Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (897 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The quantitation of the body's metabolism of toxic xenobiotic compounds, as measured by the plasma concentration of the toxicant at various time points.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Metabolism; Pharmacological and Toxicological Phenomena
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,328 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Toxicokinetics” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 717 of them (54.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 717 records.
Reviews account for 169 records (12.7%) and meta-analyses for 7. Randomized controlled trials number 3 (0.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 0 |
| 2010-2019 | 627 |
| 2020 onward | 717 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 169 | 12.7% |
| Meta-analyses | 7 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 3 | 0.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Toxicokinetics"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in pharmacology
Drug evidence builds in layers: laboratory pharmacology describes how a compound acts, pharmacokinetic studies describe how the body handles it, and randomized trials test whether it helps and what harms it causes. Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies reveal rarer adverse effects but cannot prove causation. This page is educational and is not a recommendation to start, stop or change any medicine; decisions about treatment belong with a qualified clinician.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
A Chemical Category-Based Prioritization Approach for Selecting 75 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) for Tiered Toxicity and Toxicokinetic Testing [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a group of fluorinated substances of interest to researchers, regulators, and the public due to their widespread presence in the environment.
- Closing excerpt
- 1289/EHP4555.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (190 words)
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a group of fluorinated substances of interest to researchers, regulators, and the public due to their widespread presence in the environment. A few PFASs have comparatively extensive amounts of human epidemiological, exposure, and experimental animal toxicity data (e.g., perfluorooctanoic acid), whereas little toxicity and exposure information exists for much of the broader set of PFASs. Given that traditional approaches to generate toxicity information are resource intensive, new approach methods, including in vitro high-throughput toxicity (HTT) testing, are being employed to inform PFAS hazard characterization and further (in vivo) testing. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP) are collaborating to develop a risk-based approach for conducting PFAS toxicity testing to facilitate PFAS human health assessments. This article describes the construction of a PFAS screening library and the process by which a targeted subset of 75 PFASs were selected. Multiple factors were considered, including interest to the U.S. EPA, compounds within targeted categories, structural diversity, exposure considerations, procurability and testability, and availability of existing toxicity data. Generating targeted HTT data for PFASs represents a new frontier for informing priority setting. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4555.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc0 licence; © the authors. PMID 30632786 · DOI · PMC6378680
Advancing internal exposure and physiologically-based toxicokinetic modeling for 21st-century risk assessments [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Scientifically sound, risk-informed evaluation of chemicals is essential to protecting public health.
- Closing excerpt
- Progress to meet the demand for internal exposure and PBTK modeling tools will require transparent publication of models and data to build credibility in results, as well as opportunities to partner with decision makers to evaluate and build confidence in use of these for improved decisions that promote safe use of chemicals.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (216 words)
Scientifically sound, risk-informed evaluation of chemicals is essential to protecting public health. Systematically leveraging information from exposure, toxicology, and epidemiology studies can provide a holistic understanding of how real-world exposure to chemicals may impact the health of populations, including sensitive and vulnerable individuals and life-stages. Increasingly, public health policy makers are employing toxicokinetic (TK) modeling tools to integrate these data streams and predict potential human health impact. Development of a suite of tools for predicting internal exposure, including physiologically-based toxicokinetic (PBTK) models, is being driven by needs to address large numbers of data-poor chemicals efficiently, translate bioactivity, and mechanistic information from new in vitro test systems, and integrate multiple lines of evidence to enable scientifically sound, risk-informed decisions. New modeling approaches are being designed "fit for purpose" to inform specific decision contexts, with applications ranging from rapid screening of hundreds of chemicals, to improved prediction of risks during sensitive stages of development. New data are being generated experimentally and computationally to support these models. Progress to meet the demand for internal exposure and PBTK modeling tools will require transparent publication of models and data to build credibility in results, as well as opportunities to partner with decision makers to evaluate and build confidence in use of these for improved decisions that promote safe use of chemicals.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30116055 · DOI · PMC6760598
Principles of dose-setting in toxicology studies: the importance of kinetics for ensuring human safety [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Regulatory toxicology seeks to ensure that exposures to chemicals encountered in the environment, in the workplace, or in products pose no significant hazards and produce no harm to humans or other organisms, i.
- Closing excerpt
- This review explains the rationale that compels regulatory toxicology to embrace the advancements made possible by kinetics, why understanding the kinetic relationship between the blood level produced and the administered dose of a chemical is essential for identifying the safe dose range, and why dose-setting in regulatory toxicology studies should be informed by estimates of the KMD rather than rely on the flawed concept of maximum-tolerated toxic dose, or MTD.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (245 words)
Regulatory toxicology seeks to ensure that exposures to chemicals encountered in the environment, in the workplace, or in products pose no significant hazards and produce no harm to humans or other organisms, i.e., that chemicals are used safely. The most practical and direct means of ensuring that hazards and harms are avoided is to identify the doses and conditions under which chemical toxicity does not occur so that chemical concentrations and exposures can be appropriately limited. Modern advancements in pharmacology and toxicology have revealed that the rates and mechanisms by which organisms absorb, distribute, metabolize and eliminate chemicals-i.e., the field of kinetics-often determine the doses and conditions under which hazard, and harm, are absent, i.e., the safe dose range. Since kinetics, like chemical hazard and toxicity, are extensive properties that depend on the amount of the chemical encountered, it is possible to identify the maximum dose under which organisms can efficiently metabolize and eliminate the chemicals to which they are exposed, a dose that has been referred to as the kinetic maximum dose, or KMD. This review explains the rationale that compels regulatory toxicology to embrace the advancements made possible by kinetics, why understanding the kinetic relationship between the blood level produced and the administered dose of a chemical is essential for identifying the safe dose range, and why dose-setting in regulatory toxicology studies should be informed by estimates of the KMD rather than rely on the flawed concept of maximum-tolerated toxic dose, or MTD.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34623454 · DOI · PMC8536606
A review on integrated machine learning and deep learning driven artificial intelligence models for pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics predictions, and their application [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The development of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and technology has made AI-driven drug discovery a more prominent field.
- Closing excerpt
- SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The article covers the compilation of ongoing research in the development of ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) software based on hybrid artificial intelligence and multimodeling techniques, which may increase the accuracy of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic predictions, improve ADMET endpoint predictions, and accelerate drug discovery.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (246 words)
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and technology has made AI-driven drug discovery a more prominent field. We are firmly in the AI era, with hybrid designs that eventually comprise deep learning (DL) and conventional machine learning (ML). Although traditional models can predict ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) properties, they remain relatively unsuccessful, and improving the accuracy of predictions remains challenging. Recently, several researchers have developed a hybrid learning model that successfully addresses these problems and improves prediction accuracy. The systematic tendencies facing AI-powered transformation from conventional DL and ML to hybrid learning AI models are examined in this review. Compared with traditional ML and DL, hybrid AI models have increased efficiency by reducing drug development time and costs, and improved success rates. In this context, the ongoing development of new ADMET software based on hybrid AI and multimodeling techniques can enhance the accuracy of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic predictions, improve ADMET endpoint predictions, and expedite the drug discovery of new chemical entities. Moreover, this review covers the future of AI in pharmaceutical sciences and ADMET predictions, including AI-driven prediction models that range from basic ML/DL to newly developed hybrid models, evaluation parameters, and their applications in ADMET property prediction. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The article covers the compilation of ongoing research in the development of ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) software based on hybrid artificial intelligence and multimodeling techniques, which may increase the accuracy of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic predictions, improve ADMET endpoint predictions, and accelerate drug discovery.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41763192 · DOI · PMC13084680
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Review of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) with a focus on legislation and recent publications concerning toxicokinetics and -dynamics [5]
- Research article Toxicokinetic models and related tools in environmental risk assessment of chemicals [6]
- Research article Predicting toxicities of reactive metabolite-positive drug candidates [7]
- Research article High-throughput PBTK models for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation [8]
- Research article Cytochrome P450 Induction and Xeno-Sensing Receptors Pregnane X Receptor, Constitutive Androstane Receptor, Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α at the Crossroads of Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics [9]
- Research article Toxicokinetics of chiral polychlorinated biphenyls across different species--a review [10]
References
- Patlewicz G, Richard AM, Williams AJ, Grulke CM, Sams R, Lambert J, et al.. A Chemical Category-Based Prioritization Approach for Selecting 75 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) for Tiered Toxicity and Toxicokinetic Testing. . 2019. PMID 30632786 · DOI · PMC6378680
- Cohen Hubal EA, Wetmore BA, Wambaugh JF, El-Masri H, Sobus JR, Bahadori T. Advancing internal exposure and physiologically-based toxicokinetic modeling for 21st-century risk assessments. . 2019. PMID 30116055 · DOI · PMC6760598
- Borgert CJ, Fuentes C, Burgoon LD. Principles of dose-setting in toxicology studies: the importance of kinetics for ensuring human safety. . 2021. PMID 34623454 · DOI · PMC8536606
- M M, S M, Kate SS, Taneja I, Jaiswal S, Pratap B, et al.. A review on integrated machine learning and deep learning driven artificial intelligence models for pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics predictions, and their application. . 2026. PMID 41763192 · DOI · PMC13084680
- Koch C, Schmidt-Kötters T, Rupp R, Sures B. Review of hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) with a focus on legislation and recent publications concerning toxicokinetics and -dynamics. Environ Pollut. 2015. PMID 25618363 · DOI
- Grech A, Brochot C, Dorne JL, Quignot N, Bois FY, Beaudouin R. Toxicokinetic models and related tools in environmental risk assessment of chemicals. Sci Total Environ. 2017. PMID 27842969 · DOI
- Kalgutkar AS, Dalvie D. Predicting toxicities of reactive metabolite-positive drug candidates. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015. PMID 25292426 · DOI
- Breen M, Ring CL, Kreutz A, Goldsmith MR, Wambaugh JF. High-throughput PBTK models for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2021. PMID 34056988 · DOI · PMC9703392
- Hakkola J, Bernasconi C, Coecke S, Richert L, Andersson TB, Pelkonen O. Cytochrome P450 Induction and Xeno-Sensing Receptors Pregnane X Receptor, Constitutive Androstane Receptor, Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α at the Crossroads of Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018. PMID 29527807 · DOI
- Kania-Korwel I, Lehmler HJ. Toxicokinetics of chiral polychlorinated biphenyls across different species--a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016. PMID 25824003 · DOI · PMC4591098
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.