Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,090 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A vinca alkaloid related to vinblastine that is used as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer, or for advanced or metastatic breast cancer refractory to treatment with anthracyclines.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: 5'-Nor-anhydrovinblastine; 5' Nor anhydrovinblastine; KW 2307; KW-2307; KW2307; Navelbine; Vinorelbine Tartrate.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Vinca Alkaloids
Related concepts
- Vinblastine
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Breast Cancer
- Anthracyclines
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 2,943 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Vinorelbine” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 255 of them (8.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 1,270 records.
Reviews account for 340 records (11.6%) and meta-analyses for 30. Randomized controlled trials number 367 (12.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 518 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,270 |
| 2010-2019 | 900 |
| 2020 onward | 255 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 340 | 11.6% |
| Meta-analyses | 30 | 1.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 367 | 12.5% |
Method: PubMed query "Vinorelbine"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
A randomised phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: WJOG5008L [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundCisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Closing excerpt
- The West Japan Oncology Group will employ the SP arm as the investigational arm in a future phase III study.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
BackgroundCisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This trial evaluated two experimental regimens that combine chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy.MethodsEligible patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were randomised to either the SP arm (S-1 and cisplatin) or VP arm (vinorelbine and cisplatin), with early concurrent thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy, comprising 2 Gy per daily fraction. The primary endpoint was the overall survival rate at 2 years (2-year overall survival (OS)) (Study ID: UMIN000002420).ResultsFrom September 2009 to September 2012, 112 patients were enroled. Of the 108 eligible patients, the 2-year OS was 75.6% (80% confidence interval (CI), 67-82%) in the SP arm and 68.5% (80% CI: 60-76%) in the VP arm. The hazard ratio (HR) for death between the two arms was 0.85 (0.48-1.49). The median progression-free survival was 14.8 months for the SP arm and 12.3 months for the VP arm with an HR of 0.92 (0.58-1.44). There were four treatment-related deaths in the SP arm and five in the VP arm.ConclusionsThe null hypotheses for 2-year OS were rejected in both arms. The West Japan Oncology Group will employ the SP arm as the investigational arm in a future phase III study.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30206369 · DOI · PMC6173687
Oral metronomic vinorelbine combined with endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: SOLTI-1501 VENTANA window of opportunity trial [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundThe biological effect of oral metronomic vinorelbine (mVNB) alone or in combination with endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer has been scarcely addressed.
- Closing excerpt
- Trial registrationNCT02802748 , registered 16 June 2016.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (276 words)
BackgroundThe biological effect of oral metronomic vinorelbine (mVNB) alone or in combination with endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer has been scarcely addressed.MethodsPostmenopausal women with untreated stage I-III HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 3 weeks of letrozole (LTZ) 2.5 mg/day, oral mVNB 50 mg 3 days/week, or the combination. The primary objective was to evaluate, within PAM50 Luminal A/B disease, if the anti-proliferative effect of LTZ+mVNB was superior to monotherapy. An anti-proliferative effect was defined as the mean relative decrease of the PAM50 11-gene proliferation score in combination arm vs. both monotherapy arms. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of a comprehensive panel of breast cancer-related genes and safety. An unplanned analysis of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) was also performed. PAM50 analyses were performed using the nCounter®-based Breast Cancer 360™ gene panel, which includes 752 genes and 32 signatures.ResultsSixty-one patients were randomized, and 54 paired samples (89%) were analyzed. The main patient characteristics were mean age of 67, mean tumor size of 1.7 cm, mean Ki67 of 14.3%, stage I (55.7%), and grades 1-2 (90%). Most baseline samples were PAM50 Luminal A (74.1%) or B (22.2%). The anti-proliferative effect of 3 weeks of LTZ+mVNB (- 73.2%) was superior to both monotherapy arms combined (- 49.9%; p = 0.001) and mVNB (- 19.1%; p ConclusionsShort-term mVNB is well-tolerated and presents anti-proliferative activity alone and in combination with LTZ. The high expression of immune-related biological processes and sTILs observed with the combination opens the possibility of studying this combination with immunotherapy. Further investigation comparing these biological results with other metronomic schedules or drug combinations is warranted.Trial registrationNCT02802748 , registered 16 June 2016.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31533777 · DOI · PMC6751874
Enhanced antitumor and anti-angiogenic effects of metronomic Vinorelbine combined with Endostar on Lewis lung carcinoma [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundConventional chemotherapy is commonly used to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) however it increases therapeutic resistance.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionThese results indicated that MET NVB combined with Endo significantly enhanced anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic responses without overt toxicity in a xenograft model of human lung cancer.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (255 words)
BackgroundConventional chemotherapy is commonly used to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) however it increases therapeutic resistance. In contrast, metronomic chemotherapy (MET) is based on frequent drug administration at lower doses, resulting in inhibition of neovascularization and induction of tumor dormancy. This study aims to evaluate the inhibitory effects, adverse events, and potential mechanisms of MET Vinorelbine (NVB) combined with an angiogenesis inhibitor (Endostar).MethodsCirculating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs), apoptosis rate, expression of CD31, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1α) were determined using flow cytometry, western blot analysis, immunofluorescence staining and Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. And some animals were also observed using micro fluorine-18-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to identify changes by comparing SUVmax values. In addition, white blood cell (WBC) counts and H&E-stained sections of liver, lungs, kidney, and heart were performed in order to monitor toxicity assessments.ResultsWe found that treatment with MET NVB + Endo was most effective in inhibiting tumor growth, decreasing expression of CD31, VEGF, HIF-1α, and CEPs, and reducing side effects, inducing apoptosis, such as expression of Bcl-2, Bax and caspase-3. Administration with a maximum tolerated dose of NVB combined with Endostar (MTD NVB + Endo) demonstrated similar anti-tumor effects, including changes in glucose metabolism with micro fluorine-18-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging, however angiogenesis was not inhibited. Compared with either agent alone, the combination of drugs resulted in better anti-tumor effects.ConclusionThese results indicated that MET NVB combined with Endo significantly enhanced anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic responses without overt toxicity in a xenograft model of human lung cancer.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30305062 · DOI · PMC6180630
Efficacy and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine in elderly patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Lung cancer remains one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally.
- Closing excerpt
- It was associated with a significant reduction in toxicity and may represent a valuable therapeutic option for this age group, with excellent treatment compliance.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (360 words)
Lung cancer remains one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Metronomic chemotherapy (MC) enables prolonged low-dose treatment administration with lower toxicity while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Our goal was to assess the efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine (OV) administered in a metronomic schedule in elderly patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients & methods This single-center study was conducted at the Clinical Oncology Department of Suez Canal University Hospital. The study included elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (TNM stage IIIB/IV) who had previously received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without concomitant chemoradiotherapy. All patients were confirmed to lack sensitizing EGFR mutations as well as ALK and ROS1 rearrangements, irrespective of PD-L1 expression status and were treated between January 2020 and October 2024. The study population consisted of histopathologically-proven patients who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients received metronomic OV at fixed doses (30, 40, or 50 mg three times weekly) until disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. Results From January 2020 to October 2024, 50 patients were included: 39 men (78%) and 11 women (11%). The median age was 67 years. The predominant histological subtype was squamous cell carcinoma (44%). The duration of OV therapy ranged from 6 to 18 months, with a mean of 9.16 ± 3.6 months. Patients received 8 to 24 cycles, with a mean of 11.74 ± 4.44. According to RECIST criteria, the disease control rate was 78% after 6 months, while the overall response rate was 64%. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were observed. The mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.74 months (95% CI: 12.11 to 15.36), whereas the mean overall survival (OS) was 19.67 months (95% CI: 17.85 to 21.49). Comparison of EORTC QLQ-C30 quality-of-life (QoL) scores before treatment and after 6 months of OV therapy demonstrated improvement in patients' functioning and QoL. Conclusion Metronomic OV demonstrated clinical efficacy in elderly patients with advanced wild-type NSCLC. It was associated with a significant reduction in toxicity and may represent a valuable therapeutic option for this age group, with excellent treatment compliance.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42464189 · DOI · PMC13393617
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Clinical efficacy and safety of aidi injection combination with vinorelbine and cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 54 randomized controlled trials [5]
- Research article Vinorelbine's anti-tumor actions may depend on the mitotic apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation: hypotheses with implications for chemo-immunotherapy of advanced cancers and pediatric gliomas [6]
- Research article An individual patient-data meta-analysis of metronomic oral vinorelbine in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer [7]
- Research article Oral vinorelbine-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review [8]
- Research article The efficacy and toxicity of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis [9]
- Research article A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Combination of Vinorelbine and Lapatinib in Patients With Her2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [10]
References
- Sasaki T, Seto T, Yamanaka T, Kunitake N, Shimizu J, Kodaira T, et al.. A randomised phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: WJOG5008L. . 2018. PMID 30206369 · DOI · PMC6173687
- Adamo B, Bellet M, Paré L, Pascual T, Vidal M, Pérez Fidalgo JA, et al.. Oral metronomic vinorelbine combined with endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: SOLTI-1501 VENTANA window of opportunity trial. . 2019. PMID 31533777 · DOI · PMC6751874
- Qin RS, Zhang ZH, Zhu NP, Chen F, Guo Q, Hu HW, et al.. Enhanced antitumor and anti-angiogenic effects of metronomic Vinorelbine combined with Endostar on Lewis lung carcinoma. . 2018. PMID 30305062 · DOI · PMC6180630
- Soliman SH, Atef MM. Efficacy and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine in elderly patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. . 2026. PMID 42464189 · DOI · PMC13393617
- Xiao Z, Jiang Y, Wang CQ, Hu SS, Huang XR, Chen XF, et al.. Clinical efficacy and safety of aidi injection combination with vinorelbine and cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 54 randomized controlled trials. Pharmacol Res. 2020. PMID 31935454 · DOI
- Altinoz MA, Ozpinar A, Alturfan EE, Elmaci I. Vinorelbine's anti-tumor actions may depend on the mitotic apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation: hypotheses with implications for chemo-immunotherapy of advanced cancers and pediatric gliomas. J Chemother. 2018. PMID 30025492 · DOI
- Pujol JL, Coffy A, Camerini A, Kotsakis A, Mencoboni M, Gusella M, et al.. An individual patient-data meta-analysis of metronomic oral vinorelbine in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2019. PMID 31430345 · DOI · PMC6701879
- Lesueur P, Martel-Laffay I, Escande A, Kissel M, Locher C, Gervais R, et al.. Oral vinorelbine-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018. PMID 30173589 · DOI
- Xu K, Liu T, Zhang J, Zhou Y, Yang F, Ren T. The efficacy and toxicity of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID 32472208 · DOI
- Stravodimou A, Voutsadakis IA. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Combination of Vinorelbine and Lapatinib in Patients With Her2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019. PMID 31262849 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.