Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (945 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A benign pituitary-region neoplasm that originates from Rathke's pouch. The two major histologic and clinical subtypes are adamantinous (or classical) craniopharyngioma and papillary craniopharyngioma. The adamantinous form presents in children and adolescents as an expanding cystic lesion in the pituitary region. The cystic cavity is filled with a black viscous substance and histologically the tumor is composed of adamantinomatous epithelium and areas of calcification and necrosis. Papillary craniopharyngiomas occur in adults, and histologically feature a squamous epithelium with papillations. (From Joynt, Clinical Neurology, 1998, Ch14, p50)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Craniopharyngiomas; Neoplasm, Rathke Cleft; Neoplasm, Rathke's Cleft; Neoplasm, Rathkes Cleft; Rathke Cleft Neoplasm; Rathke Pouch Tumor; Tumor, Rathke Pouch; Rathke's Cleft Neoplasm.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Neuroectodermal Tumors
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 5,397 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Craniopharyngioma” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 899 of them (16.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,509 records.
Reviews account for 728 records (13.5%) and meta-analyses for 42. Randomized controlled trials number 13 (0.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,509 |
| 2000-2009 | 827 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,162 |
| 2020 onward | 899 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 728 | 13.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 42 | 0.8% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 13 | 0.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Craniopharyngioma"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology
Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galactose-modified duocarmycin prodrugs as senolytics | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 145 | cc by PMID 32175667 · DOI · PMC7189988 |
| Adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas are characterized by distinct epigenomic as well as mutational and transcriptomic profiles | 2016 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 135 | cc by PMID 26927026 · DOI · PMC4770705 |
| Identification of targets for rational pharmacological therapy in childhood craniopharyngioma | 2015 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 84 | cc by PMID 25990246 · DOI · PMC4438576 |
| Evaluating temozolomide for pediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas using microspheroid-based drug screening | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 41760838 · DOI · PMC12948842 |
Galactose-modified duocarmycin prodrugs as senolytics [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Senescence is a stable growth arrest that impairs the replication of damaged, old or preneoplastic cells, therefore contributing to tissue homeostasis.
- Closing excerpt
- In summary, the above results make a case for testing the potential of galactose-modified duocarmycin prodrugs to treat senescence-related pathologies.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (214 words)
Senescence is a stable growth arrest that impairs the replication of damaged, old or preneoplastic cells, therefore contributing to tissue homeostasis. Senescent cells accumulate during ageing and are associated with cancer, fibrosis and many age-related pathologies. Recent evidence suggests that the selective elimination of senescent cells can be effective on the treatment of many of these senescence-associated diseases. A universal characteristic of senescent cells is that they display elevated activity of the lysosomal β-galactosidase, and this has been exploited as a marker for senescence (senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity). Consequently, we hypothesized that galactose-modified cytotoxic prodrugs will be preferentially processed by senescent cells, resulting in their selective killing. Here, we show that different galactose-modified duocarmycin (GMD) derivatives preferentially kill senescent cells. GMD prodrugs induce selective apoptosis of senescent cells in a lysosomal β-galactosidase (GLB1)-dependent manner. GMD prodrugs can eliminate a broad range of senescent cells in culture, and treatment with a GMD prodrug enhances the elimination of bystander senescent cells that accumulate upon whole-body irradiation treatment of mice. Moreover, taking advantage of a mouse model of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP), we show that treatment with a GMD prodrug selectively reduced the number of β-catenin-positive preneoplastic senescent cells. In summary, the above results make a case for testing the potential of galactose-modified duocarmycin prodrugs to treat senescence-related pathologies.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32175667 · DOI · PMC7189988
Adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas are characterized by distinct epigenomic as well as mutational and transcriptomic profiles [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionCraniopharyngiomas (CP) are rare epithelial tumors of the sellar region.
- Closing excerpt
- Detection of tumor-specific signaling pathway activation enables the possibility of target-oriented intervention.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (281 words)
IntroductionCraniopharyngiomas (CP) are rare epithelial tumors of the sellar region. Two subtypes, adamantinomatous (adaCP) and papillary CP (papCP), were previously identified based on histomorphological and epidemiological aspects. Recent data indicates that both variants are defined by specific genetic alterations, and influenced by distinct molecular pathways and particular origins. The fact that CP is an uncommon tumor entity renders studies on large cohorts difficult and exceptional. In order to achieve further insights distinguishing CP variants, we conducted whole genome methylation (450 k array) and microarray-based gene expression studies in addition to CTNNB1 and BRAF mutation analysis using a comprehensive cohort of 80 adaCP and 35 papCP.ResultsBRAF V600E mutations were solely found in the papCP subgroup and were not detectable in adaCP samples. In contrast, CTNNB1 mutations were exclusively detected in adaCP. The methylome fingerprints assigned DNA specimens to entity-specific groups (papCP (n = 18); adaCP (n = 25)) matching perfectly with histology-based diagnosis, suggesting that they represent truly distinct biological entities. However, we were not able to detect within the adaCP group (including 11 pediatric and 14 adult cases) a significant difference in methylation signature by age. Integrative comparison of the papCP with the adaCP group based on differential gene expression and methylation revealed a distinct upregulation of Wnt- and SHH signaling pathway genes in adaCP.ConclusionsAdaCP and papCP thus represent distinct tumor subtypes that harbor mutually exclusive gene mutations and methylation patterns, further reflected in differences in gene expression. This study demonstrates that DNA methylation analyses are an additional method to classify CP into subtypes, and implicates a role of epigenetic mechanisms in the genesis of the respective CP variants. Detection of tumor-specific signaling pathway activation enables the possibility of target-oriented intervention.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26927026 · DOI · PMC4770705
Identification of targets for rational pharmacological therapy in childhood craniopharyngioma [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionPediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is a histologically benign but clinically aggressive brain tumor that arises from the sellar/suprasellar region.
- Closing excerpt
- Development of mouse and cell culture models for ACP will further enable the translation of these targets from the lab to the clinic, potentially ushering in a new era in the treatment of ACP.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)
IntroductionPediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is a histologically benign but clinically aggressive brain tumor that arises from the sellar/suprasellar region. Despite a high survival rate with current surgical and radiation therapy (75-95 % at 10 years), ACP is associated with debilitating visual, endocrine, neurocognitive and psychological morbidity, resulting in excheptionally poor quality of life for survivors. Identification of an effective pharmacological therapy could drastically decrease morbidity and improve long term outcomes for children with ACP.ResultsUsing mRNA microarray gene expression analysis of 15 ACP patient samples, we have found several pharmaceutical targets that are significantly and consistently overexpressed in our panel of ACP relative to other pediatric brain tumors, pituitary tumors, normal pituitary and normal brain tissue. Among the most highly expressed are several targets of the kinase inhibitor dasatinib - LCK, EPHA2 and SRC; EGFR pathway targets - AREG, EGFR and ERBB3; and other potentially actionable cancer targets - SHH, MMP9 and MMP12. We confirm by western blot that a subset of these targets is highly expressed in ACP primary tumor samples.ConclusionsWe report here the first published transcriptome for ACP and the identification of targets for rational therapy. Experimental drugs targeting each of these gene products are currently being tested clinically and pre-clinically for the treatment of other tumor types. This study provides a rationale for further pre-clinical and clinical studies of novel pharmacological treatments for ACP. Development of mouse and cell culture models for ACP will further enable the translation of these targets from the lab to the clinic, potentially ushering in a new era in the treatment of ACP.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25990246 · DOI · PMC4438576
Evaluating temozolomide for pediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas using microspheroid-based drug screening [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PurposePediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is the most common tumor of the diencephalic-pituitary axis in children.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionThese findings suggest that temozolomide may represent a promising therapeutic option for controlling ACP.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (190 words)
PurposePediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) is the most common tumor of the diencephalic-pituitary axis in children. Although histologically benign, pediatric ACP is frequently associated with substantial endocrine dysfunction and neurological complications. The gold-standard treatment is complete surgical resection; however, because of the tumor's location, total removal is often not feasible. Consequently, several authors recommend radiotherapy as an adjuvant option. Nevertheless, partial resections are frequently followed by recurrence, and repeated surgical interventions increase morbidity and impair quality of life. Thus, adjuvant therapeutic strategies capable of controlling this tumor should be encouraged.MethodsWe analyzed seven fresh tumor specimens ACP from patients ResultsBased on these findings, we initiated treatment in a 14-year-old patient with recurrent ACP who had previously undergone multiple surgical procedures and radiotherapy. The tumor involved the left cavernous sinus and extended into the sphenoid sinus. Clinically, the patient was amaurotic and presented with panhypopituitarism. The patient received temozolomide (200 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days in 28-day cycles). After completing 12 cycles of chemotherapy, there was a notable regression of the lesion, with approximately 50% reduction in total tumor volume.ConclusionThese findings suggest that temozolomide may represent a promising therapeutic option for controlling ACP.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41760838 · DOI · PMC12948842
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors [5]
- Research article Craniopharyngioma [6]
- Research article Craniopharyngiomas [7]
- Research article Craniopharyngioma [8]
- Research article Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas [9]
- Research article Aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas [10]
References
- Guerrero A, Guiho R, Herranz N, Uren A, Withers DJ, Martínez-Barbera JP, et al.. Galactose-modified duocarmycin prodrugs as senolytics. . 2020. PMID 32175667 · DOI · PMC7189988
- Hölsken A, Sill M, Merkle J, Schweizer L, Buchfelder M, Flitsch J, et al.. Adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas are characterized by distinct epigenomic as well as mutational and transcriptomic profiles. . 2016. PMID 26927026 · DOI · PMC4770705
- Gump JM, Donson AM, Birks DK, Amani VM, Rao KK, Griesinger AM, et al.. Identification of targets for rational pharmacological therapy in childhood craniopharyngioma. . 2015. PMID 25990246 · DOI · PMC4438576
- Cavalheiro S, Pavon LF, de Farias CB, da Silva NS, Nascimento FB, Sibov TT, et al.. Evaluating temozolomide for pediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas using microspheroid-based drug screening. . 2026. PMID 41760838 · DOI · PMC12948842
- Asa SL, Mete O, Perry A, Osamura RY. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors. Endocr Pathol. 2022. PMID 35291028 · DOI
- Müller HL, Merchant TE, Warmuth-Metz M, Martinez-Barbera JP, Puget S. Craniopharyngioma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019. PMID 31699993 · DOI
- Karavitaki N, Cudlip S, Adams CB, Wass JA. Craniopharyngiomas. Endocr Rev. 2006. PMID 16543382 · DOI
- Müller HL. Craniopharyngioma. Endocr Rev. 2014. PMID 24467716 · DOI
- Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg. 2012. PMID 22501020 · DOI
- Raverot G, Ilie MD, Lasolle H, Amodru V, Trouillas J, Castinetti F, et al.. Aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021. PMID 34493834 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.