Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (743 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Reconstitution of eroded or injured epithelium by proliferation and migration of epithelial cells from below or adjacent to the damaged site.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Re Epithelialization; Wound Epithelialization; Epithelialization, Wound.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Cell Physiological Phenomena; Skin Physiological Phenomena; Wound Healing
Related concepts
- Epithelium
- Epithelial Cells
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,268 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Re-Epithelialization” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 528 of them (41.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 764 records.
Reviews account for 111 records (8.8%) and meta-analyses for 14. Randomized controlled trials number 109 (8.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 0 |
| 2010-2019 | 764 |
| 2020 onward | 528 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 111 | 8.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 14 | 1.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 109 | 8.6% |
Method: PubMed query "Re-Epithelialization"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in molecular biology
Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re-epithelialization and immune cell behaviour in an ex vivo human skin model | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 977 | cc by PMID 31913322 · DOI · PMC6959339 |
| Macrophage Phenotypes Regulate Scar Formation and Chronic Wound Healing | 2017 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 650 | cc by PMID 28714933 · DOI · PMC5536033 |
| Proinflammatory cytokines regulate epidermal stem cells in wound epithelialization | 2020 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 144 | cc by PMID 32527289 · DOI · PMC7291661 |
| Beyond re-epithelialization: prolonged remodeling re-establishes epithelial homeostasis in oral mucosa | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 1 | cc by PMID 42049704 · DOI · PMC13265752 |
Re-epithelialization and immune cell behaviour in an ex vivo human skin model [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- A large body of literature is available on wound healing in humans.
- Closing excerpt
- Together, our model recapitulates the main features of epithelial wound regeneration, and can be applied for testing wound healing therapies and investigating underlying mechanisms.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (195 words)
A large body of literature is available on wound healing in humans. Nonetheless, a standardized ex vivo wound model without disruption of the dermal compartment has not been put forward with compelling justification. Here, we present a novel wound model based on application of negative pressure and its effects for epidermal regeneration and immune cell behaviour. Importantly, the basement membrane remained intact after blister roof removal and keratinocytes were absent in the wounded area. Upon six days of culture, the wound was covered with one to three-cell thick K14+Ki67+ keratinocyte layers, indicating that proliferation and migration were involved in wound closure. After eight to twelve days, a multi-layered epidermis was formed expressing epidermal differentiation markers (K10, filaggrin, DSG-1, CDSN). Investigations about immune cell-specific manners revealed more T cells in the blister roof epidermis compared to normal epidermis. We identified several cell populations in blister roof epidermis and suction blister fluid that are absent in normal epidermis which correlated with their decrease in the dermis, indicating a dermal efflux upon negative pressure. Together, our model recapitulates the main features of epithelial wound regeneration, and can be applied for testing wound healing therapies and investigating underlying mechanisms.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31913322 · DOI · PMC6959339
Macrophage Phenotypes Regulate Scar Formation and Chronic Wound Healing [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Macrophages and inflammation play a beneficial role during wound repair with macrophages regulating a wide range of processes, such as removal of dead cells, debris and pathogens, through to extracellular matrix deposition re-vascularisation and wound re-epithelialisation.
- Closing excerpt
- The review will discuss our current knowledge of macrophage phenotype on the repair process and how alterations in the phenotypes might alter wound closure and the final repair quality.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (201 words)
Macrophages and inflammation play a beneficial role during wound repair with macrophages regulating a wide range of processes, such as removal of dead cells, debris and pathogens, through to extracellular matrix deposition re-vascularisation and wound re-epithelialisation. To perform this range of functions, these cells develop distinct phenotypes over the course of wound healing. They can present with a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, more often found in the early stages of repair, through to anti-inflammatory M2 phenotypes that are pro-repair in the latter stages of wound healing. There is a continuum of phenotypes between these ranges with some cells sharing phenotypes of both M1 and M2 macrophages. One of the less pleasant consequences of quick closure, namely the replacement with scar tissue, is also regulated by macrophages, through their promotion of fibroblast proliferation, myofibroblast differentiation and collagen deposition. Alterations in macrophage number and phenotype disrupt this process and can dictate the level of scar formation. It is also clear that dysregulated inflammation and altered macrophage phenotypes are responsible for hindering closure of chronic wounds. The review will discuss our current knowledge of macrophage phenotype on the repair process and how alterations in the phenotypes might alter wound closure and the final repair quality.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28714933 · DOI · PMC5536033
Proinflammatory cytokines regulate epidermal stem cells in wound epithelialization [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The skin, which serves as the first barrier of the human body, is particularly susceptible to exogenous injuries.
- Closing excerpt
- We also introduce promising therapeutic strategies targeting epidermal stem cells or related proinflammatory cytokines for patients with skin wounds.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (133 words)
The skin, which serves as the first barrier of the human body, is particularly susceptible to exogenous injuries. Skin wounds, including acute burns and chronic non-healing ulcers, are commonly observed in clinics. Healing of skin wounds is a complex process, consisting of infiltration of inflammatory cells, cellular proliferation, and tissue remodeling phases, which restore the integrity and functions of the skin. Epithelialization is involved in wound healing through re-establishing an intact keratinocyte layer. Epidermal stem cells are indispensable for epithelialization, and they are regulated by multiple proinflammatory cytokines or growth factors. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the effect of these cytokines on migration, proliferation, and differentiation processes of epidermal stem cells. We also introduce promising therapeutic strategies targeting epidermal stem cells or related proinflammatory cytokines for patients with skin wounds.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32527289 · DOI · PMC7291661
Beyond re-epithelialization: prolonged remodeling re-establishes epithelial homeostasis in oral mucosa [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Wound healing restores tissue integrity through tightly coordinated cellular and molecular programs, yet the biological processes that persist after apparent closure remain largely unexplored.
- Closing excerpt
- Together, these findings indicate that oral wound healing is an extended, multi-phase process in which post-healing remodeling restores epithelial homeostasis and ensures proper resolution of the repair response.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (214 words)
Wound healing restores tissue integrity through tightly coordinated cellular and molecular programs, yet the biological processes that persist after apparent closure remain largely unexplored. Using a standardized mouse hard palate injury model combined with histological, lineage-tracing, molecular, and epigenetic analyses, we show that rapid re-epithelialization is followed by months of cellular remodeling. Although wounds re-epithelialized within two weeks, temporal analyses revealed that the regenerated epithelium maintained leading-edge-like features for months. Structural reorganization, including increased cell density and epithelial thickness, persisted well beyond closure, accompanied by sustained proliferation and elevated apoptosis mediated by the p53-p21 pathway, thereby removing cells with DNA damage during tissue remodeling. Lineage tracing revealed marked alterations in Wnt-responsive epithelial stem cells, which were transiently lost from the repaired epithelium and gradually repopulated the tissue over approximately four months. Repair-activated keratinocytes showed sustained expression of keratin 6 and keratin 17 and delayed recovery of differentiation markers keratin 10 and filaggrin, indicating prolonged epithelial activation despite morphological closure. Coordinated alterations in histone marks H2AK119ub, H3K27ac, and H3K27me3, and persistent immune infiltration, indicate lasting molecular and microenvironmental remodeling that maintains the tissue in a memory-like state. Together, these findings indicate that oral wound healing is an extended, multi-phase process in which post-healing remodeling restores epithelial homeostasis and ensures proper resolution of the repair response.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42049704 · DOI · PMC13265752
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Skin Wound Healing: An Update on the Current Knowledge and Concepts [5]
- Research article Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cutaneous wound healing: Where we are and where we are heading [6]
- Research article Epithelial stem cells and implications for wound repair [7]
- Research article Skin regenerative potentials of curcumin [8]
- Research article A comparison of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and re-epithelialization [9]
- Research article Fetal skin possesses the ability to regenerate completely: complete regeneration of skin [10]
References
- Rakita A, Nikolić N, Mildner M, Matiasek J, Elbe-Bürger A. Re-epithelialization and immune cell behaviour in an ex vivo human skin model. . 2020. PMID 31913322 · DOI · PMC6959339
- Hesketh M, Sahin KB, West ZE, Murray RZ. Macrophage Phenotypes Regulate Scar Formation and Chronic Wound Healing. . 2017. PMID 28714933 · DOI · PMC5536033
- Xiao T, Yan Z, Xiao S, Xia Y. Proinflammatory cytokines regulate epidermal stem cells in wound epithelialization. . 2020. PMID 32527289 · DOI · PMC7291661
- Walton CJ, Thompson T, Syed SA, Zhu T, Guo E, Yuan X. Beyond re-epithelialization: prolonged remodeling re-establishes epithelial homeostasis in oral mucosa. . 2026. PMID 42049704 · DOI · PMC13265752
- Sorg H, Tilkorn DJ, Hager S, Hauser J, Mirastschijski U. Skin Wound Healing: An Update on the Current Knowledge and Concepts. Eur Surg Res. 2017. PMID 27974711 · DOI
- Haensel D, Dai X. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cutaneous wound healing: Where we are and where we are heading. Dev Dyn. 2018. PMID 28795450 · DOI · PMC5809211
- Plikus MV, Gay DL, Treffeisen E, Wang A, Supapannachart RJ, Cotsarelis G. Epithelial stem cells and implications for wound repair. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012. PMID 23085626 · DOI · PMC3518754
- Thangapazham RL, Sharad S, Maheshwari RK. Skin regenerative potentials of curcumin. Biofactors. 2013. PMID 23315856 · DOI
- Leopold PL, Vincent J, Wang H. A comparison of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and re-epithelialization. Semin Cancer Biol. 2012. PMID 22863788 · DOI · PMC3595494
- Kishi K, Okabe K, Shimizu R, Kubota Y. Fetal skin possesses the ability to regenerate completely: complete regeneration of skin. Keio J Med. 2012. PMID 23324304 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.