Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Immunology›Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome

Immunology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

Rare cutaneous eruption characterized by extensive keratinocyte apoptosis resulting in skin detachment with mucosal involvement.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,000 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Rare cutaneous eruption characterized by extensive keratinocyte apoptosis resulting in skin detachment with mucosal involvement. It is often provoked by the use of drugs (e.g., antibiotics and anticonvulsants) or associated with pneumonia, mycoplasma. It is considered a continuum of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Stevens Johnson Syndrome; Epidermal Necrolysis, Toxic; Epidermal Necrolyses, Toxic; Necrolyses, Toxic Epidermal; Necrolysis, Toxic Epidermal; Toxic Epidermal Necrolyses; Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis; Lyell's Syndrome.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Stomatitis; Drug Eruptions; Erythema Multiforme; Hypersensitivity, Delayed

Related concepts

  • Keratinocyte
  • Pneumonia
  • Mycoplasma

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,486 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Stevens-Johnson Syndrome” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,172 of them (18.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,516 records.

Reviews account for 923 records (14.2%) and meta-analyses for 46. Randomized controlled trials number 21 (0.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,516 records; 2000-2009: 1,038 records; 2010-2019: 1,760 records; 2020 onward: 1,172 records2,516through 19991,0382000-20091,7602010-20191,1722020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,516
2000-20091,038
2010-20191,760
2020 onward1,172
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 14.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.3 percentReviews14.2% (923)Meta-analyses0.7% (46)Randomized controlled trials0.3% (21)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,486 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews92314.2%
Meta-analyses460.7%
Randomized controlled trials210.3%

Method: PubMed query "Stevens-Johnson Syndrome"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in immunology

Immune responses are studied in model organisms, in cells from donors and in patients, and the same pathway can behave differently across these settings. Mouse immune systems differ from human ones in important ways, and blood measurements may not reflect what happens in tissues. Clinical conclusions about immune-mediated disease or immunotherapy come mainly from controlled trials and long-term cohorts. Check the species and tissue studied, whether markers were linked to outcomes patients notice, and the follow-up time.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Review of Diagnosis and Management
Frantz R, Huang S, Are A, Motaparthi K
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
150cc by
PMID 34577817 · DOI · PMC8472007
Spatial proteomics identifies JAKi as treatment for a lethal skin disease
Nordmann TM, Anderton H, Hasegawa A, Schweizer L, Zhang P, Stadler PC, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
121cc by
PMID 39415009 · DOI · PMC11602713
Recent advances in managing and understanding Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis
Hasegawa A, Abe R
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
117cc by
PMID 32595945 · DOI · PMC7308994
Recovering From Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Martin-Pozo MD, Williams EA, Bonnet KR, Kaffenberger BH, Schlundt DG, Phillips EJ, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 41222950 · DOI · PMC12613091

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Review of Diagnosis and Management [1]

Review article Frantz R, Huang S, Are A, Motaparthi K · · 2021 · cited 150 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are rare diseases that are characterized by widespread epidermal necrosis and sloughing of skin.
Closing excerpt
Due to the rare nature of the disease, there is a lack of prospective, randomized controlled trials and conducting these in the future would provide valuable insights into the management of this disease.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (155 words)

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are rare diseases that are characterized by widespread epidermal necrosis and sloughing of skin. They are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and early diagnosis and treatment is critical in achieving favorable outcomes for patients. In this scoping review, Excerpta Medica dataBASE and PubMed were searched for publications that addressed recent advances in the diagnosis and management of the disease. Multiple proteins (galectin 7 and RIP3) were identified that are promising potential biomarkers for SJS/TEN, although both are still in early phases of research. Regarding treatment, cyclosporine is the most effective therapy for the treatment of SJS, and a combination of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and corticosteroids is most effective for SJS/TEN overlap and TEN. Due to the rare nature of the disease, there is a lack of prospective, randomized controlled trials and conducting these in the future would provide valuable insights into the management of this disease.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34577817 · DOI · PMC8472007

Spatial proteomics identifies JAKi as treatment for a lethal skin disease [2]

Research article Nordmann TM, Anderton H, Hasegawa A, Schweizer L, Zhang P, Stadler PC, et al. · · 2024 · cited 121 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a fatal drug-induced skin reaction triggered by common medications and is an emerging public health issue1-3.
Closing excerpt
This study uncovers the JAK/STAT and interferon signalling pathways as key pathogenic drivers of TEN and demonstrates the potential of targeted JAKi as a curative therapy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (231 words)

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a fatal drug-induced skin reaction triggered by common medications and is an emerging public health issue1-3. Patients with TEN undergo severe and sudden epidermal detachment caused by keratinocyte cell death. Although molecular mechanisms that drive keratinocyte cell death have been proposed, the main drivers remain unknown, and there is no effective therapy for TEN4-6. Here, to systematically map molecular changes that are associated with TEN and identify potential druggable targets, we utilized deep visual proteomics, which provides single-cell-based, cell-type-resolution proteomics7,8. We analysed formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archived skin tissue biopsies of three types of cutaneous drug reactions with varying severity and quantified more than 5,000 proteins in keratinocytes and skin-infiltrating immune cells. This revealed a marked enrichment of type I and type II interferon signatures in the immune cell and keratinocyte compartment of patients with TEN, as well as phosphorylated STAT1 activation. Targeted inhibition with the pan-JAK inhibitor tofacitinib in vitro reduced keratinocyte-directed cytotoxicity. In vivo oral administration of tofacitinib, baricitinib or the JAK1-specific inhibitors abrocitinib or upadacitinib ameliorated clinical and histological disease severity in two distinct mouse models of TEN. Crucially, treatment with JAK inhibitors (JAKi) was safe and associated with rapid cutaneous re-epithelialization and recovery in seven patients with TEN. This study uncovers the JAK/STAT and interferon signalling pathways as key pathogenic drivers of TEN and demonstrates the potential of targeted JAKi as a curative therapy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39415009 · DOI · PMC11602713

Recent advances in managing and understanding Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis [3]

Review article Hasegawa A, Abe R · · 2020 · cited 117 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening diseases characterized by detachment of the epidermis and mucous membrane.
Closing excerpt
In this review, we discuss recent advances in the pathophysiology and management of SJS/TEN.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (265 words)

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening diseases characterized by detachment of the epidermis and mucous membrane. SJS/TEN are considered to be on the same spectrum of diseases with different severities. They are classified by the percentage of skin detachment area. SJS/TEN can also cause several complications in the liver, kidneys, and respiratory tract. The pathogenesis of SJS/TEN is still unclear. Although it is difficult to diagnose early stage SJS/TEN, biomarkers for diagnosis or severity prediction have not been well established. Furthermore, optimal therapeutic options for SJS/TEN are still controversial. Several drugs, such as carbamazepine and allopurinol, are reported to have a strong relationship with a specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type. This relationship differs between different ethnicities. Recently, the usefulness of HLA screening before administering specific drugs to decrease the incidence of SJS/TEN has been investigated. Skin detachment in SJS/TEN skin lesions is caused by extensive epidermal cell death, which has been considered to be apoptosis via the Fas-FasL pathway or perforin/granzyme pathway. We reported that necroptosis, i.e. programmed necrosis, also contributes to epidermal cell death. Annexin A1, released from monocytes, and its interaction with the formyl peptide receptor 1 induce necroptosis. Several diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for SJS/TEN have been reported, such as CCL-27, IL-15, galectin-7, and RIP3. Supportive care is recommended for the treatment of SJS/TEN. However, optimal therapeutic options such as systemic corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclosporine, and TNF-α antagonists are still controversial. Recently, the beneficial effects of cyclosporine and TNF-α antagonists have been explored. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the pathophysiology and management of SJS/TEN.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32595945 · DOI · PMC7308994

Recovering From Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis [4]

Research article Martin-Pozo MD, Williams EA, Bonnet KR, Kaffenberger BH, Schlundt DG, Phillips EJ, et al. · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceStevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) survivors experience substantial long-term sequelae.
Closing excerpt
It is essential that clinicians and researchers prioritize the understanding of long-term sequelae of SJS/TEN and improve current discharge education and protocols for patients and their families.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (349 words)

ImportanceStevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) survivors experience substantial long-term sequelae. Research on physical symptoms experienced during acute hospitalization is well documented, but limited studies have been completed on the long-term biopsychosocial effects of SJS/TEN, particularly from the patient's perspective.ObjectiveTo increase the understanding of the long-term complications of SJS/TEN.Design, setting, and participantsThis qualitative investigation was completed from within a community-based study, the SJS Survivors Study, using a semistructured, in-depth interview guide to query participants about their SJS/TEN experience postdischarge from the hospital. Interviews took place by phone from July 2021 through August 2023. This study included adults who experienced SJS/TEN within the United States.Main outcome and measuresA biopsychosocial theory-based framework and hierarchical coding system were utilized to understand the long-term life impacts of survivors of SJS/TEN.ResultsThe 29 participants, aged 26 to 76 years, were 66% female and 69% White and had experienced SJS/TEN from a wide range of drugs. Patients experienced support while in the hospital, but once discharged, felt isolated and without support to understand the potential sustained impacts of SJS/TEN in their lives and the lives of their family members. Patients experienced ongoing biological symptoms, such as skin issues, debilitating visual impairment, blindness, and lack of functional autonomy. Psychological impacts included symptoms of anxiety, obsessive thinking, flashbacks, and depression. Socially, some survivors expressed a sense of abandonment and described negative impacts on their careers. Survivors also expressed frustration and isolation with having to navigate posthospital care alone. There was a lack of preemptive discharge education and SJS/TEN-specific planning. Lack of physician knowledge about SJS/TEN was particularly noted and survivors turned to the internet for guidance instead of receiving direction from their physicians. Medical distrust among survivors was frequently noted.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings highlight the need for postdischarge care coordination among patients and their primary physicians, including mental health support. This care coordination should be arranged prior to discharge to ensure the availability of adequate support and optimal health outcomes. It is essential that clinicians and researchers prioritize the understanding of long-term sequelae of SJS/TEN and improve current discharge education and protocols for patients and their families.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41222950 · DOI · PMC12613091

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome [5]
    Harr T, French LE · Orphanet J Rare Dis · 2010 · cited 346 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systemic Immunomodulating Therapies for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [6]
    Zimmermann S, Sekula P, Venhoff M, Motschall E, Knaus J, Schumacher M, et al. · JAMA Dermatol · 2017 · cited 223 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Current Perspectives on Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis [7]
    Lerch M, Mainetti C, Terziroli Beretta-Piccoli B, Harr T · Clin Rev Allergy Immunol · 2018 · cited 219 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The current understanding of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis [8]
    Mockenhaupt M · Expert Rev Clin Immunol · 2011 · cited 205 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a review of the literature [9]
    Letko E, Papaliodis DN, Papaliodis GN, Daoud YJ, Ahmed AR, Foster CS · Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol · 2005 · cited 186 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Relationship between the HLA-B*1502 allele and carbamazepine-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [10]
    Tangamornsuksan W, Chaiyakunapruk N, Somkrua R, Lohitnavy M, Tassaneeyakul W · JAMA Dermatol · 2013 · cited 183 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Frantz R, Huang S, Are A, Motaparthi K. Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Review of Diagnosis and Management. . 2021. PMID 34577817 · DOI · PMC8472007
  2. Nordmann TM, Anderton H, Hasegawa A, Schweizer L, Zhang P, Stadler PC, et al.. Spatial proteomics identifies JAKi as treatment for a lethal skin disease. . 2024. PMID 39415009 · DOI · PMC11602713
  3. Hasegawa A, Abe R. Recent advances in managing and understanding Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. . 2020. PMID 32595945 · DOI · PMC7308994
  4. Martin-Pozo MD, Williams EA, Bonnet KR, Kaffenberger BH, Schlundt DG, Phillips EJ, et al.. Recovering From Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. . 2026. PMID 41222950 · DOI · PMC12613091
  5. Harr T, French LE. Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010. PMID 21162721 · DOI · PMC3018455
  6. Zimmermann S, Sekula P, Venhoff M, Motschall E, Knaus J, Schumacher M, et al.. Systemic Immunomodulating Therapies for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID 28329382 · DOI · PMC5817620
  7. Lerch M, Mainetti C, Terziroli Beretta-Piccoli B, Harr T. Current Perspectives on Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018. PMID 29188475 · DOI
  8. Mockenhaupt M. The current understanding of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2011. PMID 22014021 · DOI
  9. Letko E, Papaliodis DN, Papaliodis GN, Daoud YJ, Ahmed AR, Foster CS. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a review of the literature. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005. PMID 15875523 · DOI
  10. Tangamornsuksan W, Chaiyakunapruk N, Somkrua R, Lohitnavy M, Tassaneeyakul W. Relationship between the HLA-B*1502 allele and carbamazepine-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2013. PMID 23884208 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Acute Generalized Exanthematous PustulosisImmunology
  • Dermatitis HerpetiformisImmunology
  • Linear IgA Bullous DermatosisImmunology
  • PemphigusImmunology
  • SarcoidosisImmunology
  • AcrodermatitisRare and Inherited Diseases

All 90 articles in Immunology →

At a glance

6,486
PubMed records on this heading
18%
published since 2020
923
review articles
21
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Acute Generalized Exanthematous PustulosisImmunology
  • Dermatitis HerpetiformisImmunology
  • Linear IgA Bullous DermatosisImmunology
  • PemphigusImmunology
  • SarcoidosisImmunology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support