Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 3 complete abstracts (908 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A synthetic progestational hormone with actions similar to those of progesterone and about twice as potent as its racemic or (+-)-isomer (norgestrel). It is used for contraception, control of menstrual disorders, and treatment of endometriosis.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: 18,19-dinorpregn-4-en-20-yn-3-one, 13-ethyl-17-hydroxy-, (17alpha)-(-)-; D-Norgestrel; D Norgestrel; l-Norgestrel; l Norgestrel; Norplant; Microlut; Capronor.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Norgestrel
Related concepts
- Progesterone
- Norgestrel
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 5,166 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Levonorgestrel” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 896 of them (17.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,579 records.
Reviews account for 693 records (13.4%) and meta-analyses for 106. Randomized controlled trials number 709 (13.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,579 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,226 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,465 |
| 2020 onward | 896 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 693 | 13.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 106 | 2.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 709 | 13.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Levonorgestrel"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long acting progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pill for preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain: the PRE-EMPT pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial | 2024 | Randomized controlled trial Design not recorded in structured metadata | 28 | cc by PMID 38749550 · DOI · PMC11094611 |
| Levonorgestrel intrauterine system associated amenorrhea: a systematic review and metaanalysis | 2019 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 27 | cc by PMID 30527945 · DOI · PMC6512461 |
| Insights into the Behavior of Triple-Negative MDA-MB-231 Breast Carcinoma Cells Following the Treatment with 17β-Ethinylestradiol and Levonorgestrel | 2021 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 25 | cc by PMID 34066763 · DOI · PMC8125870 |
Long acting progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pill for preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain: the PRE-EMPT pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of long acting progestogens compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain.
- Closing excerpt
- Trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN97865475.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (337 words)
ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of long acting progestogens compared with the combined oral contraceptive pill in preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain.DesignThe PRE-EMPT (preventing recurrence of endometriosis) pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial.Setting34 UK hospitals.Participants405 women of reproductive age undergoing conservative surgery for endometriosis.InterventionsParticipants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio using a secure internet facility to a long acting progestogen (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system) or the combined oral contraceptive pill.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was pain measured three years after randomisation using the pain domain of the Endometriosis Health Profile 30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes (evaluated at six months, one, two, and three years) included the four core and six modular domains of the EHP-30, and treatment failure (further therapeutic surgery or second line medical treatment).Results405 women were randomised to receive a long acting progestogen (n=205) or combined oral contraceptive pill (n=200). At three years, there was no difference in pain scores between the groups (adjusted mean difference -0.8, 95% confidence interval -5.7 to 4.2, P=0.76), which had improved by around 40% in both groups compared with preoperative values (an average of 24 and 23 points for long acting progestogen and combined oral contraceptive pill groups, respectively). Most of the other domains of the EHP-30 also showed improvement at all time points compared with preoperative scores, without evidence of any differences between groups. Women randomised to a long acting progestogen underwent fewer surgical procedures or second line treatments compared with those randomised to the combined oral contraceptive pill group (73 v 97; hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.00).ConclusionsPostoperative prescription of a long acting progestogen or the combined oral contraceptive pill results in similar levels of improvement in endometriosis related pain at three years, with both groups showing around a 40% improvement compared with preoperative levels. While women can be reassured that both options are effective, the reduced risk of repeat surgery for endometriosis and hysterectomy might make long acting reversible progestogens preferable for some.Trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN97865475.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38749550 · DOI · PMC11094611
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system associated amenorrhea: a systematic review and metaanalysis [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Objective dataAmenorrhea is a polarizing noncontraceptive effect of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system.
- Closing excerpt
- These results provide accurate summary measures to facilitate counselling and informed method selection.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (377 words)
Objective dataAmenorrhea is a polarizing noncontraceptive effect of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Composite amenorrhea prevalence estimates that summarize all clinical data for the first-year after insertion currently are not available. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of existing prevalence estimates by the systematic calculation of amenorrhea measures for a general population of levonorgestrel intrauterine system users and to provide 90-day interval point estimates for the first year of use.StudyWe identified clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, and randomized comparative trials that were published in English between January 1970 and September 2017 through electronic searches of 12 biomedical and scientific literature databases that included MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov.Study appraisal and synthesis methodsWe considered studies that clearly defined amenorrhea per World Health Organization standards (the complete cessation of bleeding for at least 90 days), collected data from written daily bleeding diaries (the gold standard data collection technique on menstrual bleeding changes), and evaluated levonorgestrel intrauterine system devices that released 20 μg of levonorgestrel per day. We assessed study quality using guidelines established by the US Preventive Services Task Force and Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Two reviewers independently conducted all review stages; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Where possible, data were pooled with the use of a random-effects model.ResultsOf 2938 potentially relevant studies, we included 9 in our meta-analysis. We calculated amenorrhea prevalence, which was weighted for inter- and intrastudy variance, for 4 90-day intervals and months 0-12. Our results demonstrated few levonorgestrel intrauterine system users (0.2%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0-0.4) experienced amenorrhea during the first 90 days after insertion; however, prevalence increased to 8.1% (95% confidence interval, 6.6-9.7) on days 91-180. Finally, 18.2% (95% confidence interval, 14.9-21.5) of users experienced amenorrhea for at least 1 90-day interval during the first year. Although interstudy heterogeneity limited reliability of days 181-271 and 272-365 measures, prevalence increased from 13.6% (95% confidence interval, 9.3-18.0) to 20.3% (95% confidence interval, 13.5-27.0), respectively.ConclusionApproximately 20% of levonorgestrel intrauterine system users experience amenorrhea during at least 1 90-day interval by the first year after insertion. This composite estimate is consistent with the product labeling and demonstrates that most users do not experience amenorrhea during the first year. These results provide accurate summary measures to facilitate counselling and informed method selection.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30527945 · DOI · PMC6512461
Insights into the Behavior of Triple-Negative MDA-MB-231 Breast Carcinoma Cells Following the Treatment with 17β-Ethinylestradiol and Levonorgestrel [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Oral contraceptives (OCs) are widely used due to their efficiency in preventing unplanned pregnancies and treating several human illnesses.
- Closing excerpt
- Further studies are necessary to elucidate the hormones' cytotoxic mechanism of action on TNBC cells.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)
Oral contraceptives (OCs) are widely used due to their efficiency in preventing unplanned pregnancies and treating several human illnesses. Despite their medical value, the toxicity of OCs remains a public concern. Previous studies indicate the carcinogenic potential of synthetic sex hormones and their link to the development and progression of hormone-dependent malignancies such as breast cancer. However, little is known about their influence on the evolution of triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC), a malignancy defined by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors. This study reveals that the active ingredients of modern OCs, 17β-Ethinylestradiol, Levonorgestrel, and their combination induce differential effects in MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells. The most relevant behavioral changes occurred after the 24 h treatment with 17β-Ethinylestradiol, summarized as follows: (i) decreased cell viability (64.32% at 10 µM); (ii) cell roundness and loss of confluence; (iii) apoptotic aspect of cell nuclei (fragmentation, membrane blebbing); and (iv) inhibited cell migration, suggesting a potential anticancer effect. Conversely, Levonorgestrel was generally associated with a proliferative activity. The association of the two OCs exerted similar effects as 17β-Ethinylestradiol but was less effective. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the hormones' cytotoxic mechanism of action on TNBC cells.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34066763 · DOI · PMC8125870
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices [4]
- Research article ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices [5]
- Research article Management of Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 228 [6]
- Research article Copper-T intrauterine device and levonorgestrel intrauterine system: biological bases of their mechanism of action [7]
- Research article Oral progestogens vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis [8]
- Research article Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients [9]
References
- Cooper KG, Bhattacharya S, Daniels JP, Horne AW, Clark TJ, Saridogan E, et al.. Long acting progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pill for preventing recurrence of endometriosis related pain: the PRE-EMPT pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial. . 2024. PMID 38749550 · DOI · PMC11094611
- Sergison JE, Maldonado LY, Gao X, Hubacher D. Levonorgestrel intrauterine system associated amenorrhea: a systematic review and metaanalysis. . 2019. PMID 30527945 · DOI · PMC6512461
- Simu S, Marcovici I, Dobrescu A, Malita D, Dehelean CA, Coricovac D, et al.. Insights into the Behavior of Triple-Negative MDA-MB-231 Breast Carcinoma Cells Following the Treatment with 17β-Ethinylestradiol and Levonorgestrel. . 2021. PMID 34066763 · DOI · PMC8125870
- Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID 22996129 · DOI
- . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID 21691183 · DOI
- . Management of Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 228. Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID 34011888 · DOI
- Ortiz ME, Croxatto HB. Copper-T intrauterine device and levonorgestrel intrauterine system: biological bases of their mechanism of action. Contraception. 2007. PMID 17531610 · DOI
- Gallos ID, Shehmar M, Thangaratinam S, Papapostolou TK, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK. Oral progestogens vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID 20934679 · DOI
- Middleton LJ, Champaneria R, Daniels JP, Bhattacharya S, Cooper KG, Hilken NH, et al.. Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients. BMJ. 2010. PMID 20713583 · DOI · PMC2922496
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.