporal Bone

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,947 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Mastoid” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 576 of them (9.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 3,136 records.

Reviews account for 342 records (5.8%) and meta-analyses for 22. Randomized controlled trials number 68 (1.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 3,136 records; 2000-2009: 1,022 records; 2010-2019: 1,213 records; 2020 onward: 576 records3,136through 19991,0222000-20091,2132010-20195762020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19993,136
2000-20091,022
2010-20191,213
2020 onward576
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.1 percentReviews5.8% (342)Meta-analyses0.4% (22)Randomized controlled trials1.1% (68)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,947 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3425.8%
Meta-analyses220.4%
Randomized controlled trials681.1%

Method: PubMed query "Mastoid"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Epidemiology of middle ear and mastoid cholesteatomas: study of 1146 cases
Aquino JE, Cruz Filho NA, de Aquino JN
2011Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
51cc by
PMID 21739009 · DOI · PMC9443752
Mastoidectomy and mastoid obliteration with autologous bone graft: a quality of life study
Kurien G, Greeff K, Gomaa N, Ho A
2013Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
38cc by
PMID 24330542 · DOI · PMC3849804
Preoperative prediction by artificial intelligence for mastoid extension in pars flaccida cholesteatoma using temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography: A retrospective study
Takahashi M, Noda K, Yoshida K, Tsuchida K, Yui R, Nakazawa T, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
23cc by
PMID 36190937 · DOI · PMC9529134
Mastoid cortex osteoma associated with middle-ear and mastoid cholesteatoma: a case report
Zica MD, Voiosu C, Rusescu A, Hainaorsie R, Zainea V
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42602422 · DOI · PMC13474357

Epidemiology of middle ear and mastoid cholesteatomas: study of 1146 cases [1]

Research article Aquino JE, Cruz Filho NA, de Aquino JN · · 2011 · cited 51 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
UnlabelledMiddle ear cholesteatoma is an important and relatively common disorder which may have serious consequences.
Closing excerpt
We found no published papers on the epidemiology of cholesteatoma in the Brazilian literature.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (168 words)

UnlabelledMiddle ear cholesteatoma is an important and relatively common disorder which may have serious consequences.AimThe purpose was to conduct a retrospective study of the statistics of 1,146 middle ear surgical procedures for middle ear cholesteatoma in adults and children of low income living in distant areas from our city.MethodsFrom 1962 to 1988 there were 1,146 surgeries for unilateral or bilateral cholesteatomas in children and adults, which were reviewed for the following criteria: total number of surgeries, sex, onset of the first symptoms, duration of the disease, the site of perforation, the cholesteatoma site, changes in the ossicular chain, the contralateral ear, bilateral cholesteatomas, the site of residual cholesteatoma, and complications.ResultsResults are shown graphically on a pie chart.ConclusionThe etiology of cholesteatomas remains unknown. Epidemiological and statistical data, surgical reports, and conclusions of experimental studies are welcome, as they may provide support for clarifying the pathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Our results were compared with internationally published papers. We found no published papers on the epidemiology of cholesteatoma in the Brazilian literature.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 21739009 · DOI · PMC9443752

Mastoidectomy and mastoid obliteration with autologous bone graft: a quality of life study [2]

Research article Kurien G, Greeff K, Gomaa N, Ho A · · 2013 · cited 38 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundA mastoid cavity resulting from a canal wall down mastoidectomy can result in major morbidity for patients due to chronic otorrhea and infection, difficulty with hearing aids and vertigo with temperature changes.
Closing excerpt
This is currently the only QOL study comparing these two patient groups.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (269 words)

BackgroundA mastoid cavity resulting from a canal wall down mastoidectomy can result in major morbidity for patients due to chronic otorrhea and infection, difficulty with hearing aids and vertigo with temperature changes. Mastoid obliteration with reconstruction of the bony external ear canal recreates the normal anatomy to avoid such morbidity. Few have the studied the quality of life benefit that this procedure confers.MethodsThis retrospective observational study was conducted to determine if mastoid obliteration with autologous cranial bone graft following mastoidectomy improves quality of life (QOL). Patients with cholesteatoma who had mastoidectomy with primary or secondary mastoid obliteration by a tertiary otologist were surveyed using the validated Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), our primary outcome measure.ResultsFifty-eight patients were interviewed. Forty-six were primary obliteration after canal wall down mastoidectomy of a primary cholesteatoma. Twelve were secondary obliteration of an existing canal wall down mastoid cavity. Overall GBI scores were improved, with average scores of 22. Average general subscale scores were 23, physical health scores were 25, and social health scores were 22. The primary obliteration group had average scores of 19, general subscale scores of 20, physical health scores of 21, and social health scores of 22. Those with secondary obliteration scored higher, with average scores of 31, general subscale scores of 34, physical health scores of 39, and social health scores of 25.ConclusionThis study shows that mastoidectomy with obliteration using autologous cranial bone graft offers a significant QOL benefit. The GBI scores compare favourably with other otorhinolaryngology procedures. Secondary obliterations after revision mastoidectomy scored much higher than primary obliterations. This is currently the only QOL study comparing these two patient groups.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24330542 · DOI · PMC3849804

Preoperative prediction by artificial intelligence for mastoid extension in pars flaccida cholesteatoma using temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography: A retrospective study [3]

Research article Takahashi M, Noda K, Yoshida K, Tsuchida K, Yui R, Nakazawa T, et al. · · 2022 · cited 23 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Cholesteatoma is a progressive middle ear disease that can only be treated surgically but with a high recurrence rate.
Closing excerpt
These findings represent an important first step in the automatic diagnosis of the cholesteatoma extension.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (300 words)

Cholesteatoma is a progressive middle ear disease that can only be treated surgically but with a high recurrence rate. Depending on the extent of the disease, a surgical approach, such as microsurgery with a retroarticular incision or transcanal endoscopic surgery, is performed. However, the current examination cannot sufficiently predict the progression before surgery, and changes in approach may be made during the surgery. Large amounts of data are typically required to train deep neural network models; however, the prevalence of cholesteatomas is low (1-in-25, 000). Developing analysis methods that improve the accuracy with such a small number of samples is an important issue for medical artificial intelligence (AI) research. This paper presents an AI-based system to automatically detect mastoid extensions using CT. This retrospective study included 164 patients (80 with mastoid extension and 84 without mastoid extension) who underwent surgery. This study adopted a relatively lightweight neural network model called MobileNetV2 to learn and predict the CT images of 164 patients. The training was performed with eight divided groups for cross-validation and was performed 24 times with each of the eight groups to verify accuracy fluctuations caused by randomly augmented learning. An evaluation was performed by each of the 24 single-trained models, and 24 sets of ensemble predictions with 23 models for 100% original size images and 400% zoomed images. Fifteen otolaryngologists diagnosed the images and compared the results. The average accuracy of predicting 400% zoomed images using ensemble prediction model was 81.14% (sensitivity = 84.95%, specificity = 77.33%). The average accuracy of the otolaryngologists was 73.41% (sensitivity, 83.17%; specificity, 64.13%), which was not affected by their clinical experiences. Noteworthily, despite the small number of cases, we were able to create a highly accurate AI. These findings represent an important first step in the automatic diagnosis of the cholesteatoma extension.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36190937 · DOI · PMC9529134

Mastoid cortex osteoma associated with middle-ear and mastoid cholesteatoma: a case report [4]

Research article Zica MD, Voiosu C, Rusescu A, Hainaorsie R, Zainea V · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Osteomas of the temporal bone are rare benign tumors that, in a small minority of cases, may give rise to secondary cholesteatoma.
Closing excerpt
Combined HRCT and non-EPI DWI-MRI was essential for preoperative characterization and surgical planning.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (238 words)

Osteomas of the temporal bone are rare benign tumors that, in a small minority of cases, may give rise to secondary cholesteatoma. We report a case in which two independent pathological mechanisms appeared to coexist, resulting in a configuration not previously described in the literature. A 51-year-old woman presented with one year of right-sided otorrhoea and progressive mixed hearing loss unresponsive to antibiotic therapy. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) demonstrated a giant sessile osteoma arising from the anterior mastoid cortex with complete external auditory canal (EAC) obstruction. Non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI (non-EPI DWI-MRI) identified cholesteatoma restricted to the middle ear and mastoid antrum, clearly distinct from chronically inflamed mastoid air cells. Intraoperatively, a near-intact tympanic membrane with a small attic retraction pocket formed the anterior boundary; no canal-wall cholesteatoma was present. Canal wall-down (CWD) radical mastoidectomy with osteoma excision and meatoconchoplasty achieved complete disease eradication. Histopathology confirmed compact osteoma and cholesteatoma. The cavity was dry and stable at the three-month follow-up. Upon review of the published case reports of temporal bone osteoma with associated cholesteatoma, no previously reported case combined a giant osteoma of the anterior mastoid cortex with cholesteatoma confined entirely to the middle ear and mastoid behind a structurally preserved tympanic membrane. The intraoperative finding of an attic retraction pocket suggests that Eustachian tube dysfunction may have played an independent contributory role alongside the osteoma. Combined HRCT and non-EPI DWI-MRI was essential for preoperative characterization and surgical planning.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42602422 · DOI · PMC13474357

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The growth rate and size of the mastoid air cell system and mastoid bone: a review and reference [5]
    Cinamon U · Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol · 2009 · cited 93 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Endolymphatic sac surgery for Ménière's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Sood AJ, Lambert PR, Nguyen SA, Meyer TA · Otol Neurotol · 2014 · cited 74 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Reclassification of aggressive adenomatous mastoid neoplasms as endolymphatic sac tumors [7]
    Li JC, Brackmann DE, Lo WW, Carberry JN, House JW · Laryngoscope · 1993 · cited 59 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article International Otology Outcome Group and the International Consensus on the Categorization of Tympanomastoid Surgery [8]
    Yung M, James A, Merkus P, Philips J, Black B, Tono T, et al. · J Int Adv Otol · 2018 · cited 54 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mastoid obliteration [9]
    Mehta RP, Harris JP · Otolaryngol Clin North Am · 2006 · cited 53 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Surgery for Ménière's disease [10]
    Pullens B, Verschuur HP, van Benthem PP · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2013 · cited 48 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Aquino JE, Cruz Filho NA, de Aquino JN. Epidemiology of middle ear and mastoid cholesteatomas: study of 1146 cases. . 2011. PMID 21739009 · DOI · PMC9443752
  2. Kurien G, Greeff K, Gomaa N, Ho A. Mastoidectomy and mastoid obliteration with autologous bone graft: a quality of life study. . 2013. PMID 24330542 · DOI · PMC3849804
  3. Takahashi M, Noda K, Yoshida K, Tsuchida K, Yui R, Nakazawa T, et al.. Preoperative prediction by artificial intelligence for mastoid extension in pars flaccida cholesteatoma using temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography: A retrospective study. . 2022. PMID 36190937 · DOI · PMC9529134
  4. Zica MD, Voiosu C, Rusescu A, Hainaorsie R, Zainea V. Mastoid cortex osteoma associated with middle-ear and mastoid cholesteatoma: a case report. . 2026. PMID 42602422 · DOI · PMC13474357
  5. Cinamon U. The growth rate and size of the mastoid air cell system and mastoid bone: a review and reference. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009. PMID 19283403 · DOI
  6. Sood AJ, Lambert PR, Nguyen SA, Meyer TA. Endolymphatic sac surgery for Ménière's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2014. PMID 24751747 · DOI
  7. Li JC, Brackmann DE, Lo WW, Carberry JN, House JW. Reclassification of aggressive adenomatous mastoid neoplasms as endolymphatic sac tumors. Laryngoscope. 1993. PMID 8246652 · DOI
  8. Yung M, James A, Merkus P, Philips J, Black B, Tono T, et al.. International Otology Outcome Group and the International Consensus on the Categorization of Tympanomastoid Surgery. J Int Adv Otol. 2018. PMID 30100547 · DOI · PMC6354466
  9. Mehta RP, Harris JP. Mastoid obliteration. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2006. PMID 17097437 · DOI
  10. Pullens B, Verschuur HP, van Benthem PP. Surgery for Ménière's disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID 23450562 · DOI · PMC7389445

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Temporal BoneAnatomy and Physiology
  • CalcaneusAnatomy and Physiology
  • ClavicleAnatomy and Physiology
  • Frontal BoneAnatomy and Physiology
  • AcromionAnatomy and Physiology
  • MaxillaAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

5,947
PubMed records on this heading
10%
published since 2020
342
review articles
68
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Temporal BoneAnatomy and Physiology
  • CalcaneusAnatomy and Physiology
  • ClavicleAnatomy and Physiology
  • Frontal BoneAnatomy and Physiology
  • AcromionAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support