Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (712 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A quantitative prediction of the biological, ecotoxicological or pharmaceutical activity of a molecule. It is based upon structure and activity information gathered from a series of similar compounds.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships; Relationship, Quantitative Structure-Activity; Relationships, Quantitative Structure-Activity; Structure-Activity Relationship, Quantitative; Structure-Activity Relationships, Quantitative; QSAR; Structure Activity Relationship, Quantitative.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Structure-Activity Relationship
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 14,835 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 3,549 of them (23.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 6,665 records.
Reviews account for 1,364 records (9.2%) and meta-analyses for 10. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 0 |
| 2000-2009 | 4,833 |
| 2010-2019 | 6,665 |
| 2020 onward | 3,549 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,364 | 9.2% |
| Meta-analyses | 10 | 0.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 2 | 0.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in pharmacology
Drug evidence builds in layers: laboratory pharmacology describes how a compound acts, pharmacokinetic studies describe how the body handles it, and randomized trials test whether it helps and what harms it causes. Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies reveal rarer adverse effects but cannot prove causation. This page is educational and is not a recommendation to start, stop or change any medicine; decisions about treatment belong with a qualified clinician.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm | 2019 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 387 | cc by PMID 31174387 · DOI · PMC6601033 |
| Comprehensive ensemble in QSAR prediction for drug discovery | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 104 | cc by PMID 31655545 · DOI · PMC6815455 |
| A Comprehensive Review of Cholinesterase Modeling and Simulation | 2021 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 73 | cc by PMID 33920972 · DOI · PMC8071298 |
| QSAR-Based Ecotoxicological Assessment of Novel Imidazole Derivatives for Sustainable Crop Protection | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42796454 · DOI · PMC13609507 |
A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Structure-based drug design is becoming an essential tool for faster and more cost-efficient lead discovery relative to the traditional method.
- Closing excerpt
- In this review, we focus on the currently available methods and algorithms for structure-based drug design including virtual screening and de novo drug design, with a special emphasis on AI- and deep-learning-based methods used for drug discovery.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (133 words)
Structure-based drug design is becoming an essential tool for faster and more cost-efficient lead discovery relative to the traditional method. Genomic, proteomic, and structural studies have provided hundreds of new targets and opportunities for future drug discovery. This situation poses a major problem: the necessity to handle the "big data" generated by combinatorial chemistry. Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning play a pivotal role in the analysis and systemization of larger data sets by statistical machine learning methods. Advanced AI-based sophisticated machine learning tools have a significant impact on the drug discovery process including medicinal chemistry. In this review, we focus on the currently available methods and algorithms for structure-based drug design including virtual screening and de novo drug design, with a special emphasis on AI- and deep-learning-based methods used for drug discovery.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31174387 · DOI · PMC6601033
Comprehensive ensemble in QSAR prediction for drug discovery [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundQuantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is a computational modeling method for revealing relationships between structural properties of chemical compounds and biological activities.
- Closing excerpt
- The proposed individual models did not show impressive results as a single model, but it was considered the most important predictor when combined, according to the interpretation of the meta-learning.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (185 words)
BackgroundQuantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is a computational modeling method for revealing relationships between structural properties of chemical compounds and biological activities. QSAR modeling is essential for drug discovery, but it has many constraints. Ensemble-based machine learning approaches have been used to overcome constraints and obtain reliable predictions. Ensemble learning builds a set of diversified models and combines them. However, the most prevalent approach random forest and other ensemble approaches in QSAR prediction limit their model diversity to a single subject.ResultsThe proposed ensemble method consistently outperformed thirteen individual models on 19 bioassay datasets and demonstrated superiority over other ensemble approaches that are limited to a single subject. The comprehensive ensemble method is publicly available at http://data.snu.ac.kr/QSAR/ .ConclusionsWe propose a comprehensive ensemble method that builds multi-subject diversified models and combines them through second-level meta-learning. In addition, we propose an end-to-end neural network-based individual classifier that can automatically extract sequential features from a simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILES). The proposed individual models did not show impressive results as a single model, but it was considered the most important predictor when combined, according to the interpretation of the meta-learning.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31655545 · DOI · PMC6815455
A Comprehensive Review of Cholinesterase Modeling and Simulation [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The present article reviews published efforts to study acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase structure and function using computer-based modeling and simulation techniques.
- Closing excerpt
- This review also explores the inhibitory properties of several other organic and biological moieties, as well as advancements in virtual screening methodologies with respect to these enzymes.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (198 words)
The present article reviews published efforts to study acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase structure and function using computer-based modeling and simulation techniques. Structures and models of both enzymes from various organisms, including rays, mice, and humans, are discussed to highlight key structural similarities in the active site gorges of the two enzymes, such as flexibility, binding site location, and function, as well as differences, such as gorge volume and binding site residue composition. Catalytic studies are also described, with an emphasis on the mechanism of acetylcholine hydrolysis by each enzyme and novel mutants that increase catalytic efficiency. The inhibitory activities of myriad compounds have been computationally assessed, primarily through Monte Carlo-based docking calculations and molecular dynamics simulations. Pharmaceutical compounds examined herein include FDA-approved therapeutics and their derivatives, as well as several other prescription drug derivatives. Cholinesterase interactions with both narcotics and organophosphate compounds are discussed, with the latter focusing primarily on molecular recognition studies of potential therapeutic value and on improving our understanding of the reactivation of cholinesterases that are bound to toxins. This review also explores the inhibitory properties of several other organic and biological moieties, as well as advancements in virtual screening methodologies with respect to these enzymes.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33920972 · DOI · PMC8071298
QSAR-Based Ecotoxicological Assessment of Novel Imidazole Derivatives for Sustainable Crop Protection [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Imidazoles have been proven to be very effective pesticides, especially against phytopathogenic fungi and insects.
- Closing excerpt
- Molecular docking studies indicated the possible mechanism of action of the antifungal, herbicidal, insecticidal, and antibacterial activities of the observed compounds and revealed structural features important for binding to specific receptors.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)
Imidazoles have been proven to be very effective pesticides, especially against phytopathogenic fungi and insects. Due to their negative effects on the environment, only a few imidazoles have been approved for use by the European Commission (EC). There is an urgent need to develop new imidazole derivatives with high efficiency and a wide spectrum of action against numerous pests that are, at the same time, safe for the environment and beneficial for organisms and humans. In order to reduce expensive and time-consuming experiments, an in silico approach based on quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models is valuable for predicting the toxicity of new or untested chemicals. In this study, we used the Vega and ChemFREE web platforms to evaluate the pesticide similarity, environmental risk properties, and ecotoxicological effects of imidazole derivatives designed for potential synthesis. Adamantane-, alkyl-, and triazole-amide, ester, carbamate, and ketone derivatives were filtered for the evaluated properties, and four alkyl-amides were highlighted as potentially effective and environmentally safe antifungal, herbicidal, and insecticidal agents. Molecular docking studies indicated the possible mechanism of action of the antifungal, herbicidal, insecticidal, and antibacterial activities of the observed compounds and revealed structural features important for binding to specific receptors.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42796454 · DOI · PMC13609507
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative [5]
- Research article Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps [6]
- Research article 3D-QSAR in drug design--a review [7]
- Research article Mixture toxicity and its modeling by quantitative structure-activity relationships [8]
- Research article QSRR: quantitative structure-(chromatographic) retention relationships [9]
- Research article Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? [10]
References
- Batool M, Ahmad B, Choi S. A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm. . 2019. PMID 31174387 · DOI · PMC6601033
- Kwon S, Bae H, Jo J, Yoon S. Comprehensive ensemble in QSAR prediction for drug discovery. . 2019. PMID 31655545 · DOI · PMC6815455
- De Boer D, Nguyen N, Mao J, Moore J, Sorin EJ. A Comprehensive Review of Cholinesterase Modeling and Simulation. . 2021. PMID 33920972 · DOI · PMC8071298
- Kanižai Šarić G, Paurević M, Dandić A, Šrajer Gajdošik M, Rastija V. QSAR-Based Ecotoxicological Assessment of Novel Imidazole Derivatives for Sustainable Crop Protection. . 2026. PMID 42796454 · DOI · PMC13609507
- Ong SE, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat Chem Biol. 2005. PMID 16408053 · DOI
- Leach AR, Shoichet BK, Peishoff CE. Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. J Med Chem. 2006. PMID 17004700 · DOI
- Verma J, Khedkar VM, Coutinho EC. 3D-QSAR in drug design--a review. Curr Top Med Chem. 2010. PMID 19929826 · DOI
- Altenburger R, Nendza M, Schüürmann G. Mixture toxicity and its modeling by quantitative structure-activity relationships. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003. PMID 12924589 · DOI
- Kaliszan R. QSRR: quantitative structure-(chromatographic) retention relationships. Chem Rev. 2007. PMID 17595149 · DOI
- Sheridan RP, Kearsley SK. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods?. Drug Discov Today. 2002. PMID 12546933 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.