Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (975 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A slightly acid milk food produced by fermentation due to the combined action of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus thermophilus.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Yoghurt.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Cultured Milk Products
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 3,194 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Yogurt” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,083 of them (33.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,122 records.
Reviews account for 229 records (7.2%) and meta-analyses for 33. Randomized controlled trials number 406 (12.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 379 |
| 2000-2009 | 610 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,122 |
| 2020 onward | 1,083 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 229 | 7.2% |
| Meta-analyses | 33 | 1.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 406 | 12.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Yogurt"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Role of Diet in Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Prospective Observational Studies [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceSeveral meta-analyses have summarized evidence for the association between dietary factors and the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC).
- Closing excerpt
- More research is needed on specific foods for which evidence remains suggestive, including other dairy products, whole grains, processed meat, and specific dietary patterns.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (334 words)
ImportanceSeveral meta-analyses have summarized evidence for the association between dietary factors and the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, to date, there has been little synthesis of the strength, precision, and quality of this evidence in aggregate.ObjectiveTo grade the evidence from published meta-analyses of prospective observational studies that assessed the association of dietary patterns, specific foods, food groups, beverages (including alcohol), macronutrients, and micronutrients with the incidence of CRC.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to September 2019.Evidence reviewOnly meta-analyses of prospective observational studies with a cohort study design were eligible. Evidence of association was graded according to established criteria as follows: convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant.ResultsFrom 9954 publications, 222 full-text articles (2.2%) were evaluated for eligibility, and 45 meta-analyses (20.3%) that described 109 associations between dietary factors and CRC incidence were selected. Overall, 35 of the 109 associations (32.1%) were nominally statistically significant using random-effects meta-analysis models; 17 associations (15.6%) demonstrated large heterogeneity between studies (I2 > 50%), whereas small-study effects were found for 11 associations (10.1%). Excess significance bias was not detected for any association between diet and CRC. The primary analysis identified 5 (4.6%) convincing, 2 (1.8%) highly suggestive, 10 (9.2%) suggestive, and 18 (16.5%) weak associations between diet and CRC, while there was no evidence for 74 (67.9%) associations. There was convincing evidence of an association of intake of red meat (high vs low) and alcohol (≥4 drinks/d vs 0 or occasional drinks) with the incidence of CRC and an inverse association of higher vs lower intakes of dietary fiber, calcium, and yogurt with CRC risk. The evidence for convincing associations remained robust following sensitivity analyses.Conclusions and relevanceThis umbrella review found convincing evidence of an association between lower CRC risk and higher intakes of dietary fiber, dietary calcium, and yogurt and lower intakes of alcohol and red meat. More research is needed on specific foods for which evidence remains suggestive, including other dairy products, whole grains, processed meat, and specific dietary patterns.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33591366 · DOI · PMC7887658
High-fat diet-induced metabolic syndrome and oxidative stress in obese rats are ameliorated by yogurt supplementation [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The main objective of this experiment was to determine the effects of yogurt supplementation on fat deposition, oxidative stress, inflammation and fibrosis in the liver of rats with high-fat (HF) diet-induced obesity.
- Closing excerpt
- This study suggests that yogurt supplementation potentially represents an alternative therapy for the prevention of metabolic syndrome in HF diet-fed rats.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (177 words)
The main objective of this experiment was to determine the effects of yogurt supplementation on fat deposition, oxidative stress, inflammation and fibrosis in the liver of rats with high-fat (HF) diet-induced obesity. Male Wistar rats were used in this study and were separated into the following four different groups: the control, control + yogurt, high fat and high fat+ yogurt groups. The high fat groups received a HF diet for eight weeks. A 5% yogurt (w/w) supplement was also provided to rats fed the HF diet. Yogurt supplementation prevented glucose intolerance and normalized liver-specific enzyme activities in the HF diet-fed rats. Yogurt supplementation also significantly reduced the levels of oxidative stress markers in the plasma and liver of HF diet-fed rats. Moreover, inflammatory cell infiltration, collagen deposition and fibrosis in the liver of HF diet-fed rats were also prevented by yogurt supplementation. Furthermore, yogurt supplementation normalized the intestinal lining and brush border in HF diet-fed rats. This study suggests that yogurt supplementation potentially represents an alternative therapy for the prevention of metabolic syndrome in HF diet-fed rats.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31882854 · DOI · PMC6934669
Consumption of Dairy Yogurt Containing Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei, Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis and Heat-Treated Lactobacillus plantarum Improves Immune Function Including Natural Killer Cell Activity [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of consuming dairy yogurt containing Lactobacillus paracasei ssp.
- Closing excerpt
- gov: NCT03051425).
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (146 words)
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of consuming dairy yogurt containing Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei (L. paracasei), Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis (B. lactis) and heat-treated Lactobacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) on immune function. A randomized, open-label, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 200 nondiabetic subjects. Over a twelve-week period, the test group consumed dairy yogurt containing probiotics each day, whereas the placebo group consumed milk. Natural killer (NK) cell activity, interleukin (IL)-12 and immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 levels were significantly increased in the test group at twelve weeks compared to baseline. Additionally, the test group had significantly greater increases in serum NK cell activity and interferon (IFN)-γ and IgG1 than placebo group. Daily consumption of dairy yogurt containing L. paracasei, B. lactis and heat-treated L. plantarum could be an effective option to improve immune function by enhancing NK cell function and IFN-γ concentration (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03051425).
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28561762 · DOI · PMC5490537
Maize inoculation with aflatoxigenic and biocontrol fungi - toxin transfer from feed into milk and yoghurt [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The consumption of milk can contribute to the consumers` exposure to aflatoxin as aflatoxin M1 (AFM1), a hydroxylated metabolite of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), is transferred into the milk of AFB1 exposed dairy cows.
- Closing excerpt
- Further studies are necessary to investigate the exact conditions suitable for reducing the AFM1 content of contaminated milk during the processing of dairy products
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (318 words)
The consumption of milk can contribute to the consumers` exposure to aflatoxin as aflatoxin M1 (AFM1), a hydroxylated metabolite of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), is transferred into the milk of AFB1 exposed dairy cows. As mitigation measures against AFB1 presence in cattle feed, fungal biocontrol strains are applied on plant materials to reduce toxigenic A. flavus growth. The present study investigates the impact of applying two biocontrol strains (Trichoderma afroharzianum and non-toxigenic Aspergillus flavus) compared with a toxigenic A. flavus strain on the mycotoxin transfer from maize into milk and milk products in a “farm to fork” approach. Firstly, in a feeding study three groups of high yielding dairy cows are exposed to different maize flours infested with biocontrol or AFB1-foming fungal strains for 14 days to monitor a potential toxin transfer from feed to milk. In the milk of cows exposed to AFB1, AFM1 was detected with a mean value of (95.6 ng/kg ± 13.7 ng/kg) while the mean transfer rates (3.8% ± 0.9%) were slightly higher than published in previous studies. Neither AFM1 nor cyclopiazonic acid could be detected in milk from the cows exposed to the two biocontrol strains. The data show, that the AFM1 limit of 50 ng/kg in milk can be exceeded when cattle feed is contaminated with AFB1 within the legal limit. Consequently, the use of cattle feed within the current European legal limits does not necessarily guarantee for obtaining milk compliant with European maximum levels. In the second part, AFM1 containing raw milk from the experimental cows was processed further into yoghurt to investigate the fate of the toxin under acidic fermentation conditions. No AFM1 degradation was found during authentic yoghurt making, albeit in a model experiment the hydration of AFM1 in presence of citric acid was shown. Further studies are necessary to investigate the exact conditions suitable for reducing the AFM1 content of contaminated milk during the processing of dairy products
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41724885 · DOI · PMC12926233
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health [5]
- Research article Factors Influencing the Gut Microbiota, Inflammation, and Type 2 Diabetes [6]
- Research article Volatile flavor compounds in yogurt: a review [7]
- Research article Yogurt and gut function [8]
- Research article A 100-Year Review: Yogurt and other cultured dairy products [9]
- Research article Yogurt and other fermented foods as sources of health-promoting bacteria [10]
References
- Veettil SK, Wong TY, Loo YS, Playdon MC, Lai NM, Giovannucci EL, et al.. Role of Diet in Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Prospective Observational Studies. . 2021. PMID 33591366 · DOI · PMC7887658
- Lasker S, Rahman MM, Parvez F, Zamila M, Miah P, Nahar K, et al.. High-fat diet-induced metabolic syndrome and oxidative stress in obese rats are ameliorated by yogurt supplementation. . 2019. PMID 31882854 · DOI · PMC6934669
- Lee A, Lee YJ, Yoo HJ, Kim M, Chang Y, Lee DS, et al.. Consumption of Dairy Yogurt Containing Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei, Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis and Heat-Treated Lactobacillus plantarum Improves Immune Function Including Natural Killer Cell Activity. . 2017. PMID 28561762 · DOI · PMC5490537
- Lamp J, Knappstein K, Schwake-Anduschus C, Nöbel S, Saltzmann J, Dänicke S, et al.. Maize inoculation with aflatoxigenic and biocontrol fungi - toxin transfer from feed into milk and yoghurt. . 2026. PMID 41724885 · DOI · PMC12926233
- Parvez S, Malik KA, Ah Kang S, Kim HY. Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. J Appl Microbiol. 2006. PMID 16696665 · DOI
- Wen L, Duffy A. Factors Influencing the Gut Microbiota, Inflammation, and Type 2 Diabetes. J Nutr. 2017. PMID 28615382 · DOI · PMC5483960
- Cheng H. Volatile flavor compounds in yogurt: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010. PMID 21108074 · DOI
- Adolfsson O, Meydani SN, Russell RM. Yogurt and gut function. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004. PMID 15277142 · DOI
- Aryana KJ, Olson DW. A 100-Year Review: Yogurt and other cultured dairy products. J Dairy Sci. 2017. PMID 29153184 · DOI
- Kok CR, Hutkins R. Yogurt and other fermented foods as sources of health-promoting bacteria. Nutr Rev. 2018. PMID 30452699 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.