Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Teicoplanin
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Teicoplanin

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Lipoglycopeptide antibiotic from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus active against gram-positive bacteria.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (811 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Lipoglycopeptide antibiotic from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus active against gram-positive bacteria. It consists of five major components each with a different fatty acid moiety.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Teichomycin; Targocid; Teichomycin A2.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Lipoglycopeptides

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,804 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Teicoplanin” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 518 of them (18.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 911 records.

Reviews account for 265 records (9.5%) and meta-analyses for 19. Randomized controlled trials number 133 (4.7%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 911 records; 2000-2009: 731 records; 2010-2019: 644 records; 2020 onward: 518 records911through 19997312000-20096442010-20195182020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999911
2000-2009731
2010-2019644
2020 onward518
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 4.7 percentReviews9.5% (265)Meta-analyses0.7% (19)Randomized controlled trials4.7% (133)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,804 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2659.5%
Meta-analyses190.7%
Randomized controlled trials1334.7%

Method: PubMed query "Teicoplanin"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Dalbavancin binds ACE2 to block its interaction with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal models
Wang G, Yang ML, Duan ZL, Liu FL, Jin L, Long CB, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
91cc by
PMID 33262453 · DOI · PMC7705431
In Vitro Synergistic Activity of Antimicrobial Agents in Combination against Clinical Isolates of Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
Bae S, Kim MC, Park SJ, Kim HS, Sung H, Kim MN, et al.
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
59cc by
PMID 27600048 · DOI · PMC5075085
Dalbavancin reduces biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE)
Knafl D, Tobudic S, Cheng SC, Bellamy DR, Thalhammer F
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
48cc by
PMID 27896496 · DOI · PMC5366172
Dalbavancin for infective endocarditis: A systematic review of effectiveness, safety, and dosing
Chaldoupis AE, Petrakis V, Ioannou P, Tsante KA, Tsakri D, Domouchtsidou A, et al.
2026Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41665791 · DOI · PMC13086878

Dalbavancin binds ACE2 to block its interaction with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal models [1]

Research article Wang G, Yang ML, Duan ZL, Liu FL, Jin L, Long CB, et al. · · 2021 · cited 91 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic worldwide.
Closing excerpt
Given its high safety and long plasma half-life (8-10 days) shown in previous clinical trials, our data indicate that dalbavancin is a promising anti-COVID-19 drug candidate.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (157 words)

Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic worldwide. Currently, however, no effective drug or vaccine is available to treat or prevent the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we report our discovery of a promising anti-COVID-19 drug candidate, the lipoglycopeptide antibiotic dalbavancin, based on virtual screening of the FDA-approved peptide drug library combined with in vitro and in vivo functional antiviral assays. Our results showed that dalbavancin directly binds to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) with high affinity, thereby blocking its interaction with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Furthermore, dalbavancin effectively prevents SARS-CoV-2 replication in Vero E6 cells with an EC50 of ~12 nM. In both mouse and rhesus macaque models, viral replication and histopathological injuries caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection are significantly inhibited by dalbavancin administration. Given its high safety and long plasma half-life (8-10 days) shown in previous clinical trials, our data indicate that dalbavancin is a promising anti-COVID-19 drug candidate.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33262453 · DOI · PMC7705431

In Vitro Synergistic Activity of Antimicrobial Agents in Combination against Clinical Isolates of Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [2]

Research article Bae S, Kim MC, Park SJ, Kim HS, Sung H, Kim MN, et al. · · 2016 · cited 59 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Emerging resistance to colistin in clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates is of growing concern.
Closing excerpt
baumannii.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (242 words)

Emerging resistance to colistin in clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates is of growing concern. Since current treatment options for these strains are extremely limited, we investigated the in vitro activities of various antimicrobial combinations against colistin-resistant A. baumannii Nine clinical isolates (8 from bacteremia cases and 1 from a pneumonia case) of colistin-resistant A. baumannii were collected in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, between January 2010 and December 2012. To screen for potential synergistic effects, multiple combinations of two antimicrobials among 12 commercially available agents were tested using the multiple-combination bactericidal test (MCBT). Checkerboard tests were performed to validate these results. Among the 9 colistin-resistant strains, 6 were pandrug resistant and 3 were extensively drug resistant. With MCBT, the most effective combinations were colistin-rifampin and colistin-teicoplanin; both combinations showed synergistic effect against 8 of 9 strains. Colistin-aztreonam, colistin-meropenem, and colistin-vancomycin combinations showed synergy against seven strains. Colistin was the most common constituent of antimicrobial combinations that were active against colistin-resistant A. baumannii Checkerboard tests were then conducted in colistin-based combinations. Notably, colistin-rifampin showed synergism against all nine strains (100%). Both colistin-vancomycin and colistin-teicoplanin showed either synergy or partial synergy. Colistin combined with another β-lactam agent (aztreonam, ceftazidime, or meropenem) showed a relatively moderate effect. Colistin combined with ampicillin-sulbactam, tigecycline, amikacin, azithromycin, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole demonstrated limited synergism. Using MCBT and checkerboard tests, we found that only colistin-based combinations, particularly those with rifampin, glycopeptides, or β-lactams, may confer therapeutic benefits against colistin-resistant A. baumannii.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27600048 · DOI · PMC5075085

Dalbavancin reduces biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) [3]

Research article Knafl D, Tobudic S, Cheng SC, Bellamy DR, Thalhammer F · · 2017 · cited 48 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Activity of dalbavancin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) in biofilm was investigated and the microbicidal biofilm concentrations (MBC) were determined.
Closing excerpt
Dalbavancin successfully reduced MRSA and MRSE in biofilms, and therefore provides a promising option for the treatment of biofilm-associated infections.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (166 words)

Activity of dalbavancin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) in biofilm was investigated and the microbicidal biofilm concentrations (MBC) were determined. Biofilms obtained from ten MRSA and ten MRSE bloodstream isolates, collected from patients in the General Hospital of Vienna between 2012 and 2015, were incubated with dalbavancin in trypticase soy broth (TSB) in serial dilution from 0.0625 mg/l to 256 mg/l using a microtiter plate biofilm model. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 ° C and 50% humidity. Biofilms were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and stained with crystal violet. Subsequently the optical density (OD620) was used to measure the MBC, defined as the concentration of dalbavancin leading to a 50% reduction of biofilm. MBC for MRSA was 1 mg/l-4 mg/l (minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) 0.0312 mg/l-0.064 mg/l). MBC for MRSE was 2 mg/l-16 mg/l (MIC 0.023 mg/l-0.0625 mg/l). Dalbavancin successfully reduced MRSA and MRSE in biofilms, and therefore provides a promising option for the treatment of biofilm-associated infections.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27896496 · DOI · PMC5366172

Dalbavancin for infective endocarditis: A systematic review of effectiveness, safety, and dosing [4]

Systematic review Chaldoupis AE, Petrakis V, Ioannou P, Tsante KA, Tsakri D, Domouchtsidou A, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeInfective endocarditis (IE) requires prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy, leading to extended hospitalization and increased morbidity.
Closing excerpt
Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to define standardized protocols.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (246 words)

PurposeInfective endocarditis (IE) requires prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy, leading to extended hospitalization and increased morbidity. Dalbavancin, a long-acting antibiotic with excellent tissue penetration and a favorable safety profile, can be a promising alternative. This systematic review aimed to investigate the current literature regarding the use of dalbavancin for infective endocarditis.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included adult patients (≥ 18 years) with IE diagnosed by the modified Duke criteria, treated with dalbavancin as monotherapy or sequential/consolidation therapy. Data extraction included demographics, type of IE, causative pathogen, dosing regimen, surgical intervention, adverse events, and outcomes. Descriptive analyses were performed.ResultsThirty-eight studies including 565 patients were analyzed. The overall cure rate was 88.0%, with a similar success rate across native valve (90.1%), prosthetic valve (90.0%), and cardiac device-related IE (86.0%). Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus faecalis were the most common pathogens. Cure rates were comparable among most pathogens, though a lower cure rate was evident in infections due to Enterococcus faecalis compared to Streptococcus spp. (80.7% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.008). An effective antimicrobial exposure of 2 weeks had similar success rate compared to a longer period of effective antimicrobial exposure (p = 0.31). Adverse events were rare (2.9%), with mild rash being the most common.ConclusionsDalbavancin demonstrates high cure rates and excellent tolerability in IE, and could offer an attractive alternative to conventional prolonged intravenous therapy. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to define standardized protocols.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41665791 · DOI · PMC13086878

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article New lipoglycopeptides: a comparative review of dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin [5]
    Zhanel GG, Calic D, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Adam H, Lagacé-Wiens PR, et al. · Drugs · 2010 · cited 244 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Svetitsky S, Leibovici L, Paul M · Antimicrob Agents Chemother · 2009 · cited 186 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin [7]
    Wilson AP · Clin Pharmacokinet · 2000 · cited 170 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The comparative efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin [8]
    Wood MJ · J Antimicrob Chemother · 1996 · cited 142 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Vancomycin, teicoplanin, and ramoplanin: synthetic and mechanistic studies [9]
    Boger DL · Med Res Rev · 2001 · cited 105 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Dalbavancin: a novel antimicrobial [10]
    Chen AY, Zervos MJ, Vazquez JA · Int J Clin Pract · 2007 · cited 80 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Wang G, Yang ML, Duan ZL, Liu FL, Jin L, Long CB, et al.. Dalbavancin binds ACE2 to block its interaction with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal models. . 2021. PMID 33262453 · DOI · PMC7705431
  2. Bae S, Kim MC, Park SJ, Kim HS, Sung H, Kim MN, et al.. In Vitro Synergistic Activity of Antimicrobial Agents in Combination against Clinical Isolates of Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. . 2016. PMID 27600048 · DOI · PMC5075085
  3. Knafl D, Tobudic S, Cheng SC, Bellamy DR, Thalhammer F. Dalbavancin reduces biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). . 2017. PMID 27896496 · DOI · PMC5366172
  4. Chaldoupis AE, Petrakis V, Ioannou P, Tsante KA, Tsakri D, Domouchtsidou A, et al.. Dalbavancin for infective endocarditis: A systematic review of effectiveness, safety, and dosing. . 2026. PMID 41665791 · DOI · PMC13086878
  5. Zhanel GG, Calic D, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Adam H, Lagacé-Wiens PR, et al.. New lipoglycopeptides: a comparative review of dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin. Drugs. 2010. PMID 20426497 · DOI
  6. Svetitsky S, Leibovici L, Paul M. Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009. PMID 19596875 · DOI · PMC2764163
  7. Wilson AP. Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000. PMID 11020133 · DOI
  8. Wood MJ. The comparative efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996. PMID 8707731 · DOI
  9. Boger DL. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, and ramoplanin: synthetic and mechanistic studies. Med Res Rev. 2001. PMID 11579438 · DOI
  10. Chen AY, Zervos MJ, Vazquez JA. Dalbavancin: a novel antimicrobial. Int J Clin Pract. 2007. PMID 17362476 · DOI · PMC1890846

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • BleomycinDrugs and Chemicals
  • GlycopeptidesDrugs and Chemicals
  • PeptidoglycanDrugs and Chemicals
  • VancomycinDrugs and Chemicals
  • 1-PropanolDrugs and Chemicals
  • 2-AcetylaminofluoreneDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

2,804
PubMed records on this heading
18%
published since 2020
265
review articles
133
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • BleomycinDrugs and Chemicals
  • GlycopeptidesDrugs and Chemicals
  • PeptidoglycanDrugs and Chemicals
  • VancomycinDrugs and Chemicals
  • 1-PropanolDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support