Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Live Birth
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Live Birth

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The event that a fetus is born alive with heartbeats or respiration regardless of gestational age.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (912 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The event that a fetus is born alive with heartbeats or respiration regardless of gestational age. Such liveborn is called a newborn infant (infant, newborn).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Live Births.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Pregnancy Outcome

Related concepts

  • Fetus
  • Respiration
  • Gestational Age
  • Infant
  • Newborn

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 7,015 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Live Birth” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 3,364 of them (48.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 3,364 records.

Reviews account for 902 records (12.9%) and meta-analyses for 511. Randomized controlled trials number 325 (4.6%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 620 records; 2010-2019: 3,122 records; 2020 onward: 3,364 records0through 19996202000-20093,1222010-20193,3642020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-2009620
2010-20193,122
2020 onward3,364
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 12.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 7.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 4.6 percentReviews12.9% (902)Meta-analyses7.3% (511)Randomized controlled trials4.6% (325)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 7,015 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews90212.9%
Meta-analyses5117.3%
Randomized controlled trials3254.6%

Method: PubMed query "Live Birth"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Endometrioma ethanol sclerotherapy could increase IVF live birth rate in women with moderate-severe endometriosis
Miquel L, Preaubert L, Gnisci A, Resseguier N, Pivano A, Perrin J, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
28cc by
PMID 32986747 · DOI · PMC7521758
Cumulative Live Birth Rates According to Maternal Body Mass Index After First Ovarian Stimulation for in vitro Fertilization: A Single Center Analysis of 14,782 Patients
Xue X, Shi W, Zhou H, Tian L, Zhao Z, Zhou D, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
24cc by
PMID 32328028 · DOI · PMC7160227
Surrounding greenness is associated with lower risk and burden of low birth weight in Iran
Luo S, Wang Y, Mayvaneh F, Relvas H, Baaghideh M, Wang K, et al.
2023Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
22cc by
PMID 37989742 · DOI · PMC10663448
High live birth rates after laparoscopic isthmocele repair in infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vidal A, Geiger J, Vinayahalingam V, Pape J, Gulz M, Karrer T, et al.
2025Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 40303644 · DOI · PMC12037975

Endometrioma ethanol sclerotherapy could increase IVF live birth rate in women with moderate-severe endometriosis [1]

Research article Miquel L, Preaubert L, Gnisci A, Resseguier N, Pivano A, Perrin J, et al. · · 2020 · cited 28 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveTo examine the impact of ethanol sclerotherapy (EST) for endometrioma on in vitro fertilization (IVF) cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) in women with moderate-severe endometriosis.
Closing excerpt
EST could be discussed before IVF in infertile women.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (276 words)

ObjectiveTo examine the impact of ethanol sclerotherapy (EST) for endometrioma on in vitro fertilization (IVF) cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) in women with moderate-severe endometriosis.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included women with moderate-severe endometriosis (revised American Fertility Society stage III-IV) and endometrioma who underwent IVF with the ultra-long agonist protocol. We compared two groups: women undergoing EST for endometrioma before IVF (EST group), and women whose endometrioma was left in situ during IVF (No-EST group). The primary outcome was the CLBR per IVF cycle, including fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The secondary endpoints included the complication rate, number of mature oocytes retrieved, clinical pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss rate.ResultsSeventy-four women were included in the study, with 37 in the EST group and 37 in the No-EST group, representing 67 and 69 IVF cycles, respectively. The population and cycle characteristics were comparable between the two groups, especially the ovarian response to stimulation. The CLBR was significantly increased in the EST group compared to the No-EST group (31.3% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.03). The clinical and biochemical pregnancy rates were significantly increased in the EST group (37.3% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.01 and 43.3% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.01, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly increased chance of live birth in women exposed to EST before IVF with an adjusted OR of 2.68 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.13-6.36, p = 0.02). In the EST group, we reported one major complication Clavien and Dindo classification grade III, complication involving an ovarian abscess that required a laparoscopic drainage.ConclusionsEST is an interesting technique to improve IVF success rates in women with moderate-severe endometriosis. EST could be discussed before IVF in infertile women.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32986747 · DOI · PMC7521758

Cumulative Live Birth Rates According to Maternal Body Mass Index After First Ovarian Stimulation for in vitro Fertilization: A Single Center Analysis of 14,782 Patients [2]

Research article Xue X, Shi W, Zhou H, Tian L, Zhao Z, Zhou D, et al. · · 2020 · cited 24 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Objective: To investigate the cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) according to body mass index (BMI) in women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Closing excerpt
The CLBR increases in underweight women, plateaus in normal weight and overweight women, and then decreases in obese women.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (225 words)

Objective: To investigate the cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) according to body mass index (BMI) in women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF). Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: An IVF clinic in a public hospital. Patients: This is a retrospective study of 14,782 patients undergoing their first fresh IVF cycles and subsequent frozen embryo transfers in our clinic from January 2014 to January 2017. The follow-up for CLBR continued until January 2019. Patients with a BMI 2 were considered to be underweight and those with a BMI > 24 kg/m2 were considered to be overweight. Patients with a BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 were considered to be obese. Intervention(s): None. Primary Outcome Measure: The primary outcome was cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). Result(s): This study illustrated the "inverted U shape" associations between body weight and IVF outcome (CLBR). The turning points in threshold analysis, as found by an automatic search, were BMIs of 18.5 and 30.4 kg/m2. The main finding of this retrospective data analysis is that the CLBR increased in underweight women, plateaued for normal weight and overweight women with a BMI between 18.5 and 30.4 kg/m2, and decreased in obese women. Conclusion(s): The data suggested an "inverted U shape" association between BMI and CLBR. The CLBR increases in underweight women, plateaus in normal weight and overweight women, and then decreases in obese women.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32328028 · DOI · PMC7160227

Surrounding greenness is associated with lower risk and burden of low birth weight in Iran [3]

Research article Luo S, Wang Y, Mayvaneh F, Relvas H, Baaghideh M, Wang K, et al. · · 2023 · cited 22 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The nexus between prenatal greenspace exposure and low birth weight (LBW) remains largely unstudied in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Closing excerpt
Our findings suggest potential health benefits of improved greenspace in lowering LBW risk and burden in LMICs.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (147 words)

The nexus between prenatal greenspace exposure and low birth weight (LBW) remains largely unstudied in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We investigated a nationwide retrospective cohort of 4,021,741 live births (263,728 LBW births) across 31 provinces in Iran during 2013-2018. Greenness exposure during pregnancy was assessed using satellite-based normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). We estimated greenness-LBW associations using multiple logistic models, and quantified avoidable LBW cases under scenarios of improved greenspace through counterfactual analyses. Association analyses provide consistent evidence for approximately L-shaped exposure-response functions, linking 7.0-11.5% declines in the odds of LBW to each 0.1-unit rise in NDVI/EVI with multiple buffers. Assuming causality, 3931-5099 LBW births can be avoided by achieving greenness targets of mean NDVI/EVI, amounting to 4.4-5.6% of total LBW births in 2015. Our findings suggest potential health benefits of improved greenspace in lowering LBW risk and burden in LMICs.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37989742 · DOI · PMC10663448

High live birth rates after laparoscopic isthmocele repair in infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis [4]

Meta-analysis Vidal A, Geiger J, Vinayahalingam V, Pape J, Gulz M, Karrer T, et al. · · 2025 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundCesarean sections are becoming more common worldwide.
Closing excerpt
uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD42024548864).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (264 words)

BackgroundCesarean sections are becoming more common worldwide. One of the long-term complications of cesarean section is a cesarean scar defect or isthmocele. The presence of isthmocele is associated with infertility.ObjectivesThis systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effect of laparoscopic isthmocele repair on the reproductive outcomes of patients with and without infertility.Search strategyWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases in April 2024.Selection criteriaThe study included cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series reporting reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic isthmocele repair among women with or without diagnosed infertility.Data collection and analysisThe meta-analysis examined rates of live birth, pregnancy, and miscarriage.Main resultsThe search identified 866 records and 17 articles were included. Clinical pregnancy rates after isthmocele resection were 62% (95% confidence interval (CI) 54-69%) in women with infertility, compared to 33% (95% CI: 16-57%) in women without infertility and 36% in women with unknown fertility status (36%, 95% CI: 21-55%). Live birth rates were 72% (95% CI: 54-85%) among those with infertility, 78% (95% CI: 46-94%) among those without infertility, and 61% (95% CI: 42-77%) with unknown fertility status. Women with and without infertility had low miscarriage rates of 10% (95% CI: 6-16%) and 7% (95% CI: 3-18%), respectively. The prevalence of co-existing endometriosis was 29% (95% CI: 22-37%). The statistical heterogeneity of the studies ranged from 0 to 86%.ConclusionsLaparoscopic isthmocele repair has demonstrated the potential to improve reproductive outcomes, specifically in cases where infertility is linked to isthmocele-related factors, such as challenges during embryo transfer or impaired implantation. However, further well-designed multicenter trials must confirm these findings and provide stronger evidence.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD42024548864).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40303644 · DOI · PMC12037975

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
    Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, et al. · Hum Reprod Update · 2019 · cited 382 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis [6]
    Oktay K, Cil AP, Bang H · Fertil Steril · 2006 · cited 300 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013 [7]
    Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, Darmon SK, Gleicher N · Reprod Biol Endocrinol · 2017 · cited 249 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology [8]
    Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2016 · cited 239 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Female obesity is negatively associated with live birth rate following IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Sermondade N, Huberlant S, Bourhis-Lefebvre V, Arbo E, Gallot V, Colombani M, et al. · Hum Reprod Update · 2019 · cited 231 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Impact of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis [10]
    Di Toro F, Gjoka M, Di Lorenzo G, De Santo D, De Seta F, Maso G, et al. · Clin Microbiol Infect · 2021 · cited 207 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Miquel L, Preaubert L, Gnisci A, Resseguier N, Pivano A, Perrin J, et al.. Endometrioma ethanol sclerotherapy could increase IVF live birth rate in women with moderate-severe endometriosis. . 2020. PMID 32986747 · DOI · PMC7521758
  2. Xue X, Shi W, Zhou H, Tian L, Zhao Z, Zhou D, et al.. Cumulative Live Birth Rates According to Maternal Body Mass Index After First Ovarian Stimulation for in vitro Fertilization: A Single Center Analysis of 14,782 Patients. . 2020. PMID 32328028 · DOI · PMC7160227
  3. Luo S, Wang Y, Mayvaneh F, Relvas H, Baaghideh M, Wang K, et al.. Surrounding greenness is associated with lower risk and burden of low birth weight in Iran. . 2023. PMID 37989742 · DOI · PMC10663448
  4. Vidal A, Geiger J, Vinayahalingam V, Pape J, Gulz M, Karrer T, et al.. High live birth rates after laparoscopic isthmocele repair in infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2025. PMID 40303644 · DOI · PMC12037975
  5. Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, et al.. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019. PMID 30624659 · DOI
  6. Oktay K, Cil AP, Bang H. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID 16818031 · DOI
  7. Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, Darmon SK, Gleicher N. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017. PMID 28069012 · DOI · PMC5223447
  8. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID 27357126 · DOI
  9. Sermondade N, Huberlant S, Bourhis-Lefebvre V, Arbo E, Gallot V, Colombani M, et al.. Female obesity is negatively associated with live birth rate following IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019. PMID 30941397 · DOI
  10. Di Toro F, Gjoka M, Di Lorenzo G, De Santo D, De Seta F, Maso G, et al.. Impact of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021. PMID 33148440 · DOI · PMC7605748

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Term BirthAnatomy and Physiology
  • Pregnancy OutcomeAnatomy and Physiology
  • PregnancyAnatomy and Physiology
  • Breech PresentationAnatomy and Physiology
  • CoitusAnatomy and Physiology
  • PlacentationAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

7,015
PubMed records on this heading
48%
published since 2020
902
review articles
325
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Term BirthAnatomy and Physiology
  • Pregnancy OutcomeAnatomy and Physiology
  • PregnancyAnatomy and Physiology
  • Breech PresentationAnatomy and Physiology
  • CoitusAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support