Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cancer and Oncology›Liposarcoma
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Liposarcoma

Cancer and Oncology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

A malignant tumor derived from primitive or embryonal lipoblastic cells.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,107 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A malignant tumor derived from primitive or embryonal lipoblastic cells. It may be composed of well-differentiated fat cells or may be dedifferentiated: myxoid (liposarcoma, myxoid), round-celled, or pleomorphic, usually in association with a rich network of capillaries. Recurrences are common and dedifferentiated liposarcomas metastasize to the lungs or serosal surfaces. (From Dorland, 27th ed; Stedman, 25th ed)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Liposarcomas; Liposarcoma, Dedifferentiated; Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma; Dedifferentiated Liposarcomas; Liposarcoma, Pleomorphic; Pleomorphic Liposarcoma; Pleomorphic Liposarcomas; Well Differentiated Liposarcoma.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Neoplasms, Adipose Tissue; Sarcoma
Narrower topics
Liposarcoma, Myxoid

Related concepts

  • Liposarcoma
  • Myxoid

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,963 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Liposarcoma” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,110 of them (18.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,178 records.

Reviews account for 741 records (12.4%) and meta-analyses for 7. Randomized controlled trials number 25 (0.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,178 records; 2000-2009: 1,153 records; 2010-2019: 1,522 records; 2020 onward: 1,110 records2,178through 19991,1532000-20091,5222010-20191,1102020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,178
2000-20091,153
2010-20191,522
2020 onward1,110
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 12.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.4 percentReviews12.4% (741)Meta-analyses0.1% (7)Randomized controlled trials0.4% (25)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,963 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews74112.4%
Meta-analyses70.1%
Randomized controlled trials250.4%

Method: PubMed query "Liposarcoma"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology

Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Frequent amplification of HDAC genes and efficacy of HDAC inhibitor chidamide and PD-1 blockade combination in soft tissue sarcoma
Que Y, Zhang XL, Liu ZX, Zhao JJ, Pan QZ, Wen XZ, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
86cc by
PMID 33637599 · DOI · PMC7919591
Integrated exome and RNA sequencing of dedifferentiated liposarcoma
Hirata M, Asano N, Katayama K, Yoshida A, Tsuda Y, Sekimizu M, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
69cc by
PMID 31831742 · DOI · PMC6908635
Increasing Incidence of Liposarcoma: A Population-Based Study of National Surveillance Databases, 2001-2016
Bock S, Hoffmann DG, Jiang Y, Chen H, Il'yasova D
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
60cc by
PMID 32326423 · DOI · PMC7215751
Oncogenic driver and therapeutic target: Prolactin signalling axis in retroperitoneal sarcoma
Xie F, Gu L, Yang K, Wang S, Xiao M, Yan G, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42083506 · DOI · PMC13139769

Frequent amplification of HDAC genes and efficacy of HDAC inhibitor chidamide and PD-1 blockade combination in soft tissue sarcoma [1]

Research article Que Y, Zhang XL, Liu ZX, Zhao JJ, Pan QZ, Wen XZ, et al. · · 2021 · cited 86 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe advent of immune checkpoint therapy has been a tremendous advance in cancer treatment.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsThe combination of chidamide and anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy represents a potentially important strategy for STS.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (347 words)

BackgroundThe advent of immune checkpoint therapy has been a tremendous advance in cancer treatment. However, the responses are still insufficient in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We aimed to identify rational combinations to increase the response to immune checkpoint therapy and improve survival.MethodsWhole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed in 11 patients with liposarcoma. Somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) were analyzed at the gene level to identify obvious amplification patterns in drug-target genes. The expression and prognostic value of class I histone deacetylases (HDACs) was evaluated in 49 patients with sarcoma in our center and confirmed in 263 sarcoma samples from The Tumor Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Q-PCR, flow cytometry and RNA-seq were performed to determine the correlations between class I HDACs, chidamide and PD-L1 in vitro and in vivo. The efficacy of combining chidamide with PD-1 blockade was explored in an immunocompetent murine model and a small cohort of patients with advanced sarcoma. Western blot, ChIP assay and dual luciferase assessment were applied in the mechanistic study.ResultsThe HDAC gene family was frequently amplified in STS. SCNAs in the HDAC gene family were extensively amplified in 8 of 11 (73%) patients with liposarcoma, based on a drug-target gene set, and we verified amplification in 76.65% (197/257) of cases by analyzing TCGA sarcoma cohort. Class I HDAC expression is associated with a poor prognosis for patients with STS, and its inhibition is responsible for promoting apoptosis and upregulating of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). The HDAC class I inhibitor chidamide significantly increases PD-L1 expression, increased the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and reduced the number of MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment. The combination of chidamide with an anti-PD-1 antibody significantly promotes tumor regression and improves survival in a murine model. Moreover, chidamide combined with the anti-PD-1 antibody toripalimab is effective in patients with advanced and metastatic sarcoma, and the side effects are tolerable. Mechanistically, chidamide increases histone acetylation at the PD-L1 gene through the activation of the transcriptional factor STAT1.ConclusionsThe combination of chidamide and anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy represents a potentially important strategy for STS.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33637599 · DOI · PMC7919591

Integrated exome and RNA sequencing of dedifferentiated liposarcoma [2]

Research article Hirata M, Asano N, Katayama K, Yoshida A, Tsuda Y, Sekimizu M, et al. · · 2019 · cited 69 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The genomic characteristics of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) that are associated with clinical features remain to be identified.
Closing excerpt
This large-scale genomic analysis reveals the mechanisms underlying the development and progression of DDLPS and provides insights that could contribute to the refinement of DDLPS management.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (149 words)

The genomic characteristics of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) that are associated with clinical features remain to be identified. Here, we conduct integrated whole exome and RNA sequencing analysis in 115 DDLPS tumors and perform comparative genomic analysis of well-differentiated and dedifferentiated components from eight DDLPS samples. Several somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs), including the gain of 12q15, are identified as frequent genomic alterations. CTDSP1/2-DNM3OS fusion genes are identified in a subset of DDLPS tumors. Based on the association of SCNAs with clinical features, the DDLPS tumors are clustered into three groups. This clustering can predict the clinical outcome independently. The comparative analysis between well-differentiated and dedifferentiated components identify two categories of genomic alterations: shared alterations, associated with tumorigenesis, and dedifferentiated-specific alterations, associated with malignant transformation. This large-scale genomic analysis reveals the mechanisms underlying the development and progression of DDLPS and provides insights that could contribute to the refinement of DDLPS management.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31831742 · DOI · PMC6908635

Increasing Incidence of Liposarcoma: A Population-Based Study of National Surveillance Databases, 2001-2016 [3]

Research article Bock S, Hoffmann DG, Jiang Y, Chen H, Il'yasova D · · 2020 · cited 60 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Rare cancers, affecting 1 in 5 cancer patients, disproportionally contribute to cancer mortality.
Closing excerpt
Differences between SEER and CNCPR findings emphasize the need for nationwide cancer surveillance.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)

Rare cancers, affecting 1 in 5 cancer patients, disproportionally contribute to cancer mortality. This research focuses on liposarcoma, an understudied rare cancer with unknown risk factors and limited treatment options. Liposarcoma incident cases were identified from the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) program and the combined SEER-National Program of Cancer Registries (CNPCR) between 2001-2016. Incidence rates (age-adjusted and age-specific), 5-year survival, and the time trends were determined using SEER*stat software. Three-dimensional visualization of age-time curves was conducted for males and females. SEER liposarcoma cases represented ~30% (n = 11,162) of the nationwide pool (N = 37,499). Both sources of data showed males accounting for ~60% of the cases; 82%-86% cases were identified among whites. Age-adjusted incidence was greater among males vs. females and whites vs. blacks, whereas survival did not differ by sex and race. The dedifferentiated (57.2%), pleomorphic (64.1%), and retroperitoneal (63.9%) tumors had the worse survival. Nationwide, liposarcoma rates increased by 19%, with the annual percent increase (APC) of 1.43% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.74). The APC was greater for males vs. females (1.67% vs. 0.89%) and retroperitoneal vs. extremity tumors (1.94% vs. 0.58%). Thus, incidence increased faster in the high-risk subgroup (males), and for retroperitoneal tumors, the low-survival subtype. The SEER generally over-estimated the rates and time trends compared to nationwide data but under-estimated time trends for retroperitoneal tumors. The time trends suggest an interaction between genetic and non-genetic modifiable risk factors may play a role in the etiology of this malignancy. Differences between SEER and CNCPR findings emphasize the need for nationwide cancer surveillance.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32326423 · DOI · PMC7215751

Oncogenic driver and therapeutic target: Prolactin signalling axis in retroperitoneal sarcoma [4]

Research article Xie F, Gu L, Yang K, Wang S, Xiao M, Yan G, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundRetroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a type of malignant tumour arising from mesenchymal tissues within the retroperitoneal space.
Closing excerpt
PRL can activate the JAK-STAT signalling pathway by binding to PRLR on sarcoma cells, leading to the up-regulation of c-MYC.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (351 words)

BackgroundRetroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a type of malignant tumour arising from mesenchymal tissues within the retroperitoneal space. RPSs tend to develop covertly and are often undiscovered when they have already grown significantly and invaded surrounding tissues and organs. These malignancies demonstrate high recurrence rates, present surgical challenges and exhibit limited responsiveness to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Serum-derived molecules are known to play critical roles in tumourigenesis and tumour progression. However, the serum molecular profile of RPS patients remains unclear.MethodsWe performed multi-omics analysis of serum samples from patients with retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Prolactin concentrations were quantified using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). RNA-seq facilitated the identification of candidate signalling pathways, while gene expression was validated through quantitative polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry and western blot analyses. Molecular mechanisms underlying transcriptional regulation were investigated through Chromatin Immunoprecipitation-qPCR (ChIP-qPCR) and dual-luciferase reporter gene assays.ResultsIntegrative multi-omics profiling identified significant perturbations in galactose metabolism coupled with marked elevation of prolactin (PRL) levels in Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma (RLPS) patients. Further screening of serum prolactin levels in 100 patients with retroperitoneal tumours revealed that 90% of the cases exhibited hyperprolactinaemia in our research cohort, encompassing both malignant sarcomas and benign tumours. Studies at the clinical sample, cellular and animal levels have found that abnormally elevated prolactin in the serum can originate from sarcoma tissues. Mechanistic investigations identified SRY-box transcription factor 4 (SOX4) as a previously unrecognised transcriptional regulator of PRL. Functionally, PRL not only enhanced liposarcoma cell and fibrosarcoma cell proliferation but also conferred resistance to MDM2 inhibitors. Signalling pathway analysis revealed that PRL activates the Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription Pathway (JAK-STAT) signalling pathway and up-regulates c-MYC expression.ConclusionsThis study indicates that PRL can serve as an oncogenic driver and therapeutic target. The identification of SOX4-PRL-c-MYC signalling axis provides actionable insights for developing novel therapeutic strategies against this malignancy.Key pointsRetroperitoneal sarcoma cells can secrete prolactin into the bloodstream, inducing hyperprolactinaemia, which subsequently triggers metabolic reprogramming, such as glucose metabolism. SOX4 can function as a transcription factor that facilitates PRL transcription. PRL can activate the JAK-STAT signalling pathway by binding to PRLR on sarcoma cells, leading to the up-regulation of c-MYC.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42083506 · DOI · PMC13139769

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Clinical and Molecular Spectrum of Liposarcoma [5]
    Lee ATJ, Thway K, Huang PH, Jones RL · J Clin Oncol · 2018 · cited 290 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: An updated review [6]
    Thway K · Semin Diagn Pathol · 2019 · cited 245 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Liposarcoma: new entities and evolving concepts [7]
    Dei Tos AP · Ann Diagn Pathol · 2000 · cited 238 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas [8]
    Coindre JM, Pédeutour F, Aurias A · Virchows Arch · 2010 · cited 184 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Trabectedin, a drug acting on both cancer cells and the tumour microenvironment [9]
    D'Incalci M, Badri N, Galmarini CM, Allavena P · Br J Cancer · 2014 · cited 166 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Diagnosis and management of lipomatous tumors [10]
    Dalal KM, Antonescu CR, Singer S · J Surg Oncol · 2008 · cited 160 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Que Y, Zhang XL, Liu ZX, Zhao JJ, Pan QZ, Wen XZ, et al.. Frequent amplification of HDAC genes and efficacy of HDAC inhibitor chidamide and PD-1 blockade combination in soft tissue sarcoma. . 2021. PMID 33637599 · DOI · PMC7919591
  2. Hirata M, Asano N, Katayama K, Yoshida A, Tsuda Y, Sekimizu M, et al.. Integrated exome and RNA sequencing of dedifferentiated liposarcoma. . 2019. PMID 31831742 · DOI · PMC6908635
  3. Bock S, Hoffmann DG, Jiang Y, Chen H, Il'yasova D. Increasing Incidence of Liposarcoma: A Population-Based Study of National Surveillance Databases, 2001-2016. . 2020. PMID 32326423 · DOI · PMC7215751
  4. Xie F, Gu L, Yang K, Wang S, Xiao M, Yan G, et al.. Oncogenic driver and therapeutic target: Prolactin signalling axis in retroperitoneal sarcoma. . 2026. PMID 42083506 · DOI · PMC13139769
  5. Lee ATJ, Thway K, Huang PH, Jones RL. Clinical and Molecular Spectrum of Liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018. PMID 29220294 · DOI · PMC5759315
  6. Thway K. Well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: An updated review. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2019. PMID 30852045 · DOI
  7. Dei Tos AP. Liposarcoma: new entities and evolving concepts. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000. PMID 10982304 · DOI
  8. Coindre JM, Pédeutour F, Aurias A. Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Virchows Arch. 2010. PMID 19688222 · DOI
  9. D'Incalci M, Badri N, Galmarini CM, Allavena P. Trabectedin, a drug acting on both cancer cells and the tumour microenvironment. Br J Cancer. 2014. PMID 24755886 · DOI · PMC4134488
  10. Dalal KM, Antonescu CR, Singer S. Diagnosis and management of lipomatous tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2008. PMID 18286473 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Giant Cell TumorsCancer and Oncology
  • LipomaCancer and Oncology
  • Granular Cell TumorCancer and Oncology
  • Solitary Fibrous TumorsCancer and Oncology
  • OsteosarcomaCancer and Oncology
  • Phyllodes TumorCancer and Oncology

All 107 articles in Cancer and Oncology →

At a glance

5,963
PubMed records on this heading
19%
published since 2020
741
review articles
25
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Giant Cell TumorsCancer and Oncology
  • LipomaCancer and Oncology
  • Granular Cell TumorCancer and Oncology
  • Solitary Fibrous TumorsCancer and Oncology
  • OsteosarcomaCancer and Oncology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support