Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (811 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Lipoglycopeptide antibiotic from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus active against gram-positive bacteria. It consists of five major components each with a different fatty acid moiety.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Teichomycin; Targocid; Teichomycin A2.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Lipoglycopeptides
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 2,804 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Teicoplanin” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 518 of them (18.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 911 records.
Reviews account for 265 records (9.5%) and meta-analyses for 19. Randomized controlled trials number 133 (4.7%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 911 |
| 2000-2009 | 731 |
| 2010-2019 | 644 |
| 2020 onward | 518 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 265 | 9.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 19 | 0.7% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 133 | 4.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Teicoplanin"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Dalbavancin binds ACE2 to block its interaction with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal models [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic worldwide.
- Closing excerpt
- Given its high safety and long plasma half-life (8-10 days) shown in previous clinical trials, our data indicate that dalbavancin is a promising anti-COVID-19 drug candidate.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (157 words)
Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic worldwide. Currently, however, no effective drug or vaccine is available to treat or prevent the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we report our discovery of a promising anti-COVID-19 drug candidate, the lipoglycopeptide antibiotic dalbavancin, based on virtual screening of the FDA-approved peptide drug library combined with in vitro and in vivo functional antiviral assays. Our results showed that dalbavancin directly binds to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) with high affinity, thereby blocking its interaction with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Furthermore, dalbavancin effectively prevents SARS-CoV-2 replication in Vero E6 cells with an EC50 of ~12 nM. In both mouse and rhesus macaque models, viral replication and histopathological injuries caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection are significantly inhibited by dalbavancin administration. Given its high safety and long plasma half-life (8-10 days) shown in previous clinical trials, our data indicate that dalbavancin is a promising anti-COVID-19 drug candidate.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33262453 · DOI · PMC7705431
In Vitro Synergistic Activity of Antimicrobial Agents in Combination against Clinical Isolates of Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Emerging resistance to colistin in clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates is of growing concern.
- Closing excerpt
- baumannii.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (242 words)
Emerging resistance to colistin in clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates is of growing concern. Since current treatment options for these strains are extremely limited, we investigated the in vitro activities of various antimicrobial combinations against colistin-resistant A. baumannii Nine clinical isolates (8 from bacteremia cases and 1 from a pneumonia case) of colistin-resistant A. baumannii were collected in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, between January 2010 and December 2012. To screen for potential synergistic effects, multiple combinations of two antimicrobials among 12 commercially available agents were tested using the multiple-combination bactericidal test (MCBT). Checkerboard tests were performed to validate these results. Among the 9 colistin-resistant strains, 6 were pandrug resistant and 3 were extensively drug resistant. With MCBT, the most effective combinations were colistin-rifampin and colistin-teicoplanin; both combinations showed synergistic effect against 8 of 9 strains. Colistin-aztreonam, colistin-meropenem, and colistin-vancomycin combinations showed synergy against seven strains. Colistin was the most common constituent of antimicrobial combinations that were active against colistin-resistant A. baumannii Checkerboard tests were then conducted in colistin-based combinations. Notably, colistin-rifampin showed synergism against all nine strains (100%). Both colistin-vancomycin and colistin-teicoplanin showed either synergy or partial synergy. Colistin combined with another β-lactam agent (aztreonam, ceftazidime, or meropenem) showed a relatively moderate effect. Colistin combined with ampicillin-sulbactam, tigecycline, amikacin, azithromycin, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole demonstrated limited synergism. Using MCBT and checkerboard tests, we found that only colistin-based combinations, particularly those with rifampin, glycopeptides, or β-lactams, may confer therapeutic benefits against colistin-resistant A. baumannii.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27600048 · DOI · PMC5075085
Dalbavancin reduces biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Activity of dalbavancin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) in biofilm was investigated and the microbicidal biofilm concentrations (MBC) were determined.
- Closing excerpt
- Dalbavancin successfully reduced MRSA and MRSE in biofilms, and therefore provides a promising option for the treatment of biofilm-associated infections.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (166 words)
Activity of dalbavancin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) in biofilm was investigated and the microbicidal biofilm concentrations (MBC) were determined. Biofilms obtained from ten MRSA and ten MRSE bloodstream isolates, collected from patients in the General Hospital of Vienna between 2012 and 2015, were incubated with dalbavancin in trypticase soy broth (TSB) in serial dilution from 0.0625 mg/l to 256 mg/l using a microtiter plate biofilm model. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 ° C and 50% humidity. Biofilms were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and stained with crystal violet. Subsequently the optical density (OD620) was used to measure the MBC, defined as the concentration of dalbavancin leading to a 50% reduction of biofilm. MBC for MRSA was 1 mg/l-4 mg/l (minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) 0.0312 mg/l-0.064 mg/l). MBC for MRSE was 2 mg/l-16 mg/l (MIC 0.023 mg/l-0.0625 mg/l). Dalbavancin successfully reduced MRSA and MRSE in biofilms, and therefore provides a promising option for the treatment of biofilm-associated infections.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27896496 · DOI · PMC5366172
Dalbavancin for infective endocarditis: A systematic review of effectiveness, safety, and dosing [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PurposeInfective endocarditis (IE) requires prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy, leading to extended hospitalization and increased morbidity.
- Closing excerpt
- Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to define standardized protocols.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (246 words)
PurposeInfective endocarditis (IE) requires prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy, leading to extended hospitalization and increased morbidity. Dalbavancin, a long-acting antibiotic with excellent tissue penetration and a favorable safety profile, can be a promising alternative. This systematic review aimed to investigate the current literature regarding the use of dalbavancin for infective endocarditis.MethodsA systematic search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included adult patients (≥ 18 years) with IE diagnosed by the modified Duke criteria, treated with dalbavancin as monotherapy or sequential/consolidation therapy. Data extraction included demographics, type of IE, causative pathogen, dosing regimen, surgical intervention, adverse events, and outcomes. Descriptive analyses were performed.ResultsThirty-eight studies including 565 patients were analyzed. The overall cure rate was 88.0%, with a similar success rate across native valve (90.1%), prosthetic valve (90.0%), and cardiac device-related IE (86.0%). Staphylococcus aureus, Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus faecalis were the most common pathogens. Cure rates were comparable among most pathogens, though a lower cure rate was evident in infections due to Enterococcus faecalis compared to Streptococcus spp. (80.7% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.008). An effective antimicrobial exposure of 2 weeks had similar success rate compared to a longer period of effective antimicrobial exposure (p = 0.31). Adverse events were rare (2.9%), with mild rash being the most common.ConclusionsDalbavancin demonstrates high cure rates and excellent tolerability in IE, and could offer an attractive alternative to conventional prolonged intravenous therapy. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to define standardized protocols.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41665791 · DOI · PMC13086878
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article New lipoglycopeptides: a comparative review of dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin [5]
- Research article Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
- Research article Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin [7]
- Research article The comparative efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin [8]
- Research article Vancomycin, teicoplanin, and ramoplanin: synthetic and mechanistic studies [9]
- Research article Dalbavancin: a novel antimicrobial [10]
References
- Wang G, Yang ML, Duan ZL, Liu FL, Jin L, Long CB, et al.. Dalbavancin binds ACE2 to block its interaction with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and is effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal models. . 2021. PMID 33262453 · DOI · PMC7705431
- Bae S, Kim MC, Park SJ, Kim HS, Sung H, Kim MN, et al.. In Vitro Synergistic Activity of Antimicrobial Agents in Combination against Clinical Isolates of Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. . 2016. PMID 27600048 · DOI · PMC5075085
- Knafl D, Tobudic S, Cheng SC, Bellamy DR, Thalhammer F. Dalbavancin reduces biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). . 2017. PMID 27896496 · DOI · PMC5366172
- Chaldoupis AE, Petrakis V, Ioannou P, Tsante KA, Tsakri D, Domouchtsidou A, et al.. Dalbavancin for infective endocarditis: A systematic review of effectiveness, safety, and dosing. . 2026. PMID 41665791 · DOI · PMC13086878
- Zhanel GG, Calic D, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Adam H, Lagacé-Wiens PR, et al.. New lipoglycopeptides: a comparative review of dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin. Drugs. 2010. PMID 20426497 · DOI
- Svetitsky S, Leibovici L, Paul M. Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009. PMID 19596875 · DOI · PMC2764163
- Wilson AP. Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000. PMID 11020133 · DOI
- Wood MJ. The comparative efficacy and safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996. PMID 8707731 · DOI
- Boger DL. Vancomycin, teicoplanin, and ramoplanin: synthetic and mechanistic studies. Med Res Rev. 2001. PMID 11579438 · DOI
- Chen AY, Zervos MJ, Vazquez JA. Dalbavancin: a novel antimicrobial. Int J Clin Pract. 2007. PMID 17362476 · DOI · PMC1890846
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.