Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cancer and Oncology›Hydatidiform Mole
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Hydatidiform Mole

Cancer and Oncology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Trophoblastic hyperplasia associated with normal gestation, or molar pregnancy.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (827 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Trophoblastic hyperplasia associated with normal gestation, or molar pregnancy. It is characterized by the swelling of the chorionic villi and elevated human chorionic gonadotropin. Hydatidiform moles or molar pregnancy may be categorized as complete or partial based on their gross morphology, histopathology, and karyotype.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Hydatidiform Moles; Mole, Hydatidiform; Moles, Hydatidiform; Hydatid Mole; Hydatid Moles; Mole, Hydatid; Moles, Hydatid; Pregnancy, Molar.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
Narrower topics
Hydatidiform Mole, Invasive

Related concepts

  • Chorionic Villi
  • Chorionic Gonadotropin

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,432 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Hydatidiform Mole” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 422 of them (7.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 3,565 records.

Reviews account for 476 records (8.8%) and meta-analyses for 18. Randomized controlled trials number 6 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 3,565 records; 2000-2009: 754 records; 2010-2019: 691 records; 2020 onward: 422 records3,565through 19997542000-20096912010-20194222020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19993,565
2000-2009754
2010-2019691
2020 onward422
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.1 percentReviews8.8% (476)Meta-analyses0.3% (18)Randomized controlled trials0.1% (6)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,432 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4768.8%
Meta-analyses180.3%
Randomized controlled trials60.1%

Method: PubMed query "Hydatidiform Mole"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology

Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Triploidy--Observations in 154 Diandric Cases
Scholz NB, Bolund L, Nyegaard M, Faaborg L, Jørgensen MW, Lund H, et al.
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
21cc by
PMID 26562155 · DOI · PMC4642992
Dysregulation of Placental Functions and Immune Pathways in Complete Hydatidiform Moles
King JR, Wilson ML, Hetey S, Kiraly P, Matsuo K, Castaneda AV, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 31658584 · DOI · PMC6829352
NLRP7, Involved in Hydatidiform Molar Pregnancy (HYDM1), Interacts with the Transcriptional Repressor ZBTB16
Singer H, Biswas A, Nuesgen N, Oldenburg J, El-Maarri O
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
16cc by
PMID 26121690 · DOI · PMC4488268
Hydatidiform Mole with Coexisting Normal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
Zorzato PC, Ricci A, Bosco M, Galli L, Luka L, Porcari I, et al.
2025Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41155768 · DOI · PMC12566089

Triploidy--Observations in 154 Diandric Cases [1]

Research article Scholz NB, Bolund L, Nyegaard M, Faaborg L, Jørgensen MW, Lund H, et al. · · 2015 · cited 21 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Hydatidiform moles (HMs) are abnormal human pregnancies with vesicular chorionic villi, imposing two clinical challenges; miscarriage and a risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).
Closing excerpt
Although single cases of GTN after a triploid HM have been reported, the results of this study combined with data from previous prospective studies estimate the risk of GTN after a triploid mole to 0% (95% CI: 0-1,4%).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (211 words)

Hydatidiform moles (HMs) are abnormal human pregnancies with vesicular chorionic villi, imposing two clinical challenges; miscarriage and a risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). The parental type of most HMs are either diandric diploid (PP) or diandric triploid (PPM). We consecutively collected 154 triploid or near-triploid samples from conceptuses with vesicular chorionic villi. We used analysis of DNA markers and/or methylation sensitive-MLPA and collected data from registries and patients records. We performed whole genome SNP analysis of one case of twinning (PP+PM).In all 154 triploids or near-triploids we found two different paternal contributions to the genome (P1P2M). The ratios between the sex chromosomal constitutions XXX, XXY, and XYY were 5.7: 6.9: 1.0. No cases of GTN were observed. Our results corroborate that all triploid human conceptuses with vesicular chorionic villi have the parental type P1P2M. The sex chromosomal ratios suggest approximately equal frequencies of meiosis I and meiosis II errors with selection against the XYY conceptuses or a combination of dispermy, non-disjunction in meiosis I and meiosis II and selection against XYY conceptuses. Although single cases of GTN after a triploid HM have been reported, the results of this study combined with data from previous prospective studies estimate the risk of GTN after a triploid mole to 0% (95% CI: 0-1,4%).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26562155 · DOI · PMC4642992

Dysregulation of Placental Functions and Immune Pathways in Complete Hydatidiform Moles [2]

Research article King JR, Wilson ML, Hetey S, Kiraly P, Matsuo K, Castaneda AV, et al. · · 2019 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Gene expression studies of molar pregnancy have been limited to a small number of candidate loci.
Closing excerpt
In conclusion, placental functions were down-regulated, imprinted gene expression was altered, and immune pathways were activated, indicating complex dysregulation of placental developmental and immune processes in CHMs.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (216 words)

Gene expression studies of molar pregnancy have been limited to a small number of candidate loci. We analyzed high-dimensional RNA and protein data to characterize molecular features of complete hydatidiform moles (CHMs) and corresponding pathologic pathways. CHMs and first trimester placentas were collected, histopathologically examined, then flash-frozen or paraffin-embedded. Frozen CHMs and control placentas were subjected to RNA-Seq, with resulting data and published placental RNA-Seq data subjected to bioinformatics analyses. Paraffin-embedded tissues from CHMs and control placentas were used for tissue microarray (TMA) construction, immunohistochemistry, and immunoscoring for galectin-14. Of the 14,022 protein-coding genes expressed in all samples, 3,729 were differentially expressed (DE) in CHMs, of which 72% were up-regulated. DE genes were enriched in placenta-specific genes (OR = 1.88, p = 0.0001), of which 79% were down-regulated, imprinted genes (OR = 2.38, p = 1.54 × 10-6), and immune genes (OR = 1.82, p = 7.34 × 10-18), of which 73% were up-regulated. DNA methylation-related enzymes and histone demethylases were dysregulated. "Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction" was the most impacted of 38 dysregulated pathways, among which 17 were immune-related pathways. TMA-based immunoscoring validated the lower expression of galectin-14 in CHM. In conclusion, placental functions were down-regulated, imprinted gene expression was altered, and immune pathways were activated, indicating complex dysregulation of placental developmental and immune processes in CHMs.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31658584 · DOI · PMC6829352

NLRP7, Involved in Hydatidiform Molar Pregnancy (HYDM1), Interacts with the Transcriptional Repressor ZBTB16 [3]

Research article Singer H, Biswas A, Nuesgen N, Oldenburg J, El-Maarri O · · 2015 · cited 16 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Mutations in the maternal effect gene NLRP7 cause biparental hydatidiform mole (HYDM1).
Closing excerpt
However, a clear effect of harvesting ZBTB16 to the cytoplasm when the NLRP7 protein is overexpressed may be linked to the pathology of the molar pregnancy disease.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)

Mutations in the maternal effect gene NLRP7 cause biparental hydatidiform mole (HYDM1). HYDM1 is characterized by abnormal growth of placenta and lack of proper embryonic development. The molar tissues are characterized by abnormal methylation patterns at differentially methylated regions (DMRs) of imprinted genes. It is not known whether this occurs before or after fertilization, but the high specificity of this defect to the maternal allele indicates a possible maternal germ line-specific effect. To better understand the unknown molecular mechanism leading to HYDM1, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen against an ovarian library using NLRP7 as bait. We identified the transcriptional repressor ZBTB16 as an interacting protein of NLRP7 and verified this interaction in mammalian cells by immunoprecipitation and confocal microscopy. Native protein analysis detected NLRP7 and ZBTB16 in a 480kD protein complex and both proteins co-localize in the cytoplasm in juxtanuclear aggregates. HYDM1-causing mutations in NLRP7 did not show altered patterns of interaction with ZBTB16. Hence, the biological significance of the NLRP7-ZBTB16 interaction remains to be revealed. However, a clear effect of harvesting ZBTB16 to the cytoplasm when the NLRP7 protein is overexpressed may be linked to the pathology of the molar pregnancy disease.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26121690 · DOI · PMC4488268

Hydatidiform Mole with Coexisting Normal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis [4]

Meta-analysis Zorzato PC, Ricci A, Bosco M, Galli L, Luka L, Porcari I, et al. · · 2025 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate obstetric, neonatal, and oncologic outcomes of pregnancies complicated by a hydatidiform mole coexisting with a live fetus (HMCF) carried beyond viability, and to assess the impact of delivery mode on outcomes.
Closing excerpt
Vaginal delivery can be considered when no standard contraindications exist.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (206 words)

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate obstetric, neonatal, and oncologic outcomes of pregnancies complicated by a hydatidiform mole coexisting with a live fetus (HMCF) carried beyond viability, and to assess the impact of delivery mode on outcomes. Materials and Methods: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis included HMCF cases progressing beyond 23 weeks. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes, delivery patterns, and oncologic risks were analyzed. Results: Among 118 pregnancies complicated by HMFC (124 newborns), most were complete moles (87%). Median delivery occurred at 31.6 weeks, with over half before 32 weeks. Common complications included vaginal bleeding (59%), preeclampsia (30%), and hyperthyroidism (18%). Cesarean delivery was performed in 79% of cases, often for mole-related factors, but was not associated with reduced maternal or oncologic risk. Neonatal deaths occurred exclusively in infants delivered ≤32 weeks, highlighting extreme prematurity as the key determinant of survival. Severe preeclampsia was strongly linked to earlier delivery. Conclusions: With close monitoring, continuation of HMCF pregnancies is possible. Neonatal mortality is mainly driven by prematurity, which appears to be an indirect consequence of HMFC through the development of mola-associated complications. Cesarean section does not appear to improve maternal and oncologic outcomes. Vaginal delivery can be considered when no standard contraindications exist.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41155768 · DOI · PMC12566089

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Gestational trophoblastic disease: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [5]
    Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ, Fisher RA, Golfier F, Massuger L, Sessa C, et al. · Ann Oncol · 2013 · cited 222 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Clinical practice. Molar pregnancy [6]
    Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP · N Engl J Med · 2009 · cited 132 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Advances in the epidemiology of gestational trophoblastic disease [7]
    Palmer JR · J Reprod Med · 1994 · cited 92 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Hydatidiform Moles: Genetic Basis and Precision Diagnosis [8]
    Hui P, Buza N, Murphy KM, Ronnett BM · Annu Rev Pathol · 2017 · cited 91 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Gestational trophoblastic disease [9]
    Soper JT · Obstet Gynecol · 2006 · cited 90 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Partial hydatidiform mole: clinicopathological features, differential diagnosis, ploidy and molecular studies, and gold standards for diagnosis [10]
    Genest DR · Int J Gynecol Pathol · 2001 · cited 73 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Scholz NB, Bolund L, Nyegaard M, Faaborg L, Jørgensen MW, Lund H, et al.. Triploidy--Observations in 154 Diandric Cases. . 2015. PMID 26562155 · DOI · PMC4642992
  2. King JR, Wilson ML, Hetey S, Kiraly P, Matsuo K, Castaneda AV, et al.. Dysregulation of Placental Functions and Immune Pathways in Complete Hydatidiform Moles. . 2019. PMID 31658584 · DOI · PMC6829352
  3. Singer H, Biswas A, Nuesgen N, Oldenburg J, El-Maarri O. NLRP7, Involved in Hydatidiform Molar Pregnancy (HYDM1), Interacts with the Transcriptional Repressor ZBTB16. . 2015. PMID 26121690 · DOI · PMC4488268
  4. Zorzato PC, Ricci A, Bosco M, Galli L, Luka L, Porcari I, et al.. Hydatidiform Mole with Coexisting Normal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. . 2025. PMID 41155768 · DOI · PMC12566089
  5. Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ, Fisher RA, Golfier F, Massuger L, Sessa C, et al.. Gestational trophoblastic disease: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013. PMID 23999759 · DOI
  6. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP. Clinical practice. Molar pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID 19369669 · DOI
  7. Palmer JR. Advances in the epidemiology of gestational trophoblastic disease. J Reprod Med. 1994. PMID 8035370
  8. Hui P, Buza N, Murphy KM, Ronnett BM. Hydatidiform Moles: Genetic Basis and Precision Diagnosis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2017. PMID 28135560 · DOI
  9. Soper JT. Gestational trophoblastic disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID 16816073 · DOI
  10. Genest DR. Partial hydatidiform mole: clinicopathological features, differential diagnosis, ploidy and molecular studies, and gold standards for diagnosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2001. PMID 11603213 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ChoriocarcinomaCancer and Oncology
  • Gestational Trophoblastic DiseaseCancer and Oncology
  • Carcinoid TumorCancer and Oncology
  • ChordomaCancer and Oncology
  • CraniopharyngiomaCancer and Oncology
  • Cutaneous Malignant MelanomaCancer and Oncology

All 107 articles in Cancer and Oncology →

At a glance

5,432
PubMed records on this heading
8%
published since 2020
476
review articles
6
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ChoriocarcinomaCancer and Oncology
  • Gestational Trophoblastic DiseaseCancer and Oncology
  • Carcinoid TumorCancer and Oncology
  • ChordomaCancer and Oncology
  • CraniopharyngiomaCancer and Oncology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support