Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Genetics and Genomics›Sex Chromosomes
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Sex Chromosomes

Genetics and Genomics · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The homologous chromosomes that are dissimilar in the heterogametic sex.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (798 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The homologous chromosomes that are dissimilar in the heterogametic sex. There are the X chromosome, the Y chromosome, and the W, Z chromosomes (in animals in which the female is the heterogametic sex (the silkworm moth Bombyx mori, for example)). In such cases the W chromosome is the female-determining and the male is ZZ. (From King and Stansfield, A Dictionary of Genetics, 4th ed)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Chromosome, Sex; Chromosomes, Sex; Sex Chromosome; Gonosomes; Gonosome.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Chromosomes
Narrower topics
Pseudoautosomal Regions; Sex Chromatin; X Chromosome; Y Chromosome

Related concepts

  • Chromosomes

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 45,409 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sex Chromosomes” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 3,579 of them (7.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 24,272 records.

Reviews account for 4,532 records (10.0%) and meta-analyses for 58. Randomized controlled trials number 20 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 24,272 records; 2000-2009: 10,261 records; 2010-2019: 7,297 records; 2020 onward: 3,579 records24,272through 199910,2612000-20097,2972010-20193,5792020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199924,272
2000-200910,261
2010-20197,297
2020 onward3,579
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 10.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews10.0% (4,532)Meta-analyses0.1% (58)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (20)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 45,409 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4,53210.0%
Meta-analyses580.1%
Randomized controlled trials200.0%

Method: PubMed query "Sex Chromosomes"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics

Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Aging activates escape of the silent X chromosome in the female mouse hippocampus
Gadek M, Shaw CK, Abdulai-Saiku S, Saloner R, Marino F, Wang D, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
44cc by
PMID 40043106 · DOI · PMC11881916
A Y chromosome-linked genome editor for efficient population suppression in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae
Tolosana I, Willis K, Gribble M, Phillimore L, Burt A, Nolan T, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
30cc by
PMID 39747012 · DOI · PMC11696527
Mosaic loss of Y chromosome and mortality after coronary angiography
Weyrich M, Zewinger S, Sarakpi T, Rasper T, Kleber ME, Cremer S, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
26cc by
PMID 39935193 · DOI · PMC12046225
The X Factor in Immunity: Sex Differences Shaped by the X Chromosome
Radovanovic KB, Wynalda M, Anguera MC, Anguera MC
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
10cc by
PMID 41574968 · DOI · PMC12829307

Aging activates escape of the silent X chromosome in the female mouse hippocampus [1]

Research article Gadek M, Shaw CK, Abdulai-Saiku S, Saloner R, Marino F, Wang D, et al. · · 2025 · cited 44 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Women live longer than men and exhibit less cognitive aging.
Closing excerpt
Understanding how the Xi may confer female advantage could lead to novel targets that counter brain aging and disease in both sexes.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (160 words)

Women live longer than men and exhibit less cognitive aging. The X chromosome contributes to sex differences, as females harbor an inactive X (Xi) and active X (Xa), in contrast to males with only an Xa. Thus, reactivation of silent Xi genes may contribute to sex differences. We use allele-specific, single-nucleus RNA sequencing to show that aging remodels transcription of the Xi and Xa across hippocampal cell types. Aging preferentially changed gene expression on the X's relative to autosomes. Select genes on the Xi underwent activation, with new escape across cells including in the dentate gyrus, critical to learning and memory. Expression of the Xi escapee Plp1, a myelin component, was increased in the aging hippocampus of female mice and parahippocampus of women. AAV-mediated Plp1 elevation in the dentate gyrus of aging male and female mice improved cognition. Understanding how the Xi may confer female advantage could lead to novel targets that counter brain aging and disease in both sexes.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40043106 · DOI · PMC11881916

A Y chromosome-linked genome editor for efficient population suppression in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae [2]

Research article Tolosana I, Willis K, Gribble M, Phillimore L, Burt A, Nolan T, et al. · · 2025 · cited 30 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Genetic control - the deliberate introduction of genetic traits to control a pest or vector population - offers a powerful tool to augment conventional mosquito control tools that have been successful in reducing malaria burden but that are compromised by a range of operational challenges.
Closing excerpt
Mathematical modelling shows that this YLE technology is up to seven times more efficient for population suppression than optimal versions of other self-limiting strategies, such as the widely used Sterile Insect Technique or the Release of Insects carrying a Dominant Lethal gene.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (190 words)

Genetic control - the deliberate introduction of genetic traits to control a pest or vector population - offers a powerful tool to augment conventional mosquito control tools that have been successful in reducing malaria burden but that are compromised by a range of operational challenges. Self-sustaining genetic control strategies have shown great potential in laboratory settings, but hesitancy due to their invasive and persistent nature may delay their implementation. Here, instead, we describe a self-limiting strategy, designed to have geographically and temporally restricted effect, based on a Y chromosome-linked genome editor (YLE). The YLE comprises a CRISPR-Cas9 construct that is always inherited by males yet generates an autosomal dominant mutation that is transmitted to over 90% of the offspring and results in female-specific sterility. To our knowledge, our system represents a pioneering approach in the engineering of the Y chromosome to generate a genetic control strain for mosquitoes. Mathematical modelling shows that this YLE technology is up to seven times more efficient for population suppression than optimal versions of other self-limiting strategies, such as the widely used Sterile Insect Technique or the Release of Insects carrying a Dominant Lethal gene.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39747012 · DOI · PMC11696527

Mosaic loss of Y chromosome and mortality after coronary angiography [3]

Research article Weyrich M, Zewinger S, Sarakpi T, Rasper T, Kleber ME, Cremer S, et al. · · 2025 · cited 26 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background and aimsAcquired somatic mutations emerged as important drivers of adverse cardiovascular disease outcomes.
Closing excerpt
Targeting LOY may represent a sex-specific personalized medicine approach.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (294 words)

Background and aimsAcquired somatic mutations emerged as important drivers of adverse cardiovascular disease outcomes. Recently, mosaic loss of Y chromosome (LOY) in haematopoietic cells was identified to induce diffuse cardiac fibrosis in male mice. The aim of the present study was to determine the association between LOY and cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing coronary angiography.MethodsLOY was quantified in 1698 male participants of the LURIC study, who underwent coronary angiography, and its association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was determined. Furthermore, the interaction between LOY and inherited genetic susceptibility for cardiac fibrosis was assessed.ResultsThe frequency of LOY steeply increased in male participants of LURIC at the age of 60 years. Loss of Y chromosome > 17% was associated with significantly higher all-cause [hazard ratio (HR) 1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.82] and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09-2.03), which was driven by a higher risk for fatal myocardial infarction (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.46-4.81). Loss of Y chromosome > 17% was associated with a profibrotic and proinflammatory plasma protein expression profile as characterized by higher plasma levels of osteoprotegerin, matrix metalloproteinase-12, growth differentiation factor 15, heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor, and resistin. Genetic predisposition for lower myocardial fibrosis attenuated the association between LOY and cardiovascular mortality. Genome-wide methylation analyses identified differential methylation in 298 genes including ACTB, RPS5, WDR1, CD151, and ARAP1. Single-cell RNA sequencing further confirmed differential gene expression of 37 of these genes in LOY in peripheral blood mononuclear cells comprising a set of fibrosis-regulating genes including RPS5. RPS5 silencing in macrophages induced a paracrine induction of collagen expression in cardiac fibroblasts documenting a functional role in vitro.ConclusionsLOY represents an important independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in male patients with coronary artery disease. Targeting LOY may represent a sex-specific personalized medicine approach.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39935193 · DOI · PMC12046225

The X Factor in Immunity: Sex Differences Shaped by the X Chromosome [4]

Review article Radovanovic KB, Wynalda M, Anguera MC, Anguera MC · · 2026 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
There are sex differences with immune responses where females exhibit stronger immune responses compared to males.
Closing excerpt
We also highlight some dosage-sensitive X-linked genes involved in female-biased autoimmune disease, discuss sex differences with immune signaling pathways, and sex differences with viral infections and vaccine responses with the ultimate goal to leverage these insights for the development of sex-specific therapeutic interventions for immune-related diseases.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (154 words)

There are sex differences with immune responses where females exhibit stronger immune responses compared to males. Both sex hormones and sex chromosome differences between males and females contribute to the observed sex differences with innate and adaptive immune cell composition and function. Here, we present recent findings investigating sex differences with immune cells and responses, highlighting contributions from sex hormones or X-linked genes. We also review the epigenetic gene regulatory mechanisms that form the inactive X chromosome (Xi), known as X-Chromosome Inactivation (XCI), the heterochromatic nature of the Xi that allows for selective gene reactivation, and recent work investigating the mechanisms of XCI maintenance in female immune cells. We also highlight some dosage-sensitive X-linked genes involved in female-biased autoimmune disease, discuss sex differences with immune signaling pathways, and sex differences with viral infections and vaccine responses with the ultimate goal to leverage these insights for the development of sex-specific therapeutic interventions for immune-related diseases.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41574968 · DOI · PMC12829307

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The X chromosome and sex-specific effects in infectious disease susceptibility [5]
    Schurz H, Salie M, Tromp G, Hoal EG, Kinnear CJ, Möller M · Hum Genomics · 2019 · cited 290 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The X chromosome and immune associated genes [6]
    Bianchi I, Lleo A, Gershwin ME, Invernizzi P · J Autoimmun · 2012 · cited 286 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Sex Hormones and Sex Chromosomes Cause Sex Differences in the Development of Cardiovascular Diseases [7]
    Arnold AP, Cassis LA, Eghbali M, Reue K, Sandberg K · Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol · 2017 · cited 276 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Punctuated bursts in human male demography inferred from 1,244 worldwide Y-chromosome sequences [8]
    Poznik GD, Xue Y, Mendez FL, Willems TF, Massaia A, Wilson Sayres MA, et al. · Nat Genet · 2016 · cited 261 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article X chromosome regulation: diverse patterns in development, tissues and disease [9]
    Deng X, Berletch JB, Nguyen DK, Disteche CM · Nat Rev Genet · 2014 · cited 246 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Forensic use of Y-chromosome DNA: a general overview [10]
    Kayser M · Hum Genet · 2017 · cited 245 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Gadek M, Shaw CK, Abdulai-Saiku S, Saloner R, Marino F, Wang D, et al.. Aging activates escape of the silent X chromosome in the female mouse hippocampus. . 2025. PMID 40043106 · DOI · PMC11881916
  2. Tolosana I, Willis K, Gribble M, Phillimore L, Burt A, Nolan T, et al.. A Y chromosome-linked genome editor for efficient population suppression in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. . 2025. PMID 39747012 · DOI · PMC11696527
  3. Weyrich M, Zewinger S, Sarakpi T, Rasper T, Kleber ME, Cremer S, et al.. Mosaic loss of Y chromosome and mortality after coronary angiography. . 2025. PMID 39935193 · DOI · PMC12046225
  4. Radovanovic KB, Wynalda M, Anguera MC, Anguera MC. The X Factor in Immunity: Sex Differences Shaped by the X Chromosome. . 2026. PMID 41574968 · DOI · PMC12829307
  5. Schurz H, Salie M, Tromp G, Hoal EG, Kinnear CJ, Möller M. The X chromosome and sex-specific effects in infectious disease susceptibility. Hum Genomics. 2019. PMID 30621780 · DOI · PMC6325731
  6. Bianchi I, Lleo A, Gershwin ME, Invernizzi P. The X chromosome and immune associated genes. J Autoimmun. 2012. PMID 22178198 · DOI
  7. Arnold AP, Cassis LA, Eghbali M, Reue K, Sandberg K. Sex Hormones and Sex Chromosomes Cause Sex Differences in the Development of Cardiovascular Diseases. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017. PMID 28279969 · DOI · PMC5437981
  8. Poznik GD, Xue Y, Mendez FL, Willems TF, Massaia A, Wilson Sayres MA, et al.. Punctuated bursts in human male demography inferred from 1,244 worldwide Y-chromosome sequences. Nat Genet. 2016. PMID 27111036 · DOI · PMC4884158
  9. Deng X, Berletch JB, Nguyen DK, Disteche CM. X chromosome regulation: diverse patterns in development, tissues and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2014. PMID 24733023 · DOI · PMC4117651
  10. Kayser M. Forensic use of Y-chromosome DNA: a general overview. Hum Genet. 2017. PMID 28315050 · DOI · PMC5418305

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ChromosomesGenetics and Genomics
  • X ChromosomeGenetics and Genomics
  • Y ChromosomeGenetics and Genomics
  • Philadelphia ChromosomeGenetics and Genomics
  • KaryotypeGenetics and Genomics
  • AllelesGenetics and Genomics

All 95 articles in Genetics and Genomics →

At a glance

45,409
PubMed records on this heading
8%
published since 2020
4,532
review articles
20
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ChromosomesGenetics and Genomics
  • X ChromosomeGenetics and Genomics
  • Y ChromosomeGenetics and Genomics
  • Philadelphia ChromosomeGenetics and Genomics
  • KaryotypeGenetics and Genomics

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support