Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Fetal Heart
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Fetal Heart

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

The heart of the fetus of any viviparous animal.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,230 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The heart of the fetus of any viviparous animal. It refers to the heart in the postembryonic period and is differentiated from the embryonic heart (heart/embryology) only on the basis of time.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Fetal Hearts; Heart, Fetal; Hearts, Fetal.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Heart; Fetus
Narrower topics
Ductus Arteriosus; Truncus Arteriosus; Endocardial Cushions

Related concepts

  • Heart

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 13,166 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Fetal Heart” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,235 of them (9.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 8,510 records.

Reviews account for 1,003 records (7.6%) and meta-analyses for 26. Randomized controlled trials number 88 (0.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 8,510 records; 2000-2009: 1,487 records; 2010-2019: 1,934 records; 2020 onward: 1,235 records8,510through 19991,4872000-20091,9342010-20191,2352020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19998,510
2000-20091,487
2010-20191,934
2020 onward1,235
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.7 percentReviews7.6% (1,003)Meta-analyses0.2% (26)Randomized controlled trials0.7% (88)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 13,166 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,0037.6%
Meta-analyses260.2%
Randomized controlled trials880.7%

Method: PubMed query "Fetal Heart"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
First-trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis
Karim JN, Bradburn E, Roberts N, Papageorghiou AT, ACCEPTS study
2022Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
112cc by
PMID 34369613 · DOI · PMC9305869
Fetal hemodynamics and cardiac streaming assessed by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in fetal sheep
Schrauben EM, Schrauben EM, Saini BS, Darby JRT, Soo JY, Lock MC, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
54cc by
PMID 30661506 · DOI · PMC6340188
Myoarchitectural disarray of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy begins pre-birth
Garcia-Canadilla P, Cook AC, Mohun TJ, Oji O, Schlossarek S, Carrier L, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
47cc by
PMID 31347708 · DOI · PMC6794206
Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: History, Current Status, and Future Directions
Suchá D, Bohte AE, van Ooij P, Leiner T, Schrauben EM, Grotenhuis HB
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 39578988 · DOI · PMC12063768

First-trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis [1]

Meta-analysis Karim JN, Bradburn E, Roberts N, Papageorghiou AT, ACCEPTS study · · 2022 · cited 112 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound at 11-14 weeks' gestation in the detection of fetal cardiac abnormalities and to evaluate factors that impact the detection rate.
Closing excerpt
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (547 words)

ObjectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound at 11-14 weeks' gestation in the detection of fetal cardiac abnormalities and to evaluate factors that impact the detection rate.MethodsThis was a systematic review of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of fetal cardiac anomalies at 11-14 weeks' gestation, performed by two independent reviewers. An electronic search of four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and The Cochrane Library) was conducted for studies published between January 1998 and July 2020. Prospective and retrospective studies evaluating pregnancies at any prior level of risk and in any healthcare setting were eligible for inclusion. The reference standard used was the detection of a cardiac abnormality on postnatal or postmortem examination. Data were extracted from the included studies to populate 2 × 2 tables. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model in order to determine the performance of first-trimester ultrasound in the detection of major cardiac abnormalities overall and of individual types of cardiac abnormality. Data were analyzed separately for high-risk and non-high-risk populations. Preplanned secondary analyses were conducted in order to assess factors that may impact screening performance, including the imaging protocol used for cardiac assessment (including the use of color-flow Doppler), ultrasound modality, year of publication and the index of sonographer suspicion at the time of the scan. Risk of bias and quality assessment were undertaken for all included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.ResultsThe electronic search yielded 4108 citations. Following review of titles and abstracts, 223 publications underwent full-text review, of which 63 studies, reporting on 328 262 fetuses, were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In the non-high-risk population (45 studies, 306 872 fetuses), 1445 major cardiac anomalies were identified (prevalence, 0.41% (95% CI, 0.39-0.43%)). Of these, 767 were detected on first-trimester ultrasound examination of the heart and 678 were not detected. First-trimester ultrasound had a pooled sensitivity of 55.80% (95% CI, 45.87-65.50%), specificity of 99.98% (95% CI, 99.97-99.99%) and positive predictive value of 94.85% (95% CI, 91.63-97.32%) in the non-high-risk population. The cases diagnosed in the first trimester represented 63.67% (95% CI, 54.35-72.49%) of all antenatally diagnosed major cardiac abnormalities in the non-high-risk population. In the high-risk population (18 studies, 21 390 fetuses), 480 major cardiac anomalies were identified (prevalence, 1.36% (95% CI, 1.20-1.52%)). Of these, 338 were detected on first-trimester ultrasound examination and 142 were not detected. First-trimester ultrasound had a pooled sensitivity of 67.74% (95% CI, 55.25-79.06%), specificity of 99.75% (95% CI, 99.47-99.92%) and positive predictive value of 94.22% (95% CI, 90.22-97.22%) in the high-risk population. The cases diagnosed in the first trimester represented 79.86% (95% CI, 69.89-88.25%) of all antenatally diagnosed major cardiac abnormalities in the high-risk population. The imaging protocol used for examination was found to have an important impact on screening performance in both populations (P ConclusionsFirst-trimester ultrasound examination of the fetal heart allows identification of over half of fetuses affected by major cardiac pathology. Future first-trimester screening programs should follow structured anatomical assessment protocols and consider the introduction of outflow-tract views and color-flow Doppler imaging, as this would improve detection rates of fetal cardiac pathology. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34369613 · DOI · PMC9305869

Fetal hemodynamics and cardiac streaming assessed by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in fetal sheep [2]

Research article Schrauben EM, Schrauben EM, Saini BS, Darby JRT, Soo JY, Lock MC, et al. · · 2019 · cited 54 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundTo date it has not been possible to obtain a comprehensive 3D assessment of fetal hemodynamics because of the technical challenges inherent in imaging small cardiac structures, movement of the fetus during data acquisition, and the difficulty of fusing data from multiple cardiac cycles when a cardiac gating signal is absent.
Closing excerpt
Besides offering insight into normal physiology, this technology has the potential to qualitatively characterize complex flow patterns in congenital heart disease phenotypes in a large animal model, which can support the development of new interventions to improve outcomes in this population.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (348 words)

BackgroundTo date it has not been possible to obtain a comprehensive 3D assessment of fetal hemodynamics because of the technical challenges inherent in imaging small cardiac structures, movement of the fetus during data acquisition, and the difficulty of fusing data from multiple cardiac cycles when a cardiac gating signal is absent. Here we propose the combination of volumetric velocity-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging ("4D flow" CMR) and a specialized animal preparation (catheters to monitor fetal heart rate, anesthesia to immobilize mother and fetus) to examine fetal sheep cardiac hemodynamics in utero.MethodsTen pregnant Merino sheep underwent surgery to implant arterial catheters in the target fetuses. Anesthetized ewes underwent 4D flow CMR with acquisition at 3 T for fetal whole-heart coverage with 1.2-1.5 mm spatial resolution and 45-62 ms temporal resolution. Flow was measured in the heart and major vessels, and particle traces were used to visualize circulatory patterns in fetal cardiovascular shunts. Conservation of mass was used to test internal 4D flow consistency, and comparison to standard 2D phase contrast (PC) CMR was performed for validation.ResultsStreaming of blood from the ductus venosus through the foramen ovale was visualized. Flow waveforms in the major thoracic vessels and shunts displayed normal arterial and venous patterns. Combined ventricular output (CVO) was 546 mL/min per kg, and the distribution of flows (%CVO) were comparable to values obtained using other methods. Internal 4D flow consistency across 23 measurement locations was established with differences of 14.2 ± 12.1%. Compared with 2D PC CMR, 4D flow showed a strong correlation (R2 = 0.85) but underestimated flow (bias = - 21.88 mL/min per kg, p ConclusionsThe combination of fetal surgical preparation and 4D flow CMR enables characterization and quantification of complex flow patterns in utero. Visualized streaming of blood through normal physiological shunts confirms the complex mechanism of substrate delivery to the fetal heart and brain. Besides offering insight into normal physiology, this technology has the potential to qualitatively characterize complex flow patterns in congenital heart disease phenotypes in a large animal model, which can support the development of new interventions to improve outcomes in this population.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30661506 · DOI · PMC6340188

Myoarchitectural disarray of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy begins pre-birth [3]

Research article Garcia-Canadilla P, Cook AC, Mohun TJ, Oji O, Schlossarek S, Carrier L, et al. · · 2019 · cited 47 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Myoarchitectural disarray - the multiscalar disorganisation of myocytes, is a recognised histopathological hallmark of adult human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Closing excerpt
In conclusion, myoarchitectural disarray is detectable in the fetal heart of an HCM mouse model before the development of LVH.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (253 words)

Myoarchitectural disarray - the multiscalar disorganisation of myocytes, is a recognised histopathological hallmark of adult human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). It occurs before the establishment of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) but its early origins and evolution around the time of birth are unknown. Our aim is to investigate whether myoarchitectural abnormalities in HCM are present in the fetal heart. We used wild-type, heterozygous and homozygous hearts (n = 56) from a Mybpc3-targeted knock-out HCM mouse model and imaged the 3D micro-structure by high-resolution episcopic microscopy. We developed a novel structure tensor approach to extract, display and quantify myocyte orientation and its local angular uniformity by helical angle, angle of intrusion and myoarchitectural disarray index, respectively, immediately before and after birth. In wild-type, we demonstrate uniformity of orientation of cardiomyocytes with smooth transitions of helical angle transmurally both before and after birth but with traces of disarray at the septal insertion points of the right ventricle. In comparison, heterozygous mice free of LVH, and homozygous mice showed not only loss of the normal linear helical angulation transmural profiles observed in wild-type but also fewer circumferentially arranged myocytes at birth. Heterozygous and homozygous showed more disarray with a wider distribution than in wild-type before birth. In heterozygous mice, disarray was seen in the anterior, septal and inferior walls irrespective of stage, whereas in homozygous mice it extended to the whole LV circumference including the lateral wall. In conclusion, myoarchitectural disarray is detectable in the fetal heart of an HCM mouse model before the development of LVH.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31347708 · DOI · PMC6794206

Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: History, Current Status, and Future Directions [4]

Review article Suchá D, Bohte AE, van Ooij P, Leiner T, Schrauben EM, Grotenhuis HB · · 2025 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a complementary modality for prenatal imaging in suspected congenital heart disease.
Closing excerpt
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (82 words)

Fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a complementary modality for prenatal imaging in suspected congenital heart disease. Ongoing technical improvements extend the potential clinical value of fetal cardiovascular MRI. Ascertaining equivocal prenatal diagnostics obtained with ultrasonography allows for appropriate parental counseling and planning of postnatal surgery. This work summarizes current acquisition techniques and clinical applications of fetal cardiovascular MRI in the prenatal diagnosis and follow-up of fetuses with congenital heart disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39578988 · DOI · PMC12063768

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart [5]
    International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carvalho JS, Allan LD, Chaoui R, Copel JA, DeVore GR, et al. · Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol · 2013 · cited 470 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and standards for performance of the fetal echocardiogram [6]
    Rychik J, Ayres N, Cuneo B, Gotteiner N, Hornberger L, Spevak PJ, et al. · J Am Soc Echocardiogr · 2004 · cited 302 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Embryonic stem cells: a model to study structural and functional properties in cardiomyogenesis [7]
    Hescheler J, Fleischmann BK, Lentini S, Maltsev VA, Rohwedel J, Wobus AM, et al. · Cardiovasc Res · 1997 · cited 242 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The deployment of cell lineages that form the mammalian heart [8]
    Meilhac SM, Buckingham ME · Nat Rev Cardiol · 2018 · cited 222 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The Transitional Heart: From Early Embryonic and Fetal Development to Neonatal Life [9]
    Tan CMJ, Lewandowski AJ · Fetal Diagn Ther · 2020 · cited 188 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Hypoxia and fetal heart development [10]
    Patterson AJ, Zhang L · Curr Mol Med · 2010 · cited 175 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Karim JN, Bradburn E, Roberts N, Papageorghiou AT, ACCEPTS study. First-trimester ultrasound detection of fetal heart anomalies: systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2022. PMID 34369613 · DOI · PMC9305869
  2. Schrauben EM, Schrauben EM, Saini BS, Darby JRT, Soo JY, Lock MC, et al.. Fetal hemodynamics and cardiac streaming assessed by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in fetal sheep. . 2019. PMID 30661506 · DOI · PMC6340188
  3. Garcia-Canadilla P, Cook AC, Mohun TJ, Oji O, Schlossarek S, Carrier L, et al.. Myoarchitectural disarray of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy begins pre-birth. . 2019. PMID 31347708 · DOI · PMC6794206
  4. Suchá D, Bohte AE, van Ooij P, Leiner T, Schrauben EM, Grotenhuis HB. Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: History, Current Status, and Future Directions. . 2025. PMID 39578988 · DOI · PMC12063768
  5. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carvalho JS, Allan LD, Chaoui R, Copel JA, DeVore GR, et al.. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID 23460196 · DOI
  6. Rychik J, Ayres N, Cuneo B, Gotteiner N, Hornberger L, Spevak PJ, et al.. American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and standards for performance of the fetal echocardiogram. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004. PMID 15220910 · DOI
  7. Hescheler J, Fleischmann BK, Lentini S, Maltsev VA, Rohwedel J, Wobus AM, et al.. Embryonic stem cells: a model to study structural and functional properties in cardiomyogenesis. Cardiovasc Res. 1997. PMID 9463627 · DOI
  8. Meilhac SM, Buckingham ME. The deployment of cell lineages that form the mammalian heart. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018. PMID 30266935 · DOI
  9. Tan CMJ, Lewandowski AJ. The Transitional Heart: From Early Embryonic and Fetal Development to Neonatal Life. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020. PMID 31533099 · DOI · PMC7265763
  10. Patterson AJ, Zhang L. Hypoxia and fetal heart development. Curr Mol Med. 2010. PMID 20712587 · DOI · PMC3075953

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • HairAnatomy and Physiology
  • Fetal BloodAnatomy and Physiology
  • Fetal WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • MyocardiumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Breech PresentationAnatomy and Physiology
  • CardiaAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

13,166
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
1,003
review articles
88
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • HairAnatomy and Physiology
  • Fetal BloodAnatomy and Physiology
  • Fetal WeightAnatomy and Physiology
  • MyocardiumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Breech PresentationAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support