Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cancer and Oncology›Burkitt Lymphoma
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Burkitt Lymphoma

Cancer and Oncology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A form of undifferentiated malignant lymphoma usually found in central Africa, but also reported in other parts of the world.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (936 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A form of undifferentiated malignant lymphoma usually found in central Africa, but also reported in other parts of the world. It is commonly manifested as a large osteolytic lesion in the jaw or as an abdominal mass. B-cell antigens are expressed on the immature cells that make up the tumor in virtually all cases of Burkitt lymphoma. The Epstein-Barr virus (herpesvirus 4, human) has been isolated from Burkitt lymphoma cases in Africa and it is implicated as the causative agent in these cases; however, most non-African cases are EBV-negative.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Burkitt's Lymphoma; Burkitts Lymphoma; Lymphoma, Burkitt's; Lymphoma, Burkitt; Burkitt's Tumor; Burkitts Tumor; Tumor, Burkitt's; Burkitt Tumor.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Lymphoma, B-Cell

Related concepts

  • Lymphoma
  • Herpesvirus
  • Human

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 11,135 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Burkitt Lymphoma” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 926 of them (8.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 6,498 records.

Reviews account for 1,199 records (10.8%) and meta-analyses for 14. Randomized controlled trials number 35 (0.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 6,498 records; 2000-2009: 2,162 records; 2010-2019: 1,549 records; 2020 onward: 926 records6,498through 19992,1622000-20091,5492010-20199262020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19996,498
2000-20092,162
2010-20191,549
2020 onward926
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 10.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.3 percentReviews10.8% (1,199)Meta-analyses0.1% (14)Randomized controlled trials0.3% (35)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 11,135 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,19910.8%
Meta-analyses140.1%
Randomized controlled trials350.3%

Method: PubMed query "Burkitt Lymphoma"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology

Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Next-day manufacture of a novel anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: first-in-human clinical study
Yang J, He J, Zhang X, Li J, Wang Z, Zhang Y, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
97cc by
PMID 35798714 · DOI · PMC9262977
Sequence Variation of Epstein-Barr Virus: Viral Types, Geography, Codon Usage, and Diseases
Correia S, Bridges R, Wegner F, Venturini C, Palser A, Middeldorp JM, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
85cc by
PMID 30111570 · DOI · PMC6206488
Genetic Biomarkers and Their Clinical Implications in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children
Lejman M, Chałupnik A, Chilimoniuk Z, Dobosz M
2022Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
59cc by
PMID 35269896 · DOI · PMC8911213
Targeted panel sequencing for refining B-cell lymphoma diagnosis: a real-life, reference center experience
Böck J, Maurus K, Doll J, Brändlein S, Yang Q, Kurz KS, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41634404 · DOI · PMC13053561

Next-day manufacture of a novel anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: first-in-human clinical study [1]

Research article Yang J, He J, Zhang X, Li J, Wang Z, Zhang Y, et al. · · 2022 · cited 97 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
To improve clinical outcomes and shorten the vein-to-vein time of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, we developed the FasT CAR-T (F-CAR-T) next-day manufacturing platform.
Closing excerpt
Further evaluations in larger clinical studies are needed.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (215 words)

To improve clinical outcomes and shorten the vein-to-vein time of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, we developed the FasT CAR-T (F-CAR-T) next-day manufacturing platform. We report the preclinical and first-in-human clinical studies evaluating the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of CD19 F-CAR-T in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). CD19 F-CAR-T cells demonstrated excellent proliferation with a younger cellular phenotype, less exhaustion, and more effective tumor elimination compared to conventional CAR-T cells in the preclinical study. In our phase I study (NCT03825718), F-CAR-T cells were successfully manufactured and infused in all of the 25 enrolled pediatric and adult patients with B-ALL. CD19 F-CAR-T safety profile was manageable with 24% grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 28% grade 3/4 neurotoxicity occurring predominantly in pediatric patients. On day 14, 23/25 patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR), and 20 subsequently underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) within 3 months post F-CAR-T therapy. Fifteen of 20 patients were disease-free with a median remission duration of 734 days. One patient relapsed and 4/20 died from transplant-related mortality. Of the three patients who did not undergo allo-HSCT, two remained in CR until 10 months post-F-CAR-T. Our data indicate that anti-CD19 FasT CAR-T shows promising early efficacy for B-ALL. Further evaluations in larger clinical studies are needed.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35798714 · DOI · PMC9262977

Sequence Variation of Epstein-Barr Virus: Viral Types, Geography, Codon Usage, and Diseases [2]

Research article Correia S, Bridges R, Wegner F, Venturini C, Palser A, Middeldorp JM, et al. · · 2018 · cited 85 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
One hundred thirty-eight new Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome sequences have been determined.
Closing excerpt
Some specific EBV genome alterations that appear to be significant in EBV-associated cancers are already known, and current efforts to make an EBV vaccine and antiviral drugs should also take account of sequence differences in the proteins used as targets.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (291 words)

One hundred thirty-eight new Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome sequences have been determined. One hundred twenty-five of these and 116 from previous reports were combined to produce a multiple-sequence alignment of 241 EBV genomes, which we have used to analyze variation within the viral genome. The type 1/type 2 classification of EBV remains the major form of variation and is defined mostly by EBNA2 and EBNA3, but the type 2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the EBNA3 locus extend into the adjacent gp350 and gp42 genes, whose products mediate infection of B cells by EBV. A small insertion within the BART microRNA region of the genome was present in 21 EBV strains. EBV from saliva of U.S. patients with chronic active EBV infection aligned with the wild-type EBV genome with no evidence of WZhet rearrangements. The V3 polymorphism in the Zp promoter for BZLF1 was found to be frequent in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases from both Hong Kong and Indonesia. Codon usage was found to differ between latent and lytic cycle EBV genes, and the main forms of variation of the EBNA1 protein have been identified.IMPORTANCE Epstein-Barr virus causes most cases of infectious mononucleosis and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. It contributes to several types of cancer, including Hodgkin's lymphoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and gastric carcinoma. EBV genome variation is important because some of the diseases associated with EBV have very different incidences in different populations and geographic regions, and differences in the EBV genome might contribute to these diseases. Some specific EBV genome alterations that appear to be significant in EBV-associated cancers are already known, and current efforts to make an EBV vaccine and antiviral drugs should also take account of sequence differences in the proteins used as targets.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30111570 · DOI · PMC6206488

Genetic Biomarkers and Their Clinical Implications in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children [3]

Review article Lejman M, Chałupnik A, Chilimoniuk Z, Dobosz M · · 2022 · cited 59 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies characterized by abnormal proliferation of immature lymphoid cells.
Closing excerpt
In this article, we provide an overview of the latest information on genomic alterations found in childhood ALL and discuss their impact on patients' clinical outcomes.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (208 words)

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies characterized by abnormal proliferation of immature lymphoid cells. It is the most commonly diagnosed childhood cancer with an almost 80% cure rate. Despite favorable survival rates in the pediatric population, a significant number of patients develop resistance to therapy, resulting in poor prognosis. ALL is a heterogeneous disease at the genetic level, but the intensive development of sequencing in the last decade has made it possible to broaden the study of genomic changes. New technologies allow us to detect molecular changes such as point mutations or to characterize epigenetic or proteomic profiles. This process made it possible to identify new subtypes of this disease characterized by constellations of genetic alterations, including chromosome changes, sequence mutations, and DNA copy number alterations. These genetic abnormalities are used as diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers that play an important role in earlier disease detection, more accurate risk stratification, and treatment. Identification of new ALL biomarkers, and thus a greater understanding of their molecular basis, will lead to better monitoring of the course of the disease. In this article, we provide an overview of the latest information on genomic alterations found in childhood ALL and discuss their impact on patients' clinical outcomes.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35269896 · DOI · PMC8911213

Targeted panel sequencing for refining B-cell lymphoma diagnosis: a real-life, reference center experience [4]

Research article Böck J, Maurus K, Doll J, Brändlein S, Yang Q, Kurz KS, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The reliable diagnosis of one of the many types of B-cell lymphoma (BCL) currently requires an integrated approach comprising morphological expertise, immunophenotyping, and inclusion of clinical data, but may also incorporate flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and clonality analysis.
Closing excerpt
It has been particularly useful in providing additional arguments to clarify the clinically important DD between BL and DLBCL in challenging cases.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (222 words)

The reliable diagnosis of one of the many types of B-cell lymphoma (BCL) currently requires an integrated approach comprising morphological expertise, immunophenotyping, and inclusion of clinical data, but may also incorporate flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and clonality analysis. In recent years, several studies have elucidated the mutational landscape of BCL, which may also serve as a complementary diagnostic tool. We have developed a custom next-generation sequencing panel for application in the routine diagnosis of BCL based on available literature and our diagnostic questions. We applied this panel to 160 cases of BCL or with this differential diagnosis (DD) in our routine workflow to gain further diagnostic support or on clinical request. Evaluable results were obtained in all but two cases of the entire cohort. Diagnostically informative molecular genetic profiles were identified in 72% of the evaluable cases. Focusing on 21 challenging cases with the DD of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) and the germinal center B-cell-like subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we detected at least one mutation in all cases, and in 18/21 (86%) cases, panel sequencing provided significant decision guidance. In conclusion, although morphology and immunohistochemistry remain the backbone of diagnosis, panel sequencing provided substantial diagnostic assistance in many cases. It has been particularly useful in providing additional arguments to clarify the clinically important DD between BL and DLBCL in challenging cases.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41634404 · DOI · PMC13053561

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Burkitt's lymphoma [5]
    Molyneux EM, Rochford R, Griffin B, Newton R, Jackson G, Menon G, et al. · Lancet · 2012 · cited 417 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Germinal centres and B cell lymphomagenesis [6]
    Basso K, Dalla-Favera R · Nat Rev Immunol · 2015 · cited 411 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Spectrum of Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases [7]
    Kutok JL, Wang F · Annu Rev Pathol · 2006 · cited 355 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Adult Burkitt leukemia and lymphoma [8]
    Blum KA, Lozanski G, Byrd JC · Blood · 2004 · cited 345 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Molecular biology of Burkitt's lymphoma [9]
    Hecht JL, Aster JC · J Clin Oncol · 2000 · cited 257 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Burkitt's lymphoma: clinicopathologic features and differential diagnosis [10]
    Ferry JA · Oncologist · 2006 · cited 205 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Yang J, He J, Zhang X, Li J, Wang Z, Zhang Y, et al.. Next-day manufacture of a novel anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: first-in-human clinical study. . 2022. PMID 35798714 · DOI · PMC9262977
  2. Correia S, Bridges R, Wegner F, Venturini C, Palser A, Middeldorp JM, et al.. Sequence Variation of Epstein-Barr Virus: Viral Types, Geography, Codon Usage, and Diseases. . 2018. PMID 30111570 · DOI · PMC6206488
  3. Lejman M, Chałupnik A, Chilimoniuk Z, Dobosz M. Genetic Biomarkers and Their Clinical Implications in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children. . 2022. PMID 35269896 · DOI · PMC8911213
  4. Böck J, Maurus K, Doll J, Brändlein S, Yang Q, Kurz KS, et al.. Targeted panel sequencing for refining B-cell lymphoma diagnosis: a real-life, reference center experience. . 2026. PMID 41634404 · DOI · PMC13053561
  5. Molyneux EM, Rochford R, Griffin B, Newton R, Jackson G, Menon G, et al.. Burkitt's lymphoma. Lancet. 2012. PMID 22333947 · DOI
  6. Basso K, Dalla-Favera R. Germinal centres and B cell lymphomagenesis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015. PMID 25712152 · DOI
  7. Kutok JL, Wang F. Spectrum of Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases. Annu Rev Pathol. 2006. PMID 18039120 · DOI
  8. Blum KA, Lozanski G, Byrd JC. Adult Burkitt leukemia and lymphoma. Blood. 2004. PMID 15265787 · DOI
  9. Hecht JL, Aster JC. Molecular biology of Burkitt's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000. PMID 11054444 · DOI
  10. Ferry JA. Burkitt's lymphoma: clinicopathologic features and differential diagnosis. Oncologist. 2006. PMID 16614233 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Infectious MononucleosisInfectious Diseases
  • Sezary SyndromeCancer and Oncology
  • Hodgkin DiseaseCancer and Oncology
  • Mycosis FungoidesCancer and Oncology
  • Tumor Lysis SyndromeImmunology
  • Papillomavirus InfectionsInfectious Diseases

All 107 articles in Cancer and Oncology →

At a glance

11,135
PubMed records on this heading
8%
published since 2020
1,199
review articles
35
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Infectious MononucleosisInfectious Diseases
  • Sezary SyndromeCancer and Oncology
  • Hodgkin DiseaseCancer and Oncology
  • Mycosis FungoidesCancer and Oncology
  • Tumor Lysis SyndromeImmunology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support