Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (780 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Hereditary, progressive degeneration of the retina due to death of rod photoreceptors initially and subsequent death of cone photoreceptors. It is characterized by deposition of pigment in the retina.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Pigmentary Retinopathy; Pigmentary Retinopathies; Retinopathies, Pigmentary; Retinopathy, Pigmentary; Tapetoretinal Degeneration; Tapetoretinal Degenerations.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Eye Diseases, Hereditary; Retinal Dystrophies
- Narrower topics
- Alstrom Syndrome; Bardet-Biedl Syndrome; Kearns-Sayre Syndrome; Usher Syndromes
- See also
- Tangier Disease
Related concepts
- Rod Photoreceptors
- Cone Photoreceptors
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 11,733 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Retinitis Pigmentosa” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 2,473 of them (21.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,076 records.
Reviews account for 1,141 records (9.7%) and meta-analyses for 26. Randomized controlled trials number 71 (0.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 4,076 |
| 2000-2009 | 2,006 |
| 2010-2019 | 3,178 |
| 2020 onward | 2,473 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,141 | 9.7% |
| Meta-analyses | 26 | 0.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 71 | 0.6% |
Method: PubMed query "Retinitis Pigmentosa"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in rare and inherited diseases
Rare conditions are difficult to study: few patients means small studies, case reports and registries are common, and randomized trials are the exception. Small samples limit precision and can exaggerate effects, and cases reported in the literature may be the most severe or unusual. Evidence from many small studies is best read together. Check how patients were identified, how many were included and how long they were followed.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bardet-Biedl syndrome improved diagnosis criteria and management: Inter European Reference Networks consensus statement and recommendations | 2024 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 68 | cc by PMID 39085583 · DOI · PMC11576898 |
| Retinitis Pigmentosa: From Pathomolecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies | 2024 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 31 | cc by PMID 38276069 · DOI · PMC10819364 |
| Gene Therapy for Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Challenges and New Progress | 2024 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 25 | cc by PMID 39199291 · DOI · PMC11352491 |
| Intravitreal photoswitch therapy in advanced retinitis pigmentosa: a phase 1 open-label trial | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 6 | cc by PMID 41981307 · DOI · PMC13190265 |
Bardet-Biedl syndrome improved diagnosis criteria and management: Inter European Reference Networks consensus statement and recommendations [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Four European Reference Networks (ERN-EYE, ERKNet, Endo-ERN, ERN-ITHACA) have teamed up to establish a consensus statement and recommendations for Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS).
- Closing excerpt
- This consensus recommends revised diagnostic criteria for BBS that will ensure certainty of diagnosis, giving robust grounds for genetic counselling as well as in the perspective of future trials for innovative therapies.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (241 words)
Four European Reference Networks (ERN-EYE, ERKNet, Endo-ERN, ERN-ITHACA) have teamed up to establish a consensus statement and recommendations for Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS). BBS is an autosomal recessive ciliopathy with at least 26 genes identified to date. The clinical manifestations are pleiotropic, can be observed in utero and will progress with age. Genetic testing has progressively improved in the last years prompting for a revision of the diagnostic criteria taking into account clinical Primary and Secondary features, as well as positive or negative molecular diagnosis. This consensus statement also emphasizes on initial diagnosis, monitoring and lifelong follow-up, and symptomatic care that can be provided to patients and family members according to the involved care professionals. For paediatricians, developmental anomalies can be at the forefront for diagnosis (such as polydactyly) but can require specific care, such as for associated neuro developmental disorders. For ophthalmology, the early onset retinal degeneration requires ad hoc functional and imaging technologies and specific care for severe visual impairment. For endocrinology, among other manifestations, early onset obesity and its complications has benefited from better evaluation of eating behaviour problems, improved lifestyle programs, and from novel pharmacological therapies. Kidney and urinary track involvements warrants lifespan attention, as chronic kidney failure can occur and early management might improve outcome. This consensus recommends revised diagnostic criteria for BBS that will ensure certainty of diagnosis, giving robust grounds for genetic counselling as well as in the perspective of future trials for innovative therapies.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39085583 · DOI · PMC11576898
Retinitis Pigmentosa: From Pathomolecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Retinitis pigmentosa is an inherited disease, in which mutations in different types of genes lead to the death of photoreceptors and the loss of visual function.
- Closing excerpt
- The treatment of this disease remains a challenge, to which we hope to find a solution as soon as possible.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (178 words)
Retinitis pigmentosa is an inherited disease, in which mutations in different types of genes lead to the death of photoreceptors and the loss of visual function. Although retinitis pigmentosa is the most common type of inherited retinal dystrophy, a clear line of therapy has not yet been defined. In this review, we will focus on the therapeutic aspect and attempt to define the advantages and disadvantages of the protocols of different therapies. The role of some therapies, such as antioxidant agents or gene therapy, has been established for years now. Many clinical trials on different genes and mutations causing RP have been conducted, and the approval of voretigene nepavorec by the FDA has been an important step forward. Nonetheless, even if gene therapy is the most promising type of treatment for these patients, other innovative strategies, such as stem cell transplantation or hyperbaric oxygen therapy, have been shown to be safe and improve visual quality during clinical trials. The treatment of this disease remains a challenge, to which we hope to find a solution as soon as possible.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38276069 · DOI · PMC10819364
Gene Therapy for Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Challenges and New Progress [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) poses a significant threat to eye health worldwide, with prevalence rates of 1 in 5000 worldwide.
- Closing excerpt
- We delve into the most prevalent genes associated with RP and discuss advancements in genome-editing strategies currently employed to correct various disease-causing mutations.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (167 words)
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) poses a significant threat to eye health worldwide, with prevalence rates of 1 in 5000 worldwide. This genetically diverse retinopathy is characterized by the loss of photoreceptor cells and atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium. Despite the involvement of more than 3000 mutations across approximately 90 genes in its onset, finding an effective treatment has been challenging for a considerable time. However, advancements in scientific research, especially in gene therapy, are significantly expanding treatment options for this most prevalent inherited eye disease, with the discovery of new compounds, gene-editing techniques, and gene loci offering hope for more effective treatments. Gene therapy, a promising technology, utilizes viral or non-viral vectors to correct genetic defects by either replacing or silencing disease-causing genes, potentially leading to complete recovery. In this review, we primarily focus on the latest applications of gene editing research in RP. We delve into the most prevalent genes associated with RP and discuss advancements in genome-editing strategies currently employed to correct various disease-causing mutations.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39199291 · DOI · PMC11352491
Intravitreal photoswitch therapy in advanced retinitis pigmentosa: a phase 1 open-label trial [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- A small azobenzene photoswitch molecule (KIO-301), designed to confer light responsiveness to retinal ganglion cells, was evaluated for safety and feasibility in a first-in-human, phase 1, gene-agnostic, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial in individuals with advanced retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
- Closing excerpt
- gov identifier: NCT05282953.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)
A small azobenzene photoswitch molecule (KIO-301), designed to confer light responsiveness to retinal ganglion cells, was evaluated for safety and feasibility in a first-in-human, phase 1, gene-agnostic, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial in individuals with advanced retinitis pigmentosa (RP). KIO-301 was administered by intravitreal injection to 12 eyes of 6 participants. The primary outcome was ocular and systemic safety over 30 days. Secondary and exploratory assessments included functional vision testing, visual acuity, kinetic visual field, functional magnetic resonance imaging and participant-reported outcomes. The primary safety outcome was met, with no serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities observed at any point. No drug-related intraocular inflammation occurred, and all ocular adverse events were mild and procedure-related. Exploratory assessments identified variation in light perception and functional vision measures in some participants. Light-evoked blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal changes in visual cortical regions were observed following dosing and showed a temporal pattern compatible with pharmacodynamic activity. Participant-reported quality-of-life scores varied over time. In this small, nonrandomized phase 1 study in individuals with late-stage RP, intravitreal KIO-301 demonstrated an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, supporting the feasibility of photoswitch therapy in advanced RP, and motivating further evaluation in larger trials. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05282953.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41981307 · DOI · PMC13190265
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa [5]
- Research article Retinitis pigmentosa [6]
- Research article Expert consensus document: Mitochondrial function as a therapeutic target in heart failure [7]
- Research article Genes and mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa [8]
- Research article Mitochondrial dysfunction in inherited renal disease and acute kidney injury [9]
- Research article Cone rod dystrophies [10]
References
- Dollfus H, Lilien MR, Maffei P, Verloes A, Muller J, Bacci GM, et al.. Bardet-Biedl syndrome improved diagnosis criteria and management: Inter European Reference Networks consensus statement and recommendations. . 2024. PMID 39085583 · DOI · PMC11576898
- Vingolo EM, Mascolo S, Miccichè F, Manco G. Retinitis Pigmentosa: From Pathomolecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies. . 2024. PMID 38276069 · DOI · PMC10819364
- Liu Y, Zong X, Cao W, Zhang W, Zhang N, Yang N. Gene Therapy for Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Challenges and New Progress. . 2024. PMID 39199291 · DOI · PMC11352491
- Casson RJ, Daniels E, Barras CD, Dwyer A, Strem BM, Wykoff CC, et al.. Intravitreal photoswitch therapy in advanced retinitis pigmentosa: a phase 1 open-label trial. . 2026. PMID 41981307 · DOI · PMC13190265
- Verbakel SK, van Huet RAC, Boon CJF, den Hollander AI, Collin RWJ, Klaver CCW, et al.. Non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018. PMID 29597005 · DOI
- Hamel C. Retinitis pigmentosa. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006. PMID 17032466 · DOI · PMC1621055
- Brown DA, Perry JB, Allen ME, Sabbah HN, Stauffer BL, Shaikh SR, et al.. Expert consensus document: Mitochondrial function as a therapeutic target in heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017. PMID 28004807 · DOI · PMC5350035
- Daiger SP, Sullivan LS, Bowne SJ. Genes and mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa. Clin Genet. 2013. PMID 23701314 · DOI · PMC3856531
- Emma F, Montini G, Parikh SM, Salviati L. Mitochondrial dysfunction in inherited renal disease and acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016. PMID 26804019 · DOI · PMC5469549
- Hamel CP. Cone rod dystrophies. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007. PMID 17270046 · DOI · PMC1808442
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.