Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Genetics and Genomics›Sequence Alignment
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Sequence Alignment

Genetics and Genomics · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The arrangement of two or more amino acid or base sequences from an organism or organisms in such a way as to align areas of the sequences sharing common properties.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (907 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The arrangement of two or more amino acid or base sequences from an organism or organisms in such a way as to align areas of the sequences sharing common properties. The degree of relatedness or homology between the sequences is predicted computationally or statistically based on weights assigned to the elements aligned between the sequences. This in turn can serve as a potential indicator of the genetic relatedness between the organisms.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Alignment, Sequence; Alignments, Sequence; Sequence Alignments; Determination, Sequence Homology; Determinations, Sequence Homology; Sequence Homology Determinations; Sequence Homology Determination.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Genetic Techniques

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 102,959 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sequence Alignment” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 5,057 of them (4.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 44,901 records.

Reviews account for 3,368 records (3.3%) and meta-analyses for 18. Randomized controlled trials number 15 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 20,736 records; 2000-2009: 44,901 records; 2010-2019: 32,265 records; 2020 onward: 5,057 records20,736through 199944,9012000-200932,2652010-20195,0572020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199920,736
2000-200944,901
2010-201932,265
2020 onward5,057
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 3.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews3.3% (3,368)Meta-analyses0.0% (18)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (15)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 102,959 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3,3683.3%
Meta-analyses180.0%
Randomized controlled trials150.0%

Method: PubMed query "Sequence Alignment"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics

Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin
Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4,117cc by
PMID 29773078 · DOI · PMC5956843
MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system
Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM, Coston R, Salzberg SL, Zimin A
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2,252cc0
PMID 29373581 · DOI · PMC5802927
Fast Genome-Wide Functional Annotation through Orthology Assignment by eggNOG-Mapper
Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2,157cc by
PMID 28460117 · DOI · PMC5850834
Minimizing reference bias with an imputed personalized reference
Vaddadi K, Lin MJ, Majidian S, Mun T, Langmead B
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 41786604 · DOI · PMC13138014

Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin [1]

Research article Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, et al. · · 2018 · cited 4,117 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundTaxonomic classification of marker-gene sequences is an important step in microbiome analysis.
Closing excerpt
q2-feature-classifier and tax-credit are both free, open-source, BSD-licensed packages available on GitHub.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (189 words)

BackgroundTaxonomic classification of marker-gene sequences is an important step in microbiome analysis.ResultsWe present q2-feature-classifier ( https://github.com/qiime2/q2-feature-classifier ), a QIIME 2 plugin containing several novel machine-learning and alignment-based methods for taxonomy classification. We evaluated and optimized several commonly used classification methods implemented in QIIME 1 (RDP, BLAST, UCLUST, and SortMeRNA) and several new methods implemented in QIIME 2 (a scikit-learn naive Bayes machine-learning classifier, and alignment-based taxonomy consensus methods based on VSEARCH, and BLAST+) for classification of bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal ITS marker-gene amplicon sequence data. The naive-Bayes, BLAST+-based, and VSEARCH-based classifiers implemented in QIIME 2 meet or exceed the species-level accuracy of other commonly used methods designed for classification of marker gene sequences that were evaluated in this work. These evaluations, based on 19 mock communities and error-free sequence simulations, including classification of simulated "novel" marker-gene sequences, are available in our extensible benchmarking framework, tax-credit ( https://github.com/caporaso-lab/tax-credit-data ).ConclusionsOur results illustrate the importance of parameter tuning for optimizing classifier performance, and we make recommendations regarding parameter choices for these classifiers under a range of standard operating conditions. q2-feature-classifier and tax-credit are both free, open-source, BSD-licensed packages available on GitHub.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29773078 · DOI · PMC5956843

MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system [2]

Research article Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM, Coston R, Salzberg SL, Zimin A · · 2018 · cited 2,252 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The MUMmer system and the genome sequence aligner nucmer included within it are among the most widely used alignment packages in genomics.
Closing excerpt
These improvements make MUMer4 one the most versatile genome alignment packages available.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (270 words)

The MUMmer system and the genome sequence aligner nucmer included within it are among the most widely used alignment packages in genomics. Since the last major release of MUMmer version 3 in 2004, it has been applied to many types of problems including aligning whole genome sequences, aligning reads to a reference genome, and comparing different assemblies of the same genome. Despite its broad utility, MUMmer3 has limitations that can make it difficult to use for large genomes and for the very large sequence data sets that are common today. In this paper we describe MUMmer4, a substantially improved version of MUMmer that addresses genome size constraints by changing the 32-bit suffix tree data structure at the core of MUMmer to a 48-bit suffix array, and that offers improved speed through parallel processing of input query sequences. With a theoretical limit on the input size of 141Tbp, MUMmer4 can now work with input sequences of any biologically realistic length. We show that as a result of these enhancements, the nucmer program in MUMmer4 is easily able to handle alignments of large genomes; we illustrate this with an alignment of the human and chimpanzee genomes, which allows us to compute that the two species are 98% identical across 96% of their length. With the enhancements described here, MUMmer4 can also be used to efficiently align reads to reference genomes, although it is less sensitive and accurate than the dedicated read aligners. The nucmer aligner in MUMmer4 can now be called from scripting languages such as Perl, Python and Ruby. These improvements make MUMer4 one the most versatile genome alignment packages available.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc0 licence; © the authors. PMID 29373581 · DOI · PMC5802927

Fast Genome-Wide Functional Annotation through Orthology Assignment by eggNOG-Mapper [3]

Research article Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, et al. · · 2017 · cited 2,157 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Orthology assignment is ideally suited for functional inference.
Closing excerpt
de.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (216 words)

Orthology assignment is ideally suited for functional inference. However, because predicting orthology is computationally intensive at large scale, and most pipelines are relatively inaccessible (e.g., new assignments only available through database updates), less precise homology-based functional transfer is still the default for (meta-)genome annotation. We, therefore, developed eggNOG-mapper, a tool for functional annotation of large sets of sequences based on fast orthology assignments using precomputed clusters and phylogenies from the eggNOG database. To validate our method, we benchmarked Gene Ontology (GO) predictions against two widely used homology-based approaches: BLAST and InterProScan. Orthology filters applied to BLAST results reduced the rate of false positive assignments by 11%, and increased the ratio of experimentally validated terms recovered over all terms assigned per protein by 15%. Compared with InterProScan, eggNOG-mapper achieved similar proteome coverage and precision while predicting, on average, 41 more terms per protein and increasing the rate of experimentally validated terms recovered over total term assignments per protein by 35%. EggNOG-mapper predictions scored within the top-5 methods in the three GO categories using the CAFA2 NK-partial benchmark. Finally, we evaluated eggNOG-mapper for functional annotation of metagenomics data, yielding better performance than interProScan. eggNOG-mapper runs ∼15× faster than BLAST and at least 2.5× faster than InterProScan. The tool is available standalone and as an online service at http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28460117 · DOI · PMC5850834

Minimizing reference bias with an imputed personalized reference [4]

Research article Vaddadi K, Lin MJ, Majidian S, Mun T, Langmead B · · 2026 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Pangenome indexes reduce reference bias in sequencing data analysis.
Closing excerpt
Advantages of our impute-first approach include that (1) it fully considers linkage disequilibrium and produces a phased diploid reference as an output; (2) it produces accurate personalized references even from low-coverage data; and (3) it is compatible with both graph and linear reference representations, achieving its highest variant-calling F1 accuracy using a standard linear aligner (BWA-MEM).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (232 words)

Pangenome indexes reduce reference bias in sequencing data analysis. However, bias can be reduced further by using a personalized reference, for example, a diploid human reference constructed to match a donor individual's alleles. Here, we present a new impute-first alignment framework that combines elements of genotype imputation and read alignment. We first genotype the individual using a subsample of the input reads. Using a reference panel and an efficient imputation algorithm, we impute a personalized diploid reference. Finally, we index the personalized reference and apply a read aligner (either linear or graph) to align the full read set to the personalized reference. On the HG002 sample, this framework achieves a higher variant-calling F1-score (99.77%) compared with the traditional linear aligner (99.62%), graph pangenome aligner (99.72%), and graph personalized-pangenome aligner (99.75%), with substantial reduction in the number of errors (38.73% vs. a linear aligner, 14.97% vs. a graph aligner, and 6.05% vs. a personalized graph). An imputed reference can have comparable efficiency to a pangenome reference, making it an overall advantageous choice for whole-genome DNA sequencing experiments. Advantages of our impute-first approach include that (1) it fully considers linkage disequilibrium and produces a phased diploid reference as an output; (2) it produces accurate personalized references even from low-coverage data; and (3) it is compatible with both graph and linear reference representations, achieving its highest variant-calling F1 accuracy using a standard linear aligner (BWA-MEM).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41786604 · DOI · PMC13138014

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [5]
    Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. · Nucleic Acids Res · 1997 · cited 52,507 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing [6]
    Branton D, Deamer DW, Marziali A, Bayley H, Benner SA, Butler T, et al. · Nat Biotechnol · 2008 · cited 1,571 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions [7]
    Treangen TJ, Salzberg SL · Nat Rev Genet · 2011 · cited 1,294 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mapping RNA-seq Reads with STAR [8]
    Dobin A, Gingeras TR · Curr Protoc Bioinformatics · 2015 · cited 1,059 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements [9]
    Schäffer AA, Aravind L, Madden TL, Shavirin S, Spouge JL, Wolf YI, et al. · Nucleic Acids Res · 2001 · cited 1,021 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Protein database searches using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices [10]
    Altschul SF, Wootton JC, Gertz EM, Agarwala R, Morgulis A, Schäffer AA, et al. · FEBS J · 2005 · cited 811 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, et al.. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin. . 2018. PMID 29773078 · DOI · PMC5956843
  2. Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM, Coston R, Salzberg SL, Zimin A. MUMmer4: A fast and versatile genome alignment system. . 2018. PMID 29373581 · DOI · PMC5802927
  3. Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, et al.. Fast Genome-Wide Functional Annotation through Orthology Assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. . 2017. PMID 28460117 · DOI · PMC5850834
  4. Vaddadi K, Lin MJ, Majidian S, Mun T, Langmead B. Minimizing reference bias with an imputed personalized reference. . 2026. PMID 41786604 · DOI · PMC13138014
  5. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al.. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997. PMID 9254694 · DOI · PMC146917
  6. Branton D, Deamer DW, Marziali A, Bayley H, Benner SA, Butler T, et al.. The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2008. PMID 18846088 · DOI · PMC2683588
  7. Treangen TJ, Salzberg SL. Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions. Nat Rev Genet. 2011. PMID 22124482 · DOI · PMC3324860
  8. Dobin A, Gingeras TR. Mapping RNA-seq Reads with STAR. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2015. PMID 26334920 · DOI · PMC4631051
  9. Schäffer AA, Aravind L, Madden TL, Shavirin S, Spouge JL, Wolf YI, et al.. Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001. PMID 11452024 · DOI · PMC55814
  10. Altschul SF, Wootton JC, Gertz EM, Agarwala R, Morgulis A, Schäffer AA, et al.. Protein database searches using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices. FEBS J. 2005. PMID 16218944 · DOI · PMC1343503

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Sequence AnalysisGenetics and Genomics
  • Multilocus Sequence TypingGenetics and Genomics
  • Expressed Sequence TagsGenetics and Genomics
  • Genetic CodeGenetics and Genomics
  • IntronsGenetics and Genomics
  • Sequence HomologyMolecular Biology

All 95 articles in Genetics and Genomics →

At a glance

102,959
PubMed records on this heading
5%
published since 2020
3,368
review articles
15
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Sequence AnalysisGenetics and Genomics
  • Multilocus Sequence TypingGenetics and Genomics
  • Expressed Sequence TagsGenetics and Genomics
  • Genetic CodeGenetics and Genomics
  • IntronsGenetics and Genomics

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support