Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Immunology›Seroconversion
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Seroconversion

Immunology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The appearance of antibodies against causative agents in the blood of individuals during the course of an infection or following immunization.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,078 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The appearance of antibodies against causative agents in the blood of individuals during the course of an infection or following immunization.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Seroconversions.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Immune System Phenomena
See also
Immune System Phenomena

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,451 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Seroconversion” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 884 of them (60.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 884 records.

Reviews account for 96 records (6.6%) and meta-analyses for 50. Randomized controlled trials number 138 (9.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 0 records; 2010-2019: 588 records; 2020 onward: 884 records0through 199902000-20095882010-20198842020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20090
2010-2019588
2020 onward884
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 3.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 9.5 percentReviews6.6% (96)Meta-analyses3.4% (50)Randomized controlled trials9.5% (138)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,451 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews966.6%
Meta-analyses503.4%
Randomized controlled trials1389.5%

Method: PubMed query "Seroconversion"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in immunology

Immune responses are studied in model organisms, in cells from donors and in patients, and the same pathway can behave differently across these settings. Mouse immune systems differ from human ones in important ways, and blood measurements may not reflect what happens in tissues. Clinical conclusions about immune-mediated disease or immunotherapy come mainly from controlled trials and long-term cohorts. Check the species and tissue studied, whether markers were linked to outcomes patients notice, and the follow-up time.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Prevention of M. tuberculosis Infection with H4:IC31 Vaccine or BCG Revaccination
Nemes E, Geldenhuys H, Rozot V, Rutkowski KT, Ratangee F, Bilek N, et al.
2018Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
557cc by
PMID 29996082 · DOI · PMC5937161
Pre-existing polymerase-specific T cells expand in abortive seronegative SARS-CoV-2
Swadling L, Diniz MO, Schmidt NM, Amin OE, Chandran A, Shaw E, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
383cc by
PMID 34758478 · DOI · PMC8732273
SARS-CoV-2 S1 and N-based serological assays reveal rapid seroconversion and induction of specific antibody response in COVID-19 patients
Algaissi A, Alfaleh MA, Hala S, Abujamel TS, Alamri SS, Almahboub SA, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
86cc by
PMID 33024213 · DOI · PMC7538990
Temporal trends in viral setpoint and peak CD4 + cell count soon after HIV-1 seroconversion
Pantazis N, Sabin C, Costagliola D, Grabar S, Carlander C, Gill J, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42013444 · DOI · PMC13566474

Prevention of M. tuberculosis Infection with H4:IC31 Vaccine or BCG Revaccination [1]

Randomized controlled trial Nemes E, Geldenhuys H, Rozot V, Rutkowski KT, Ratangee F, Bilek N, et al. · · 2018 · cited 557 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundRecent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection confers a predisposition to the development of tuberculosis disease, the leading killer among global infectious diseases.
Closing excerpt
).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (360 words)

BackgroundRecent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection confers a predisposition to the development of tuberculosis disease, the leading killer among global infectious diseases. H4:IC31, a candidate subunit vaccine, has shown protection against tuberculosis disease in preclinical models, and observational studies have indicated that primary bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination may offer partial protection against infection.MethodsIn this phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned 990 adolescents in a high-risk setting who had undergone neonatal BCG vaccination to receive the H4:IC31 vaccine, BCG revaccination, or placebo. All the participants had negative results on testing for M. tuberculosis infection on the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube assay (QFT) and for the human immunodeficiency virus. The primary outcomes were safety and acquisition of M. tuberculosis infection, as defined by initial conversion on QFT that was performed every 6 months during a 2-year period. Secondary outcomes were immunogenicity and sustained QFT conversion to a positive test without reversion to negative status at 3 months and 6 months after conversion. Estimates of vaccine efficacy are based on hazard ratios from Cox regression models and compare each vaccine with placebo.ResultsBoth the BCG and H4:IC31 vaccines were immunogenic. QFT conversion occurred in 44 of 308 participants (14.3%) in the H4:IC31 group and in 41 of 312 participants (13.1%) in the BCG group, as compared with 49 of 310 participants (15.8%) in the placebo group; the rate of sustained conversion was 8.1% in the H4:IC31 group and 6.7% in the BCG group, as compared with 11.6% in the placebo group. Neither the H4:IC31 vaccine nor the BCG vaccine prevented initial QFT conversion, with efficacy point estimates of 9.4% (P=0.63) and 20.1% (P=0.29), respectively. However, the BCG vaccine reduced the rate of sustained QFT conversion, with an efficacy of 45.4% (P=0.03); the efficacy of the H4:IC31 vaccine was 30.5% (P=0.16). There were no clinically significant between-group differences in the rates of serious adverse events, although mild-to-moderate injection-site reactions were more common with BCG revaccination.ConclusionsIn this trial, the rate of sustained QFT conversion, which may reflect sustained M. tuberculosis infection, was reduced by vaccination in a high-transmission setting. This finding may inform clinical development of new vaccine candidates. (Funded by Aeras and others; C-040-404 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02075203 .).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29996082 · DOI · PMC5937161

Pre-existing polymerase-specific T cells expand in abortive seronegative SARS-CoV-2 [2]

Research article Swadling L, Diniz MO, Schmidt NM, Amin OE, Chandran A, Shaw E, et al. · · 2022 · cited 383 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Individuals with potential exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) do not necessarily develop PCR or antibody positivity, suggesting that some individuals may clear subclinical infection before seroconversion.
Closing excerpt
Our data highlight RTC-specific T cells as targets for vaccines against endemic and emerging Coronaviridae.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (258 words)

Individuals with potential exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) do not necessarily develop PCR or antibody positivity, suggesting that some individuals may clear subclinical infection before seroconversion. T cells can contribute to the rapid clearance of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronavirus infections1-3. Here we hypothesize that pre-existing memory T cell responses, with cross-protective potential against SARS-CoV-2 (refs. 4-11), would expand in vivo to support rapid viral control, aborting infection. We measured SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells, including those against the early transcribed replication-transcription complex (RTC)12,13, in intensively monitored healthcare workers (HCWs) who tested repeatedly negative according to PCR, antibody binding and neutralization assays (seronegative HCWs (SN-HCWs)). SN-HCWs had stronger, more multispecific memory T cells compared with a cohort of unexposed individuals from before the pandemic (prepandemic cohort), and these cells were more frequently directed against the RTC than the structural-protein-dominated responses observed after detectable infection (matched concurrent cohort). SN-HCWs with the strongest RTC-specific T cells had an increase in IFI27, a robust early innate signature of SARS-CoV-2 (ref. 14), suggesting abortive infection. RNA polymerase within RTC was the largest region of high sequence conservation across human seasonal coronaviruses (HCoV) and SARS-CoV-2 clades. RNA polymerase was preferentially targeted (among the regions tested) by T cells from prepandemic cohorts and SN-HCWs. RTC-epitope-specific T cells that cross-recognized HCoV variants were identified in SN-HCWs. Enriched pre-existing RNA-polymerase-specific T cells expanded in vivo to preferentially accumulate in the memory response after putative abortive compared to overt SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our data highlight RTC-specific T cells as targets for vaccines against endemic and emerging Coronaviridae.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34758478 · DOI · PMC8732273

SARS-CoV-2 S1 and N-based serological assays reveal rapid seroconversion and induction of specific antibody response in COVID-19 patients [3]

Research article Algaissi A, Alfaleh MA, Hala S, Abujamel TS, Alamri SS, Almahboub SA, et al. · · 2020 · cited 86 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
As the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2, continues to spread rapidly around the world, there is a need for well validated serological assays that allow the detection of viral specific antibody responses in COVID-19 patients or recovered individuals.
Closing excerpt
This is specifically important for tracing contacts and cases and conducting large-scale epidemiological studies to understand the true extent of virus spread in populations.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (223 words)

As the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2, continues to spread rapidly around the world, there is a need for well validated serological assays that allow the detection of viral specific antibody responses in COVID-19 patients or recovered individuals. In this study, we established and used multiple indirect Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)-based serological assays to study the antibody response in COVID-19 patients. In order to validate the assays we determined the cut off values, sensitivity and specificity of the assays using sera collected from pre-pandemic healthy controls, COVID-19 patients at different time points after disease-onset, and seropositive sera to other human coronaviruses (CoVs). The developed SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit of the spike glycoprotein and nucleocapsid (N)-based ELISAs not only showed high specificity and sensitivity but also did not show any cross-reactivity with other CoVs. We also show that all RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients tested in our study developed both virus specific IgM and IgG antibodies as early as week one after disease onset. Our data also suggest that the inclusion of both S1 and N in serological testing would capture as many potential SARS-CoV-2 positive cases as possible than using any of them alone. This is specifically important for tracing contacts and cases and conducting large-scale epidemiological studies to understand the true extent of virus spread in populations.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33024213 · DOI · PMC7538990

Temporal trends in viral setpoint and peak CD4 + cell count soon after HIV-1 seroconversion [4]

Research article Pantazis N, Sabin C, Costagliola D, Grabar S, Carlander C, Gill J, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesTo examine whether HIV-1 virulence, as measured by prognostic markers soon after seroconversion, has changed over time and across subgroups in the context of widespread ART availability.
Closing excerpt
The subsequent trend reversal, most evident among MSM, warrants ongoing monitoring.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (237 words)

ObjectivesTo examine whether HIV-1 virulence, as measured by prognostic markers soon after seroconversion, has changed over time and across subgroups in the context of widespread ART availability.DesignObservational cohort study of individuals with well estimated HIV-1 seroconversion dates recruited from clinics in eight European countries and Canada (CASCADE Collaboration).MethodsWe analyzed data from 21 933 participants who seroconverted 1980-2014, while ART-naïve and AIDS-free. Piecewise linear mixed models with one knot at 1 year after seroconversion for log 10 HIV-1 RNA (setpoint viral load, SPVL) and 4 months for square-root CD4 + cell count (peak CD4) were fitted. Models adjusted for age, sex/probable exposure route, region of origin, diagnosis during acute infection, and assay type.ResultsSPVL increased and peak CD4 declined over time until approximately 2000, then stabilized, with a mild reversal after 2005. Estimated (95% CI) average SPVL for those seroconverting on 1/1/1980, 1/1/1995, 1/1/2005, and 31/12/2014 was 3.2 (3.0-3.4), 4.0 (3.9-4.1), 4.3 (4.2-4.4), and 4.2 (4.1-4.3) log10 copies/ml, respectively. Corresponding estimates for peak CD4 were 960 (898-1025), 615 (584-648), 521 (492-551), and 560 (526-594) cells/μl. The increase in SPVL up to 2005 was less pronounced in European/North American MSM (1.0 log 10 copies/ml) than in men and women with heterosexual exposure from the same region or from Africa (1.5 and 1.4 log 10 copies/ml, respectively).ConclusionsSPVL and peak CD4 stabilized by 2000-2005, consistent with HIV-1 adaptation to the population. The subsequent trend reversal, most evident among MSM, warrants ongoing monitoring.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42013444 · DOI · PMC13566474

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Efficacy of covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
    Lee ARYB, Wong SY, Chai LYA, Lee SC, Lee MX, Muthiah MD, et al. · BMJ · 2022 · cited 397 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Times to key events in Zika virus infection and implications for blood donation: a systematic review [6]
    Lessler J, Ott CT, Carcelen AC, Konikoff JM, Williamson J, Bi Q, et al. · Bull World Health Organ · 2016 · cited 70 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article HIV vaccine-induced sero-reactivity: a challenge for trial participants, researchers, and physicians [7]
    VISR Working Group of Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise, Voronin Y, Zinszner H, Karg C, Brooks K, Coombs R, et al. · Vaccine · 2015 · cited 38 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic review of risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance [8]
    Kuang XJ, Jia RR, Huo RR, Yu JJ, Wang JJ, Xiang BD, et al. · J Viral Hepat · 2018 · cited 33 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Can we withdraw anticoagulation in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome after seroconvertion? [9]
    Sciascia S, Coloma-Bazán E, Radin M, Bertolaccini ML, López-Pedrera C, Espinosa G, et al. · Autoimmun Rev · 2017 · cited 16 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Immune response of COVID-19 vaccines in solid cancer patients: A meta-analysis [10]
    Hua T, Fan R, Fan Y, Chen F · Hum Vaccin Immunother · 2024 · cited 12 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Nemes E, Geldenhuys H, Rozot V, Rutkowski KT, Ratangee F, Bilek N, et al.. Prevention of M. tuberculosis Infection with H4:IC31 Vaccine or BCG Revaccination. . 2018. PMID 29996082 · DOI · PMC5937161
  2. Swadling L, Diniz MO, Schmidt NM, Amin OE, Chandran A, Shaw E, et al.. Pre-existing polymerase-specific T cells expand in abortive seronegative SARS-CoV-2. . 2022. PMID 34758478 · DOI · PMC8732273
  3. Algaissi A, Alfaleh MA, Hala S, Abujamel TS, Alamri SS, Almahboub SA, et al.. SARS-CoV-2 S1 and N-based serological assays reveal rapid seroconversion and induction of specific antibody response in COVID-19 patients. . 2020. PMID 33024213 · DOI · PMC7538990
  4. Pantazis N, Sabin C, Costagliola D, Grabar S, Carlander C, Gill J, et al.. Temporal trends in viral setpoint and peak CD4 + cell count soon after HIV-1 seroconversion. . 2026. PMID 42013444 · DOI · PMC13566474
  5. Lee ARYB, Wong SY, Chai LYA, Lee SC, Lee MX, Muthiah MD, et al.. Efficacy of covid-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022. PMID 35236664 · DOI · PMC8889026
  6. Lessler J, Ott CT, Carcelen AC, Konikoff JM, Williamson J, Bi Q, et al.. Times to key events in Zika virus infection and implications for blood donation: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2016. PMID 27821887 · DOI · PMC5096355
  7. VISR Working Group of Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise, Voronin Y, Zinszner H, Karg C, Brooks K, Coombs R, et al.. HIV vaccine-induced sero-reactivity: a challenge for trial participants, researchers, and physicians. Vaccine. 2015. PMID 25649349 · DOI · PMC4331207
  8. Kuang XJ, Jia RR, Huo RR, Yu JJ, Wang JJ, Xiang BD, et al.. Systematic review of risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance. J Viral Hepat. 2018. PMID 29624821 · DOI
  9. Sciascia S, Coloma-Bazán E, Radin M, Bertolaccini ML, López-Pedrera C, Espinosa G, et al.. Can we withdraw anticoagulation in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome after seroconvertion?. Autoimmun Rev. 2017. PMID 28899804 · DOI
  10. Hua T, Fan R, Fan Y, Chen F. Immune response of COVID-19 vaccines in solid cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024. PMID 38785118 · DOI · PMC11135846

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Acute Generalized Exanthematous PustulosisImmunology
  • Adaptive ImmunityImmunology
  • Addison DiseaseImmunology
  • AgammaglobulinemiaImmunology
  • AnaphylaxisImmunology
  • Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane DiseaseImmunology

All 90 articles in Immunology →

At a glance

1,451
PubMed records on this heading
61%
published since 2020
96
review articles
138
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Acute Generalized Exanthematous PustulosisImmunology
  • Adaptive ImmunityImmunology
  • Addison DiseaseImmunology
  • AgammaglobulinemiaImmunology
  • AnaphylaxisImmunology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support