Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (821 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The fluid surrounding the OVUM and granulosa cells in the Graafian follicle (ovarian follicle). The follicular fluid contains sex steroids, glycoprotein hormones, plasma proteins, mucopolysaccharides, and enzymes.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Fluid, Follicular; Follicular Fluids; Liquor Folliculi; Folliculi, Liquor; Antral Fluid, Ovarian Follicle.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Ovarian Follicle; Extracellular Fluid
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 3,647 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Follicular Fluid” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 893 of them (24.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 986 records.
Reviews account for 166 records (4.6%) and meta-analyses for 10. Randomized controlled trials number 115 (3.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 941 |
| 2000-2009 | 827 |
| 2010-2019 | 986 |
| 2020 onward | 893 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 166 | 4.6% |
| Meta-analyses | 10 | 0.3% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 115 | 3.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Follicular Fluid"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follicular fluid content and oocyte quality: from single biochemical markers to metabolomics | 2009 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 464 | cc by PMID 19413899 · DOI · PMC2685803 |
| Circulating microRNAs in follicular fluid, powerful tools to explore in vitro fertilization process | 2016 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 81 | cc by PMID 27102646 · DOI · PMC4840336 |
| Composing the Early Embryonic Microenvironment: Physiology and Regulation of Oviductal Secretions | 2019 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 78 | cc by PMID 31905654 · DOI · PMC6982147 |
| Correlation between follicular fluid hormonal levels in PCOS women and embryo development in ART cycles | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 3 | cc by PMID 41662290 · DOI · PMC12885263 |
Follicular fluid content and oocyte quality: from single biochemical markers to metabolomics [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The assessment of oocyte quality in human in vitro fertilization (IVF) is getting increasing attention from embryologists.
- Closing excerpt
- This review provides an overview of the current knowledge about the biochemical predictors of oocyte quality in FF, describing both the results coming from studies on single biochemical markers and those deriving from the most recent studies of metabolomics.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
The assessment of oocyte quality in human in vitro fertilization (IVF) is getting increasing attention from embryologists. Oocyte selection and the identification of the best oocytes, in fact, would help to limit embryo overproduction and to improve the results of oocyte cryostorage programs. Follicular fluid (FF) is easily available during oocyte pick-up and theorically represents an optimal source on non-invasive biochemical predictors of oocyte quality. Unfortunately, however, the studies aiming to find a good molecular predictor of oocyte quality in FF were not able to identify substances that could be used as reliable markers of oocyte competence to fertilization, embryo development and pregnancy. In the last years, a well definite trend toward passing from the research of single molecular markers to more complex techniques that study all metabolites of FF has been observed. The metabolomic approach is a powerful tool to study biochemical predictors of oocyte quality in FF, but its application in this area is still at the beginning. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge about the biochemical predictors of oocyte quality in FF, describing both the results coming from studies on single biochemical markers and those deriving from the most recent studies of metabolomics.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 19413899 · DOI · PMC2685803
Circulating microRNAs in follicular fluid, powerful tools to explore in vitro fertilization process [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Circulating or "extracellular" microRNAs (miRNAs) detected in biological fluids, could be used as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of several disease, such as cancer, gynecological and pregnancy disorders.
- Closing excerpt
- Therefore, these miRNAs could provide new helpful biomarkers to facilitate personalized medical care during IVF.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (185 words)
Circulating or "extracellular" microRNAs (miRNAs) detected in biological fluids, could be used as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of several disease, such as cancer, gynecological and pregnancy disorders. However, their contributions in female infertility and in vitro fertilization (IVF) remain unknown. This study investigated the expression profiles of five circulating miRNAs (let-7b, miR-29a, miR-30a, miR-140 and miR-320a) in human follicular fluid from 91 women with normal ovarian reserve and 30 with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and their ability to predict IVF outcomes. The combination of FF miR-30a, miR-140 and let-7b expression levels discriminated between PCOS and normal ovarian reserve with a specificity of 83.8% and a sensitivity of 70% (area under the ROC curve, AUC = 0.83 [0.73-0.92]; p 2 (p = 0.04). Moreover, FF let-7b predicted the development of expanded blastocysts with 70% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity (AUC = 0.67 [0.54-0.79]; p = 0.02) and FF miR-29a potential to predict clinical pregnancy outcome reached 0.68 [0.55-0.79] with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 53.5% (p = 0.01). Therefore, these miRNAs could provide new helpful biomarkers to facilitate personalized medical care during IVF.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27102646 · DOI · PMC4840336
Composing the Early Embryonic Microenvironment: Physiology and Regulation of Oviductal Secretions [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The oviductal fluid is the first environment experienced by mammalian embryos at the very beginning of life.
- Closing excerpt
- Special emphasis is laid on farm animals because, owing to the availability of sample material and the economic importance of fertility in livestock husbandry, a large part of the work on this topic has been carried out in domestic animals used for dairy and/or meat production.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (217 words)
The oviductal fluid is the first environment experienced by mammalian embryos at the very beginning of life. However, it has long been believed that the oviductal environment was not essential for proper embryonic development. Successful establishment of in vitro embryo production techniques (which completely bypass the oviduct) have reinforced this idea. Yet, it became evident that in vitro produced embryos differ markedly from their in vivo counterparts, and these differences are associated with lower pregnancy outcomes and more health issues after birth. Nowadays, researchers consider the oviduct as the most suitable microenvironment for early embryonic development and a substantial effort is made to understand its dynamic, species-specific functions. In this review, we touch on the origin and molecular components of the oviductal fluid in mammals, where recent progress has been made thanks to the wider use of mass spectrometry techniques. Some of the factors and processes known to regulate oviductal secretions, including the embryo itself, as well as ovulation, insemination, endogenous and exogenous hormones, and metabolic and heat stress, are summarized. Special emphasis is laid on farm animals because, owing to the availability of sample material and the economic importance of fertility in livestock husbandry, a large part of the work on this topic has been carried out in domestic animals used for dairy and/or meat production.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31905654 · DOI · PMC6982147
Correlation between follicular fluid hormonal levels in PCOS women and embryo development in ART cycles [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder characterized by ovulatory dysfunction.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings suggest that increased FF testosterone levels may negatively correlation with fertilization rates, which may reflect one of the contributing factors to the suboptimal ART outcomes observed in PCOS patients.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (220 words)
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder characterized by ovulatory dysfunction. Fertility outcomes in PCOS patients are often suboptimal, potentially owing to alterations in the follicular fluid (FF) microenvironment. However, the differences in FF hormone levels between PCOS and non-PCOS patients, as well as their correlation with assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes, remain unclear. This prospective study included 18 PCOS patients and 18 infertile women without PCOS (control group) undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Division of Reproductive Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital. The primary objective was to compare ART outcomes between the groups. Furthermore, FF testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and luteinizing hormone levels were evaluated to assess their correlation with these outcomes. The number of retrieved oocytes was significantly higher in the PCOS group; however, the rates of metaphase II oocyte formation, fertilization, blastocyst formation, and high-quality blastocyst formation were comparable between the groups. Although FF testosterone and FF luteinizing hormone levels were higher in the PCOS group than in the control group, the differences were not statistically significant. Spearman correlation analysis showed that FF testosterone levels were negatively correlated with fertilization rate (r = -0.3496, p = 0.0366). These findings suggest that increased FF testosterone levels may negatively correlation with fertilization rates, which may reflect one of the contributing factors to the suboptimal ART outcomes observed in PCOS patients.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41662290 · DOI · PMC12885263
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Oocyte environment: follicular fluid and cumulus cells are critical for oocyte health [5]
- Research article Formation of the ovarian follicular antrum and follicular fluid [6]
- Research article Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: clinical implications [7]
- Research article N-Acylethanolamines in human reproductive fluids [8]
- Research article Follicle selection in cattle and horses: role of intrafollicular factors [9]
- Research article Age-associated changes in cumulus cells and follicular fluid: the local oocyte microenvironment as a determinant of gamete quality [10]
References
- Revelli A, Delle Piane L, Casano S, Molinari E, Massobrio M, Rinaudo P. Follicular fluid content and oocyte quality: from single biochemical markers to metabolomics. . 2009. PMID 19413899 · DOI · PMC2685803
- Scalici E, Traver S, Mullet T, Molinari N, Ferrières A, Brunet C, et al.. Circulating microRNAs in follicular fluid, powerful tools to explore in vitro fertilization process. . 2016. PMID 27102646 · DOI · PMC4840336
- Saint-Dizier M, Schoen J, Chen S, Banliat C, Mermillod P. Composing the Early Embryonic Microenvironment: Physiology and Regulation of Oviductal Secretions. . 2019. PMID 31905654 · DOI · PMC6982147
- Kongsomnuan S, Niransuk P, Singwongsa A, Satirapod C. Correlation between follicular fluid hormonal levels in PCOS women and embryo development in ART cycles. . 2026. PMID 41662290 · DOI · PMC12885263
- Dumesic DA, Meldrum DR, Katz-Jaffe MG, Krisher RL, Schoolcraft WB. Oocyte environment: follicular fluid and cumulus cells are critical for oocyte health. Fertil Steril. 2015. PMID 25497448 · DOI
- Rodgers RJ, Irving-Rodgers HF. Formation of the ovarian follicular antrum and follicular fluid. Biol Reprod. 2010. PMID 20164441 · DOI
- Da Broi MG, Giorgi VSI, Wang F, Keefe DL, Albertini D, Navarro PA. Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: clinical implications. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018. PMID 29497954 · DOI · PMC5984887
- Schuel H, Burkman LJ, Lippes J, Crickard K, Forester E, Piomelli D, et al.. N-Acylethanolamines in human reproductive fluids. Chem Phys Lipids. 2002. PMID 12505702 · DOI
- Beg MA, Ginther OJ. Follicle selection in cattle and horses: role of intrafollicular factors. Reproduction. 2006. PMID 16940278 · DOI
- Babayev E, Duncan FE. Age-associated changes in cumulus cells and follicular fluid: the local oocyte microenvironment as a determinant of gamete quality. Biol Reprod. 2022. PMID 34982142 · DOI · PMC8862720
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.