Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (911 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A fatty acid with anticonvulsant and anti-manic properties that is used in the treatment of epilepsy and bipolar disorder. The mechanisms of its therapeutic actions are not well understood. It may act by increasing gamma-aminobutyric acid levels in the brain or by altering the properties of voltage-gated sodium channels.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Divalproex; 2-Propylpentanoic Acid; 2 Propylpentanoic Acid; Valproate Sodium; Sodium Valproate; Valproate; Dipropyl Acetate; Magnesium Valproate.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Pentanoic Acids
Related concepts
- Epilepsy
- Bipolar Disorder
- Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 15,145 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Valproic Acid” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 2,587 of them (17.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,547 records.
Reviews account for 1,549 records (10.2%) and meta-analyses for 158. Randomized controlled trials number 647 (4.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 4,547 |
| 2000-2009 | 3,681 |
| 2010-2019 | 4,330 |
| 2020 onward | 2,587 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,549 | 10.2% |
| Meta-analyses | 158 | 1.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 647 | 4.3% |
Method: PubMed query "Valproic Acid"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis | 2023 | Systematic review Design not recorded in structured metadata | 104 | cc by PMID 37208596 · DOI · PMC10197489 |
| Insights into Structural Modifications of Valproic Acid and Their Pharmacological Profile | 2021 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 37 | cc by PMID 35011339 · DOI · PMC8746633 |
| Epigenetic targeting of the ACE2 and NRP1 viral receptors limits SARS-CoV-2 infectivity | 2021 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 33 | cc by PMID 34635175 · DOI · PMC8504098 |
| The molecular footprint of valproic acid in human hippocampal organoid | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42897295 · DOI · PMC13680533 |
The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectiveWhile there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs.
- Closing excerpt
- Conclusions(CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (264 words)
ObjectiveWhile there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison between drugs for migraine prophylaxis.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 13, 2022, for randomized trials of pharmacological treatments for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen references, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and rated the certainty (quality) of evidence as either high, moderate, low, or very low using the GRADE approach.ResultsWe identified 74 eligible trials, reporting on 32,990 patients. We found high certainty evidence that monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor (CGRP(r)mAbs), gepants, and topiramate increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo. We found moderate certainty evidence that beta-blockers, valproate, and amitriptyline increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, and low certainty evidence that gabapentin may not be different from placebo. We found high certainty evidence that, compared to placebo, valproate and amitriptyline lead to substantial adverse events leading to discontinuation, moderate certainty evidence that topiramate, beta-blockers, and gabapentin increase adverse events leading to discontinuation, and moderate to high certainty evidence that (CGRP(r)mAbs) and gepants do not increase adverse events.Conclusions(CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37208596 · DOI · PMC10197489
Insights into Structural Modifications of Valproic Acid and Their Pharmacological Profile [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Valproic acid (VPA) is a well-established anticonvulsant drug discovered serendipitously and marketed for the treatment of epilepsy, migraine, bipolar disorder and neuropathic pain.
- Closing excerpt
- The review is expected to provide necessary knowledgebase for the further development of VPA-derived compounds.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (172 words)
Valproic acid (VPA) is a well-established anticonvulsant drug discovered serendipitously and marketed for the treatment of epilepsy, migraine, bipolar disorder and neuropathic pain. Apart from this, VPA has potential therapeutic applications in other central nervous system (CNS) disorders and in various cancer types. Since the discovery of its anticonvulsant activity, substantial efforts have been made to develop structural analogues and derivatives in an attempt to increase potency and decrease adverse side effects, the most significant being teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity. Most of these compounds have shown reduced toxicity with improved potency. The simple structure of VPA offers a great advantage to its modification. This review briefly discusses the pharmacology and molecular targets of VPA. The article then elaborates on the structural modifications in VPA including amide-derivatives, acid and cyclic analogues, urea derivatives and pro-drugs, and compares their pharmacological profile with that of the parent molecule. The current challenges for the clinical use of these derivatives are also discussed. The review is expected to provide necessary knowledgebase for the further development of VPA-derived compounds.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35011339 · DOI · PMC8746633
Epigenetic targeting of the ACE2 and NRP1 viral receptors limits SARS-CoV-2 infectivity [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 uses the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and neuropilin-1 (NRP1) receptors for entry into cells, and the serine protease TMPRSS2 for S protein priming.
- Closing excerpt
- Thus, administering VPA could be considered a safe treatment for COVID-19 patients until vaccines have been rolled out across the world.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (330 words)
BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 uses the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and neuropilin-1 (NRP1) receptors for entry into cells, and the serine protease TMPRSS2 for S protein priming. Inhibition of protease activity or the engagement with ACE2 and NRP1 receptors has been shown to be an effective strategy for blocking infectivity and viral spreading. Valproic acid (VPA; 2-propylpentanoic acid) is an epigenetic drug approved for clinical use. It produces potent antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects through its function as a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. Here, we propose VPA as a potential candidate to tackle COVID-19, in which rapid viral spread and replication, and hyperinflammation are crucial elements.ResultsWe used diverse cell lines (HK-2, Huh-7, HUVEC, Caco-2, and BEAS-2B) to analyze the effect of VPA and other HDAC inhibitors on the expression of the ACE-2 and NRP-1 receptors and their ability to inhibit infectivity, viral production, and the inflammatory response. Treatment with VPA significantly reduced expression of the ACE2 and NRP1 host proteins in all cell lines through a mechanism mediated by its HDAC inhibitory activity. The effect is maintained after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Consequently, the treatment of cells with VPA before infection impairs production of SARS-CoV-2 infectious viruses, but not that of other ACE2- and NRP1-independent viruses (VSV and HCoV-229E). Moreover, the addition of VPA 1 h post-infection with SARS-CoV-2 reduces the production of infectious viruses in a dose-dependent manner without significantly modifying the genomic and subgenomic messenger RNAs (gRNA and sg mRNAs) or protein levels of N protein. The production of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) induced by TNF-α and SARS-CoV-2 infection is diminished in the presence of VPA.ConclusionsOur data showed that VPA blocks three essential processes determining the severity of COVID-19. It downregulates the expression of ACE2 and NRP1, reducing the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2; it decreases viral yields, probably because it affects virus budding or virions stability; and it dampens the triggered inflammatory response. Thus, administering VPA could be considered a safe treatment for COVID-19 patients until vaccines have been rolled out across the world.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34635175 · DOI · PMC8504098
The molecular footprint of valproic acid in human hippocampal organoid [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a multifaceted neurodevelopmental condition characterized by neuroinflammation, and disruption in neuronal development.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings highlight the contribution of miRNA-mediated regulatory mRNA networks to VPA-induced neuroinflammation-associated with ASD in hHOs.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (145 words)
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a multifaceted neurodevelopmental condition characterized by neuroinflammation, and disruption in neuronal development. Valproic acid (VPA) is a known environmental risk factor for ASD. Induced pluripotent stem cells (IPSCs IMR90-4)-derived human hippocampal organoids (hHOs) at 60 days of development were used to investigate VPA-induced changes in mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) profiles. The molecular effects of VPA on hHOs were deciphered by meaningfully integrating the ability of miRNA to regulate expression of their predicted mRNA targets crucial to altering neuroinflammatory pathways. Molecular footprint can be defined as the VPA-induced changes to the miRNA profile resulting in coordinated post-transcriptional (mRNA) regulation of neuronal and inflammatory pathways associated with ASD. Based on the results, the molecular footprint of VPA in hHOs was generated for the first time. These findings highlight the contribution of miRNA-mediated regulatory mRNA networks to VPA-induced neuroinflammation-associated with ASD in hHOs.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42897295 · DOI · PMC13680533
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article The valproic acid-induced rodent model of autism [5]
- Research article Molecular and therapeutic potential and toxicity of valproic acid [6]
- Research article Valproic acid metabolism and its effects on mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation: a review [7]
- Research article Valproic Acid and Epilepsy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Evidences [8]
- Research article Anti-tumor mechanisms of valproate: a novel role for an old drug [9]
- Research article Biochemical, molecular and epigenetic mechanisms of valproic acid neuroprotection [10]
References
- Lampl C, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, Jassal T, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, et al.. The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. . 2023. PMID 37208596 · DOI · PMC10197489
- Mishra MK, Kukal S, Paul PR, Bora S, Singh A, Kukreti S, et al.. Insights into Structural Modifications of Valproic Acid and Their Pharmacological Profile. . 2021. PMID 35011339 · DOI · PMC8746633
- Saiz ML, DeDiego ML, López-García D, Corte-Iglesias V, Baragaño Raneros A, Astola I, et al.. Epigenetic targeting of the ACE2 and NRP1 viral receptors limits SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. . 2021. PMID 34635175 · DOI · PMC8504098
- Pokharel BR, Cook PP, Akula SM. The molecular footprint of valproic acid in human hippocampal organoid. . 2026. PMID 42897295 · DOI · PMC13680533
- Nicolini C, Fahnestock M. The valproic acid-induced rodent model of autism. Exp Neurol. 2018. PMID 28472621 · DOI
- Chateauvieux S, Morceau F, Dicato M, Diederich M. Molecular and therapeutic potential and toxicity of valproic acid. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010. PMID 20798865 · DOI · PMC2926634
- Silva MF, Aires CC, Luis PB, Ruiter JP, IJlst L, Duran M, et al.. Valproic acid metabolism and its effects on mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation: a review. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008. PMID 18392741 · DOI
- Romoli M, Mazzocchetti P, D'Alonzo R, Siliquini S, Rinaldi VE, Verrotti A, et al.. Valproic Acid and Epilepsy: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Evidences. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2019. PMID 30592252 · DOI · PMC7052829
- Blaheta RA, Cinatl J. Anti-tumor mechanisms of valproate: a novel role for an old drug. Med Res Rev. 2002. PMID 12210556 · DOI
- Monti B, Polazzi E, Contestabile A. Biochemical, molecular and epigenetic mechanisms of valproic acid neuroprotection. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2009. PMID 20021450 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.